Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on movie genre and social commentary
Essay on movie genre and social commentary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on movie genre and social commentary
The statement by lo spagnolo has been analyzed by scholars in two dominating thoughts. Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, Giulio Cesare Castello, and the like have contended that lo spagnolo’s offering had underlying homosexual intentions. On the other hand, scholars such as Fernaldo Di Giammatteo, Lino Micchichè, and Marcia Landy propose that such an act by lo spagnolo is of social compassion, thus expressing this communal philosophy. This double entendre strategy also operates in the actions of the characters and in Visconti’s visual presentation of them. Lo spagnolo’s offer to pay Gino’s train fare accommodates Marxist heterocentricity as an act of solidarity exemplifying lo spagnolo’s declared philosophy that “money has legs and was meant to walk”. However, as Nowell-Smith and other have noted, the incident is essentially a …show more content…
The scene continues with the two men conversing, in which we begin to learn more about this vague and peculiar character. We learn of lo spagnolo’s time in Spain, where he most certainly was active in the civil war, opposite to the fascists; given what we are to understand from his dialogue. We are further exposed to his continually travelling lifestyle, one in which he offers to Gino. “I am an artist. Today, here; tomorrow, there. Wherever I go, there is work to do.” The character is being represented as a deviation from the normal. A stable job, family and home life are void from lo spagnolo and I would extend the same analysis to Gino. Subsequently, in lo spagnolo, Gino meets another migrant that perhaps share similar convictions. In time we arrive to where lo spagnolo extents the proposition of traveling together: “in two we can do many things.” Consequently, we return to Nowell-Smith analysis “lo spagnolo’s decision to stay with Gino in Ancona instead of continuing on to Trieste as he had intended hints at homosexual
Ignazio Silone’s Bread and Wine became one of the most controversial as well as influential novels in Italy during the early twentieth century. Bread and Wine is set in rural impoverish Italia countryside under the Catholic and fascist control. It begins with Don Benedetto, an elderly priest and his aged sister are waiting for visitors to come celebrate his birthday. These visitor’s are some of his favorite students who have grown up and moved away. In their reminiscing, Don Benedetto begins to ask how other student lives have turned out after all these years. Including his favorite pupil, Pietro Spina. The former students explain that Pietro Spina had become a communist revolutionary and was exiled from Italy, and is on the run from police who are hunting him. Don Benedetto asks the student to aide Pietro in his return to Italy. At this point the novel begins to focus on Pietro Spina and his return to Italy. Pietro aided by his childhood friend Nunzio dons the disguise of a Catholic priest called Don Paolo Spada. However, Pietro Spina has abandoned the religious beliefs and ideas of becoming a saint that he once had as a child and now in his adult life is considered to be a fervent atheist making; this disguise quite ironic. While in disguise, Spina becomes exasperated with the strong catholic beliefs and superstitious ideas which are the basis of thought of the peasants he is trying to influence. This brings about the continuous theme of socialism and Christianity as well as the question surrounding all the characters within the novel, “How can a decent person act in a terrible time?”1 Silone uses this questions to explore how the political views of fascism within the Catholic church effects uneducated peasants withi...
The film El Contrato showcases the conditions of workers trying to support families back at home. The men all live under one roof, on a contract for a duration of eight months to work in Ontario at a tomato greenhouse. The workers band together and treat each other as a family would, learning to survive.
In the time of William Shakespeare where courtship and romance were often overshadowed by the need to marry for social betterment and to ensure inheritance, emerges a couple from Much Ado About Nothing, Hero and Claudio, who must not only grow as a couple, who faces deception and slander, but as individuals. Out of the couple, Claudio, a brave soldier respected by some of the highest ranked men during his time, Prince Don Pedro and the Governor of Messina, Leonato, has the most growing to do. Throughout the play, Claudio’s transformation from an immature, love-struck boy who believes gossip and allows himself to easily be manipulated is seen when he blossoms into a mature young man who admits to his mistakes and actually has the capacity to love the girl he has longed for.
Venice is a busy place where all the characters are constantly worried about their income, they give loans and they borrow money to maintain their business. Here we see the first clash of love and money. Bassanio needs to impress a rich heiress from Belmont, but unfortunately, he does not have the money to win a lady from a rich family as a wife, “O my Antonio, had I but the means to hold ...
...The crucial element drawing these plays together is the mutual use of a symbolically significant object. That is, the staff. The staff is disgraced in the manner in which role it had been given in the plays. Although it is ambiguous, the staff appears to be a metaphorical phallic symbol in the Two Gentlemen of Verona used to convey to crudity of Launce’s views on marriage. Conversely, in The Jew of Malta, it is used in a most blasphemous sense – for the purpose of mocking the Christian faith. The faith is ridiculed when the staff is used satirically to ‘support’ the dead Friar and when Jacomo uses it with the intention to murder. This is explicitly ironic. Thus this essay has shown how irony, hypocrisy, mockery and sexual innuendo all serve the same purpose in these plays – to challenge the society by the subverting and perverting moral, religious and political codes.
...ed for Antonio to come off as being homosexual or if our modern general definition of homosexuality has influenced how we view Antonio. However, Shakespeare’s plays always seem to have shocking themes that are not meant to be seen without a close analysis. This analysis is able to prove why Shakespeare chose the word “ love” over any other word in order to invoke a certain homosexual feeling regarding Antonio and Bassanio’s relationship. Through this art of placing themes that Shakespeare uses, it is easy to see how homosexuality was intended to be placed as an underlying theme of The Merchant of Venice.
Therefore, Antonio sets the rest of the mood of the novel by changing the focus from just immigration to internally as well (North versus South). He uses something empowering to the Roman people against them, comparable to racism. He enforces the point that even fellow Italians possess distaste between each other and compartmentalize misconstrued labels on them. This novel presents different viewpoints of life in Italy and how each one has reasoning’s for the ideas of other people with none, except for Amedeo, ready to conform together and help each other. The novel’s purpose is to allow for new Cornell students to see culture from different points of view and to understand
The plot, characters, and relationships present in William Shakespeare’s play, The Merchant of Venice all revolve around the concept of money; a theme that is strongly linked to the religious dichotomies explored throughout the comedy. At the beginning of the play, Antonio and Bassanio 's money-rooted relationship is introduced. Bassanio asks Antonio to lend him three thousand ducats. Antonio agrees to take out a loan for his friend, even though Bassanio had previously borrowed money and had not yet returned it. Antonio’s willingness to help out his seemingly untrustworthy friend, demonstrates his belief that friendship is more imperative than money. As a Christian, Antonio is following the expected trend; he is valuing life over stuff. Another
I aim to show how the “human” relationships in the play reflect real life relationships within Shakespeare’s own society (as well as his future audience), for which his plays were written and performed. Ferdinand and Miranda’s type of relationship shows Shakespeare’s ideas about true love, recognising not just the emotional side of love, but the physical nature too. Miranda promises Ferdinand “The jewel in my dower” which is her virginity, a prized thing in Jacobean times. This knowledge would have been known by Shakespeare’s audience, and knowing this helps us to understand Prospero’s protection of his daughter from Caliban. Ferdinand is asked not to have lustful thoughts about Miranda as “Sour-eyed disdain and discord shall bestrew the union of your bed with weeds so loathly that you shall hate it both” meaning that sex before marriage will poison the lovers’ marriage bed so that they will both grow to loathe it.
“Antonio, have you seen my nephew, your son anywhere?” Leonato asked hurriedly. “He is most likely taking care of the music right now, that is what I saw him doing last. I do however have something to tell you that may or not shock you.” Antonio exclaimed in an excited but quiet voice, making sure no one heard him. Leonato adjusted his body to a more calm pose as his nephew was, in fact, taking care of the music so he had nothing to worry about. “And what is this that you wish to tell me?” He asked in a curious, shrill tone. “Well, how do I put this, a servant of mine was strolling through the orchard and heard Claudio and Don Pedro, the prince of Aragon discussing their love for your daughter, more specifically, the prince’s love, there is apparently a plan for the prince to ask her out during the ball tonight.” a smile spread across Leonato’s face, he obviously could not hide the excitement that overcame him.“Are you sure your servant heard him
Throughout the story, Venice is the backdrop for cultural and religious friction. Here, many arguments and disputes take place. The play begins with a mention of Antonio’s investments at sea, and inability to loan his friend money. Antonio tells his friend that he is depressed because he can’t lend another friend, Bassanio, money. Bassanio says, “Tis not unknown to you, Antonio, How much I have disabled mine estate, By something showing a more swelling port Than my faint means would grant continuance: Nor do I now make moan to be abridged from such a noble rate; but my chief care Is to come fairly off from the great debts where in my time something too prodigal hath left me gaged.” Bassanio says that his great debts in Venice abridge him from a noble rate, and that is prodigal hath has left him gaged. Here, Bassanio mentions his serious debt and that wealth or lack of it is an important role in Venice’s society. The religious conflict in Venice can be seen where Shylock, a Jewish money-lender is approached by Antonio, a Christian, to obtain a loan. Shylock agrees to give the loan, on condition that if it can’t be paid back, Antonio gives Shylock a pound of flesh. Antonio and Shylock have deep-rooted hatred for each other because of their religions. This hatred is spurred over the greedy interest loan Shylock has offered. Shylock says, You call me misbeliever, cut-throat dog, And spit upon my Jewish gaberdine, […] 'Fair sir, you spit on me on Wednesday last, You spurn 'd me such a day; another time You call 'd me dog; and for these courtesies I 'll lend you thus much moneys
Antonio and Shylock are both successful entrepreneurs in Venice but they both have different attitudes and experiences. When Antonio is asking Shylock for the loan he says, “Within these two months – that’s a month before this bond expires – I do expect, return of thrice times the value of this bond.” (1.3.169-170). Antonio and Shylock both are well off and successful businessmen. Antonio, being a man who is treats everyone nicely, lends his good name to Bassanio to woo Portia. Shylock on the other hand, could never do that and is a very greedy man who asks for three times the value of the loan. Also, Antonio is a risk taker and thinks things will always go the right way for him and his success will continue, which is shown when he accepts the high interest rate and the bizarre payment if the money isn’t received. Shylock handles his business straightforward and charges interest because it is his job, although being a very high amount and if it isn’t carried out, Shylock gets his payment of one pound of flesh. Shylock is depicted as the greedy businessman while Antonio is the nice man who tries his luck.
“If a Jew wrongs a Christian, what is his humility? Shakespeare shows here that money doesn’t have the same effect on love as it does with the caskets or with the evil in Shylock, and that it can be used for good love in Portia’s donation. In Venice, Bassanio brings fourth the 6000 ducats to repay Shylock, but he doesn’t accept it. Once Portia, disguised as the doctor, entered the court, she pleads with Shylock to show mercy, but he refuses.
Bassanio was a failed lord, and he desired to marry Portia because her great affluence would allow him to repay his debt to his friend Antonio, a merchant. However, in order to woo Portia, Bassanio had to acquire a loan from Shylock under Antonio’s name. As a usurer, Shylock charged insanely high interest rates for loans. This rapacious behavior was widely condemned by the public in this time period. Shylock also forced Antonio to agree to a contract stating “if you repay me not on such a day, in such a place, such sum or sums as are expressed in the condition, let the forfeit be nominated for an equal pound of your fair flesh, to be cut off and taken in what part of your body pleaseth me” (I.3.143-148). Later on, Antonio becomes bankrupt because his ships vanish at sea. Unable to repay Shylock, Shylock demands Antonio’s flesh as compensation. The transaction portrays economic loans in an exceptionally negative light. The fact that Shylock, a Jew, would have the audacity to demand flesh from a Christian as payment in addition to charging interest would have made such commercial activities seem even more atrocious to the audience. This economic conflict that erupts between Shylock and Antonio’s social relationship is a consequence of Portia and Bassanio’s romantic relationship. It shows how closely romance and economics are woven
In many instances, Bassanio and Antonio believe that friendship is more important than love. Therefore, the following theme is proven: friendship is a bond stronger than a vow of love. At the beginning of the play, Antonio is willing to sacrifice his credit to ensure Bassanio’s happiness. In the middle of the play, friendship and romance conflict, as Antonio is willing to give up his flesh to fulfill the bond that he makes with Shylock, and Bassanio departs to Venice without his newly-wedded wife. At the end of the play, Antonio persuades Bassanio to break his promise to his wife, fully proving the bond of friendship is stronger than a vow of love.