Incompatibilities Between Evolutionary and Behavioral Archaeology

1105 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Overview of metaphors we live by

Michael J. O’Brien, R Lee Lyman, and Roberts D. Leonard’s article “Basic incompatibilities between Evolutionary and Behavioral Archaeology” is in response to Michael Brian Schiffer’s article “Some Relationships between Behavioral and Evolutionary Archaeologies”. The main reason for this comment article is because O’Brien, Lyman, and Leonard are all evolutionary archaeologists. O’Brien, Lyman, and Leonard attempt to argue that there are several important reasons that evolutionary and behavioral archaeology cannot work together. This claim was in response to what Schiffer had proposed in his article “there is no fundamental reason why these two programs cannot work in concert to achieve the goal of explaining behavioral (or evolutionary change in human societies.” (Schiffer 1996:643) O’Brien, Lyman, and Leonard primarily focused on the “metaphysical …show more content…

O’Brien, Lyman and Leonard have vastly different approaches to the same question that Schiffer is trying to answer. Schiffer’s main approach is that the actives of past people are what behavioral narratives/theories are centralized on. Whereas O’Brien, Lyman and Leonard approach is more centered on Darwinian evolution, and that “evolutionary archaeology has many parallels to modern paleobiology” (O’Brien, Lyman and Leonard 1998:487), which evolutionary archaeology borrows concepts and approaches from. O’Brien, Lyman and Leonard do make light of that, “before a truly integrative approach to the historical study of humans and their artifacts merges-that is, one that investigates the evolutionary pathways of humans and the groups in which they live we must make clear what the points of contention are among the various approaches” (O’Brien, Lyman and Leonard 1998:495), which is true, that the only real reason that behavioral and evolutionary archaeology is because of the approaches they both

Show More
Related

  • The Piltdown Hoax Perpetrator: Charles Dawson the Prime Suspect In this Crime against Anthropology

    2684 Words  | 6 Pages

    Humanity became fascinated with the idea of evolution with the work of Charles Darwin and the Scientific Revolution. People began hunting for fossils that would prove that man had an ape derived ancestry (Weiner, 1955). After various years of searching, a piece of physical evidence was found in England that was said to confirm the theory of evolution (Weiner, 1955).This confirmation came from Charles Dawson’s discoveries from 1908, that were announced publicly in 1912 (Thackeray, 2011). Dawson was believed to have found the fossil remains of the “missing link” between ape and human evolution, the reconstructed skull of Piltdown man (Augustine, 2006). The material was found in stratigraphical evidence and animal remains that were, at the time, adequate enough to confirm the antiquity of the remains (Weiner, 1955). In 1915, another specimen, Piltdown man II, was found further proving this theory (Augustine, 2006). However, this was merely a hoax proven by fluorine relative dating in 1953; the artifacts and bone fragments discovered turned out to be altered to fit the proposed scenario (Augustine, 2006). The skull found was actually composed of a human braincase that was younger than the complimentary orangutan lower jaw (Falk, 2011). Both sections of the skull had been stained to appear to be from the same person of the same age (Falk, 2011).The perpetrator of this act was never caught and there are many theories proposed for the motive of this hoax (Augustine, 2006). Many people have been taken into consideration for this crime, such as Chardin, Woodward, Hinton, and Dawson (Augustine, 2006). Nevertheless, the evidence that proves that Dawson is guilty of this crime against anthropology is quite substantial compared to the evidence...

    Read More

  • Interbreeding Between Neandertals and Modern Humans

    1344 Words  | 3 Pages

    The human archaeological record is a long and undefined story that may be the most complex question researched today. One of the big questions in human history is the disappearance of the Neanderthal people from the archaeological record around 30,000 BP. While for thousands of years Neanderthals and Anatomically modern humans crossed paths and perhaps lived in close relations, we have yet to really understand the degree to which they lived together. My hypothesis is that these two hominids, Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans, interbred exchanging genes after Modern Humans dispersed from Africa and creating like cultures and material remains. The differences between Neanderthal and Modern humans are not only physical but also genetically evolved and this research will determine an estimated amount of admixture between the two groups.

    Read More

  • Perspective and the Right Reasons View in Solving Epistemic Disagreements.

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    In “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement”, Thomas Kelly gives two responses to the question “How should awareness of disagreement, with those that you take to be your epistemic equal, effect the rational confidence you have in your beliefs?”. Kelly discusses two possible responses to the question. The first is Richard Foley's first person perspective argument. Adam Elga calls the second the right reasons view (Elga, 2007 pg. 485). Kelly pursues the latter, and does not go further than agreeing with Foley that we should only view these disputes with a first person perspective.

    Read More

  • Scavenger hunt

    836 Words  | 2 Pages

    The idea that early hominids were powerful players in the ancient is slowly slipping away. Evidence is emerging that our ancestors were not great hunters, but scavengers that roamed the savanna looking for leftovers. Pat Shipman, discusses how it would be possible for early hominids to survive as strangers and how this method of cultivation affected human evolution. Shipman, uses the marks that stone tools, and teeth would make on the bones of prey animals as evidence for her hypothesis. She theorizes that early hominids weren't mighty hunter, but cunning scavengers.

    Read More

  • Natural Selection, Scale, and Cultural Evolution

    965 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dunnell believed that evolutionary biology is a better method to explain evolution in cultural anthropology and archaeology rather than cultural evolution. The main problem with biological evolution is the dilemma of altruistic behavior in humans, which is the exact opposite of natural selection. Dunnell states that altruistic behavior is “the ultimate of the selfish principles” (Dunnell 1996: 26). The original solution to the issue of altruistic behavior was thought to be to change the scale of which natural selection works from that of the individual to the group. However, Dunnell gives three reasons why this change usually would not work. First, the individual, not the group, is the mean by which the reproductivity occurs. Second, the individual is the mean by which observable characteristics show themselves. Finally, changes in higher levels of ranking in society, such as that of the group, are too slow for ...

    Read More

  • Similarities Of Neanderthals

    1464 Words  | 3 Pages

    As the earliest extinct human relatives to become known to science, the Homo neanderthalensis have snatched a relatively iconic influence in human evolutionary investigations. A significance that has been enormously reinforced by the substantial behavioral and fossil record that has expanded since the original Feldhofer Cave skullcap and partial skeleton were unexpectedly uncovered in 1856, by miners working in Germany’s Neander Valley (Tattersall & Jeffrey 1999: 7117-7119). ‘The Neanderthals’ is the informal classification of a particular group of large-brained hominids whom inhabited Europe and Western Asia between 130,000 to around 35,000 years ago. Complementary human populations lived at the same time in Africa and Asia. The Neanderthals were a highly successful race for a substantial period of time, but this situation chang...

    Read More

  • Paradigm The Paradigm

    1558 Words  | 4 Pages

    Therefore, it’s difficult to start a conversation between geologists, archaeologists and historians. It’s vital to narrow the research prospects in these fields but also I think there needs to be more scientific discourse between different fields that affect each other in one way or another. The human historical paradigm is grounded in the research of archaeology. However, Hancock debates that the field of geology has more to teach humans about our history than we think. He debates that around 15,000 to 8,000 BC, during the last ice age, an unprecedented world-wide cataclysm was overlooked that led to the extinction of countless species, including the megafauna (Hancock

    Read More

  • Understanding Early Man : Scientific Discovery vs. Emotionally Driven Hypothesis

    670 Words  | 2 Pages

    The ways in which we attempt to determine the history of early man say much more about who we are today, and who we will be tomorrow, and who we want to be today, and who we want to be tomorrow, than they do about who we were in the past. This statement comes from a person who knows little about science, and less about the specific scientific techniques used in archeological excavation and analysis. But it seems to me that much of the observations that are made in the study of early man are predicated as much on new theory as they are on old observation, and much of the old observation seems to be based on how humans act now, rather than in the past.

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Early Humans and Their Environment

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    In A Green History of the World, Clive Ponting analyzes human history from humans' hunter-gatherer roots, their ability to stand upright, their use of speech, and their use of tools. Mary Stiner would emphasize that although these aspects of humanity are important, it is just as fruitful, if not more so, to study the interactions of humans with their faunal counterparts. In doing so, one can try to uncover the reasons why humans evolved into large predators capable of using speech and tools to survive rather than remain like their primate relatives, who are relatively non-predatory. In Stiner's article, "Modern Human Origins - Faunal Perspectives," she emphasizes that because of changes within human beings themselves and changes in the environment (climactic conditions and types of surrounding predators, competitors, and prey) were human beings able to perhaps diverge from these primates with non-modern human characteristics and instead evolve to resemble their predatory competitors.

    Read More

  • What´s Evolutionary Psychology?

    2527 Words  | 6 Pages

    Many of the most prominent critics of Evolutionary Psychology (Buller and Kaplan) are deeply skeptical of Evolutionary Psychology’s two defining tenets. The first tenet says the human mind is “massively modular,” composed of a myriad of independent, special purpose (“domain-specific”) modules, each evolved to help our ancestors survive and reproduce during the hunter-gather period of human evolution. The second tenet focuses on the idea that no subsequent cognitive adaptations to novel environments have occurred (Machery 2007; Rellihan 2012). According to prominent critic David Buller (2005), evolutionary psychologists think that humans are a le...

    Read More

  • The American Museum Of Natural History: Anthropology

    1858 Words  | 4 Pages

    also films that could have been seen for a small price, but if one has the time

    Read More

  • Cognitive Evolution

    789 Words  | 2 Pages

    The emergence of modern cognition has been fundamental in separating early humans from our primate predecessors but archaeology and anthropology has provided diverse arguments the precise moment this came to be. There have been separate claims that the modern mind could have come to be when early humans created the first stone tools, the first personal ornamentation or the first artworks. In a deeper analysis it become clearer that the first complex thought came about not from any of those single events but rather a combination of the first two scenarios mentioned as the third scenario supports the claim. The human spark cannot be identified by the development of technology alone but rather by the gradual change that occurs between the innovations of stone tools and personal ornamentation known as the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Period.

    Read More

  • The Study of Archaeology

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most key examples of understanding human culture through archaeology is the topic of climate and the environment. As seen through history, there is an intricate relationship between the environment and life on earth. Through extensive research, archaeologists have the ability to take note of minor cultural changes that can be attributed to the environment during a particular time period. These changes include, shifts in methods of food collection, changes in the artwor...

    Read More

  • The Upper Paleolithic

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    Milliken, S. (2007). Neanderthals, anatomically modern humans, and ‘modern human behaviour’ in italy. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 26(4), 331-358. Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp1r.riosalado.edu/ehost/detail?sid=cae2e42e-6569-4993-a8c4-134211362cdc@sessionmgr113&vid=5&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ==

    Read More

  • Paleolithic Culture

    834 Words  | 2 Pages

    The cultural innovations analyses presented here illustrate the presence of cumulative cultural evolution in the upper Paleolithic and portray how a steady rate of change continuous with that seen in later human history. This should serve to encourage interests in the internal process of evolution that may tend to produce a smooth curve, including the possible the autocatalytic effects of the increasing technological

    Read More

More about Incompatibilities Between Evolutionary and Behavioral Archaeology

Open Document