Marriage Is About Love Not Gender

1148 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gender discrimination refection 1

Asia Clinton
Mr. Karp
Senior composition
January 9, 2015
Marriage is about love not gender. Being in love is when two people whether a man and women or even a man and man or a women and women care about each other enough to be in a relationship or even get to the point where they want to marry. No one should care whether or not someone else is marrying the same sex because it is not their life that they are living in. In March 2005, a San Francisco Superior Court judge ruled on consolidated cases regarding same-sex marriage in California. The court held that the California ban on same-sex marriage violated the state constitution. The California Supreme Court unanimously agreed to review the decision of the appellate court, and it took its time in doing so. On June 3, 2008, the California secretary of state certified ballot proposition 8, which provided simply that: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." Because of the court 's ruling, the State of California began legally performing same-sex marriages on June 16, 2008.In November 2011, the California Supreme Court ruled that state law did allow Prop 8 's supporters to defend it in court. Now only some states are Plowing gay marriage to be legal (Hanson). The defense of marriage act does not prohibit states from issuing same-sex marriage licenses, it set out to accomplish two key issues in regards to marriage. In its ruling, the Hawaii Supreme Court stated that a Hawaii law prohibiting same-sex marriage was unconstitutional and sent the case to a trial court in order to find out if the law could be upheld through compelling state interest. When the...

... middle of paper ...

...o a stable, loving relationship as a marriage to the person they do love. Countries as Catholic as Spain, as different as Sweden and South Africa, and as near as Canada have embraced gay and lesbian marriage without any noticeable effect (Boise).
The argument really comes down to letting adults do as they wish, they are not hurting anybody. Homosexuals getting married really has no effect on anybody but themselves. Although with all the extra weddings, gifts, and honeymoons, it would actually be a good way to stimulate the economy. Most People don’t realize that just because gay people get married doesn’t always have to mean that it’s hurting someone else. Why is it that only some states make same-sex marriage legal? All states should be legal. Everyone should be able to marry anyone of their choice and who cares about other people’s opinions, as long as there happy.

Show More
Related

  • Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Analysis

    1298 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), the court determined gay marriage to be a constitutional right, striking down several dozen state laws against SSM. While there has been some residual pushback against this decision, overall there has been broad complacence due to a high level of public support for the decision. Little scholarship has been done on how this decision has been implemented because the discussion was made so recently, but some measures show that “99.87 percent of the U.S. population [lives] in a county where same-sex marriage licenses are available” ("Local Government Responses to Obergefell v. Hodges." n.d.). While there are some pockets of resistance it is clear that there is broad local compliance with this decision, likely because of its broad popularity. Instances in which local bodies choose to disregard the Obergefell decision are highly publicized, and generally receive a great deal of public criticism. Thus, the SSM marriage example has fulfilled the two conditions for successful policy, as interest groups were able to use the courts to accomplish a set of aims, and local support has allowed for the implementation of the policy. While there has been some pushback along the way, this pushback has only served to further raise awareness of issue in the minds of the American people, and helped this cause gain

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Obergefell V. Hodges

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases, it is expected that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was revealed, the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Obergefell V. Hodges

    1123 Words  | 3 Pages

    The supreme court case of Obergefell v. Hodges is one huge reason why we have same-sex marriage as of today. Richard Hodges is the defendant while James Obergefell is the plaintiff. As a result of this case, states are unable to pass laws that limit marriage of same-sex couples. It requires all states to license marriages between these couples, and makes states recognise marriages made outside of said states. Before this case, there were several other cases that supported similar, but not exact situations, which will be briefly covered in this essay. However, the Obergefell v. Hodges case is what officially made same-sex marriage undeniable by all states in the union.

    Read More

  • California's Proposition 8

    919 Words  | 2 Pages

    Proposition 8 was a piece of legislation formally called the California Marriage Protection Act which was an amendment to the Constitution of the State of California. The amendment was voted on and passed during the state elections of November 5th, 2008. The new legislation added to the constitution reads: “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” The issue was prompted in May of 2008, when the California Supreme Court ruled that same sex couples had a right to marry one another according to the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution of the United States. This overruled earlier legislation known as Proposition 22, which was in fact the same as Proposition 8, but was a part of California’s Family Code, and not written into the constitution. Because the Constitution was given precedence over the Family Code in the Supreme Court’s ruling, Proposition 22 was rendered obsolete. Many people who shared conservative views about the meaning of marriage took exception to that and took action to create Proposition 8.

    Read More

  • The Fourteenth Amendment

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    For some background, this case escalated to the Supreme Court since several groups of same-sex couples from different states, sued state agencies when their marriage was refused to be recognized. As it escalated through appeals, the plaintiffs argued that the states were violating the Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Equal Protection, according to the Constitution refers to the fact that, “any State [shall not] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” (23). The opposition of this case was that, 1) The Constitution does not address same-sex marriage as a policy, and 2) The sovereignty of states regarding the decision. Ultimately, and according to the Oyez project, the Court held that “[the Amendment] guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples,” and therefore, same-sex marriage is a fundamental liberty.

    Read More

  • Process Philosophy Essay

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    We must support any marriage, even if it’s not the traditional marriage. If the two people getting married truly love and support each other, then according to the law they should be allowed to marry. When people have successful marriages, they have a better outcome when raising their children. I do believe that God should be the center of every relationship and marriage. I always refer to Philippians 4:13, I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me (NIV). With His love and guidance any marriage will

    Read More

  • Essay On Gay Rights

    1342 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the recent history of America, gay marriage has always been an issue. With the different views and morals everyone has on the subject, it makes it hard for individual states to determine what side they should be on. In 1983 a Harvard Law School student, Evan Wolfson, wrote a thesis stating the rule of marriage equality. Justices concluded that gay couples were entitled to the legal benefits of civil marriage; and most crucially in the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts, whose favorable ruling, in a suit by lawyer Mary Bonauto and the Boston-based Gay and Lesbian Advocated and Defenders, led to the nation’s first bona fide same-sex marriages…” (“Gay Marriage turns 10 and Credit Should Be Spread around- The Boston Globe). On May 17, 2004 Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriages. In June of 2013, California legalized gay marriages, which helped their large LGBT (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered) community. (“History and Timeline of the Freedom…”). When this finally happened, it was seen as a great achievement by Karmala Harris, a California Attorney. “This is a profound day in our country, and its just the right thing: ‘Justice is finally being served’” (“Court Gives OK for California Gay Marriages”).

    Read More

  • Argument/Persuasive Essay

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first reason that should be discussed about same-sex marriage is discrimination. Who are we to discriminate against anyone? Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender sex, should all be treated just as equal as the heterosexuals. We are all of the same human form. Where is our humanity if we tell people of the same-sex that they are not recognized to acquire marriage and have the same legal rights as we do? It is clearly stated in the American Constitution that everyone deserves the same, equal rights. Not allowing same-sex couples to have a valid marriage is not only discriminating, it also disrobes them of their freedom.

    Read More

  • Marriage Equality For All

    1432 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many homosexual marriages will in fact last longer than marriages between heterosexual couples because it is so much more difficult for them to be married in the first place. In fact a recent study was completed in Vermont over a three year period of time that proved marriages to be very well grounded for same-sex couples. Homosexual participants were compared with heterosexual participants and the homosexual couples actually reported greater relationship quality, compatibility, intimacy, and lower levels of conflict after being unionized (“Sexual Orientation Across The Lifespan”). Marriage actually made these couples st...

    Read More

  • Morality of Same Sex Marriage

    330 Words  | 1 Pages

    Love is a phenomenon, which is purely human. Hence, if two individuals of the same sex love each other, why can they not celebrate this love through marriage? Biology should not be an argument against this.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    Firstly I will discuss the reasons for marriage equality. I argue marriage equality is in the best interest for family life. Allowing homosexuals to form stable committed relationships through marriage would allow for healthier homosexual relationships. You can’t prevent people from being homosexual however giving those people the right to marry can help them experience greater personal happiness. Studies have suggested that not only does legalizing marriage in an area generally make homosexual individuals in that area happier; it also makes them physically and mentally healthier and saves them money on health care (Hatzenbuehler, O’Cleirigh, Grasso, Mayer, Safren, & Bradford, 20012). I don’t see any compelling reason to take away the joy homosexuals get from marriage, this is one of the many reasons I support marriage equality.

    Read More

  • Homosexuals Should Have Equal Rights

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    Homosexual love relationships is exactly the same to that of a heterosexual couple. Marriage is a commitment that two people make when they love each other, they are willing to spend the rest of their days together, with the person who can be themselves and not have the fear of being judged for what they are, the person which you know is there at all times in good times and in bad times. Not with a person that you 're with only because society is so agreeable. In the United States in 2004 Massachusetts became the first state to legalize marriage be...

    Read More

  • Same Sex Marriage

    748 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gay and lesbian unions have been for a long time a subject that no one liked to discuss. For the last few decades, gays and lesbians have come out and expressed their sexuality preferences. Many believe that same sex marriage should not be legalized because it's against the moral. It's against the definition of marriage, which is considered as the union of a man and a woman as a husband and wife. Same sex marriage should be legalized because the way society views the union of lesbian and gays can a change. Another reason why same sex marriage should be legalized is that children that are issued from a gay or lesbian couple will be loved and raised in a family that is legally recognized under the law. Lesbians and gays also deserve to have the same rights as heterosexuals.

    Read More

  • Gay Marriage Should be Legal

    2010 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are many opponents of gay people as it is, and they all have their reasons to dislike the idea of permitting them get married. One of the main reasons is that the primary purpose of marriage is procreation. Because gay couples are unable to have children, they should not be allowed to marry (Schiffen 495). Another main argument is that the word marriage means the union of one man and one woman. This is a long-standing theme of most major Western religions. Under a proposed bill known as the Defense of Marriage act, marriage is defined as “a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” Furthermore, it defines a spouse as “ a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife” (What 1). Under these guidelines, it is quite obvious that gay couples would not be eligible for marriage. People against homosexual marriage also say that it is a person’s choice to be gay. Since the individual chooses to be a homosexual, they should not be given special privileges. Another argument that you hear is that these couples should not get married simply because of the torment and ridicule they would be faced with in their everyday lives. There are news reports from across America telling about how a gay person was beaten or killed just because they were looked at as different. Some of these people would end up the target of verbal abuse and maybe even physical abuse, just because some heterosexual people see them as different.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many people believe in a traditional marriage between a man and a woman. God created man and woman to be faithful and produce children. Same-sex marriage is contrary to the word of God and the laws of nature; therefore, it is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. Many biblical scriptures talk about how immoral same-sex marriage is.

    Read More

More about Marriage Is About Love Not Gender

Open Document