Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about ethical eating
An essay about fish farming
Essay on fish farming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Maine Lobster Festival is supposed to be a celebration inviting anyone and everyone to celebrate the delectable lobster, but Wallace uses it to shed some light on the welfare of the animal when cooking and eating it. He does a great job at analyzing the festival as well as challenging the meaning of food based on how we define the animals we consume. This includes the substitution of words, people’s ignorance, and the scientific language. The way we identify food can all be supported by these three main influences. First off Wallace does an excellent job on creating a background and explanation of the festival. “The assigned subject of this article is the 56th Annual MLF, July 30 to August 3, 2003, whose official theme was “Lighthouses, Laughter, and Lobster” (Wallace 50). Already you can see the effect of words on the event. The theme uses the word laughter in order to convey a sense of happiness. However, some people would disagree when thousands of pounds of lobsters are killed in order for the event to take place. This word usage not only can be used to convey happiness but be used as to keep up morality. …show more content…
“Is it significant that “lobster,” ”fish,” and “chicken” are our culture’s words’ for both the animal and the meat, whereas most mammals seem to require euphemisms like “beef” and “pork” that help us separate the meat we eat from the living creature the meat once was?” (Wallace 62). Euphemisms for food can definitely be used as a way for us not to associate it with death. Not only that but there is an expansive list for it such as poultry, seafood, etc. My mom would use words like beef or pork to me when I asked her what food was. Now I know they’re synonymous to dead cow or dead pig. The way we use our words can impact our morals on subjects such as food in my case. Not only that, but it can keep your ignorance on a
In the narrative “Food Is Good” author Anthony Bourdain humorously details the beginning of his journey with food. Bourdain uses lively dialogue with an acerbic style that sets his writing apart from the norm. His story began during his childhood and told of the memories that reverberated into his adulthood, and consequently changed his life forever. Bourdain begins by detailing his first epiphany with food while on a cruise ship traveling to France. His first food experience was with Vichyssoise, a soup served cold.
The state of Maine is a huge tourist spot known for it’s rocky coastline and seafood cuisine, especially lobster. Annually, the state holds the “Maine Lobster Festival” every summer, and is a popular lucrative attraction including carnival rides and food booths. The center of attention for this festival is, unsurprisingly, lobster. The author of the article “Consider the Lobster”, David Foster Wallace, mainly uses logos and pathos, and explores the idea of being put into the lobsters perspective by describing how the cooking process is done and informing us on the animal’s neurological system in a very comprehensible way. He effectively uses these persuasive devices to paint a picture for the audience and pave way for the reader to conjure
I believe David Foster Wallace’s aim for writing this piece was to explain his reasoning for killing and eating animals and to understand other people’s views on the issue as well. This is apparent throughout the writing. Wallace starts out by giving his personal description of the Maine Lobster Festival. He describes how it takes place July 30th through August 3rd, thousands of people come to the festival every year, its broadcasted on live television by CNN, and about 25,000 fresh lobsters are eaten over the course of the festival. Additionally, he goes into the biology of the lobster such as the scientific name and evolution. Leading up to this, he states the question for writing this piece, “Is it alright to boil a sentient creature alive for our gustatory pleasure” (p.9 Wallace)?
In his opening sentence, Wallace refers to the Maine Lobster Festival as “enormous, pungent, and extremely well-marketed” (252). This is an effective turn of phrase in that each reader assigns his or her own values to those adjectives. While an optimist sees in his mind’s eye a large, aromatic party filled with revelers from all over the continent, a pessimist pictures a crowded, stinky mess which has sold out for the money. Wallace draws them both in with his careful use of language. The words “optimist” and “pessimist” need further exploration.... ...
Throughout the essay, Berry logically progresses from stating the problem of the consumer’s ignorance and the manipulative food industry that plays into that ignorance, to stating his solution where consumers can take part in the agricultural process and alter how they think about eating in order to take pleasure in it. He effectively uses appeals to emotion and common values to convince the reader that this is an important issue and make her realize that she needs to wake up and change what she is doing. By using appeals to pathos, logos, and ethos, Berry creates a strong argument to make his point and get people to change how they attain and eat food.
She begins by pointing out how novelists never mention food. “it is part of the novelist’s convention not to mention soup and salmon and ducklings.” As if soup, salmon and ducklings are an expectation. Even though nobody talks about it, she takes the liberty to defy that convention. She describes the cooked fish that has been sunk into a
David Foster Wallace presented evidences for his questions regarding lobsters consumption through disproving the theory that lobster do not feel pains by providing scientific and observable proofs about lobsters' anatomy and behaviors. He discussed why people chose to ignore the moral questions of animal consumption by showing that people prefer familiarity over uncertainty and they do not like to discuss uncomfortable issues. Finally, he defined the roles of the three sides involving animal consumption and related them to Plato's allegory of the cave.
In the article by Wendell Berry titled “The Pleasures of Eating” he tries to persuade the readers of the necessity and importance of critical thinking and approach to choosing meals and owning responsibility for the quality of the food cooked. He states that people who are not conscious enough while consuming products, and those who do not connect the concept of food with agricultural products, as people whose denial or avoidance prevents them from eating healthy and natural food. Berry tries to make people think about what they eat, and how this food they eat is produced. He points to the aspects, some which may not be recognized by people, of ethical, financial and
In the article "Consider the lobster" by David Foster Wallace, begins by explaining a festival, is held every late July in the state’s midcoast region, meaning the western side of Penobscot Bay, the Maine Lobster Festival. In the next few paragraphs, he talks about the festival, and what they do on the festival. The author follow this with the characteristics of a lobster, from the history of how it was back then a food for poor people, and now in days is like the steak of s...
In her book Semiotics and Communication: Signs, Codes, Cultures, Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz describes the wide use of food as signs, and also as social codes. The reason foods are so useful as signs and social codes is because they are separable, easily adaptive to new environments, and it is not difficult to cook, or eat for that matter. Food is a major part of our daily lives, Not only for survival, but it plays a substantial social role in our lives. We will look deeper into the semiotics of food, how food is used as identity markers, and also the role that foods play in social change in our lives. First let us start with the semiotics of food.
“A Case for Eating Dogs” is a satirical excerpt from Jonathan Safran Foer’s book titled “Eating animals” written in a reverie-description mode, intentionally addressed to the cultural context of Americans, specifically dog owners or animal lovers, yet also individuals who eat dog meat. Foer’s purpose is to encourage his audience to treat dogs as how they treat other animals by not consuming meat at all. Through the discourse structure of a satire and use of rhetorical devices and ingredients, audiences with a cultural context of animal lovers might agree with Foer, whereas dog owners and/or lovers might misinterpret his implicit message and hence, continue eating meat.
Gonzalez, Julina Roel. ""The Philosophy of Food," Edited by David M. Kaplan." Ed. Michael Goldman. Teaching Philosophy 36.2 (2013): 181-82. Print.
On a warm day in late August, the community members of Smallville gather in the town park to eat seafood, this is the explanation of the plot. The Annual Smallville Seafood Festival, run by Mr. Johnson, who organizes the event every year. The children arrive first and start play with their friends for the last time this summer until their parents to eat seafood with them. Mrs. Smith arrives late and chats briefly with her friend, Mrs. Berg.
Is it morally permissible to eat meat? Much argument has arisen in the current society on whether it is morally permissible to eat meat. Many virtuous fruitarians and the other meat eating societies have been arguing about the ethics of eating meat (which results from killing animals). The important part of the dispute is based on the animal welfare, nutrition value from meat, convenience, and affordability of meat-based foods compared to vegetable-based foods and other factors like environmental moral code, culture, and religion. All these points are important in justifying whether humans are morally right when choosing to eat meat. This paper will argue that it is morally impermissible to eat meat by focusing on the treatment of animals, the environmental argument, animal rights, pain, morals, religion, and the law.
Let me begin with the words by George Bernard Shaw: ‘Animals are my friends and I don’t eat my friends’. This indicates the ethic aspect of meat consumption. In fact, people often don’t realize how animals are treated, but they can see commercial spots in their TV showing smiling pigs, cows or chickens, happy and ready to be eaten. My impression is that there can’t be anything more cruel and senseless. It is no secret that animals suffer ...