Life Of Pi Rhetorical Analysis Essay

1001 Words3 Pages

Life of Pi by Yann Martel
Pi, an irrational number, has never really been used to represent irrationality in a symbolistic manner in literature until it was cleverly paired with quite an irrational story in Yann Martel’s Life of Pi. The book, published in 2012, takes place in India, Mexico, Canada, and in the Pacific, and is an astounding work of metaphors, hardship, and philosophical ideas about life and its irrationality. Perhaps pulling from his background of extensive travel and Philosophy degree, Martel creates an intricate and multilayered story that pushes readers to keep reading through all 319 pages despite a tying plot. Although the book is technically a work of fiction, Martel, clearly influenced by the realism genre of writing, …show more content…

The author's note takes the reader into the story, which begins with the author meeting the main character in search of the story which the author heard about in India. Although very confusing at this point it is essential to read the beginning of the story in order to understand the remainder and the many layers of Allegorical the story. The author meets with the main character, whom is unknown at this point and describes the various elements of his house in Toronto, Canada, and the unknown character’s family and appearance. Martel than confuses the reader even more by beginning the story which will make up the majority of the chapters and plot. At this point, the main character is introduced. His name is Piscine Monitor Patel the son of an Indian zookeeper, named after a French swimming pool, and his is a young boy of Indian ethnicity, living in Pondicherry, India. He lives a life of a typical school boy, fighting with his brother, learning from his parents, and growing to understand the world and its challenges. Pi though, becomes deeply rooted in religion and faith and becomes a participant of Islam, Christianity, and Hinduism. Throughout the story, the reader learns how Piscine, later to get the nickname Pi, develops into a man …show more content…

My strongest criticism of the work is the painfully slow and monumentally confusing beginning to the story. In my opinion, the layers of the story make the story simply too confusing following the “Author’s Note” and it took me a lot of willpower to make my way through the first fifteen or so chapters. However, I could not have been more satisfied to have worked through the introduction pages, as the remainder of the book is artfully crafted. The plot continues to climb to the top of the metaphorical roller-coaster with characters which are so alive and real that the reader cannot help but feel sympathetic and connected to them. The plot flows smoothly through the chapters post-author interruptions, and it guides the reader through Martel’s amazingly accurate descriptions of the Pacific, India, and Pi’s situation. Martel paints an extremely vivid image in the readers head using descriptions clearly drawn from his personal travel experience. Now at the top of the “roller-coaster,” Martel has the reader wait patiently throughout the majority of the book, giving the reader time to ponder what Pi has gone through and what really matters in life. Through this “waiting” the reader watches Pi grow as a character into a man and a survivor, which is typical of the literal journey motif. However, reading the story symbolically, the

Open Document