Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lessons to be remembered from the Vietnam war
American lessons learned from the Vietnam war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lessons to be remembered from the Vietnam war
There are many ways of conducting and overcoming Irregular Warfare. When it comes to operating against irregular threats our Marine Corps Leadership traits helps us as a force of readiness and are prominent in our everyday fight against irregular warfare. These traits include but are not limited to initiative, decisiveness, and knowledge, which are the 3 traits I believe to be the most important in the fight against irregular threats and how we can develop and use these traits in our fight against irregular warfare.
Using initiatives towards irregular warfare is a broad spectrum. It can range from evolving to facilitate the full spectrum of operations in multinational operating environments to ongoing transformational changes in leadership development and training that will provide us as a fighting force with the multi-skilled leaders to take on the initiatives that are involved and required to take on irregular warfare and the threats that are facilitated with it. Without initiative where are we? It’s the trait that we take
…show more content…
Having the basic of knowledge and understanding to confront irregular threats is the center and basis around the importance of operations. Researching past irregular threats and how we approached, intercepted, and overcame them are essential. The Vietnam War is one of the most knowledgeable wars we can learn from when it comes the fight against the threats of irregular war. The lessons we learned from the Vietnam War and working with other governments to gain experience that was effective and a necessity to gain an advantage to counter the communist insurgency. We take that knowledge and use it towards how we fight todays irregular threats. We obtain this knowledge by researching how past irregular threats were
The relationship between conventional and guerilla operations was a key element of the Vietnamese communists’ “Dau Tranh” strategy to fight and win the Vietnam War. A brief description of the Dua Tranh (meaning struggle) strategy is appropriate since it was the basis for North Vietnam’s success. The strategy consisted of an armed struggle and a political struggle. The armed struggle began with Stage One hit and run guerilla tactics to “decimate the enemy piecemeal and weaken then eliminate the government’s administrative control of the countryside...
When one thinks about warfare, the average mental picture is usually a movie war scene with soldiers, and planes; very rarely do people think about about the average Joe, trimming his hedge. In the short story “Grace Period”, by Will Baker, there is a man trimming his hedge outside with an electric hedge trimmer when a nuclear bomb is dropped; his wife has gone to get the mail. In “an instant [he felt as] everything stretched just slightly, a few millimeters, then contracted again” (Baker, 1989, p. 7). Although the character does not know what is happening, the reader may realize that this description is a high altitude nuclear burst. The article “Nuclear Weapon Effects”, by John Pike, describes what a nuclear bomb’s effects are and what could happen if one was dropped. Based on clues in the story and the information from the article, the reader can determine what is happening to the man and what he can expect will happen to him.
The Vietnam War: A Concise International History is a strong book that portrays a vivid picture of both sides of the war. By getting access to new information and using valid sources, Lawrence’s study deserves credibility. After reading this book, a new light and understanding of the Vietnam war exists.
Terriff, Terry. 2006. "Warriors and Innovators: Military Change and Organizational Culture in the US Marine Corps." Defence Studies 6, no. 2: 215. Advanced Placement Source, EBSCOhost (accessed November 28, 2017).
The world’s history is majorly shaped by mega wars that happen both inside and outside the boundaries of individual nations. Almost every sovereign state in the world had to forcefully liberate itself from its colonizers and oppressors mainly through warfare. For instance, America had to fight a long and exhausting revolutionary war against the British before it could attain its independence in 1783, likewise is the fate of many other nations. It is important to understand the two distinct types of wars that exist and their implications. Guerrilla warfare and the conventional military warfare are two types of war that are very different in their execution and military approach. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the similarities and differences existing between the American war in Vietnam and the American Revolution (Vetter, 1997).
The Vietnam War, a counter-insurgency conflict waged between North Vietnamese Communist forces and their South Vietnamese opposition, was one that many of its participants are not like to forget.
Thinking historically while conducting counterinsurgency in the 21st century poses questions regarding how to develop political and strategic plans. This bibliographic essay will examine the political and military aspect of fighting counterinsurgent warfare by 20th century theorists Galula’s, “Counterinsurgency Warfare Theory and Practice” and Trinquier’s, “Counterinsurgency Warfare Theory and Practice”. Strategy in fighting guerilla wars will be discussed by comparing conflicts in battles and ideologies from the past to current day. Moreover, ways to avoid the one size fits all war mentality when combating modern day insurgents will be recommended.
When thinking about World War I, most do not think about the Ottoman Empire. However, many important actions and decisions occurred in this region. A man named T. E. Lawrence was a huge liability toward the Ottoman Empire from 1916 until the end of World War I. Thomas Edward Lawrence was born on August 16, 1888. He was the son of Sir Thomas Chapman and Sarah Junner. The couple never married, but instead they took the name of Lawrence. The family decided to settle in Oxford. This is where Thomas Edward grew up, went to school, and eventually attended university. At Oxford, Lawrence decided to study history, and he also wanted to do his undergraduate thesis on medieval castles in the Turkish- held area of Syria and Palestine.
It has been debated by varying scholars as to whether Caesar Augustus’ foreign policy to expand Rome’s empire had more to do with defensive imperialism as a response to encroaching threats, or rather, an aggressively, unprovoked move to claim hegemony over the known world. However, I would like to postulate in support of the former theory that in an attempt to restore and ensure long-lasting security to their empire, Augustus was forced to take proactive measures in order to preserve it. With territorial boundaries normally running along the rivers so as to provide a better defensive posture, he felt it necessary to expand the northern border to the river so as to secure their autonomy and position. Perhaps if he could establish a wide buffer
The just war theory is described by Thomas Massaro in his book Living Justice as the “principle that warfare might be justified under certain conditions” (108). The complexities involved with international relations makes determining a just war very difficult. Even though historically pacifism hasn’t gained much traction within Catholic circles, it currently is gaining popularity with many mainstream Catholics. With so many differing views on military action, one might ask, “What determines a just war? How can we balance the need for peace with self-defense?” An examination of criteria for a just war and critiques written on this topic might shed light on these two questions.
This paper will critically analyze Task Force Ranger (TFR) in Mogadishu, Somalia while supporting the United Nations Operations in Somalia. The lack of combined nations shared intelligence and proper course of action analysis lead to the military defeat of Task Force Ranger in Somalia. Battle analysis of the Battle of Mogadishu reveals that inaccurate intelligence played a decisive role in the battle and could of lead to alternative ending.
Vietnam was the most unconventional conflict that American Troops had ever been involved with up to that point. American troops had never seen guerilla warfare or the use of tunnel networks in any other conflict we’ve been in. The thought of people living under troop’s feet was a bizarre and an unnatural thought, and the hit and run ambush tactics of Vietnamese Guerrilla’s was something we had never even heard before.
The Thirty Years War was a series of conflicts, not-knowingly involving most European countries from 1618 to 1648. The war, which was fought mainly in Germany, was started when Bohemian Protestants furiously attacked the Holy Roman Emperor in terms to impose a restriction on their religious and civil liberties. By understanding the Thirty Years War, you will notice the notable religious, political and social changes. The changes paved the religious and political maps of Europe. Not only did this war affect the religious and political demographic, it caused populations to perish and lose large amounts of their goods. What was known as a religious battle, turned out to be a political feud in competition of which state has the greater power affecting men, women, soldiers and civilians. “[The bohemians] had no idea that their violent deed would set off a chain reaction of armed conflict that would last thirty years and later be called Europe’s “first world war” of the modern era.” When the war ended, the lands were defiled and over 5 million people were killed.
Civil conflicts tend to erupt “within nation-states and threaten their governments, the social order, and the rate and path of their development” (Anastasion et al. 17). Throughout the years there has been much debate centered on defining the underlying cause(s) of civil conflict. There are many theories that have evolved over time that suggest reasoning for the occurrence of civil conflict(s). Yet there still remains no concrete definition of cause. However, there was a theorist and scholar by the name of Thomas Malthus that offered a considerably plausible argument for the cause of civil war. Malthus produced a theory called Malthusianism; this theory expressed the potential underlying effects that can evolve from the rapid growth of a population combined with the scarce availiability of resources (Anastasion et al.).
Many analysts have indicated that there is an increasing convergence in the different modes of warfare. They suggest that the greatest challenge in the future will not come from a single approach from a state, but state and non-state actors choosing from a variety of tactics and technology. They will also be used independently, or combined in new and innovative ways to create greater complexity. It is this variety of options that enable the threat to switch between and even use concurrently, these techniques and technologies, thus create confusion about where and who the enemy is, and complicate the battlefield with conditions that would not be expected when facing a conventional enemy. Because real world experience shows us that these threats have gone from being distractions in conventional warfare, to taking the centre stage in the contemporary operation environment (COE).