Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of moral education
The importance of teaching moral values at school
Importance of moral education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of moral education
character education where ‘universal values’ are targeted, it also relies heavily on the opinion of an individual teacher (Noel, 1997).
Main themes and feature of morality in education
The main purposes of revisiting main features of morality are to consider and examine the relevance of morality in its narrow specification within education settings. By doing so, it helps the study to acknowledge and taking these features as the guidance tool for the understanding and the argument of the classroom’s morality discourse in the coming section. First of all, it is emphasised that teaching is itself a moral act. Secondly, the issues of morality in the classroom is not straightforward, yet is more complex and subtle. Lastly, it is there is always
…show more content…
Moral authority is considered a crucial role in most of stage of classroom process. Studies even point out the moral authority of a teacher is the precondition for the academic authority to take place and this moral authority is “premised on principles, or fundamental truths, which are independent of written, or positive, laws” (Grover, 2015). This shares similarities with the indoctrinative feature of character education discussed earlier. And as being so closely associated to the idea of power relations in the classroom, morality and its practical translation within the classroom discourse are taken as central issues in this section. In conjunction to the moral dimension of education and teaching (Johnston, 2002b) that emphasises the role of school and education to be places that promote specific set of society values and beliefs, the teachers are considered centre in the process of carrying out this institutional mission. However, the context of classroom is so dynamics and instilled with various conflict forces and relations, for example, the conflict between teacher’s belief and those of her students, it calls for resort to power relations to carry out the matter of moral influence (Buzzelli and Johnston,
McNeel, S. (1994). College teaching and student moral development. In J. Rest, & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 27-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
The purpose of this paper is to find evidence of Kohlberg 's and Piagets moral stages for adolecents. We are going to ask a teenager a series of different questions in an interview in order to find out where exactly they fit in Kohlberg’s and Piaget’s moral stages and if the fall in the one designated for teenagers, Postconventional and Autonomous morality respectivly. According to these theorist, adolescents are starting to form their own ideas of what is right and wrong and using their ideals to see what they would do in certain situations.
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Character education…our shared responsibility. Retrieved August 22, 2011 from http://www2.ed.gov.
“Once a teacher has identified an opening in the curriculum for exploring a moral value, the next step is to plan an effective lesson or unit around that value. That means selecting good materials (Lickona, 1991, p. 170)”. I feel this book is exactly that, a riveting story that can expose students to great moral values.
(2012). Vygotsky from ZPD to ZCD in moral education: reshaping Western theory and practices in local context. Journal Of Moral Education, 41(2), 225-243. doi:10
When one thinks about morals, he or she often find himself in difficulty. It is a fact that morals are mostly passed from one generation to another. However, we all face challenges when trying to understand whether they are all accurate or not. To start with, Morals are those values that normally protect life and always respectful of the dual life value of individual and others. Therefore, Morals are those rules that normally govern actions that re wrong or right. We know that morals may be for all people in the society or individual beliefs in the society. Some of the great morals include freedom, charity, truth, honesty and patience and all of them have a common goal. It is a fact that when they function well in the society, they end up protecting and enhancing life. These morals need to be examined always to make sure that they are performing their mission of protecting life. As a matter of fact, morals are derived from the government and society, self and religion. When morals are derived from the government and society, they tend to change as the morals and laws of the society changes. An example of the changes is seen in the cases of marriage versus individuals living together. It is true that in the past generation, it was quite rare to see any couple living together without having any legal matrimonial ceremony. However, this
In “The Essential Agrarian Reader,” Norman Wirzba claims that “it is only as we are faithful to the particularities and demands of place and accept responsibility for our actions in those places, that we can claim to be moral beings at all” ( Wirzba 95). Without recognizing the effects of our actions on a certain place we cannot consider ourselves moral individuals. In this paper, I will argue that this claim is correct because without a sense of accountability, a connection to morality cannot be made.
Philosophical musings on the nature of morality are often expressed by thinkers who focus on human nature. Among the factors which determine human behaviour, a moral analysis of the concepts of right and wrong is often prominent. In investigating human behaviour through the relationship between reflection and action, this morality is often observed. Therefore, in the course currently entitled Human Sciences 101: Reflection and Action, both phiolosophy and morality are key themes. However, the calendar description for the course is as follows, “What is the relationship between thinking and action? Do they pull us in different directions? Can they be integrated? This course investigates how our own dialogue with core texts, from antiquity (e.g., Homer, Plato, Christian Scriptures) to the present (e.g., Joyce, Arendt), offers ways of understanding the dilemmas and issues raised by these texts and present in our culture” (Waterloo 2013). The description lacks a mention of the philosophical concepts of morality within the course's content. One of the core texts of the course where morality can be seen is Saint Augustine's Confessions, where Augustine explores a theological philosophy. The theme of morality is also seen in René Descartes' Discourse on Method and Related Writings, where Descartes proposes a scientific moral philosophy. Hannah Arendt's Eichmann in Jerusalem also explores morality through a philosophical examination of the relationship between thinking and committing evil. Therefore, the writings of Augustine, Descartes and Arendt each exhibit a philosophical perspective on morality which can be tied to the course's central theme of reflection and action. [END OF INTRODUCTION]
... is learned through life experience, through the people who raise and teach. Through these life experiences, morality morphs into a belief system one may choose to believe in. This system whether good or bad, allows for humans to follow a certain path. Without this moral belief system, the world would go into chaos. Both writers discussing the idea of morality provide an essential opinion in the world. Their arguments not only teach people how to act, but how to treat one another throughout life. Morality allows people to be at their best, by forcing individuals to be accountable for their actions, and makes a person learn from their own mistakes. Through reading both these works, it is obvious that in order to have morality in the workplace, one must first have a strong personal moral ground. Morality is necessary in order to exceed in the professional world.
“Everywhere and at all levels social life offers us the daily spectacle of authority fulfilling its primary function – of man leading man on, of the ascendancy of a settled will which summons and orients uncertain wills” (Jouvenel, 1957, p.30). As Plato remarked, authority stems from a man’s ability to direct members of society to the ultimate good (VanderStaay et al., 2009). Authority, in this regard, is thus crucial to achieve the common good in any society, including the academic one (Johnston, 1963; Spring, 1999). Any approval or refusal of particular perspectives of authority, to some extent, determines what takes place in schools (Wilson, 1977). Current educational research has been piloted on exploring authority in teacher-student relationship (VanderStaay et al., 2009; Macleod et
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Character education…our shared responsibility. Retrieved August 20, 2011 from http://www2.ed.gov.
Morals are defined as expressing or teaching a conception of either behaviour. Teaching moral values to a child are usually the responsibility of the parents. A parent influences a child at a young age, although as they mature they have the ability to accept or reject their traits. In the play, A Taste of Honey, author Shelegh Delaney illustrates the impact a parent has on a child, and how their decisions can affect the way in which they control their lives. Children are influenced by their parents and this is reflected in their behaviour, which is dependent on the morals instilled in them from birth.
Teacher Ethics “Ethics are defined as a set of principles of right conduct; the rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or the members of a profession” (Dictionary of the Human Language, 2000). Teachers are often put in situations that require more than just knowing the basic school rules. It is within these situations, that the ethical dilemmas occur. There is not always a right way to deal with the many daily problems that face educators, but there are ways to handle situations that are better than others. Teachers should follow and refer to a code of ethics to help teach in the most appropriate and ethical way as well as a guide to help deal with dilemmas.
Effective character education programs need to include many main beliefs. It is said that “Character education promotes core ethical values as the basis of good character.” This means that some values which include caring, honesty, fairness, responsibility, and respect for self and others are all essential to building character education. The hope is that schools that implement character education programs look at these values as obligations for the student to uphold. The second thing that character education needs to have is thinking, emotion, and behavior.
In a society with a vast array of different beliefs and mediums through which these beliefs are presented, children can get lost in an overwhelming sea of influential ideas and concepts not necessarily intended for their eyes and ears. Character education is a concept that calls for teachers and school curriculums to guide students in learning what Edward F. DeRoche and Mary M. Williams (2001, p. 25) described as “core values held sacred by a democratic society.” Parents are generally considered the teachers of morals, but if values like sharing, compassion, and honesty are never enforced or addressed outside the home, these values may never be established as a stable foundation in the child’s mind. Character education’s purpose is to help children choose to be well-mannered, stable, cooperative individuals. Character education is not in every school system, but its support is growing along with the amount of research evidence increasing in its favor (Viadero, 2003). The teaching of values in education has evolved into character education, and today there are different studies, designs, and resources for character education programs in schools to foster moral growth and citizenship in children.