Marginalia By Billy Collins Summary

673 Words2 Pages

The definition of marginalia is marginal notes. Billy Collins’ poem, “Marginalia”, is about just that. Collins uses sarcasm, metaphors, and juxtapositions to focus on all the different type of marginalia, from criticizes to praises, and how they affect the piece of work.
Collins starts out his poem by talking about how “Sometimes the notes are ferocious, / skirmishes against the author” (1-2) meaning that each critic of the piece is going to war with the author. Each belittling comment is a threat to the author. Sometimes this can demolish strong literary works, but it can also make it more influential. In lines 46-48 Collins writes, “you have not read Joshua Reynolds… until you have read him/ enwreathed with Blake’s furious scribbling” giving …show more content…

Nature is such a prominent theme in both high school and college literature, and if it is not in one of your books, you have not paid any attention in any English class. Finally the speaker goes on to talk about Catcher in the Rye in the ninth and tenth stanzas. He reminisces about how he got a copy from his library when he was beginning high school. This is significant because Catcher in the Rye is on many high school syllabuses because its subject is easy for teenagers to relate to. In line 57 the speaker reveals, “how vastly [his] loneliness was deepened”, which mirrors the loneliness of the book’s protagonist, Holden Caulfield, and in line 64 we read an annotation from a girl who wrote “Pardon the egg salad stains, but I’m in love.” explaining that she dropped her egg salad sandwich on the book because she is either in love with the book or in love with someone the book reminded her of.
But marginalia are not just for critics and students, thoughtful readers read both the book and the annotations within them. These kinds of readers can be “fans cheering from empty bleachers” (23) not writing in the margins but still appreciates the work of the author and other readers who have wrote what they thought, or they could reach “for a pen if only to show/ [they] did not just laze in an armchair turning pages” (35-36) to show their knowledge and understanding of what the author is trying to convey and to give their own opinion about the

Open Document