Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of humanistic approach psychology
A major proponent of humanistic psychology
Logotherapy vs freud
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison of humanistic approach psychology
LOGOTHERAPY’S PARADIGMATIC UNDERPINNINGS
Logotherapy is underpinned by the humanistic paradigm, as its key concepts recognise human individuality and freedom, as well as their need to fulfil their potential and find meaning. To understand the connection between humanism and logotherapy, it is important to first take a look at what humanism is, and how it came about.
Humanism, often referred to as the “Third Force” of psychology, emerged in the 1960’s in response to what some psychologists considered the shortcomings of behaviourism and psychoanalysis. These psychologists wanted to develop a different approach to studying humankind, an approach that emphasised humanisation as opposed to dehumanisation of the person. They criticised behaviourism
…show more content…
It focuses on an in-depth understanding of people’s thoughts and feelings, with the belief that talking to and sharing experiences with people can allow for a thorough understanding of human beings. (https://www.simplypsychology.org/humanistic.html) Frankl adopted a qualitative approach when developing logotherapy. For instance, in the concentration camps he observed the prisoners around him, conducting unstructured interviews with them as well as documenting his observations and experiences in the camps. Frankl having experienced the camps himself allowed for him to be a participant as opposed to an objective outsider. This approach to research allowed for a more holistic understanding of the prisoner’s thoughts and feelings and genuine insight into their behaviour. Rather than making use of a laboratory experiment to gain scientific results, Frankl’s research was centred around subjective experiences, focusing on his subject matter as a whole rather than simply its elements. Furthermore, humanists maintain that humans are essentially different from other animals and therefore view studies done on animals as being irrelevant in explaining human behaviour. (Themes and var) In line with this view, Frankl studied human beings as opposed to …show more content…
Freedom from something you do not wish for could mean not being influenced by that thing. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/freedom In contrast to freedom is determinism, which refers to our fate and all events being completely determined by factors out of our control; it preludes free will and sees freedom of choice as an illusion. The question is, “are we in control of our destiny or is it determined by outside forces? (study guide) http://www.dictionary.com/browse/determinism
Logotherapy’s answer to this question is whilst we may not be able to control the conditions we face, we are able to control how we react. In other words, we are not free from our conditions, but we are free to choose how we respond to these conditions. We are free to chose to overcome our hardships, we are free to determine our attitude toward these events and we are free to take responsibility for pursuing our meaning in life. It takes on the stance that humans have free will and are able to choose their actions.
In his book, Thomas Hobbes argued that freedom is comprised when there are no outer impediments towards a person when engaging in what he desires to do: “Unregulated agent is that one can engage in what he wills and bear as per desire that liberty is absenteeism of outer impediments.” According to this definition, free will is the ability of a person to make a decision without being prevented or obstructed by any part. Another philosopher (Hume) defined freedom- liberty, as power of doing or of not doing, as per the d...
There are numerous advantages and complication in the humanistic approaches to the study of psychology. Numerous individuals sent out messages to each other, non-explicitly, thus, influencing the actions exhibited. As it was stated in the first letter written by Rilke, addressed to Kappus:”Things aren’t all so tangible and sayable as people would usually have us believe; most than all other things are works of art, those mysterious existences, whose life endures beside our own small, transitory life” (Rilke 8). People are able to understand each other in the normal process since gestures have been popular among our societies. In addition, individuals would not have to waste so much time verbalizing everything in our today’s fast-paced societies. The only complication in this process had been individuals with difficulty processing cognitive information had struggling experiences adapting to this usual humanistic approach.
Being free is possible by factors surrounding ones’ intentions. There are those that believe it possible to be free by perspective, voice, or thinking. Approaching the discussion of what freedom is best is in the hands of the pursuer. Immanuel Kant freedom of self differs from Martin Luther’s freedom for faith, but both come together as a way of improvement for mankind.
...ng can be taken from a man but one thing: The last of the human freedoms—to choose one's attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one's own way…" (Pg.25, Frankl, 2006).
Humanistic psychology relies on client centred therapy and the idea that each individual has the potential to achieve a position in their psyche named self actualisation. Humanistic psychology differs from psychodynamic theory in that it is optimistic about the human psyche and does not view conflict as inevitable. Humanistic psychology assumes people attach meaning to their unique perspectives on the world and that behaviour is strongly influenced by this. Carl Rogers defined the healthy personality as being one that had congruence between the perceived self and the experienced self and that the individual in question experienced unconditional positive regard from their parent or guardian. He defined an unhealthy personality as being one which lacked these components. Abraham Maslow alternatively suggested a hierarchy for which a person’s healthy personality could be measured by stages of psychological and physical needs (see diagram 2). He suggested that, for a person to achieve self actualisation and become a fully functioning person, they must first satisfy all the needs of each level in the pyramid before moving onto the next
Once Viktor Frankl was liberated in April of 1945, he set to work on piecing together the manuscript that he had lost. He began to further develop his idea of logotherapy. This idea is based on three philosophical and psychological components: the freedom of will, will to meaning, and the meaning in life. The freedom of will, according to logotherapy, is that humans posses the freedom of choice and are not fully subjected to their conditions. The will of meaning is not only saying that humans have freedom of choice but also the ability to fulfill goals a...
Logotherapy was initially developed by Holocaust survivor Viktor E. Frankl whilst he endured the horrors of a concentration camp, as described in his novel Man’s Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy. At the core of logotherapy is the insistence that man desires to fulfill his life by giving it significance and filli...
Barnes analyzes Frankl's theories, based on the differences between psychotherapy and Logotheraphy, he claims that Logotheraphy is more humane. Barnes concludes in his journal, not overruling the term Logos, a theological noun that is defined as man's existence due to God/ biblical reference. This statement does not contradict Frankl's novel and re-search as, Frankl's situation: a prisoner of one of the worst wars in history. Frankl's mentality, stability and faith are questionable, due to what he has experienced. The fact that he survives the war, finishes his novel and progresses in lifeitself proves his theory of self practiced logotheraphy.
Taking this into consideration, the meaning of freedom can further be explored. Perhaps it can be defined as having the liberty to choose who/what the ruler is to be. For, since nothing can exist without having some form of rule, if people are not permitted to choose what the ruling factor is, then that would not be considered having freedom.
We can define freedom in a positive or a negative manner. The former would be related to self-realization and being free from internal obstacles, while the latter definition concentrates on being free from external constraints, that is no one interfere with our freedom, at least not arbitrarily, since we need some rules to live in a society. In this essay, I will assume a negative concept. Philosophic value may be split into two types of value. Non-independent value, which is specific instrumental value. If something has non-independent value, it is valuable in re...
Freedom is a human value that has inspired many poets, politicians, spiritual leaders, and philosophers for centuries. Poets have rhapsodized about freedom for centuries. Politicians present the utopian view that a perfect society would be one where we all live in freedom, and spiritual leaders teach that life is a spiritual journey leading the soul to unite with God, thus achieving ultimate freedom and happiness. In addition, we have the philosophers who perceive freedom as an inseparable part of our nature, and spend their lives questioning the concept of freedom and attempting to understand it (Transformative Dialogue, n.d.).
This psychology perspective emphasizes individuals ' inherent drive towards self-actualization, the process of realizing and expressing one 's own capabilities and creativity. It helps the client gain the belief that all people are inherently good. It adopts a holistic approach to human existence and pays special attention to such phenomena as creativity, free will, and positive human potential. It encourages viewing ourselves as a "whole person" greater than the sum of our parts and encourages self exploration rather than the study of behavior in other people. Humanistic psychology acknowledges spiritual aspiration as an integral part of the human psyche. It is linked to the emerging field of transpersonal psychology. As per usual, there are advantages and limitations to this particular theory. One of the greatest strengths of humanistic psychology is that it emphasizes individual choice and responsibility. Humanistic psychology satisfies most people 's idea of what being human means because it values personal ideals and self-fulfillment. Finally, humanistic psychology provides researchers with a flexible framework for observing human behavior because it considers a person in the context of his environment and in conjunction with his personal perceptions and feelings. As with any viewpoint, humanistic psychology has its critics. One major criticism of humanistic psychology is that its concepts are too vague. Critics
Humanistic and Existential Psychology are influential on each other, both including the “meaning of our existence, the role of free will, and the uniqueness of each human” (Burger, 2015). This paper reviews three articles written by influential psychologists of their time, Maslow, Rogers, and Frankl. The review of each will include a summary, how well the contents connect to the humanistic or existential psychology, and if their ideas still have a relevant application in today’s environment. The first article for review by Viktor Frankl, an existential psychologist, Logotherapy and Existentialism, was written in 1967.
Introduction ¬¬ Freedom can mean many different things. But the main question is, what does it mean to be free? What defines individual freedom in a civilized society? Are our choices mechanically determined by prior psychological causes or can we break free from those constraints and make choices that are genuinely free? The concept of ‘freedom’ or ‘liberty’ is not so easy to pin down.
To begin, I will explain how Frankl found meaning in his life despite the harsh conditions of the concentration camps. Frankl says, “Life is not primarily a quest for pleasure, as Freud believed, or a