Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
William golding life
William gerald golding biography essay
William golding philosophy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
William Golding once stated, “ I have always understood the Nazis because I am of that sort by nature.” This statement reveals that Golding was heavily influenced by the political systems involved in WW2, such as the totalitarian leadership of Adolf Hitler, and the democratic system of the U.S. These influences are portrayed through the different systems Jack and Ralph setup to control the group of boys. Golding’s use of political symbolism in Lord Of The Flies demonstrates men are naturally savage. This is portrayed by Jack being a totalitarian leader, and Ralph as a democratic leader and the failure of both systems to contain violence.
Golding uses the character Jack in the novel Lord of the Flies to represent a totalitarian regime. This
…show more content…
political system allowed the boys to commit countless savage actions such as the ruthless killing of Simon. Jacks initial thoughts of Ralph's leadership were portrayed when Jack ironically says, “We got to have rules and obey them. After all we're not savages"(Golding pg42). The struggle for leadership impacted Ralphs and Jacks views on eachother. When Ralph is elected leader Jack disagrees with the other boys choices and Jack begins to portray actions that would be considered abnormal for the typical English boy.
These abnormalities ended up revealing that Jack would rather lead the group of boys by using a totalitarian system, in which was appealing to the boys since Ralph's leadership required all the boys to work in order to maintain the shelter and signal fire, as for Jacks leadership which allowed the boys to do what they liked but the boys would have to obey Jack when needed. Even though Jacks leadership contained the boys in a group, this system ended up not being able to contain the boys savagery. In Bechallems encyclopedia the author wrote about the topic of political systems in Lord of the Flies, mentioning how Jack was the first of the boys to move towards anarchy. The author stated, “Early on, the boys assume they can manage their affairs quite easily, simply because they are English, Ironically, Jack, the first to move toward anarchy, asserts, “We’ve got to have rules and obey them. After all, we’re not savages. We’re English, and the English are best at everything.”(Beacham’s encyclopedia of popular fiction). This …show more content…
movement towards anarchy caused Jack to react differently towards rules and responsibilities making him develop a new group that would portray that men are instinctively savage. Golding included the political system of totalitarianism due to his influences in World War 2 like Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan. Golding also included the war between the boys because in his experience in WW2 he was able to understand how the rise of totalitarianism was a leading cause of WW2. This understanding was incorporated in his writing through Jack being a totalitarian leader who would constantly cause problems with the other group which was ruled by Ralph. In Lord of the Flies , Ralph is a symbol of a democratic system.
This is revealed through Ralphs choices in allowing the boys to have say. Golding revealed Ralphs step towards democracy when “Ralph says, 'We ought to have more rules... This is our island’" After noticing none of the boys cared about rules or responsibilities, Ralph becomes disappointed with the democratic procedure. Allowing Jack to convince the boys to join his group. This reveals that men are instinctively savage since they joined a group that wanted to survive and would use terror to enforce conformity. A scholar named Oldsey wrote, “Ralph is no monster of goodness. He himself becomes disillusioned with democratic procedure…” ( “Lord of the Flies: Beezlebub Revisited.”). This statement by Oldsey reveals that the reader is able to understand that Ralph is not perfect and political systems always contain flaws. Which is why the reader can conclude that mankind's human nature is masked by an ever changing political
systems. When Golding implements his influences into his writing it allows the reader to compare what is occurring in Golding’s writing to what Goulding witnessed happen during the time of WW2. Whether it was the failure of both political sides in the war to contain violence or the experiences Golding endured. Golding ultimately revealed that men are instinctively savage and in order to contain savagery men create laws and powers that enforce conformity. Golding reveals in his writing that the civilized world the boys once lived in was fading away when he stated, “The world, that understandable and lawful world, was slipping away.” (Chapter 11). Golding portrays to the reader that as men seperate themselves from law and reasoning the more likely they are to move towards anarchy and savagery. An scolar who wrote in Bechallem’s encyclopedia stated, “ As Golding acknowledged, political systems may seem “logical and respectable” but mask an underlying problem. The danger is that rationalist looks for logical cause and effect and unwilling to recognize the inherent evil in human nature. The rationalist assumes that civilization is all powerful because it seems more reasonable for people to co-exist with rules and mutual respect.” (Beacham’s encyclopedia of popular fiction). This author agree that no matter which political system is put into place, that system is doomed to fail due to men being imperfect. These imperfection cause men to act on instinct instead of reasoning. Allowing the readers to conclude that certain political systems cannot contain mans human nature. Overall, the tetrous experiences Golding went through during the war influenced many scenes in his novel Lord of the Flies. Golding represents these experiences through symbols such as his characters, like Ralph who represents a democracy and Jack who represents a Dictatorship. Golding’s use of political symbolism reveals men are naturally savage through Jack moving towards anarchy, Ralph introducing democracy and the failure of both political systems to contain the violence. Finally the reader is able to understand through these symbols that no political system is perfect due to men being imperfect. Which is why men being naturally savage heavily influence the political systems men try to use to mask their savagery.
Sir William Golding has constantly been a man who sees nothing good in anything. He examined the world to be a dreadful place due to the people who has populated the Earth. In order to display how he observes the world which was around the period of the second world war, he came to the decision of producing a novel. His novel was titled “Lord of the flies”. In the novel, William Golding familiarized his audience with three groups of boys; the hunters, the younger children and the gentle boys. Each faction of children in the book; “Lord of the flies” held a significant meaning. Jack and his hunters represented the Nazi’s or a more current group, Donald Trump supporters because they are people who unfortunately fail to think before
A group of kids got stuck on an island after their plane got shot down and they all have many different personalities. Being stuck on an island usually brings out the worst of people.But, there were two characters in novel, “The Lord of The Flies” that had good morals. These two characters were Ralph and Simon. Ralph and Simon weren’t intimidated by not having any adults around, instead, they tried to bring out the best of themselves and not take part in any horseplay the rest of the boys did.
The Lord of the Flies is a gruesome story about young boys stranded on an island, who underwent a transformation from polite British choir boys to savage hooligans. One of the main difficulties the boys face during their adventures upon the island, is their method of government, they either follow the path of Ralph, the democratic leader whose main focus is to escape the despairing island; or Jack a power-hungry monarchical leader who won't ever take no for an answer. The two boys are constantly bickering and arguing over who deserves the leader-position. We all understand Ralph wants to be leader so that he can ensure that the boys will return back home, but in Jack's case, it is a constant mystery to us about why he wants power over the other children. But we do get much small hints from the author, William Golding, that Jack's biggest fear among the other children on the island is public humiliation. This becomes more and more evident the farther on into the book, and his fear seems to be what persuades him to reach for a powerful position.
In the Lord of the Flies there are many themes that stand out. After reading Fredrick Douglass’ speech, “If I had a Country, I Should be a Patriot,” the theme that Goldings’ book that is most relatable to me is the lack of democracy and equal rights. Jack reminded me of a southern slave master and his primary focus that had no regard for others’ rights. In conclusion, in The Lord of the Flies, the rivalry between democracy and dictatorship is evident in Jack and Ralph’s relationship and relates back to the North versus the South rivalry for democracy for the
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies is a story much like the true events of the totalitarian Soviet Union. The original leader in Lord of the Flies introduces himself simply as “Ralph”(Golding 8). Althought his priorities are good, his way of governing is certainly harsh: “ ‘You voted me chief. Now you do what I say ’ ”(115). Later in the book, power is switched to another leader of the group, Jack Merridew. Golding shows his style of rule as also very forceful. “‘There isn’t a tribe for you anymore… I’m chief!’” (261) Jack states. Although both of the leaders are very commanding, Ralph was elected, like a democracy, and Jack forced his way into power through false hope. The result ended up more like a dictatorship.
We all want to live in a world where we have freedom, rights, opinions and democracy gives us that. In the book Lord of the Flies, Ralph’s democratic leadership style is much better than Jack’s dictator leadership style because everyone has equal rights and that is fair. Firstly, Ralph gives everyone on the island a chance to express their opinion and contribute. Secondly, getting rescued is the most important thing for Ralph. Last but not least, Jack is very self centered and selfish. He is rude and inconsiderate. He doesn’t care about anyone but himself.
“Maybe there is a beast… maybe it's only us” (Golding 80). Referencing the savagery of human nature, this statement is one with great accuracy. While reading Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, many themes and problems presented themselves. The book really highlighted the use of power, and the types of people using it. People in society, whether they want power or not, can use their authority without the best intentions, corrupting themselves and others into inhumanity. For example, Jack uses his urge for authority, and eventually his control, to create an extremely savage tribe of boys, by pushing his own wants and laws onto them. This type of power can demoralize many people, including the ultimate
Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a novel that represents a microcosm of society in a tale about children stranded on an island. Of the group of young boys there are two who want to lead for the duration of their stay, Jack and Ralph. Through the opposing characters of Jack and Ralph, Golding reveals the gradual process from democracy to dictatorship from Ralph's democratic election to his lack of law enforcement to Jack's strict rule and his violent law enforcement.
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change of character is significant as he leads the other boys into savagery, representing Golding’s views of there being a bad and unforgiving nature to every human.
In William Golding’s novel, the Lord of the Flies, even though Ralph became chief of the stranded boys, Jack eventually rose to power through scare tactics, confidence, determination, and control. When Jack demonstrated his leadership skills, it was evident that he was superior to Ralph and would use his sense of Social Darwinism (survival of the fittest) and his oratory skills to surpass and isolate Ralph completely. Regardless of Ralph’s strengths, such as his conch, democratic maneuvers, firm motives, and kind demeanor, Jack’s mere presence ousted Ralph’s chances of taking effective leadership. By using propaganda against Ralph, gaining support from his partisan tribe members, and overpowering Ralph through his persuasive techniques and appearance, Jack clearly demonstrated how his leadership of the island was inevitable.
In Lord of the Flies, Golding is able to exemplify intelligence, violence, and leadership, through the behaviors, responses, and actions of Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, respectively. Golding provides insight into the delicate touch-and-go basis of human nature, something that to this day has yet to be fully understood.
Throughout William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies there is an ever-present conflict between two characters. Ralph's character combines common sense with a strong desire for civilized life. Jack, however, is an antagonist with savage instincts, which he cannot control. Ralph's goals to achieve a team unit with organization are destroyed by Jack's actions and words that are openly displayed to the boys. The two leaders try to convince the boys that their way of survival is correct.
In William Golding's novel, Lord of the Flies Ralph though not the stronger person, demonstrates a better understanding of people than Jack which gives him better leadership qualities. Ralph displays these useful human qualities as a leader by working towards the betterment of the boys' society. He knows the boys need stability and order if they are to survive on the island. He creates rules and a simple form of government to achieve this order. Jack does not treat the boys with dignity as Ralph does. Ralph understands that the boys, particularly Piggy, have to be given respect and must be treated as equals. This makes Ralph a better leader as he is able to acknowledge that he was not superior to any of the other boys. Ralph's wisdom and ability to look to the future also make him a superior leader. Ralph has the sense to keep his focus on getting off the island. He insists on keeping the fire burning as a distress signal. Ralph's leadership provides peace and order to the island while Jack's leadership makes chaos.
One of the main themes in William Golding's 1954 novel Lord of the Flies is that without civilization, there is no law and order. The expression of Golding's unorthodox and complex views are embodied in the many varied characters in the novel. One of Golding's unorthodox views is that only one aspect of the modern world keeps people from reverting back to savagery and that is society. Golding shows the extreme situations of what could possibly happen in a society composed of people taken from a structured society then put into a structureless society in the blink of an eye. First there is a need for order until the people on the island realize that there are no rules to dictate their lives and take Daveers into their own hands. Golding is also a master of contrasting characterization. This can be seen in the conflicts between the characters of Jack, the savage; Simon, the savior; and Piggy, the one with all the ideas.
As the story opens, the boys are stranded on the island without any type of authority and must fend for themselves. A meeting is held and the chief, Ralph, is quickly named. A reader at once can notice there is already a power struggle between Jack and Ralph but this is overlooked when Jack says rational and sensible remarks about what should be done. The stability of civilization is still apparent when Jack says, “I agree with Ralph. We’ve got to have rules and obey them. After all, we’re not savages. We’re English, and the English are best at everything. So we’ve got to do the right things,” (Golding 42). The boys are still influenced by the restraints they learned from a controlled society. Joseph Conrad asserts that “there exists a certain ‘darkness of man’s heart’ that is suppressed by the light of civilization” (Introduction to Lord of the Flies 2). “Although Golding suggests the harmony of an ideal society, he does not indicate any faith in its creation” (Kennard 234). The more meetings that are held the more futile they become. “ ’We have lots of assemblies. Everybody enjoys speaking and being together. We decide things. But they don’t get done,’ ” (Golding 79). The boys realize that there are no punishments for what they do and disregard their priorities. “The idea that the absence of the restraints of civilization can lead to a subversion towards savagery” (Introduction to Lord of the Flies 2). The makeshift society that the boys have created is already starting to weaken.