Life Of Pi Rhetorical Analysis

798 Words2 Pages

There are many ways that as humans we try to understand and make sense of the world around us. One of the ways we simplify our reality is using metaphors, they allow us to turn unfamiliar and complex concepts into explicit terms. In the Life of Pi the author, Yann Martel, uses metaphors to familiarize distant concepts with the reader. He allows the reader to understand and relate to incomprehensible events. After a cargo ship sinks in the middle of the Pacific ocean, a single lifeboat is all that remains. The lifeboat consists of a zebra, an orangutan, hyena, a royal bengal tiger, and a sixteen year old boy, Piscine Patel. The events that follow are unbelievable and physically, spiritually, and mentally challenge and change each survivor. …show more content…

At the beginning of the book Pi had the luxury of being in control of what he eats, this choice quickly dissolved when he was on the boat as he was forced to eat meat. Morally at the beginning Pi found killing a fish a nearly impossible deed, demonstrated when he stated, “A life time of peaceful vegetarianism stood between me and the willful beheading of a fish,” slowly after the beheading he sacrificed his beliefs and adapted to the situation he was in, resulting in him becoming a carnivour. Martel demonstrated Pi’s drastic dietary change by reflecting it onto the algae island. Vegetarianism and carnivorism can be considered polar opposites, day and night, black and white. When Pi had a choice of what he ate there was “light” in his life, but darkness came after the ship sank, shown when referring to his first night he stated, ”Darkness came. There was no moon. Clouds hid the stars.” and that choice evaporated, the same idea was echoed in the island, when there was light (day) the island was a peaceful safe but when darkness came it became a fiery hell. Martel appropriately used the island as a metaphor for the black and white contrast between Pi’s change in

Open Document