Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women's role in society
Women's role in society
Freud psychodynamic approach theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women's role in society
The article entitled “Women and the Subversion of the Community”, written by Mariarosa Dalla Costa and Selma James, goes in depth about women’s roles in society in the past and present and how to change for the better in the future. A few of the specific points discussed in this article include what women’s roles in society tend to be and why, how women have struggled to break this stereotype and how no matter what women do, men are always in charge on some if not all levels. Each of these major discussion points is also exemplified through the culture and life style of Las Cholitas shown in the documentary “The Fighting Cholitas”.
Cholitas are simply put, women who wear long, layered skirts with elegant shawls and braids. Traditionally
…show more content…
these women are expected to be housewives but many also have an unlikely hobby: wrestling. Here we reach our first run in with Mariarosa Dalla Costa and Selma James. Las Cholitas are expected to be housewives partly because they wear feminine clothing and proudly portray a feminine culture in a modern world where many women dress less traditionally. But we can’t blame society’s expectations solely on how a woman chooses to dress. Women working in the home goes way back to when work outside the home first came to existence which gave people the opportunity to earn a wage elsewhere. However, it was always men who got a job, leaving the women and children behind. This movement additionally stripped the women and children of their power that “derived from the family’s dependence on their labor…” and gave it all to the men who were now financial responsible for everyone who didn’t earn a wage. Taking care of the home became a woman’s only job since they had to make up for their husband’s and children’s efforts once they started work and school. Eventually this lead to the exploitation of women in the home as they work as hard for the family as the man the main difference being that women don’t earn a wage. In a sense, Las Cholitas demand to be housewives is simply a bi-product of industrialization leading to exploitation and expectation of women to work for free in the home under the husband’s power since he is financially responsible. With the abandonment of women by their husband and children, comes a sense of exclusion from the outside world. If a woman doesn’t have a job outside the home, what is her purpose to leave? If she’s always at home cooking or cleaning, how is she to gain a purpose to leave? This exclusion leads to the misconception that women can’t have jobs beyond the home because they are innocent and incapable. On the contrary, a women’s supposed incapability comes from the fact she is trapped in her home, alone with her work never allowing her any outside experience thus keeping her innocent. This misconception towards women is exactly why Las Cholitas wrestle. The sport gives Las Cholitas an outlet. It allows them to have a social life and prove that they are able bodied human beings instead of incapable, innocent and dependent on their husbands. Many Cholitas are criticized by their community for participating in wrestling because of the Cholita culture and expectations but they continue the sport regardless. One wrestler even explained that the sport allows Las Cholitas to express a sort of strength that is inside all women that wouldn’t be recognized or bothered with otherwise. Mariarosa Dalla Costa makes another important point about men and how they are always somehow in control.
She argues that this is due to the female perception that “to have a penis means to have power”. This is a result of the Freudian idea that every relationship is powered by the fear of castration and the Oedipus complex. A man’s fear of castration coupled with an Oedipus complex essentially gives the man a simultaneous fear and love for women leading to the need to control them. Men having power is still seen even in the lives of Las Cholitas, a culture focused on women. Las Cholitas’ wrestling helps them be independent in a predominantly male powered society but everything around the sport is still controlled by men. Their training is handled by men and each competition is organized and announced by men. In addition, at the specific gym featured in “The Fighting Cholitas”, it was a man’s idea to invite the Cholitas to train in his facility and more or less exploit them so he could make money off hosting each match. Furthermore many families of the Cholitas don’t approve of their wrestling because it is dangerous and what is the family to do if the mother gets hurt? The whole house would fall apart if the housewife can’t fulfill her daily chores. But there is some hope as not all families are like this. A specific wrestler interviewed for the documentary mentions that her husband doesn’t want her to wrestle but supports her anyway because he can’t stop her from doing something she
loves.
As much as men are working, so are women, but ultimately they do not face the same obstacles. For example, “Even if one subscribes to a solely economic theory of oppression, how can one ignore that over half of the world's workers are female who suffer discrimination not only in the workplace, but also at home and in all the areas sex-related abuse” (Moraga 98). This gives readers a point of view in which women are marginalized in the work place, at home, and other areas alike. Here Moraga gives historical accounts of Chicana feminists and how they used their experiences to give speeches and create theories that would be of relevance. More so, Moraga states how the U.S. passes new bills that secretly oppress the poor and people of color, which their community falls under, and more specifically, women. For instance, “The form their misogyny takes is the dissolution of government-assisted abortions for the poor, bills to limit teenage girls’ right to birth control ... These backward political moves hurt all women, but most especially the poor and "colored." (Moraga 101). This creates women to feel powerless when it comes to control one’s body and leads them to be oppressed politically. This places the government to act as a protagonist, and the style of writing Moraga places them in, shines more light to the bad they can do, especially to women of color. Moraga uses the words, “backward moves”
Colonial Latin American society in the Seventeenth Century was undergoing a tremendous amount of changes. Society was transforming from a conquering phase into a colonizing phase. New institutions were forming and new people and ideas flooded into the new lands freshly claimed for the Spanish Empire. Two remarkable women, radically different from each other, who lived during this period of change are a lenses through which many of the new institutions and changes can be viewed. Sor Juana and Catalina de Erauso are exceptional women who in no way represent the norm but through their extraordinary tales and by discovering what makes them so extraordinary we can deduce what was the norm and how society functioned during this era of Colonial Latin America.
The novel, The Underdogs by Mariano Azuela is a great perception of the Mexican Revolution. The stories of exploits and wartime experiences during the Mexican Revolution was fundamentally driven by the men. The war was between the people and the government. Throughout the novel, these men had to isolate themselves from their families and battle for a cause they greatly believed in. Even with not enough resources, the people were able to fight aggressively in order to overthrow the government. Regardless of the men who were at war, there were two females who played a significant role in the Mexican Revolution, Camila and War Paint. While the representation Mariano Azuela captures these ladies and their role in society are accurate, he neglects
Women are seen as failure and can’t strive without men in the Mexican-American community. In this novel you can see a cultural approach which examines a particular aspect of a culture and a gender studies approach which examines how literature either perpetuates or challenges gender stereotypes. Over and over, Esperanza battled with how people perceived her and how she wished to be perceived. In the beginning of the book, Esperanza speaks of all the times her family has moved from one place to another. “Before that we lived on Loomis on the third floor, and before that we lived on Keeler.
However, it wasn’t an effortless process for these women to gain respect. These women experienced sexism and were often discredited for their work. During the El Salvadoran Civil War, sexism was prominent. The women working in groups such as the FMLN were trying to change these perceptions, and create a more equal life for the women in El Salvador. Although sexism was still very common, the FMLN and the women involved were working very hard and their contributions were beginning to be noticed.
Desert Blood is based on a stereotypical context of the female commodization whereby Rubi, Ximena and Ivon try to fight against the patriarchy so that they can find their individual empowerment at deeper levels. In addition, Ximena and Ivon represent a network empowerment while Rubi represents organizational empowerment. Alba’s novel has given empowerment to the female characters where they manage to break the silence that surrounded the reality of Juarez femicide; this offers a long-awaited voice on the crime as well as the women that needed to speak-up. Alba shows that the women were considered almost worthless and were not considered as the tenable social construct which was maintained and established by the patriarchal
In addition, these women were often subjected to control, domination, and violence by men” (Global). This validates Azuela’s stance on how women should stay within their traditional roles because fighting for equality has been ineffective even today.
By examining the narrative voice as well as the cultural restraints placed on them, readers can see the sexist culture in the novel and that the novel itself does not necessarily advocate this misogyny. Yunior, a Dominican man, is the overall narrator of the novel, so readers essentially see everything through his masculine eye. When discussing a brief fling with Lola, Oscar’s sister, Yunior says, “Even those nights after I got jumped she wouldn’t let me steal on her ass for nothing. So you can sleep in my bed but you can’t sleep with me?” (Diaz 169) His question suggests that it is his right to sleep with her, and his discussion of Lola herself objectifies her by noting only her body and her refusal to use it. This objectification is clearly sexist, but it is a reflection of the narrative voice, Yunior, not of Lola. Yunior will casually refer to a woman as “a bitch” (Diaz 183), which is clearly demeaning, but it is a man’s view and does not reflect on the substance of the women. It shows readers the culture he was raised in, not an actual portrayal of the women, illustrating a misogynist society but not a misogynistic novel. In the Dominican Republic, gender-based violence is the fourth leading cause of death, hinting at the overall problems caused by the hyper-sexualized nature of the country. Sociologist Denise Paiewonsky
Vigil, Ariana. 2009. “Transnational Community in Demetria Martinez's Mother Tongue”. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism, 10 (1): 54-76
The story “Woman Hollering Creek" by Sandra Cisneros describes the lives of Mexicans in a Chicago neighborhood. She depicts the life that women endure as Latino wives through her portrayal of the protagonist, Cleofilas. For Cisneros being a Mexican-American has given her a chance to see life from two different cultures. In addition, Cisneros has written the story from a woman’s perspective, illustrating the types of conflicts many women face as Latino wives. This unique paradigm allows the reader to examine the events and characters using a feminist critical perspective.
North Americans and Mexicans must also attempt to overcome the ideas that women should be seen and not heard. In Anzaldúa’s words, “Hocicona, repeloma, chismosa, having a big mouth, questioning, carrying tales are all signs of being mal criada. In my culture they are all words that are derogatory if applied to women – I’ve ever heard them applied to men” (2947).
In Federico García Lorca’s La Casa de Bernarda Alba, a tyrant woman rules over her five daughters and household with absolute authority. She prevents her daughters from having suitors and gives them little to no freedom, especially with regard to their sexualities and desires. They must conform to the traditional social expectations for women through sewing, cleaning, as well as staying pure and chaste. While, as John Corbin states in The Modern Language Review, “It was entirely proper for a respectable woman in [Bernarda’s] position to manage her household strictly and insist that the servants keep it clean, to defend its reputation, ensure the sexual purity of her daughters, and promote advantageous marriages for them,” Bernarda inordinately
The Women of Colonial Latin America serves as a highly digestible and useful synthesis of the diverse life experiences of women in colonial Latin America while situating those experiences in a global context. Throughout, Socolow mediates the issue between the incoherence of independent facts and the ambiguity of over-generalization by illustrating both the restrictions to female behavior and the wide array of behavior within those restrictions. Readers of varied backgrounds will come away with a much deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities that defined the lives of the diverse women of the New World ruled by Portugal and
The novel Gabi, a Girl in Pieces, written by Isabel Quintero, portrays the extreme pressure women from traditional/cultural households encounter in order to be seen as “picture perfect.” Women have to be and act accordingly to the expectations of their family and community in order to be respected and valued as a “lady.” One mistake is all it takes to become known as “a mala mujer” which is why women are anticipated to protect their body as they would their life.
“Poverty and exploitation of women in Latin America can never be alleviated because they are rooted in machismo,” meaning that because of the way society was run in Latin American, women can’t advance from the ancient state of mind that they belong in the private sphere and should stay there, because only men are good enough to be out in the public sphere. The reason why society was run in this manner, was because of the machismo feeling engraved in the minds of men and, in some cases, women in society. Alicia, Carolina, and Nancy don’t really have any other choice, than try to survive on their own by doing acts that are not “approved” by the society they live in. Even now, because of their actions, we could even disagree with the way they decided to approach their situation, because even now a day, we could think that selling one’s body or being involved in “off the book”