Macbeth: It's Only Natural Versus Unnatural

1215 Words3 Pages

Macbeth: It's Only Natural [Versus Unnatural]
The importance of a particular work, in the eyes of society, can be wholly valued upon the work's ability to influence that society's populace - of the potential for reaction amongst the people of that civilization. The moment that a work loses its relevance is the second that it loses its shape and form as well, and is the point at which that work softly curves back into the vast. With regards to Shakespeare's Macbeth, the question may be asked if whether or not such an old story could still make a meaningful connection with people who are thousands of years outside of its original audience. Is modern humanity still, at its core, enough alike its predecessor to allow for the general society to …show more content…

Although often influenced by the input of others, Macbeth undertakes heinous acts through his own ambition, proving time and again that though the actions may not have been suggested by his own conscious, he is, nevertheless, freely willing to perform them. From the very dawn of mankind, itself, a persistent theme seems to ring out, that “[w]hoever sows injustice reaps calamity, and the rod they wield in fury will be broken” (Proverbs 22.8). When man acts in a way that does not conform to the nature of his Creator, then he will surely bring destruction upon himself. In Macbeth, there were many people in positions of “unchecked power”, as that is often the norm for the kinds of governmental powers that were within the time period portrayed, but the ones who were most shown to be affected by a tragic downfall due to corruption were the same people who rebelled against the decent nature of God and instead took matters into their own hands and attempted to climb the social ranks through the means of cheating and

Open Document