Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thoreau’s understanding of nature and human life
Thoreau's views
Thoreau's individualism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thoreau’s understanding of nature and human life
Saying that life was meant to be lived simplistically is nonsensical as the word “simple” is too vague and broad to define something as complex as human life Furthermore if one could define what a “simple life” would consist of that live would stick lack meaning. It's is the complications of life that give it substance and meaning. Henry David Thoreau saying “life is frittered away by detail.” is an overly idealistic approach to life. A simple life is an unobtainable goal and even if it were possible to attain, why would you want one?
Saying that one should live “simply” is a uneducated and almost neanderthalic comment. Life itself is one of the most complex natural mechanisms. Humans bodies consist of 37.2 trillion cells. In our
…show more content…
lifetimes we meet hundred of people, feel thousands of feelings and emotions, and encounter different experiences. How in that madness could one live life simply. Also what or who defines “simple”? For example a man who lives in a small American town and works a desk job from nine to five, his life may seem simple to us residents of New York. But compared to a Buddhist monk in the mountains of Tibet that man’s life is riddled with complexity. It's all a matter of perspective and therefore impossible to define a “simple life”. When Henry David Thoreau said “life is frittered away by detail” he was taking an extremely lucid approach to examining the meaning of life.
The detail in life is what gives it purpose, meaning and excitement. Imagine your life without detail. You would simply get up and do the same thing everyday with no changes or excitement. Detail is art. Detail is excitement. Detail is entertainment. It's what makes life worth living. In addition Thoreau fails to give us any clear instructions on how to live a simple life. He just states that “life is frittered away by detail” but gives no solution. Finally he doesn't define “detail”. What exactly constitutes “detail”?
If it were somehow possible to live a “simple life” why would you want to? Doesn't a life without detail sound dull and boring? Also there's no guarantee that living a “simple life” would result in a happy, fulfilling life. If you are dealing with stress and depression living simply may be counter productive. It simply avoids your problems rather than dealing with them.
In conclusion living a simple life is nearly impossible. Life is inherently too complex and no one’s definition of a “simple life” can be correct. Thoreau saying “life is frittered away by detail” is an illogical and full approach to the guidelines of how to live. If anything the details that Thoreau refers to, actually make life more interesting. Ask yourself how dull your life would be without details and is it possible to live without
detail?
In his essay, “The Evolution of Simplicity,” American conservative political and cultural commentator David Brooks examines the modern obsession with the simplification of life. His essay hints at man’s tendency to overcomplicate various aspects of day-to-day activities and failure to appreciate life for its true beauty. Brooks warns that this over complication of the nation can leave us swamped with stress and spread to thin, spending too much of our energy and focus on unimportant and virtually irrelevant facets of our existence.
For example, “Our life is like a German Confederacy, made of up petty states,with its boundary forever fluctuating, so that even a German cannot tell you how it is bounded at any moment.” (page 277). The German Confederacy was a group created to try to unify states. After the French Revolution things in europe got hectic. By creating the German Confederacy they tried to make everything easier and bring things back to order, but it ended up causing more of a problem. By using this simile, Thoreau was saying that life is much more complicated than it has to be. He gives the feeling of being ludicrous. That people complicate their lives with little things that don’t really matter much to the bigger picture. Another example in the text is, “ Let us spend one day as deliberately as Nature, and not be thrown off the track by every nutshell and mosquito’s wing that falls on the rails.” (page 280). What Thoreau is saying is the we should spend one day just being, as in living life without complications. Spend one day not getting off track and making it complicated by little things that don’t matter. Thoreau uses similes to compare life of humans to simpler things to show that we too, do not have to be complicated. But yet we are so he uses similes to clarify his
Thoreau went into the woods for many different reasons than McCandless. He decided to live in the woods so he could live deliberately. He desired to learn what life had to teach him and face only the essential facts of life without any other distractions. Going into the woods, would let him know that he had lived, so when he died, he wouldn’t regret never fully living. He wanted to figure out if this life in nature was mean or sublime. If it was mean, he hoped to publish his findings to the world, but if it was sublime, he would just know this knowledge and use it for his next excursion. Thoreau heavily believed in simplicity. He felt everything should be simplified, and that people were squandered by details. As he said, “ Simplicity, simplicity,
Throughout the passage many devices appear so the reader can have a deeper understanding of Thoreau’s attitude towards life. “Let us spend one day as deliberately as Nature, and not be thrown off the track by every nutshell and mosquito’s wing that falls on the rails. Let us rise early and fast, or break fast, gently and without perturbation;
This excerpt from "Walden" by Henry D. Thoreau uses the literary element of word choice to express the importance of living simply and taking life slow. He uses bold and eloquent words to evoke a sense of peace and relaxation. He stresses the importance of living a life without unnecessary anxiety, for it causes nothing but stress. To understand and appreciate what is truly wonderful in life, we must forgo our rushing mindsets
We often focus on the unimportant and minor details of life. Rather than just going on about life peacefully, we tend to complicate things for ourselves by never being satisfied. Throughout the story, Thoreau uses rhetorical questions as a literary device. He questions the actions of those who surround him by asking, “Why should we knock under and go with the stream?” This is similar to asking, “Why make things harder for yourself when you can just go with the flow?” He asks, “Why should we live with such a hurry and waste of life?” This question is straightforward, simply meaning; we often tend to rush life without completely living it. Instead, we should rather pace ourselves and enjoy every present moment before it’s gone.
To conclude, Thoreau believed that people should be ruled by conscience and that people should fight against injustice through non-violence according to “Civil Disobedience.” Besides, he believed that we should simplify our lives and take some time to learn our essence in the nature. Moreover, he deemed that tradition and money were unimportant as he demonstrated in his book, Walden. I suggested that people should learn from Thoreau to live deliberately and spend more time to go to the nature instead of watching television, playing computer games, and among other things, such that we could discover who we were and be endeavored to build foundations on our dreams.
Thoreau distinguishes what he wishes his life was; he compares what he wants out of life to what he currently has. He says “I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practice resignation, unless it was quite necessary.” He makes note of how dear and important life is, and how he wishes to live in a way which he hadn’t been before, by making the most out of the life he has left.
He also appreciated the simplicity of life and wished not to complicate it with thousands of affairs, but rather, two or three.
In conclusion, humankind is blessed with life as God created it. One must reflect on their actions throughout life because one will be judged by God in the next life, one must see the importance of gasping liberation, and one must have a loving and open heart when helping the poor. Life should be lived to its fullest because once time is lost, it cannot be regained; life needs to be appreciated.
Have you ever woke up in the morning and asked yourself, “Why am I living this life?” Throughout the book of Walden, Henry David Thoreau questions the lifestyles that people choose; he makes his readers wonder if they have chosen the kind of lifestyle that give them the greatest amount of happiness. Thoreau stated, “Most men, even in this comparatively free country, through mere ignorance and mistake, are so occupied with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them().” This quote is important because most of society these days are so caught up in work and trying to make ends meet that they lose the values in life. Thoreau was forced to change his life when he found himself unhappy after a purchase for a farm fell through. On Thoreau’s journey he moves to Walden and builds a house and life from nothing but hard work, symbolizes many different objects.
With the statement, “Most men, even in this comparatively free country, through mere ignorance and mistake, are so occupied with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them,” Thoreau is saying that many people in the world, including the United States, are not able to enjoy life because they are too preoccupied with working and earning wealth to buy unnecessary goods. Thoreau believes that men only need four things to survive: fuel, food, shelter, and clothing. However, according to Thoreau, people still strive to obtain more and more unnecessary material goods. To obtain these goods, Thoreau writes, “He has no time to be any thing but a machine,” meaning that men are so busy working to make excessive money that work consumes their entire lives. Thoreau, on the other hand, ignores “factitious cares” such as excessive wealth, furniture, and a large home, in order to enjoy his life and not be forced to live his life as a machine.
Throughout the essay, Thoreau uses polysyndeton to express the simplicity that came from going to the woods. All over this essay, Thoreau uses polysyndeton many times, he uses it to emphasize that people should choose the simple path of life over the common complex path. For example, Thoreau uses polysyndeton to explain that people must be smart about how to live their lives to the fullest or end their lives never accomplishing their goals. Furthermore, Thoreau uses polysyndeton to express that working hard and making things simple, is the only path to fully live your life. Thoreau chooses to use polysyndeton to emphasize that it is up people, if their actions help them to simplify their path to fulfillment or if their actions cause them to
The essay that was written on Faubert's A Simple Heart by Myra Jehlen, very accurately states that to be simple is not necessarily to be simpleminded. Felicite is a a highly revered house maid in France for a woman names Madam Aubain. In A Simple Heart, Felecite encounters many situations that we may encounter in our lives and the writers unbiased and non-judging descriptions of events give light to the complexity that gives Felecite her simple thoughts. Her great attachement with a parrot named Lou Lou, saving the Madam and her children from the bull and ... are all examples of the ways that someone with appearingly simple thoughts might actually have very complex reasons for making the choices that they make.
That is, Thoreau suggests finding out what you really value and really need for your life. Thus, Thoreau try to solve this problem from an economic view of point. Thoreau states that everyone seems to treat economy carelessly; however, “economy is a subject which admits of being treated with levity, but it cannot so be disposed of” (72). When they treat economy carefully and look at their problem from a different angle, they would realize that it is not so serious problem. Almost all their problems do not come from lack of the necessary for life but come from lack of the luxury. They do not understand the difference between necessary and luxury at