Life Of Pi Rhetorical Analysis

1275 Words3 Pages

Character Surrogacy and Vicarious Storytelling Yann Martel’s critically acclaimed and academically revered novel, Life of Pi, offers a formative insight into themes of the nature of religion; exploration of faith; the natural world; and above all, the art of storytelling, cementing his contribution to the literary community as a precedent for the application of narrative techniques. While all narrative techniques present themselves in this late 20th Century magnum opus, one may identify that the most prevalent of these for the advancement of the narrative include: backstory, foreshadowing, and frame story. In the expository chapters of Life of Pi, Yann Martel introduces himself as a character in the story; a nuanced examination of how an author …show more content…

One instance of this follows Pi’s father, the manager of the Pondicherry Zoo, Santosh Patel, demonstrating the fundamental laws of survival by feeding a goat to a starving tiger. He stresses the dangers of wild animals to his children in fear of their curiosity jeopardizing their safety. After the traumatic events that transpired, he candidly remarks “‘I want you to remember this lesson for the rest of your lives’” (Martel 34). After further inspection, it becomes clear that the purpose of including this story holds more relevance to the larger plot than what appears on the surface; it introduces a lingering conflict for our protagonist in the future. Additionally, another conflict presents itself to the protagonists shortly after. Set in the 1970s, this fictitious family faces a very legitimate threat to India at the time when Mrs. Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India, planned for the suspension of civil liberties to subvert the power to herself while she was in office. A political statue of this nature would hypothetically compromise Santosh Patel’s …show more content…

And the New India, or the family of it, would decide to move to Canada)” (Martel 75). It becomes inherently clear that, for better or for worse, the Patel family must uproot themselves and assimilate into a new country and a new culture, posing conflict for the future events of the story where much of Pi’s suffering occurs. By taking the time to thoroughly prepare his audience by establishing vital elements of his story, Martel demonstrates the extent of his craft to develop an extensive world and a cohesive chain of events. In essence, critics should not overlook Yann Martel’s narrative technique; in only the first third of the story, he exhibits clear expertise in the art of storytelling and world building. By implementing devices such as background, foreshadowing, and framestory, he augments an illusion of an authentic interview, or docufiction of a fabricated character who possesses visceral human qualities that parallel life, and struggles that offer an allegory for perseverance and acceptance and adaptation of one’s afflictions, such as that of the animals he symbolizes in his esteemed

More about Life Of Pi Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document