Introduction:
The practice of delaying a child’s enrollment in kindergarten until age 6 instead of the standard enrollment age of 5 is known as pre-primary academic redshirting. Originally the practice of holding back a child for a year from entering kindergarten in order to provide them an athletic advantage due to advanced physical maturity, the practice of redshirting has developed an emphasis on academic maturity, as redshirting allows students to enter kindergarten having an advantage over their younger and less mature peers in terms of academic preparedness. Redshirting for academic purposes has been on the rise in American schools, as nearly 17% of children in 2008 were admitted to kindergarten at age 6, whereas only 9% of children were admitted to kindergarten at age 6 back in 1993. The sudden increase in redshirting creates significant age and ability gaps in kindergarten classes, providing redshirted children with a better chance of academic success than their younger peers due to more maturity. However, redshirting is not
…show more content…
always necessary, as recent findings show that the majority of children are actually prepared for kindergarten by age 5. Despite this, the University of Virginia found that children are more likely to be redshirted if they come from a white or high socioeconomic status (SES) family, as these families are more likely to push academic achievement for their children, which may include delaying kindergarten in order to give a child an advantage. Malcolm Gladwell’s Theory The factors behind the sudden popularity of academic redshirting correspond with Malcolm Gladwell’s theory of success presented in his book, Outliers, which suggests that success can not be achieved on one’s own, rather it is determined by certain opportunities and their upbringing.
For example, Gladwell examines trends in the rosters of the elite Canadian Hockey League, finding that the majority of players were born in January, February, or March. Comparing these dates to the cutoff date for each age division, January 1, Gladwell proves that birthdates impact success, as the majority of hockey players who were older in each age division became successful because of maturing earlier than their younger peers in their age division. In terms of redshirting, Gladwell’s theory implies that a student who enters kindergarten one year older than the rest of their classmates will have a better chance of success due to earlier
maturity. Gladwell also develops a theory of how certain demographics contribute to academic success in Outliers by analyzing a study of multiple families and their management of their child’s academic career. The results of the study show that white, wealthy, and highly educated parents take more of an interest in their child’s academic career, often making efforts to provide their child with academic benefits over other students, whereas minority, low class, and less educated parents are less likely to insert themselves in their child’s academic career. Driven by the result of this study, Gladwell’s theory explains the trend in academic redshirting in white and high SES populations, as the clear benefits in redshirting appeal to these populations seeking success in their children’s academic careers. Population Factor: Hingham, Massachusetts Gladwell’s theory explains the rates of redshirting in Hingham, Massachusetts, where approximately 17% of second graders in the 2017-2018 school year were found to have been 6 years old when entering kindergarten, resulting in an large age gap in the second grade class. Compared to Hingham, the neighboring towns reflect lower rates of redshirting, as 10% of students in Cohasset and 8% of students in Hanover, Duxbury, and Braintree delayed entering kindergarten for a year due to their lower white and SES populations than those of Hingham. According to a 2010 census, Hingham’s population is 96.1% white and 1.3% Black or Hispanic. Due to the fact that white parents are more likely to redshirt, Hingham, a primarily white town, has a significant number of children who are redshirted. Hingham’s high SES population further contributes to the large number of students who are academically redshirted, as about 31% of Hingham residents have an average income of over $200,000, compared to 11% of Massachusetts residents who have an income over $200,000. With overall higher rates of high income in Hingham, families are more likely to get involved in the academic lives of their children, as wealthier families tend to push their children harder in school, hence, are more likely to redshirt their children. Further, 3% of parents who had completed up to the end of high school planned to delay their child’s kindergarten entry, whereas 12% of parents with a Bachelor’s degree or a higher degree were likely to delay their child’s kindergarten entry. According to a 2011 census, roughly 43.3% of Hingham residents have a Bachelor’s degree, ranking high above the national average of 30% of people with a Bachelor’s degree. Due to the fact that a significant portion of the population of Hingham is highly educated, Hingham has more parents who invest in the benefits of academic redshirting, as more educated parents are more likely to redshirt their children. Population Factor: Los Angeles, California Another area where academic redshirting in increasing in popularity is Los Angeles, California. The main factor in the trend of redshirting in Los Angeles is a high SES population, as the median household value in Los Angeles is$593,500 and 32.8% of Los Angeles residents have completed a Bachelor’s degree. In Los Angeles Public Schools, as stated in Gladwell’s theory, the large number of SES families contributes to the rates of redshirting in Los Angeles, as children coming from high SES families are more likely to be redshirted. However, Los Angeles Public Schools consists of 86% minority families, creating a lower redshirting rate compared to Hingham, as only 7.5% of students in Los Angeles Public Schools are redshirted. Compared to Hingham, Los Angeles has significantly more minorities, resulting in fewer cases of redshirting, as minority parents generally do not get as involved in their children’s academic lives as white parents do, hence, may not feel the need to further prepare their child for kindergarten by redshirting him or her. Birthdate Factor: In most American schools, the age cutoff date for enrollment is around early September, such as in California, where the cutoff date for enrollment is September 5. Students born just before date are usually put at a disadvantage, as by kindergarten, their older peers may be more developed and may exceed more in school due to their advantage in maturity. However, if a student with a birthday within close range of the cutoff date is redshirted, they would be older than the rest of their classmates, therefore more mature and developed by kindergarten, resulting in a better chance of future academic success. Recommendation Despite the academic benefits that students who are redshirted receive, the recent popularity of academic redshirting has resulted in an age division in kindergarten that puts many students at a disadvantage. In order to close the age gap in kindergarten classes, schools should create a requirement that students enroll only at the age of 5. For example, California will pass the Kindergarten Readiness Act over a three year period starting this year, which ensures that students are 5 years old by the time they enter kindergarten, while also providing a concrete cutoff date that divides classes into groups of students who are all less than a year apart from each other. This law would close the age gap in kindergarten classes, as no students would be age 6 at the beginning of the school year, hence, would not have an advantage over others. However, the one exception to these regulations that needs to be considered is children who were born close to the cutoff date for each year, as students who have just turned 5 are less developed than others who have turned 5 earlier in the year. By establishing these regulations, fewer kindergarteners would be redshirted, resulting in fewer disadvantages and less of an age and ability class in kindergarten classes.
In chapter 1, Gladwell used examples of professional hockey players to support this theory. He supplied data charts reflecting that the most successful hockey players were born in January, February and March. With January being the cutoff month, this would give those
In Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell argues that there is no such thing as a self-made man, and that success is only the result of a person’s circumstances. However, throughout the novel Gladwell points out that your circumstances and opportunities only help you become successful if you are willing to take advantage of them and work hard. From a twelve year old living in the Bronx, to those who were born at just the right time to become millionaires, one thing is the same throughout; these people because successful because they seized the opportunities they were given. The advantages and opportunities that came from their circumstances would not be important if they had not grasped them. Every successful man is self made, because he has seized the
Malcolm Gladwell is a canadian-english journalist, speaker, and bestselling author. In his bestselling book “Outliers”, Malcolm Gladwell discusses success and what patterns correlate with it. He states that how much time you put into a certain activity, specifically 10,000 hours, can put you in a elite level of proficiency. This in turn can give someone the tools to allow them the ability to be successful. Using historical citations, patterns, and real life examples, Gladwell forms his 10,000 hour rule. Due to his knowledgeable yet calm tone Gladwell seems to show credibility. His intended audience could be people who enjoy statistics or people who want to be successful and find possible ways to do so. Gladwell uses a logical appeal to show the patterns he has found through his studies of success. He supports his claim with overwhelming statistics which back it. He also uses similes to help better understand how he can relate the patterns he has found for the elite in a certain activity to other things. Foil is probably Gladwell's best means of convincing the reader to his thesis of the 10,000 hour rule. He uses Foil to compare success and we define to legends such as Bill Gates The Beatles and Bill Joy. Overall Gladwell uses Logos, similes, and foils to support his claim of the 10,000 hour rule.
Once in a while, it really hits people that they don’t have to experience the world in the way they have been told to. Gladwell believes that cultural legacies are powerful forces. Cultural legacies are the customs of a family or a group of people, that is inherited through the generations. According to Malcolm Gladwell’s book, Outliers, Cultural legacies is something that’s been passed down for generations to generations. It depends on what type of legacies was passed that will affect a person. If a good legacy was passed down, someone can keep that legacy going by trying hard at keeping the legacies going. If a bad legacy was passed down; I believe that cultural legacies can be altered or changed, by good working habits, determination, and a positive mindset to succeed. Culture can affect either positively or negatively, but we have the power to turn our cultural
Malcolm Gladwell makes many debatable claims in his book “The Outliers”. One of these controversial topics is brought up in chapter three when he talks about a person’s IQ and how that relates to one’s success. Gladwell says, “The relationship between success and IQ works only up to a point. Once someone has reached an IQ of somewhere around 120, having additional IQ points doesn’t seem to translate into any measurable real-world advantage.”After reading “Outliers” I believe that this is the greatest controversial topic. I agree with Malcolm Gladwell because there are a high amount of people who are not incredibly smart that are very successful, success can be viewed differently by different people, and from my own experiences on the U-High
Occasionally, it is important to be born during certain times of the year in order to become better at a task that is being performed. In other words, people may have advantages depending on the time of the year they are born. They practice more for a sport or get further help for school. Gladwell says that “A boy who turns ten on January 2, then, could be playing alongside someone who does not turn ten until the end of the year…a twelve month gap in age represents enormous differences in physical maturity”(24). What he means is that a young boy born in January may have a greater physical advantage than a boy born in December when it comes to playing hockey. This example can be applied to any other sport. When the child starts conditioning at 6, his friend will be 5 and still to young to condition giving the older kid the advantage to play better. Every country arranges the cut off dates differently according to the sport and the season it is played in. Gladwell says, “The cutoff date for almost all non-school baseball leagues in the United States is July 31, with the result that more major league players are born in August than any other month”(26). If players are...
Shapiro, E.S. (2011). Saving the future: Response to intervention may be on solution that prevents a child’s ailing academic health. Theory to Practice: An Inquisitive Review of Contemporary Education & Health, 3, 14-19.
Sindelar, R. (2004). Recess: Is it needed in the 21st Century? Clearinghouse on Early Education and Parenting, Vol. 18, Issue 1, 1-6.
Each and every person has their own thoughts and opinions throughout life, no matter how alike or different two individuals can be. In this generation, anyone can speak freely and debate as they please. Two very important individuals Carol Dweck whom is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, and Malcolm Gladwell whom is a Canadian journalist and speaker created two inciting pieces. “Mind-Sets and Equitable Education” by Dweck, and “The Matthew Effect” by Gladwell, are very similar as well as different pieces of writing. Dweck and Gladwell’s arguments appear different’ in reality due to education and sports, mindsets, and achieving success.
Statics from the US Census Bureau reveal that just under half of all 3-4 year old children attended preschool in 2013. This is the also the same year that most school districts across the country adapted to a full day of kindergarten, rather than a half day. This means that children now will be expected to handle a 6 hour day of learning and, consequently; for those children who do not attend preschool this could be a real challenge. Preschool not only helps a child with social and emotional skills, it also provides a strong foundation for academic learning. It gives them an opportunity to become familiar with routine in a structured learning environment and can help make the transition to a full day of kindergarten even easier. Yet, there are still some parents who feel -- for many reasons, preschool is unnecessary and choose not to send them.
In Chapter 8 and 9 of Outliers: The Story of Success, Gladwell exams some of the ways that Asian and American students learn math, arguing that some of the principles in the US education system should be reconsidered. I generally agree with Gladwell’s point of view. I believe in two ways, students ' principal spirit and the length of students’ studying, the US education system leaves much to be desired, though an overhaul is in progress.
Children’s development, including their brain development, and the differences, both physically and emotionally that, children go through when transitioning into kindergarten. Reviews of different forms have evidence concluding that these programs have short, medium, and long-term benefits that suggest the effects are often greater for more disadvantaged children. “Some of the evidence from model research has produced exciting results in terms of improving educational attainment and earnings and reducing welfare dependency and crime.” (Currie, 2001). “To the point where cost-benefit analysis of these programs suggests they would eventually pay for themselves in terms of cost-savings to the government if it produced even a quarter of the long-term gains of model programs.” (Currie, 2001). This is one of the reasons the government has been pouring an abundance of money into these programs, in fact, Obama just recently announced a one billion dollar investment in early childhood education. “Obama said that less than one-third of 4-year-olds enrolled in preschool and blamed the high cost of these programs for essentially shutting off access to poorer infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. “ (Obama announces $1 billion investment, 2015, p. 1). “He said studies repeatedly show that children who are educated early in life are more likely to
Many children begin school at the ages of 5 or 6, the age when a child enters kindergarten. However, children?s learning capabilities are at there peak at earlier ages than that. Alison Gopnik, a professor of psychology at the University of California at Berkeley says, ?Children learn more in their early years than they ever will again. With the dissolution of the extended family, the best way to support early learning is with publicly funded pre-K? (Starr, 2002). Their brains are more primed to learn and will absorb more information earlier in life. Therefore the earlier children begin their education, the better. It is through these programs that the children learn proper etiquettes when dealing with teachers and fellow students. ?Children who attend well-planned, high quality programs?tend to learn more and are better prepared to successfully master the complex demands of formal schooling,? says one government commissioned review of research on early childhood education (Ruben, 2000/2001).
McWayne, C., Cheung, K., Green Wright, L. E., & Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2012). Patterns of school readiness among head start children: Meaningful within-group variability during the transition to kindergarten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 862-878. doi: 1939-2176
At first glance, there is some evidence that the redshirted children perform better initially (Zill, Loomis, & West, 1997, p. 40). However, unlike in sports, the effect doesn’t last. Erikson Institute President Emeritus Samuel Meisels states, “as children get older…whatever advantage is conferred by starting school a year older decreases dramatically” (Safer, 2012). One study by Oshima and Domaleski (2006) compares students with summer birthdays against children with prior fall birthdays to determine the effect of age on