Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cost estimation and behavious
Cost Estimating Techniques Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cost estimation and behavious
Amitai suggests that space exploration can still occur but at a reduced price. His main point that justifies this statement is “the main costs of space exploration arise from the fact that we are set on sending humans, rather than robots”. Why robots? Well Amitai suggests that the reason why space exploration is at such a high cost is because humans require much more assistance than robots. Amitai explains how humans need to come back to earth so transportation is needed and this is not cheap. The average cost of a rocket launch to space equates to around $1.5 billion and it is very similar for a return trip as well. Furthermore, he states that space vehicles must be safe for humans but we can risk a few robots without worrying. Robots can Steven calls manned missions ‘an incredible waste of money’ and argues that “for the cost of putting a few people on a very limited set of locations on Mars we could have dozens of unmanned, robotic missions roving all over Mars”. This quotation suggests that space exploration is a waste of money as of now but he is also stating that countries can use their money more efficiently if they allow robots rather than humans to enter space. This would then allow many people to adjust their perspective on the matter and realise that space exploration may not be a waste of This is because it includes different viewpoints from different people increasing its reliability. The article was also published on CNN, an American news channel, which means that the information provided is fairly accurate. He also exclaims that space exploration can still be efficient if the money is used wisely. This elucidates how he is not biased and is neutral about the situation because he has not chosen a side. However, the argument has a number of flaws which damage its credibility. Firstly, there is no real evidence that robots are cheaper to maintain in space compared to humans. This is because there is no statistical information to justify this point. Amitai Etzioni is also a sociologist, someone who studies the society and social behaviour, resulting in him having no real experience in this topic further reducing the reliability of his article because of his lack of expertise on this topic. Ron Garan, a fighter pilot and astronaut, wrote an article explaining how space exploration can benefit the planet by helping solve problems in developing countries. He strongly believes that space exploration is vital as it allows us to interact with new things and it also helps people overcome challenging
There are many people who see space as the last and greatest frontier for humankind. There are many groups who are leading the way and NASA is one of them. But should our tax dollars be invested in such an idea? No, according to British history professor Jerry DeGroot. His thesis, in the article “is that United States should, a sensually, defund NASA. From what I can tell, he uses mainly pathos to try to sway his argument, leaving very little appeals to ethos and practically none to logos. I’m going to explore these three appeals, as well as many of the fallacies he uses within the piece.
Have you ever wondered what Earth was like without space exploration? In the story Leaving Main Street the author states, “The United States has more important things to spend money on.” On the other hand some people believe that successful space programs adds to our economy,national prestige,create jobs,and improves national security. We shouldn't spend valuable resources on space exploration, because we could end hunger and poverty.
Dubner, Stephen. "Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost?." Freakonomics: The Hidden Side of Everything. New York Times, 11/1/2010. Web. 18 Jul 2010. .
Space, one of the great mysteries of the world. Many have dreamed of exploring the frontier that is space but only few have. It’s been 48 years since the last human set foot on another body in space, why would this be when it only took 8 years to send the first humans to the moon. Before we answer the question of why it’s been so long since the last time a human set foot on another planet we must answer the following: would it be more effective to send humans and robots to space or just robots? Sending humans and robots is inefficient because food and water must also be sent, which will take a great deal of weight, additionally humans are subject more directly to the dangerous frontier that is space. Sending just robots is the superior solution because of the following reasons: we can already send robots into space, robots can be controlled remotely by humans, robots can’t have their decisions influenced by emotions, and sending robots is much more cost effective.
As a country we need to start investing more money and research into space technology. Programs currently exist for this effort, but the potential for research and progress is limited by a lack of funding; compared to other government funded programs, aerospace funding is pitiful. Continued research in space technology is a necessary step in our growth and development not just as a country but also as entire human race. If we are to achieve this goal, it is necessary to increase funding for space research and technology and consider the possibility of colonizing outer space. If we limit our existence to the planet Earth, and continue to drain the resources on this planet, we will destroy the only home we have.
Were you aware that the budget for space exploration extends well over thirty-two billion dollars? People are dying of hunger overseas, not even wealthy enough to feed their own families, and NASA is spending twenty billion dollars to put a man on the moon! What did we learn on the moon, how can this endeavor help mankind? Nothing, and it can't! Some people declare that space exploration is man's greatest enterprise into the unknown.
The American space program as well as the United States economy is facing many challenges at this time but we need to look at what the long term costs of not continuing a robust manned and unmanned space program will be. The solar system holds many mysteries and an untold amount of untapped resources that if not explored and utilized by the United States will be utilized by other Nations. With finite resources on Earth any nation that is able to tap into new resources will be at a tremendous advantage both economically and politically. Space exploration also has positive international benefits as well as inspiring young people to enter careers in science. Kofi Annan the United Nations Secretary General at the time stated: "....space exploration can help bring cultures together. Space is also helping us to address some of today's most urgent problems. Space technology has produced tools that are transforming weather forecasting, environmental protection, humanitarian assistance, education, medicine, agriculture and a wide range of other activities. And, of course, a fascination with space leads many young people to pursue careers in science and technology, helping developing countries in particular to build up their human resources, improve their technological base and enhance their prospects for development" (Driscoll, 2003, 68)
Space Exploration has waisted billions of dollars on just failed attempts to go to space. This is foolish, when we have so many problems in the world to solve. World problems range from poverty and starving people to natural disaster damage. Every problem requires a surplus of money. This means we can’t spare any to unnecessary causes such as space exploration.
Space exploration is not worth the cost because, according to an article written by Brian Kennedy, “even though Americans are proud of NASA’s achievements and that they value the program, Americans are reluctant to pay more for space exploration.” (paragraph 10) According to Kennedy, he says that “Americans say that the US government spends too little on education (70%) and healthcare (57%)” (paragraph
NASA’s research and innovation looked promising, but it came at a cost. Money, resources, and spacecraft accidents, most famously Apollo 13 all hindered NASA’s research. In the 21st century, the debate over funding for NASA is at its peak since the birth of the organization in 1958, especially when there are numerous problems throughout the world. Is the money spent on space exploration worth the advantages and advances it contributes to society? When considering this topic, one might ask themselves, why explore space?
Since the beginning of time, mankind has sought after learning about and exploring the universe. This yearning drove us to achieve such great things as the journey to the moon and the discovery of water on mars. Nowadays, several people argue as to whether or not space exploration is worth the effort. I believe that it is humanity’s instinctual nature to pursue a better understanding of ourselves, and our universe. Further understanding of our universe will lead to the discovery of new technologies and ways to secure humanity’s survivability. As such, this essay will argue that space exploration is a necessity to our kind and that NASA should be progressively more financed.
The recent events regarding the NASA Mars probes have renewed the debate of reinstalling manned space missions with the objectives of exploring and landing on foreign worlds such as the moon and the red planet Mars, rather than the use of solely robotic craft and machines. It is my belief that we should return to the days of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, those of manned lunar landings and manned space exploration. Robots simply cannot and should not be allowed to be the sole means of visiting these worlds, nor should humans only be able to witness new findings second hand through the use of computers and machines. It is human nature to be normally curious of one’s surroundings, and it is important that we send one of our own to new worlds. The effects that past missions have had on the world’s people, as well as our political and cultural climates are another valid reason for flesh instead of metal to lay claim to space. Also, the limitless applications and new education that manned flights can bring to us from on site human interactions could lead to another technological and industrial revolution like the original lunar programs had done for us during the Gemini and Apollo programs.
Most people think that the costly downside to funding space exploration is a reason to avoid spending money on sciences and instead spend it on problems here on earth, but such funding for space exploration actually promotes economical as well as scientific benefits. Space exploration is an important expenditure for the high cost because of the potential for numerous benefits such as the possibility to find useful resources to cultivate, space exploration and satellites produce many thousands of jobs in our economy, and it creates and discovers newer and better technologies through research and development.
Exploration is worth the risk because it can lead to learning new things, it can lead to cooperation, and it can lead to the survival of humanity. To start it off, exploration is worth the risk because it may lead to humans learning advanced information. In the speech,”Remarks at the Dedication of the Aerospace Medical Health Center,”John F. Kennedy said,”I give you three examples: first, medical space research may open new understanding of man’s relation to his environment. Examinations of the
Some may think exploring outer space is simply a human’s curiosity. This is true but on the contrary, people explore to learn about things they may have never known and touch on the essence of the creation of the universe. Another reason for exploring this uncharted area is the technological advancements people have made and immense amount of innovation they have achieved in this field (Wood). Lastly, scientists study the other planets just in case one day humans need to relocate after overwhelming damage has been done to Earth. Suffice to say, it is a vital part of today’s day and age to research outer space (Rothery).