Manipulation In Julius Caesar Research Paper

967 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Manipulation in julius caesar essay

My Argument theme is Manipulation throughout Julius Caesar. I will show three unique scenarios in which manipulation was used by William Shakespeare’s characters to draw the audience's attention, sympathy, anger, and confusion.
Manipulation by Opinion A.Brutus states- “The only way is to kill Caesar. I have no personal reason to strike at him—only the best interest of the people.” His way of stating yeah we have to kill him but i have no idea or just reason for it except that I hate him because the people love him and not me . B.Brutus in speaking with the other men says- “ But, alas, Caesar must bleed for it. And, gentle friends, Let’s kill him boldly but not wrathfully. Let’s carve him as a dish fit for the gods, Not hew him as a carcass fit for hounds. And let our hearts, as …show more content…

Cassius in his mind saying Caesar resents him but loves Brutus, so decides to forge letters and have the letters strewn around by a lower man as to cause discontent in men he wanted to join in his mindset.
B. Cicero convincing others that the Gods are displeased and demand repramation, and their will must be followed . As though the entirety of Rome will suffer because Caesar has chosen to lead his people as one of them not as a god.
C. Cassius instructing Cinna to place the forged letters in Brutus’ Seat ( knowing that Cinna can be persuaded easily) , in this way he is manipulating not just Cinna but Brutus as well.
Manipulation by power can be by Bullying, by stature, by demeaning someone by down playing their intelligence or making them think that their way of thinking is nonconsequential.

Manipulation at the Funeral
One of the most obvious scenes of manipulation in the acts that we read was in the Funeral scene. On both Anthony and Brutus’ parts. Their manipulation was not just that of the people of Rome and each other but of the people reading the words or watching the play also. It was the one part that made me think the most in all of what we

Show More
Related

  • Brutus and Antony’s Use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    (877) in order to make the crowd feel complete and utter guilt for their betrayal and anger towards the conspirators who killed their beloved idol. Brutus and Antony’s use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos throughout the novel are just examples of the everyday persuasion used around us daily, when reading the play it does look like one giant competition to see who is the most persuasive and influential character. Even in today’s economy, companies have to compete for the attention of consumers’ worldwide and politicians who argue their beliefs and views to millions of voters in order to get what they want, because the art of persuasion is just one big game. Works Cited Shakespeare, William. The.

    Read More

  • Is Brutus Caesar Guilty

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world Like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about to find ourselves dishonourable graves.” (1.2.136-139)

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rhetorical devices have been around for many centuries, and they are used to convince and persuade people to believe in their cause. These strategies exploit individuals by influencing them to feel sympathy or trust the speaker. In Julius Caesar, a historic tragedy written by the prominent Shakespeare, Antony’s brilliant rhetorical strategies are used to trump Brutus and prompt the Roman people to unite with his rebellion against the unjust butcher of the beloved Julius Caesar.

    Read More

  • Brutus vs Antony

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.

    Read More

  • Quotes Of Manipulation In Julius Caesar

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every person has their own individual beliefs and values that they live by. There is a line that one believes they will never cross. However, people can also be easily persuaded to abandon these values if the reasoning is fair enough. This is human nature. To manipulate someone is to use or change them for a specific purpose. In Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, he illustrates how easily people can change their minds through manipulation. He conveys how people can be manipulated, how they manipulate themselves, and how they manipulate others.

    Read More

  • Manipulation In Homer's Odyssey And Julius Caesar

    660 Words  | 2 Pages

    In almost all works of literature, people have used the concept of themes to further deepen the meaning of stories. Themes give stories dimension and allow the stories to have some sort of deep and philosophical lesson. If you look at Homer’s Odyssey and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, you will find that there are many relatable features concerning the two. Both of these works give themes about life and death to keep the main point of each passage interesting to the readers. One of the major life lessons and themes we see numerous of times throughout each of the texts is the rules of manipulation. Manipulation is very crucial to the survival of the characters in both the Odyssey and play, Julius Caesar. In this essay, I will use evidence from both works to demonstrate how manipulation is used within these texts and why it is used as a strength and a weakness.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar And Brutus Manipulation

    593 Words  | 2 Pages

    William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a tragic drama, set in Ancient Rome about the horrendous death of Julius Caesar. Brutus, leader of the conspiracy against Caesar, begins as Caesar’s friend. Cassius, instigator of the conspirator, manipulates Brutus into killing Caesar. Brutus agrees to this plan because of his plans for Rome. The bond between these two connects when Brutus agrees to Cassius about killing Caesar for the best of Rome. Cassius, very power hungry, comes up with a plan that will succeed in both of them killing Caesar. They both rely on each other because they want the power that Caesar has been requested to make the best of Rome. This dream of making Rome better was manipulated by Cassius to Brutus. However,

    Read More

  • Cassius' Manipulation of Brutus, the Noblest Roman of Them All, in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    687 Words  | 2 Pages

    Brutus is shown as being easily manipulated in the play. This trait is shown a few times in the play. At the beginning, Brutus is tricked by Cassius into believing that killing Julius Caesar would be for the better of Rome (1, 2, ll. 32-321). Cassius is able to deviously influence Brutus into thinking that Caesar is no different from Brutus. He says, “Brutus and Caesar: what should be in that Caesar?/ Why should that name be sounded more than yours?” (1, 2, ll. 142-143) Cassius also uses many other examples to manipulate Brutus. Later on, when the conspirators gather at Brutus’ home, Brutus believes that the other conspirators are killing Caesar for the good of Rome as well (2, 1, ll.114-116). After Brutus and the conspirators have killed Caesar, Mark Antony masks his anger ...

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    Playwright, William Shakespeare, in the play Julius Caesar, utilizes many instances of rhetorical devices through the actions and speech of Caesar's right-hand man, Mark Antony. In the given excerpt, Antony demonstrates several of those rhetorical devices such as verbal irony, sarcasm, logos, ethos, and pathos which allows him to sway the plebeians. The central purpose of Mark Antony’s funeral speech is to persuade his audience into believing that Caesar had no ill intentions while manipulating the plebeians into starting a rebellion against their new enemies, Brutus and the conspirators.

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Manipulation in Julius Caesar

    993 Words  | 2 Pages

    All in all, many characters in Julius Caesar are not able to achieve what they set out to do without their ability to manipulate the people around them. Despite knowing that being untruthful is not looked kindly upon in society, people constantly lie and deceive. The human desire to achieve one’s goals and receive what they want pressures people into falsification. At some point in everyone’s life, they tell at least a white lie in order to satisfy their desires. Manipulation is something that helps to define humanity and is inside every single one of us. In the end, people believe that their manipulation will benefit themselves, but the consideration of others is not always in one’s mind. This is seen in both the play and in society today.

    Read More

  • Brutus Character Analysis Essay

    1080 Words  | 3 Pages

    Brutus recognizes that the “enemies have beat [Brutus and the conspirators].. to a pit” and believes it is honorable “to leap in” themselves “than tarry till” the enemies force them (5.5.23-25). Hence, Brutus requests his servant to assist him in committing suicide and finally utters “Caesar, now be still / I kill’d not thee with half so good a will” (5.5.50-51). Brutus’s action exhibits his understanding of the killing of Caesar, and now views it as irreparable. Furthermore, Brutus takes notice of the fights and unending deaths around him all due to his naivety and failure to judge people’s evil side. As a result, Brutus views suicide as the most appropriate “method” to retain his honor and dignity; otherwise, he would have to encounter the Roman citizens’ criticization and would be humiliated for his actions. In addition, Brutus requests Caesar to be done with his vengeance and to forgive him as he acts solely for the best of Rome, displaying Brutus to be a tragic hero who failed doing his best for good. Furthermore, the play ends with Antony’s summary of Brutus’s character leaving the audience to characterize Brutus to be the one who suffered the most and died in a tragic way. Antony describes Brutus to be “the noblest Roman of them all…/ [and have acted] only in a general

    Read More

  • Anthony Manipulation In Julius Caesar

    600 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the, play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, we will talk about manipulation, manipulation can be defined as the action of manipulating someone in a clever or unscrupulous way. We will elaborate on the following people Anthony, Cassius, and Caesar. Firstly, Anthony, is probably the best manipulator at that time because there were many times he manipulated the Roman citizens with his clever talk, when he was allowed to talk at Caesar's funeral when he was saying the Brutus was an honorable man but his mean was way different also when he manipulated the citizen by making a fake will of Caesar so persuade the people, here are some evidence of him manipulating and persuading the Roman people “i only speak right on. I tell you thas which you yourselves do know” act 3 scene 2 line 220-21, “That Anthony speaks in his funeral.

    Read More

  • The Speech of Marcus Antonius in Julius Caesar

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    Antony, though he kept to his bargain, brought the audience to his side in a variety of ways. He used all three methods of persuasion to his advantage. He claimed the killers of Caesar to be honorable and noble, and in the very act of doing so turned Brutus' followers against him. This shows the true ability of Marcus Antonius, and that he is a far greater threat than the conspirators recognized. This power of words is well known, and Aristotle's three methods of persuasion live on in modern speechwriters. Ethos, logos, and pathos are just as effective in our time as in that of Shakespeare, the Roman Empire, and wherever there are people to speak and people to listen. Thus even today, this speech of Shakespeare through Antony shows the sheer impact that mere words can have.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Title Analysis

    602 Words  | 2 Pages

    Why would a title be a name of a fairly minor character? Yes Julius Caesar was a character of major power, but he was killed off in Act 3! The title should include Marcus Brutus, seeing as he is the actual main character. He was the one who was in the play a vast majority and made a very big impact on the plot!

    Read More

More about Manipulation In Julius Caesar Research Paper

Open Document