Marine Corps Leadership Essay

Leadership traits have been used throughout time. The one that has decided the outcome of life death more often then any other is justice. This trait is one of the fourteen that guide and shape the future leaders of the Marine Corps, and yet it is cast aside and ignored. It does not go unnoticed, and is unacceptable when nothing is done about it. Due to the scarcity of obligation and education, the senior leadership lacks justice because of the display of favoritism, inconsistent standards, and absence of fairness. First, favoritism runs rampant in the Marine Corps. The squad leader that has a Lance Corporal that went on a deployment with him and a Private First Class straight out of school, will punish the the Private First Class more severely if they were both late to formation. In the article Conservatives Attack on DADT Repeal Affecting Unit Cohesion Not Supported by Fact, Matt Gert and Dianna Porter (2010) explain “Favoritism and double standards are deadly to philia and its associated phenomena- cohesion,

When standards are used inconsistently. Today’s leadership has issues enforcing these standards on their peers, but are quick to enforce them with Junior Marines. You teach Junior Marines its okay to hold some standards higher or allow certain people to disregard those standards altogether. It will confuse the next generation of leadership, and they will make the same mistakes. Pride should be shown when enforcing Marine Corps standards. In Leading Marines, United States Marine Corps (2013) they argue” Consequently, Marine leaders must be forged in the same crucible and steeled with the same standards as those placed in their charge- standards and traditions as old as our nation itself.” The senior leaders should take pride in our standards, the same as they do our traditions. That responsibility stays with the rank of Sergeant or higher, to be fair with those standards no matter the