Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Simple definitiion of art
Essay on art history
What is art? essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Simple definitiion of art
For centuries, the established conventions of art remained relatively unchanged and unchallenged. Artists were expected to demonstrate a certain degree of skill and originality in their works, whether it be through subject matter, form, or both. These conventions were considered the fundamental aspects of being an artist, to follow what the masters had established before them in order to create what had come to be accepted as art, and to go against them would be to not be an artist. That is, at least, until Marcel Duchamp submitted his now famous piece Fountain to a New York City exhibition in 1917. It was with this artwork that Duchamp paved the way for all future art movements, forcing the art world to sit back and question what makes …show more content…
MUTT” etched into the side, a “readymade” as Duchamp would call it. The critics were, unsurprisingly, outraged at this piece, to the point that Fountain was even “misplaced” for the duration of the exhibition. The critics accused the creator of plagiarism, insisting that it was in no way an actual work of art, but it was wth this outcry that Duchamp accomplished exactly what he set out to do. Readymade art challenged the very basis of what art had been for centuries: an original work made by the artists themselves. With readymade art, any mass produced object could be declared art by an artist, completely undermining the originality and uniqueness that every work of art had been for centuries. Every piece of art throughout history was specially made, ensuring it would be impossible to replicate. The very concept of being able to paint the Mona Lisa or The Last Supper exactly as the same as the original is, of course, ludicrous. They are all one of a kind, and even the most dedicated attempts to remake them would never be exactly the same—as per the point of art. Readymades completely nullified this concept—especially considering the fact that none of the originals of Duchamp’s readymades still exist, any works seen in museums are remakes—leaving the power of what makes art completely in the hands of the
At the turn of the 20th and further into the 21st century, art began to drop the baggage carried from the masters of the Renaissance and began a trajectory of change. Artists began challenging the schools and galleries of art around the world in an effort to break away from the chains that were wrapped around them in an effort to control the basis of art. Strange patters, shapes, colors and spaces emerged as each one challenged every norm known to the artistic circle. Critics and viewers alike were suddenly required to think less about the topics of paintings and more about their formal aspects. As decades passed, the singularity of art began to intensify and different forms of art demanded the same recognition as others before. Liberation
Duchamp’s piece was not controversial because of the simplistic nature of the piece, nor the oddity of it- it was controversial because he had not made it himself. People were very opposed to this idea because they believed that art was something made and not found. Duchamp’s “ready-made” art, which were always mass produced objects made by machines, was offensive to them and so they rejected it wholeheartedly. Unlike Fountain, Kandinski’s Little Pleasures was not rejected because of the nature of its ’creation’, it was rejected because people had never before seen art with such a lack of recognizable forms. Before Kandinski, art had always had representations of things from life, and Little Pleasures seemed almost completely arbitrary to them with no connections to the world they lived in. As such, both pieces were, at first, denied the title of “art” because society was unable to break from tradition and admire something
During the 20th Century artists began to challenge art and question the foundations and boundaries of artistic techniques and approaches. The main challenge artist faced during this time was breaking the barrier of realism and moving to representative art. Although, the creation of the camera made this change even more difficult. With this technological advance, anyone could buy a camera and snap a shot of a specific moment in time, without having to recreate it by hand. This was a very attracting concept to most, but also another impulse for those artists who were trying to break the artistic boundaries. Likewise, artists who decided to continue, or begin, painting were also looking to create something different that also evoked a specific
Willem de Kooning was known as one of the major artists of the Abstract Expressionism period. In the post World War II era, de Kooning painted in the style that is referred to as Abstract expressionism, Action painting, and the New York School. Like all Modern art, the intent of these forms of art was not to produce beauty, but critical reflection. The intent was to awaken in the viewer a recognition of the specific, usually social or political, concern of the artist (New World, 2008). De Kooning reflected this period by working in such as a way as to both eschew all traces of visible reality in the painting as well as to create uncontrolled and sometimes violent gestures, which is reminiscent of this time (Gale Encyclopedia, 2006). His works show great emotion, mostly of a tortured, aggressive nature, which was thought of by many to be the ultimate expression of this abstract period.
According to Tocqueville in aristocratic times the purpose of creating the arts was to produce the best artwork spending a great amount of time on it perfecting it and selling it for a high price. However, in today’s society the way to get rich is to sell your artwork for a cheaper price by manufacturing more quantity but with cheaper materials less in value, reproducing the artwork quicker and cheaper. Today all ranks of people can afford to buy a replicated artwork, which can easily be mistaken for the real thing. They are so highly perfected it is hard to tell apart what is original and what is not. They are many artistes today however; the quality of the production has
One of the most unique figures in the continuum of the art world, Marcel Duchamp changed the way we look at and produce art today. Marcel Duchamp was by far, one of the most controversial figures in art. Two of the most well known and talked about pieces by him are The Fountain and The Bride Stripped Bare by her Bachelors, Even . Duchamp created many other pieces that caught the attention of critics, other artists, and the population in a negative way; however, these two pieces alone, brought about the greatest amount of controversy.
Modern art serves to immerse us more thoroughly in a scene by touching on more than just our sight. Artists such as Grosz, and Duchamp try to get us to feel instead of just see. It seems that this concept has come about largely as a way to regain identity after shedding the concepts of the Enlightenment. “Philosophers, writers, and artists expressed disillusionment with the rational-humanist tradition of the Enlightenment. They no longer shared the Enlightenment's confidence in either reason's capabilities or human goodness...” (Perry, pg. 457) It is interesting to follow art through history and see how the general mood of society changed with various aspects of history, and how events have a strong connection to the art of the corresponding time.
It’s interesting to note what happened to the art world after Duchamp revolutionized art into meaninglessness. Artists seem to be exempt from the moral laws that are binding to ordinary people. Everything is O.K. under art’s magic umbrella: rotting corpses with snails crawling over them, kicking little girls in the head, rape and murder recreations, women defecating. Where does it stop? What is art and what is porn? What is art and what is disgusting? Where is the line? There isn’t one anymore. The effect of Duchamp’s pranks was to point out that anything could be art. All it took was getting people to agree to call something art.
Heidegger exclaims that when one fails to comprehend the ideas of things clearly, then they fall prey to the inability to grasps the nature of the thing (350). If people believe the thing is a product of the equipment, which is in terms of the thoughts of general experience of beings, then those people will be unable to figure the thing was derived from natural forces. I agree with Heidegger argument as this is a prime example of missing knowledge. If the people are unaware to certain key information about a piece of art, they are prone to incorrectly attribute the work as a whole and fail to figure that the works is what breaks the part of the work that discloses the
Personal experience does not dictate the type of human each person is; however, it is a major fact that separates each human from one another. Along with this, the “banking” concept does not “dehumanize” or make a person less knowledgable when compared to another. In fact, if both personal experience and memorization were mixed a whole new world of education would be created. There is no black and white when it comes to the education of the sciences, it is a rather grey area, a homogenous mixture to ensure the student receives the best education possible.
Art is not useless as Oscar Wilde stated; nor is it the death of logic by emotion as Plato supposed. Art is an activist trying to inform and shape the social consciousness. Art by nature is critical and questions how the world is perceived. These questions are pivotal in creating change within society. The Armory Show, a major turning point in American art, for example, was inspired by shifting perceptions of the aesthetic and a stirring toward modernity. The Armory Show was an artistic rebellion against the juries, prizes, and restricted exhibitions that excluded unacademic and yet t...
...encing and affecting the art movement and its contribution in shaping how art is produced and critiqued based on the standards that it had set.
Modern Art does not follow any traditional rule, in fact Modern Art breaks this barrier. In the traditional way of painting, you must the true nature of your work; you must have the balance in creating it. The rules that are working on our universe must be applied to the old traditional painting.
First, what exactly is appropriation in art? Art History, by Marilyn Stokstad states quite simply that appropriation is the representation of a preexisting image as one's own (1155). Marcel Duchamp could be considered the first appropriator with his ready-mades. Duchamp took everyday objects and made them art simply by saying it was art. Duchamp did this to try and destroy the art object. Duchamp was fascinated with the concept of ready-made for years. Duchamp used the image of the Mona Lisa in a 1919 piece entitled L.H.O.O.Q.. Duchamp created this image in reference to his alter ego. Rrose Selavy. He feels that Rrose's fame, for those versed in Dada and Surrealism, is equal to that of the Mona Lisa's. This is why Duchamp drew the unmistakable mustache and beard of Salvador Dali on the face of the Mona Lisa's face. Perhaps Duchamp felt that Dali's fame as a surrealist paralleled that of the Mona Lisa.
Art has evolved and regenerated itself many times during our human existence. These differences are defined through changes in styles under various theories. During the nineteenth and early twentieth century, a style known as Expressionism became popular. During this movement the artists were trying to use their artwork as a tool of expression toward life. It was mainly dominant in the nonrepresentational arts, such as abstract visual arts and music. It also was probably one of the most difficult movements to understand because the whole point of the piece lay within the artist. Not only was it a movement, it defined the act of art as a whole. From the beginning of time, each work of art, excluding replicas, show a way of expressing one's self. Every artist puts a piece of his or herself into their artwork. Who really is to determine what that work of art was meant to express?