Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Approaches to crime prevention
Crime prevention approaches
Crime prevention approaches
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Approaches to crime prevention
A Humboldt County judge ruled today there was enough evidence for Marcia Kitchen to stand trial for her alleged role in a 2016 fatal hit-and-run that left her daughter and daughter’s friend dead.
Judge John Feeney said there was sufficient cause to believe Marcia Kitchen might have been drunk when she allegedly struck the 14-year-old girls on Eel River Drive near the Fortuna city limits. Feeney held her to on one count of vehicular manslaughter without gross negligence and driving under the influence causing death. She also was held to answer for special allegations that included fleeing the scene and causing injury or death.
The ruling came at the end of the third day of a preliminary hearing regarding the July 12, 2016, fatal hit-and-run
…show more content…
that left Kiya Kitchen and Faith Tsarnas dead. Kitchen is expected to return to the Humboldt County courthouse on May 25 for an arraignment on information. Family of both victims had been in attendance throughout the hearing. Earlier on Monday a defense attorney for Marcia Kitchen cross-examined her son Jevin Kitchen after he said his mom confessed to killing his sister and daughter’s friend along Eel River Drive near the Fortuna city limits.
Defense attorney Benjamin Okin questioned Jevin Kitchen’s memory, noting portions of the incident the 18-year-old had recounted to investigators but could not recall during testimony. Jevin Kitchen conceded his memory of details was better about the time of the event and statements made early on were likely more accurate.
Jevin Kitchen had told investigators around the time of the incident that when his mom got home with her damaged Jeep she said she wasn’t immediately sure what she had hit.
“ ‘It was something big,’ ” Jevin Kitchen recalled his mom saying when shown a copy of his transcribed interview with law enforcement. “...The whole front bumper was messed up.”
The son’s description of William Stewart, a long-time friend of Marcia Kitchen who was in the Jeep with her at the time of the crash, seemed to misidentify the man. He had told police that the man looked like some kind of “San Diego gangster” and was “all tatted up.” Stewart testified Tuesday to having a single tattoo one of his biceps, according to a transcribed interview read by
Okin. Jevin Kitchen also said he may have at first tried to shield his mom when initially questioned by investigators. She had allegedly told him not to give his accounts of the incident. “I believe a little bit of me was still trying to protect my mom because I didn’t want to see her go,” Jevin Kitchen said. “...What is done is done. What is right needs to be done. This is right. This is why I’m doing this.” Investigation and Analysis California Highway Patrol officer Paul craft said he found Marcia Kitchen’s jeep at her home in Fortuna. After law enforcement began to suspect she may have been the driver, he said he went to her home and found the vehicle in a side yard on her property. He described damage to the Jeep that appeared to have a “large area of impact.” Kristina Rosenfeld a forensic scientist with the California Department of justice said she analyzed material found on the front of the jeep and believed it may be flesh or skin. She said a photo of the back of Tsarnas’ legs and further testing led her to believe the Jeep’s license plate may have left an imprint on the teen. Rosenfeld described the Jeep having “major front end damage”. “The grill was wrecked and folded around,” she said.
Victim Herbert sustained approximate two inch scratches on her right elbow due to being pushed to the ground by Suspect Chuldzhyan.
Reyes v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 589 F.2d 791, 794 (5th Cir. 1979) The appellant court held that it was not. According to rule 404 under the Federal Rules of Evidence, “evidence of a person 's character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait”. Fed. R. Evid. 404 Under this rule the evidence of Reyes prior convictions admitted by the trial court, “purpose of showing that he was intoxicated on the night that he was run over by defendant-appellee 's train” proves to be inadmissible under Rule 404(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Reyes v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 589 F.2d 791, 792 (5th Cir. 1979) The courts due mention the exceptions on the admission of character evidence. However the court did not use the evidence of Reyes past drunkenness to prove some other criminal purpose. Since the trial court failed to do the latter, and instead entered evidence on the basis of character to prove that the plaintiff acted in accordance with his character trait during the night in question, it went against the modern rules set out in FRE 404 and is therefore
...t his the evidence in front of a jury. Still believing in his innocence Jeff is filing for parole after fourteen years of eligibility. He is hoping to meet parole board criteria so he can be released on parole.
On June 7th 2008, Sarah May Ward was arrested for the murder of Eli Westlake after she ran him over in a motor vehicle in St. Leonards. Prior to the incident the offender had been driving the wrong way down Christine Lane which was a one way street. Whilst this was occurring she was intoxicated, under the influence of marijuana, valium, and ecstasy and was unlicensed to drive. The victim and his brother who were also intoxicated, where walking down the lane and where nearly hit by the offender. This prompted the victim to throw cheese balls at the car and make a few sarcastic remarks regarding her driving ability. After a brief confrontation between the two parties the victim and his brother turned away and proceeded to walk down Lithgow Street. The offender followed the victim into the street and drove into him while he was crossing a driveway.
The evidence presented to myself and the other juror’s proves that Tyrone Washburn is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of his wife, Elena Washburn. On March 12, 1979 Elena Washburn was strangled in the living room of her family’s home. Her body was then dragged to the garage, leaving a trail of blood from the living room to the place it was found. Her husband, Tyrone Washburn, found her in the family’s garage on March 13, 1979 at 1:45 A.M. When officer Dale Chambers arrived at the scene he found her lying face down in a pool of blood. The solid evidence in this case proves only one person, Tyrone Washburn, is guilty of murder.
In conclusion, Mrs. Barrett suffered from many years of abuse from her husband. She finally snapped and shot Mr. Barrett, killing him. She did this because in self- defense and beyond reasonable doubt that he would have killed her. She also should be able to claim Battered Woman 's Syndrome because she went through the stages of abuse and meets the qualifications of a battered woman described in Leslie McGuire’s book. In the end, Mrs. Barrett should have Leslie McGuire testify because she is very experienced and widely known, she has heard and counseled people in over 300 cases. . She is a reliable person with good intentions and will only help the case. I hope that you make the right decision today, Thank you.
That night, many witnesses reported having seen a man changing the tire of his van and waving any possible help away angrily while others reported seeing a woman wandering around the side of the dangerous highway. More witnesses reported that Kenneth and his wife were having many violent disputes at their home that usually resulted in Kenneth pursuing an angry Yvonne around the block. The most compelling evidence against Mathison, however, is purely scientific. Detective Paul Ferreira first noticed that the extensive blood stains inside the Mathison van. After hearing Mathison’s original account, he summoned the assistance of famed forensic expert Dr. Henry Lee to analyze what he thought was inconsistent evidence. Blood stains on the paneling and the spare tire in the cargo area reveal low-velocity blood stains meaning that the blood probably dripped from Yvonne’s head onto the floor. The stains found on the roof and steering wheel were contact transfer patterns probably caused by Mathison’s bloody hands. Blood stains on the driver’s side of the van were contact-dripping patterns which indicate that Mathison touched the inside of the van multiple times before and after moving his wife’s body. The final groups of blood stains on the instrument panel of the van were medium-velocity stains which show investigators that Mathison probably struck his wife at least once in the front seat causing the blood to fly from her open head wound. The enormous amounts of blood inside the van lead prosecutor Kurt Spohn to investigate the Mathison case as a murder instead of a misdemeanor traffic violation.
R. v. Lavallee was a case held in 1990 that sent waves through the legal community. The defendant, Lyn Lavallee was in a relationship with her partner, Kevin Rust, in which he would abuse her both mentally and physically. On the night of the incident, Lyn and her husband got into a fight, her husband pulled out a gun and told her if she didn’t kill him now he’d be coming for her later. When leaving the room, Lyn shot Kevin in the back of the head killing him instantly. She was convicted of murder, but when brought before the Manitoba Court, she was acquitted of the charges. An appeal was made to the Manitoba court of Appeal on the grounds that expert testimony should not be admitted as evidence in the courts. They argued that the jury was perfectly
I arrived on scene at 17:10 hours. A juvenile was standing under the carport beside a white Dodge Durango. The reporting party, Kaella D. Barners (F/B, DOB: 05/04/1977), exited the front door when she seen deputies arrive. I approached the juvenile, Katera Edwina Barners (F/B, DOB: 08/29/2000). Katera was calm and cooperative. Katera had been upset at her mother. I observed an end table on the hood of the vehicle. I asked Katera if she put it there. Katera said she threw it there in attempt to damage the vehicle.
and Brian Kaelin, who lived in Simpson’s guest house, went to get McDonald’s, shortly after 9pm on the night of June 12th. O.J. had arranged to leave on a flight to Chicago at 11:45 the same night in order to attend a Hertz event the next day. At 10:25 O.J.’s limo driver arrived twenty minutes early to pick him up for his flight. After buzzing the intercom multiple times, at 10:40 the limo driver drove around to the gate of O.J.’s house, but did not see any vehicles in his driveway. At 10:50 the limo driver paged his boss to let him know nobody was home. The driver saw Kaelin, who came from the backyard with a flashlight investigation three loud noises he had heard while he was in his room, Kaelin waved at the driver but did not open the gate. The driver then saw a dark person walk into the house through the front door, and shortly after the lights on the first floor came on. At 10:56 the driver buzzed the intercom again, only this time O.J. answered it and said, “Sorry, I overslept and I just got out of the shower. I’ll be down in a minute.” Finally, O.J. left in the limo at 11:15 and got on his flight to Chicago at 11:45
When the first responder got to the scene he adimatately meet the 911 caller, who lead him to a car in an apartment parking lot. The car doors were closed and all of the windows were fogged. The police officer used his flashlight to see inside of the car before opening the door. He found a young African American woman who had been shot several times. The officers quickly called for backup, investigators and medical personnel. While awaiting for their arrival he secured the crime scene with caution tape, creating an initial perimeter setup as discussed in lecture two. Once everyone arrived he left it to them to search the car while he talked to the 911 caller, witnesses and others who had information on who had been present in the car. The investigators were able to collect physical evidence of bullets and cartage casings that were found outside the vehicle and inside the vehicle on the floorboard of the driver’s side. The team determined the bullets came from a 40 caliber. Other types of physical evidence that were found on the scene were the bloody clothing on the victim, the victim’s cell phone and fibers in the car from the driver’s side. personnel at the scene crime took several photographs, powered test for finger prints and did a blood spatter analysis. Stewart’s autopsy revealed that she had been shot at close range in the left hand once and in the
from the victim and the scene of the crime be tested and his appeals were denied ("A.B. Butler").
Tasmiyah Whitehead, twenty year old of Rockdale County, Georgia who is not guilty has been , pleaded guilty to manslaughter for lying to the police about being within possession of a knife in commission of a crime. “Tasmiyah and her twin sister Jasmiyah Whitehead, were both 16 years old when the police said the teens got into a brutal brawl in the kitchen with their 34-year-old mother, Jarmecca Whitehead. The incident occurred before school on January 13, 2010. Their mother was beaten, bitten, and stabbed repeatedly. The police discovered that their mother’s jugular vein, lung, and neck was plunged with a knife from the back, which caused a fatal severing of the mother’s spinal cord. According to WSB-TV, the twins stayed with their grandmother due to violence and extreme strife characterized the environment they were living in (dailynews.com)”.
McDonald was charged with second-degree intentional murder, that night. She pleaded innocent in count of self-defense.
“Officers discovered blood both on the door of the suspect’s Ford Bronco, and also droplets leading into his house. Inside, a pair of bloodied socks were discovered, blood that was later matched to Nicole” (Reed). “The general processing of the scene was sloppy, with items of evidence never entering the chain of custody, photographs being taken without scales for reference, bloody police shoe prints littering the scene and even evidence not ever being collected, most notably a bloodied fingerprint found on the gateway of the house.” (Reed). This evidence contradicts Simpsons defense story that he was gone throughout the weekend of the murders, but as his blood was shown through the crime scene, many were confused as to what to believe. “A blood sample taken from OJ was allegedly carried around in the pocket of an investigator for hours after collection, rather than being immediately submitted as evidence and preserved. Furthermore, 1.5mL of this blood sample was supposedly lost, leading to claims of planted evidence and incrimination” (Reed). In this case, many speculated that due to Simpsons overpowering wealth and fame, that he might have bribed the evidence team (Reed). As the case slowly began to close with many evidence for and against Simpson, it was very tough for jurors to come to the conclusion of Simpsons innocence or