Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on intersectionality
Essay on intersectionality
Thesis on intersectionality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on intersectionality
The social contract in the United States of America has alway had problems and will probably always will. The movie Lifeboat, directed by Alfred Hitchcock in 1944, talks about the different problems with the social contract around the time of WWII. The movie was about a boat heading to England and gets torpedoed by Nazis, some of the passengers and crew made it onto to a lifeboat. The boat that was heading to England was also able to sink the Nazi’s submarine, a German Nazi survived and was rescued by the people on the lifeboat. The rest of the movie was about the people on the lifeboat discussing topics that deal with the social contract and what they were going to do with the German. Lifeboat conveys the problems with the social contract …show more content…
The upper class people did not treat lower class people as equals. Andrew Carnegie, was a rich factory owner in the book Out of this Furnace. He was able to become so rich, because he saved money by not paying his workers a lot. He also made them work long hours and did not spend money to make sure the factories were safe. He owned the land and buildings were most of his workers lived. He had the ability to raise their rent, making sure his worker stayed lower class with him on top (Adrienne 2/17/17). In the movie Lifeboat, Rittenhouse was very similar to Andrew Carnegie. Rittenhouse was rich, owned a lot factories and did not like labor unions. During the scene with Rittenhouse and Kovac gambling, Kovac talks about how Rittenhouse will end up owing him so much, that he will get one of Rittenhouse’s many factories. Kovac explains that he would have union meetings so that the workers could talk about how to make their conditions better. Rittenhouse gets offended, not wanting a lower class man to criticize how he runs his factories. Rittenhouse started to accuse Kovac of cheating, because Kovac kept on winning and it was his deck of cards. Kovac showed that he wanted equality between the workers and giving the lower class the chance to move up. Rittenhouse did not like Kovac telling him how to run his factory, Rittenhouse like keeping his workers in line and below
The inequalities in America during the gilded age came from an unequal distribution of wealth, leaving only a small percentage of individuals with riches while the rest suffered in poverty even with constant overproduction of everyday necessities. People argued that social darwinism would chose who was meant to be rich and the survival of the fittest would deem who was better than the rest. From 1870-1895, journalists and critics dismantled the inequality during the period and some offer their own solutions.
If an owner does not possess these qualities, then by the rigors of business ownership he would be mentally crushed by the amount of work that falls upon the owner's shoulders. In addition, even though labor came cheaply to the wealthy owners, labor was still an issue because of the Unions that were formed to protect the rights of workers.... ... middle of paper ... ...
At this time, Vanderbilt had emerged as a top leader in the railroad industry during the 19th century and eventually became the richest man in America. Vanderbilt is making it abundantly clear to Americans that his only objective is to acquire as much wealth as possible even if it is at the expense of every day citizens. Another man who echoed such sentiments is Andrew Carnegie. In an excerpt from the North American Review, Carnegie takes Vanderbilt’s ideas even further and advocates for the concentration of business and wealth into the hands of a few (Document 3). Carnegie suggests that such a separation between the rich and the poor “insures survival of the fittest in every department” and encourages competition, thus, benefiting society as a whole. Carnegie, a steel tycoon and one of the wealthiest businessmen to date, continuously voiced his approval of an ideology known as Social Darwinism which essentially models the “survival of the fittest” sentiment expressed by Carnegie and others. In essence, he believed in widening inequalities in society for the sole purpose of placing power in the hands of only the most wealthy and most
On the other hand, Carnegie understands that there exists inequality, but he believes that the superior can cooperate with the inferior to gain equality. In fact, it the document he clarifies, “There remains…only one mode of using great fortunes…in this we have the true antidote for the temporary unequal distribution of wealth, the reconciliation of the rich and the poor−a reign of harmony” (Carnegie, 54). Carnegie does not particularly consider inequality a problem. He understands that in order for wealthy to facilitate the lives of the poor, there must be inequality to establish status, but he also discerns that by helping the poor they are given a chance to reach equality. In fact, Carnegie says, “Individualism will
The view on the wealthy in the society was different from one person to another and this actually led to publications and criticisms one after another. Actually the discovery of new economic opportunities made United States to be viewed as a land of economic glory and prosperity. This in turn attracted more people from different parts of the world. Ironically, some of the optimistic immigrants got overly involved relentless poverty and had to struggle for cont...
... safeguard that unionization might be achieved, Steinbeck recommends the structuring of a "transitory work board," which would at last capacity like the longshoremen's employing halls and might additionally set compensation essentials. At the same time, the state will start arraigning the "dangerous fascistic gatherings", implying the Associated Farmers, under the same criminal against syndicalism laws utilized against work organization. At last, Steinbeck contends that to screen the changes will oblige an "aggressor and watchful association of white collar class individuals, workers, instructors, skilled workers, and liberals to battle the fascistic forces and to support this state in an equitable structure". He cautions that not undertaking these changes may cause the Okies to turn into "an armed force determined by misery and disdain to take what they require."
In the late 1700’s and early 1800’s, big business began to boom. For the first time, companies were developing large factories to manufacture their goods. Due to the new mechanics and cheap labor, factory owners can now produce their goods at a cheaper rate. As big businesses brought wealth and capitalism, it also widened the gap between the wealthy elite and the poor. One class in particular was horribly affected by the growth of big factories.
As stated in the textbook, the wealthiest people were seaport merchants that made their business on imports, exports, banks and insurance companies, and urban real estate. An example would be the Boston Brahmins who were a cluster of old Protestant families in Boston that constituted the city’s social elite by the early 19thcentury. The upper class enjoyed the prosperity industrialization granted them as they achieved luxury and extravagance. Below the social elite was a growing middle class that included lawyers, salesmen, clerks, retail merchants, and accountants. Industrialization provided occupations that allowed people to lift themselves higher in the social strata The middle class took advantage of their increased wages by living comfortably and providing an education for their next generation in order to maintain their social standing. The only class that did not benefit from industrialization was the poor working class. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, lower class families relied on their farms for a living. Industrialization has caused entire families to leave the fields and work in factories. The working class faced harsh working conditions and low wages did not provide them any comfort or security. The Industrial Revolution has indeed formed the American social strata, but not all social classes benefited
The struggle for survival by mankind can be found in many different settings. It can be seen on a battlefield, a hospital room or at sea as related in “The Open Boat”, written in 1897 by Stephen Crane. The story is based on his actual experiences when he survived the sinking of the SS Commodore off the coast of Florida in early 1897. “The Open Boat” is Stephen Crane’s account of life and death at sea told through the use of themes and devices to emphasize the indifference of nature to man’s struggles and the development of mankind’s compassion.
After the civil war, the United States had deep social divisions that strictly divided the classes. This period of time was called the Gilded Age. The economy was shifting more and more towards an industrial one, manufacturing in the United States was more than the greater powers of Europe combined. With these industries, there were huge monopolies over steel, oil, and various other markets. The wealthy over these corporations had much influence in the government and politics. All the while, the lower classes were led to believe that they had something wrong with them. They were told they had a “lack of character” that prevented them from being successful (Foner pg. 121). The upper class as well as many economists believed that being successful from unskilled labor was impossible. They believed that entrepreneurial skills were the only thing that would allow people to become successful. The labor movement vehemently disagreed with this. They knew that the reason why most lower class workers would never be promoted or paid a livable wage was because the wealthy believed they were subhuman. They held strikes and rallies against the big corporations, such as the Great Railroad Strike, and the Pullman Strike, but their voices were ignored. .
The article “Living on a Lifeboat” by Garrett Hardin entails the ecologist’s dramatic feelings on immigration. According to Hardin, people are disregarding the future of the United States by expecting all the rights and none of the responsibilities that are associated with an increasing population.
The upper class developed the eElite American Culturef which gave them the view that they were superior to the others around them. They also developed a bad view of lower class people as they did not mix with them.
Mr. Birling fires Eva for unionizing and he defends his actions even after knowing the consequences of his actions by saying, “ if they didn’t like those rates, they could go and work somewhere else” (17). Readers learn that Birling’s company pays a substandard wage and that he himself has no concern for workers who cannot survive from these wages. Once they attempt to unionize, he cold-bloodedly fires the major union supporters and stubbornly keeps the workers’ wages at the same low level. It is ironic that even though he had to work hard for his wealth, he feels no responsibility for helping others who are merely trying to survive. However, Eric reacts to the situation differently by taking responsibility for Eva’s death and claiming that “the fact remains that [he] did what [he] did” (61).
Friend, Celeste. "Social Contract Theory [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Hamilton College, 15 Oct. 2004. Web. 01 Oct. 2011. .
Money is an essential part of life where every people can satisfy whatever they need and every person in America has a chance to find a job. However, some of the people in the country wanted to go on with their life freely by being a part of a welfare. Furthermore, distribution of wealth is a huge demand of every citizen. Everyone today is trying to look down for every people in the lower class, as they did not give any benefit to the country, waiting for the benefits that they will receive from the government. For instance, when most lower class people have gone through a financial crisis due to overspending, insufficient fund or pay for their work to support themselves and/or their family. The example shows that lower class people made the economy of the country unstable, however, the middle class and the higher class is at fault as well. Furthermore, even though the benefit of that the lower class received is from the middle class, the middle class as well benefits from the higher class. To sum up, every class is at fault towards giving the country’s economy a positive