Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Digital media and print media effects on society
The impact of electronic media
The scope of the impact of digital media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Louis Daguerre: Capturing the Invention that Changed Photography Today
Photography is a part of almost everyone's everyday life whether it is through a smartphone, laptop, or professional camera. Before the late 1800s, though, even a simple picture was not possible. Although many people worked hard and put their ideas and inventions of new cameras in the world, Louis Daguerre is among one of the most important. Michael Hart, in his book, The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History, ranks Daguerre as the 47th most influential person in the world. This ranking is appropriate because of the many ways his invention influenced today's world. His technique was practical and widely used in the 1800s. Although his methods are different
…show more content…
from the modern ways of photography today, his Daguerreotype provided the world with a basic structure of today's camera. The influence of events that occurred before Daguerre's invention, the impact on the world that his invention accomplished, and the effect of his new techniques on the modernized world caused Michael Hart to consider him one of the most influential persons in history. In Daguerre’s early life, things were very different in the means of photography. Until the mid-19th century, the only way to record a scene was to paint or draw it and Daguerre wanted something better (Buckminster 391). Louis Daguerre’s motives for his invention started during his early life. Daguerre was born in Cormeilles, France in 1787. Not much is known about his early life except that when he was around sixteen, he became a scene paper and set designer. He was also the first to use gas lamps to light the stage (Buckminster 382). ¨In the early nineteenth century, the camera obscura had shrunk to the size of a small box and was fitted with adjustable lens. A mirror positioned inside the box would flip the image right-side up. The image could then be traced on paper and accurate dimensional rations could be obtained¨ (Driscoll). Daguerre wanted to find an easier way to capture what was going on in the world. Ideas of photography and inventions of other innovators had already been introduced into the world when Daguerre was a child. Many of the inventors that came up with ideas for the camera didn't follow through with them, unlike Daguerre, which is why he gets credited with the invention of the camera. One of Daguerre's main reasons for inventing his Daguerreotype was so he could record life in America through the pre-Civil war period (Driscoll). He wanted to find a way to more efficiently copy images realistically. The same idea had occurred to Joseph-Nicephore Niepce in 1814. Niepce had been trying to capture sunlight on paper by using the camera obscura and combining chemicals based on silver that changed color when left in light to create the first photograph (Buckminster 393). Daguerre and Niepce made a partnership to come up with a new invention, the Daguerreotype. In Louis Daguerre's time of significance he created an invention that would change the photography era.
With help from Niepce’s son, Daguerre invented the Daguerreotype. “First, he took a copper plate, coated it in silver, and treated it with iodine vapor...Daguerre put the plate in his camera and exposed it to light. Next, he ‘developed’ the plate by letting fumes from hot Mercury pass over it. Finally, he ‘fixed’ the developed image by treating it with salt" (Buckminster 394-395). Daguerre, with help, experimented with different ideas until he found a way to create a improved version of the camera obscura that worked quicker and more precisely. Although the reason is unknown, Daguerre was the one to come up with the idea of using Mercury to help quicken the process of taking pictures. Since Daguerre was the one to come up with the idea of using Mercury, Niepce decided to let him name the invention after himself, the Daguerreotype.
Daguerre’s invention affected his era greatly. Daguerreotypes were very common in the 1800s. The cost of a Daguerreotype portrait was soon within the reach of most middle-class Americans. Daguerreotypes provided a record of American history for over two decades (Driscoll). Not only were Daguerreotypes new and a good source of photography, they were also affordable and not as time consuming as many other camera processes. Family portraits could be taken in faster manner and they were more affordable than the other options, making the Daguerreotype one of the top choices for middle-class American
families. Louis Daguerre's invention affected the world in many ways by creating something that has been developed and modernized to a point where we use it in our everyday lives in many different forms. ¨The Daguerreotype remained popular for about 20 years, it was eventually overtaken by better methods of photography" (Buckminister 399). The Daguerreotype was inexpensive and quick to use compared to other options of photography, which made it very popular. Other inventors, though, started to improve the Daguerreotype to make an attempt to invent something more like today's modern cameras. Once these more modernized forms became available and in the price range of most Americans, people started to shift away from the Daguerreotype. The invention of the camera greatly affected the world during the 1800s and still affects the world now. ¨Until the invention of photography, history was mostly about the written word and the painted picture. Photography was something entirely different: it actually captured moments of history, as people saw them and as they were happening" (Buckminster 400). Photography was something that was completely new and completely changed the world. Now, people could record the exact scene of something happening and take a picture of it to keep forever. Although there are many modernized cameras today, people still use the Daguerreotype to take pictures. “Daguerreotypes remained popular in the United States until the 1860s, and many fine examples still exist today"(Everyday Life: Communication). The Daguerreotype, with the help of other inventors and ideas, evolved into a camera a lot like the ones used today. Eventually, once new technology was discovered, tiny cameras were placed in smart phones and laptops. Cameras have changed the world and, though most were destroyed, the world still has a few examples of the first camera that was in a reasonable price range and did not require an artist to copy the picture into a painting. Daguerre's invention of the Daguerreotype evoked the ideas from many other pioneers to come together and make the current cameras we have today. Now, cameras and photographs are everywhere. Imagine going home after work or school and not using a phone to Snapchat or check Instagram and Twitter posts. A camera is used to do all of those things. In every phone, laptop, and tablet there are cameras that are used by people throughout our daily lives. Photography is taken for granted and don't realize what it was like before Daguerre. Daguerre was one of the most influential persons in history because of what happened in his early life that inspired him to become an inventor, how widely his camera invention affected the world around him at the time, and how the Daguerreotype is continuing to affect the world today through professional cameras and smartphones. When Daguerre was young, he aspired for something better than a camera obscura and having to draw your own pictures if you wanted to have a photograph. Also, he did not like having the eight hour session of sitting in boredom with a straight face to get a simple family portrait. He changed this and the world greatly appreciates it. Now, his simple Daguerreotype invention has evolved into so much more and the people on this Earth are extremely grateful for all that Daguerre has started. Although there are many new camera inventions, the original Daguerreotype will permeate through the ages. Some people could say that Louis Daguerre should not rank in the top 100 in Michael Hart's list. That point has logical reasoning behind it for two reasons: Daguerre did not do much to invent the camera and other people came up with quicker and more affordable ways to take pictures. At the time, though, his invention was the most widely known and affordable for the people living in the world. Daguerre changed the world with his invention. Without the Daguerreotype, people would never have been able to physically see past events with a realistic perspective. Personally, I agree with Michael Hart. I think that although Daguerre didn't come up with the best and most intellectual camera, he still should be credited with what he has done. He worked for a long time to come up with an invention that prospered for so long and changed the way we see history. In my life, I enjoy using my camera on my phone, as well as my professional camera to take pictures and I cannot imagine a world without being able to take pictures the way we can today.
The daguerreotype served as a medium for two fundamental forms of expression in the early days – in the field of both the arts and sciences (Daniel, 2004). Daguerre discovered that he could capture images of artistic sculptures so that people could appreciate art even though they were not physically present at the location of the art piece, he also realised that it could be used as a scientific tool where the daguerreotype could capture images through microscopes and other scientific devices so that people did not have to possess any scientific equipment to view the generated images (Daniel, 2004). The unprecedented ability to reproduce a certain image that once could only be viewed through the human eye and stored in the human brain made the daguerreotype a phenomenal invention.
To be named one of the top photographers of the 20th Century is a substantial credit on its own, but to do so with no formal training or background in the art is remarkable, yet accomplished by Philippe Halsman. It all started at the young age of fifteen, when Philippe would photograph friends and family with his father’s 9x12-cm view camera, developing the glass plate “miracles” in the family’s bathroom sink. Even in these early years, using rudimentary equipment, it was evident Halsman had a gift and would leave a definitive mark on the photographic industry. With his ability to capture the true spirit of the subject and his advanced technical abilities, his career was destined to be nothing short of successful (B. Johnson 180).
2 Gustavon, Todd. Camera: A History of Photography from daguerreotype to Digital. New York, NY: Sterling Publishing, 2009
The first type of using light to make a picture was the daguerreotype. Both Louis Jacques Mande Daguerre and Nicephore Niepce, who passed away before the public was introduced to the daguerreotype, founded this type of picture taking. However, before this Louis Daguerre made a "theater without actors." Beaumont Newhall explains that this was an illusion made by extraordinary lighting effects that made the 45 ½ foot by 71 ½ foot pictures appear to change as one looked at them (2).
What, if any impact did photography play in the role of arts ‘evolution’, in particular, what impact did photography have in the works of the impressionist painters. Two obviously conflicting opinions arise through texts by ‘Aaron Scharf’ and ‘Kirk Vanerdoe’. Scharf argues that the impact of ‘snapshot photography’ and the invention and wide distribution of portable camera’s had a significant influence on the works of the painter ‘Degas’. Vanerdoe takes the opportunity to question what makes an influence significant, and tends to see the creation of Impressionism stem from earlier art movements. Then comes the question, what, if any arguments are valid, what arguments are opinions and what can be sieved down to fact.
The images that will be compared in this essay are Two Models at a Table by Baron Adolf De Meyer and Atelier Couture by Paolo Roversi.
Photography has been around for nearly 200 years and has advanced dramatically with the new technology. In 1826, when the first photograph was taken photography was a very basic art form, but soon after photographers figured out how to manipulate their photos. In today’s society, it is almost unheard of to look at photographs that are raw and unedited, but has it always been this way? Dating back to the first photograph in 1826 by Joseph Nicephore Niepce, photography seemed to be raw, but only a few decades after those photographers discovered they could alter their photos to make them more appealing (“Harry Ransom Center”). Over the past 200 years photos of all different subjects have been manipulated through history and technology seems to be the culprit.
Louis Daguerre influenced numerous photographers by inventing a photographic process called the daguerreotype. Daguerreotype is remarkable detailed, highly polished on a silver-plated copper that seemed magical to many people (Daniel). The daguerreotype well captured the society’s lifestyle in a striking yet realistic way (Nelson). This would’ve been the most attractive point about the daguerreotype; the clarity of the pictures were probably very eye-catching. He had a determined goal, and this goal was his one and only. Daguerre wan...
You wouldn’t be able to take pictures of anything for memories if the camera wasn’t invented. Louis Daguerre invented the first camera just to capture things for memory. The camera was invented to capture a picture of anything you wanted to save as a memory. In today’s world, people use the camera during many special occasions to remember that specific day. It helps a lot because so many people can enjoy or see what an occasion was like even if they weren’t there by looking at the pictures. “The daguerreotype, aptly called a ‘mirror with a memory’, was an amazing development, and one cannot but marvel at the intricacy of the detail.” Before it was made, people didn’t really struggle without since they didn’t even use anything that could capture scenes.
This book is a note written by Roland Barthes to record the dialectical way he thought about the eidos(form, essence, type, species) of Photographs. Roland Barthes was a French literary theorist, philosopher, linguist in his lifetime, but surprisingly he was not a photographer. As Barthes had a belief that art works consists with signs and structures, he had investigated semiotics and structuralism. However, through Camera Lucida, he realized the limitation of structuralism and the impression to analyze Photography with only semiotics and structuralism. Barthes concludes with talking about unclassifiable aspects of Photography. I could sense the direction Barthes wanted to go through the first chapter ‘Specialty of the Photograph’. He tried to define something by phenomenology
During the era of 1980 to 1918, Industrial Revolutions and WWI brought the photography field to a new trend - a symbol of modernity. Since the electricity invention was introduced, the production of photography expanded to a mass market and the concept of photography shifted resembling to modernity. “The perceived vulgarity of mass culture and the excitement of modern art combined to encourage photographers interested in art and personal expression to create a separate aesthetic (Mary).” Unlike other Pictorialists, British photographer Frederick H.Evans, preferred to photography in a “pure inclination,” that he refused to employ special lenses and negative settlement on his photographs. Evans discovered the structure of architecture in art photography that would deliver both “emotional and aesthetic responses to space,
Kids today think of film as ancient technology and have no idea how it works, but film is a spectacular invention that is still used today! The creation of film is the most important invention in photo history because film has been used for over one hundred years. In 1841 Henry Tal...
When going for a walk, a person takes in the beauty around them. On this particular day, the refulgent sun is extra bright, making the sky a perfect blue. White, puffy clouds fill the sky, slowing moving at their own pace. The wind is peacefully calm, making the trees stand tall and proud. There is no humidity in the air. As this person walks down the road, they see a deer with her two fawns. The moment is absolutely beautiful. Moments like this happen only once in a great while, making us wanting to stay in the particular moment forever. Unfortunately, time moves on, but only if there were some way to capture the day’s magnificence. Thanks to Joseph Niépce, we can now capture these moments and others that take our breath away. The invention of the camera and its many makeovers has changed the art of photography.
“When photography was invented it was thought to be an equivalent to truth, it was truth with a capital ‘T’.” Vicki Goldberg
It was made on a polished sheet of pewter and coated with light-sensitive bitumen dissolved in lavender oil (Hirsch, “Seizing the Light: A History of Photography”). Being able to permanently fix a photographic image was a big leap for the field of photography, but it was still not practical for commercial or consumer use; the exposure for Niepce’s image is believed to have took anywhere from eight hours to several days—a staggering amount of time to create just one image (Hirsch). When Niepce died suddenly in 1833, he left his notes to his partner Louis Daguerre who continued to make technological advancements in photography after Niepce’s death. Daguerre further experimented with silver-based processes and was able to cut the exposure time of an image down from multiple hours to mere minutes in optimum conditions (Ward). Images crafted in this manner were officially dubbed “Daguerreotypes.” Figure 4 shows a Daguerreotype made by Daguerre himself; it is believed to be the first photographic image containing living people. The process discovered by Daguerre was the first photographic process to be commercially introduced to the public in 1839, and this year is now considered the birth of practical photography