Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Attitudes toward marriage
Attitudes toward marriage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Maggie Gallagher’s article “Why Marriage is Good for You” list some key points as to why marriage could possibly be good for someone. The topic itself is not an easy ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer. It is a very dynamic topic of discussion that undoubtedly requires a significant amount of evidence to prove why a person feels one way or the other. Gallagher attempts to prove why she thinks marriage is in fact good for people. Some of her points are not as strongly supported as they should be. In order to give such a bold statement, a person a needs to have good evidence to support their argument. Gallagher gives the notion that marriage always makes things better for people. As that may be true, it is important to back up that statement with something …show more content…
She implies that a man who is single and educated in any profession will make less money than a married man, due to a marriage premium. Her only comparisons are single men and married men, and her factors are education and job history. But there are so many other factors that will determine how much money a man will make. Regardless of being married or not, things like health status, job experience, and race, can all be factors in determining how much an employer is willing to pay someone. If Gallagher would’ve incorporated other factors into her theory, she could have made her statement …show more content…
“Divorce weakens the bonds between parents and children over the long run. Adult children of divorce describe relationships with both their mother and their father less positively, on average, and they are about 40 percent less likely than adults from intact marriages to say they see either parent at least several times a week” (Gallagher). This statement could be better supported if only Gallagher would have included test results of teenage or younger children of divorced parents. She could have also had other factors such as the results of the children who stayed with mom compared to children who stayed with dad. At the end of the day, regardless of the status of the parents’ relationship, a child will love whichever parent is around more. To whichever parent that shows more love, compassion, and interest. To whichever one who shows that they
Human beings are not isolated individuals. We do not wander through a landscape of trees and dunes alone, reveling in our own thoughts. Rather, we need relationships with other human beings to give us a sense of support and guidance. We are social beings, who need talk and company almost as much as we need food and sleep. We need others so much, that we have developed a custom that will insure company: marriage. Marriage assures each of us of company and association, even if it is not always positive and helpful. Unfortunately, the great majority of marriages are not paragons of support. Instead, they hold danger and barbs for both members. Only the best marriages improve both partners. So when we look at all three of Janie’s marriages, only her marriage to Teacake shows the support, guidance, and love.
Is marriage really important? There is a lot of controversy over marriage and whether it is eminent. Some people believe it is and some people believe it is not. These opposing opinions cause this controversy. “On Not Saying ‘I do’” by Dorian Solot explains that marriage is not needed to sustain a relationship or a necessity to keep it healthy and happy. Solot believes that when a couple gets married things change. In “For Better, For Worse”, Stephanie Coontz expresses that marriage is not what is traditional in society because it has changed and is no longer considered as a dictator for people’s lives. The differences between these two essays are the author’s writing style and ideas.
Wilson makes strong points to show that marriage is good for human interaction, he fails to mention the aspects of marriage that take a toll on someone. He says that “our desire for sexual unions and romantic attachments is as old as humankind, and they will continue forever.”(431), but he does not state that marriage takes hard work and that it is not easy as pie.. The only negative point he focuses on is the financial aspect of marriage, when it is much more than that. When speaking about cohabitation, he states that it is merely a form of being single. He does not touch on the aspects of how it may progress to marriage; he simply says it will end within two years, again with no references to back this up. Wilsons attempts to convince the reader that marriage is the only way they will be able to stay in love because the incentive to stay together is much higher than living in cohabitation because you have invested that much more. He states that living in cohabitation “… I stop loving you; I walk away.” He continues saying that he fails to write about the house they could be renting, or even bought together and many other investments that people are living together purchase and pay for, even if it is
In the article “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” the author, Stephanie Coontz, talks about how love has rarely been the motivating reason for marriage, and how in many cultures it still isn’t. She also informs readers of the reasons why people got married in ancient cultures, different types of motivations for marriage in modern cultures, how the union between spouses often isn’t the most important relationship in other countries, and how marriage is often not monogamous.
“At current rates, about 40% of U.S. children will witness the breakup of their parents’ marriages before they reach 18” (Cherlin). This started as a prediction that was thought up almost forty years ago, in 1984. Today, this is more or less an everyday occurrence; not every divorce is the same. Yet society tends to lean towards stereotypes of divorce, when it comes to the children and how they should be acting because of the divorce.
Inside the article “Why Marriage is Good for You”, Maggie Gallagher makes claims that marriage improves many facets of an individual’s life; including both mental and physical health, longevity, finances, and reduced chances of infidelity (Gallagher). The statements made throughout the article reference many statistics and studies conducted by various organizations and individuals, however, Gallagher falls victim to a number of common logical fallacies. While this weakens Gallagher’s argument in the article, it does not necessarily make it false.
The definition of American family is based on the idea that a legally married couple shares a household, which has been considered as a male that provides the income and a female who is responsible for taking care of the husband, household and children. Even though, Maggie Gallagher in her essay the benefits of marriage in “Why marriage is good for you,” states that she is trying to promote the return to more traditional view of marriage within the society. However, there is a controversy that American family is experiencing changes in every aspect, being on decline as a consequence of three factors. First, more babies are born in extramarital relations, second, individualism of men and women including same sex couples, and third, the high rates of divorce.
Waite and Gallagher’s (2001) book, The Case for Marriage: Why Married People are Happier, Healthier, and Better off Financially, is about the justification for the importance of marriage. The authors (2001) use research and controlled studies based on sociology, economics, medicine, psychology, sexology, and law, to address the issues of the anti-marriage debate and myths about marriage in modern American society. The authors use the finding from the research and studies to compose the effects and benefits of being married. According to Waite and Gallagher (2001) the marriage population is better off physically, mentally, economically, socially, and sexually compared to the single population, divorce population, cohabitation population, and same sex-couples populations. Waite and Gallagher (2001) first present the five myths about the post marriage culture war and then contribute their rebuttal for each myth
In Linda J. Waite’s research “Does Marriage Matter?” , she is trying to encourage people demographers to share their knowledge of the benefits of marriage in order to influence the decisions of laypeople and public officials. Therefore, she presents a consolidated account of the major benefits of marriage. Waite proceeds to address the question: Does marriage matter? She provides a number of benefits which married people enjoy over non-married people, beginning with healthy behavior.
Additionally, marriage will support children to become productive citizens. Marriage is a self-sacrificing act of devotion to another human being. After several years, marriage has been under scrutiny. Though, starting in the mid-80s and forward on society has failed to acknowledge the common good of marriage, and what it has to offer. The government is not going to add their two sense into promoting programs, which will save marriages. However, what about the people who still believe in it, or need to save their own marriage that is on the brink of divorce. The government feels that marriage is not worth saving since it’s not for every person. It is understandable that marriage is not for everybody, but let the entire world a fair chance at the opportunity of
It is unfortunate that marriages sometimes end and there are children caught in the middle of the marriage but it may be worst for the parents to stay together simply for the children’s sake. However when parents do divorce the children are the most effected by the divorce. Often enough the divorce causes children to feel displaced and also to have feelings that their world is coming to an end. These children tend to grow into adults with either extreme emotional detachment and self-esteem issues or they will have strong family values and try to prevent the cycle from repeating itself but the majority of these children grow up suffering from the divorce.
The increasing numbers of couples choosing cohabitation over marriage may seem like the institution of marriage is falling apart and that many people today no longer understand the rules and assumptions of marriage. As I read the article “The Deinstitutionalization of Marriage Revisited: A New Institutional Approach to Marriage” by Sean Lauer and Carrie Yodanis, I learned that the approach to an alternative is not necessarily the deinstitutionalization of marriage itself as much as the discrimination present in the institution of marriage that prohibits the entrance of some individuals that are unable to meet the requirements to marry even if they wanted to. However, I go on to argue that marriage as an institution that promises social security
These authors are Waite and Gallagher in ‘The Case for Marriage’ and Brady’s ‘Why I Want a Wife’. It is evident that both readings recognize the importance of marriage to people in the modern world. This
Marriage naturally creates families; it provides the conditions for a healthy environment that is beneficial to the upbringing of children. Opponents of same-sex marriage often ground their arguments on parental and religious concerns. Many argue that sa...
“Marriage is good for your health." Miami Herald [Miami, FL] 11 Feb. 2005. Academic OneFile. Web. 13 April. 2011