Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Marks and spencer competitive strategy
Marks and spencer competitive strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Marks and spencer competitive strategy
Marks and Spencer Strategy Evaluation
(a) MARKS AND SPENCER’s SUCCESS
This question is answered in relation to the success achieved before the downturn in performance in the late 1990’s.
• The strategic intent was to have a simple pricing policy and the use of the ST MICHAEL LOGO as a sign of quality.
• Had structured formula for all its stores whereby a set of principles were held as core to the organisation
• The value chain was well managed suppliers been local and control could be exercised over suppliers and the manner in which the supply to the customers was dealt with in a uniformed manner throughout.
• The company was well funded through public listing and held value for shareholders.
• The business was in a cash cow phase with business and financial risk being medium.
• The company had a high market share within their target market with the promotion of the their flagship product the ST MICHAEL brand.
• The company had a strong competitive position.
• Products were valued by customers due to high quality.
• Products were made locally and perceived to be of high quality as they were British products. This can be especially true after the post wars years and before companies started large scale globalisation.
• Chinese boom of imports had not yet really affected the market.
• Customer loyalty was built and maintained.
• The corporate culture and top down structure suited the environment.
• Before globalisation could affect local markets in the UK the environment was relatively stable.
• Corporate culture of the “family atmosphere” was adequate for the pre-globalisation era.
• There was an understanding of what the customers valued – good quality at a good price.
• The stores were adequately staffed to supply a good consumer service to the client.
• There suppliers were totally reliant on them and thus placed them in a high position over suppliers.
• Knowledge of the industry having been operating from the late 19th century.
• Superior brand image to competitors – differentiation strategy through product quality and brand image
• The company protected their brand ST MICHAEL as a quality brand
• High entry costs for new competitors.
(b) BASIS OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
MARKS AND SPENCERS competitive advantage eminated from its concentration on a product differentiated basis by supplying a product of high quality, manufactured in the UK and carrying the brand name of ST MICHAEL which it built over a long period of time and marketed to a loyal consumer base.
(c) MARKS AND SPENCER DOWNTURN
• The company did not react to a changing environment.
• The top down structure was autocratic and led to a bureacratic environment within the organisation
The company is affronting several challenges; the industry of sports and medicine is very competitive. There are big companies and multinationals that have a high power of negotiation and dominion in scale economy that allow them to enter in any market and introduce their products. If Smith & Brown apply the strategy of the balanced scorecard with the four perspectives, it can discover and improve its strengths and comparative advantages against the other competitors in the market (Norreklit, 2000). To create the comparative advantages against the high street drug and supermarket chain’s own labeled products, which are normally considered as average quality products, Smith & Brown can focus on producing luxury products using their brand profile, which insures the customer that these products are widely used and trusted by sport celebrities. The retailers cannot be considered as new rivals in the market, but an empowered client that new negotiation conditions have to be considered. In an aspect the company needs to revise which internal aspects give them an advantage against the other companies (Marlys & Steven,
The company had to be the second largest retailer shop in the US; it has many advantages that come along. The customers well acknowledge the company and its brand have been well established.
As we learned from Chapter 12, price must be carefully determined and match with firm’s product, distribution, and communication strategies. (Hutt & Speh, 2012, p. 300) Therefore, there should be a strong market perspective in pricing. In order to build an effective pricing policy, marketers should focus on the value a customer places on a product or service. One of the most effective ways to do so is differentiating through value creation.
And we will purchase capacities when plant utilisation above 90%. This will expand the business size and have a positive impact on economies of scale. Composed with High End and Size products transfer into Traditional and Low End, we have multiproduct in targeted segments. “Higher firm-level ability raises a firm 's productivity across all products, which induces a positive correlation to a firm’s intensive and extensive margin” (Bernard, Redding and Schott 2006). This means with an effective business strategy and management, businesses can boost sales of all products within the segment. With a larger product profile for Traditional and Low End, it works to generate larger market shares. Refer to Graph 4 and 5, Digby sold twice units of products than its core competitor-Baldwin by having Daze and Dixie in its Traditional segment, which drives its segment market share to double Baldwin’s. The boost in sales and market share prove the correct implication of the
Product as an element of the marketing mix is at the base of Primark 's marketing strategy, as it is meant to attract customers researching those very actual benefits which only Primark products should be able to provide. In this Primark also has to be careful, shall other companies adapt their products to provide similar benefits the targeted customers may chose other companies ' products, so benefits may also comport risks for Primark as those are not very specific.
Marks and Spencer's Definition of Performance Management Performance management provides Marks and Spencers with needed information on their employees. The information helps Marks and Spencers develop the skills of the employees based on the information collected at the appraisal, it helps recognise when training is needed. Performance management helps M&S by improving their service by having able workers that work to their full abilityand by improving the relationship between workers and the company. Here is Marks and Spencer's definition of performance management: Performance management is a joint process that involves both the supervisor and the employee, who identify common goals, which are linked to the goals of the organisation. This process results with the establishment of written performance exceptions later used as measures for feed back and performance evaluation.’
reputation of being the best in the industry. To do this they focused on and
In the case, Marks & Spencer and Zara, it discusses two business process designs that each company took. You first had Marks & Spencer, who had a more traditional approach. Their chain started of with the buying team, design, developers, merchandisers, technologist, suppliers, logistics, and lastly the store. Zara, however, comes up with a new innovative design. With this new design in effect the delivery of new collections only has a lead-time of 5 days. They were able to cut down this time due to the fact that products where mainly produced on Galicia.
The source of the brand features is in a connection between customers and companies that sell services or products. Consumers who choose a specific company fundamentally acknowledge to prefer that brand more than other brands rooted from the recognition of the brand’s worth.
of a firm to attain new forms of competitive advantage (Müller, 2011). It is due to these
1. Strategy in the second half of the 1980s: Having innovative, high-quality products and being a reliable, responsive supplier.
Unilever’s steady underlying improvement in Europe has continued, with 2.8% growth in the year. The fourth quarter was particularly strong, at 5.5%, against a weaker comparator. The Americas were up by 4.1% in the year, with Brazil and Mexico improving through the year, while the US grew solidly at 3.2%. Asia Africa has shown consistent, broad-based growth across countries and categories throughout the year, up by 11.1%. This demonstrates that merging with globalised technologically advanced companies such as SAS, and using their expertise, is paying dividends for Unilever. (Unilever’s Annual Report, 2007) (Drinks Business Review, “Unilever selects SAP as standard for global IT Strategy”, May 2007)
The main symptom and concern is that Scotts’ European sales had increased as expected, but margins had dropped, as well as synergies between the acquired companies were not working as expected. In addition, one of Scotts Europe’s largest customers was threatening to leave due to unacceptable service levels that might cause a domino effect to other large customers.
All items are hand-picked and have been established for 3 years. Mr Price will need to combat this threat by closing the gap where potential customers are escaping by merging businesses, or creating a competitive advantage. A competitive advantage is achieved by having lower prices, better quality, customer’s loyalty or best service. (Retief, 2015)
By offering the lowest price products make the consumers believed in us and creating the strong relationship with the customer value.