Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thoreau’s view towards humans and nature
Rhetorical analysis of thoreau's civil disobediance
Thoreau's essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thoreau’s view towards humans and nature
Time: about 70 minutes “Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity!” once stated by Thoreau. Henry David Thoreau was a simple man with a simple life. He yearned for simplicity. He was a very wise man as well. In his piece of writing “ Where I Lived and What I Lived For” Thoreau explains a life of simplicity separated from the complexity of society. In “Where I Live and What I lived For” Thoreau most effectively appeals to pathos through the use of allusion, similes, and imagery. Throughout “Where I Lived and What I Lived for”, Thoreau uses allusion to evoke pathos. The first allusion Thoreau uses in “Where I Lived and What I Lived For” is, “...fable tells us that we were long ago changed into men; like pygmies we fight with cranes...” (page 276). …show more content…
This alludes to a Greek fable and to Book three of the Ilaid. In other words, Thoreau is trying to say like the pygmies fighting the cranes we busy ourselves with things in life that are not of importance. He is stating that it was thought that we grew up and stopped adding complications but in fact we have not. It gives the feeling of being childish and obtuse. That the way we are living is not the correct way. Another example of allusion that Thoreau uses is, “ With unrelaxed nerves, with morning vigor, sail it by, looking another way, tired to the mast like Ulysses.” (page 280). Ulysses is another name for Odysseus. In a section of this epic poem there’s a story about how Odysseus and his crew sail through the sea and come across some sirens. The sirens try to tempt them into the sea so they can drown the men. Odysseus tells his crew to look away and plug their ears with wax to drown out the voices of the sirens, but Odysseus himself goes with no wax in his ears and still manages to not be called into the sea to his death. Thoreau uses this allusion to show that the world needs more people like Ulysses. Thoreau uses this to show that the sirens are the complicated things in life that people don’t need but yet follow and try to reach because it calls to them. He uses Ulysses to show that is it possible to have it there and to ignore it at the same time. Thoreau, in a way, makes people feel guilty for not being strong enough to ignore the forbidden fruits of life. Similes occurred quite often throughout this piece of writing.
For example, “Our life is like a German Confederacy, made of up petty states,with its boundary forever fluctuating, so that even a German cannot tell you how it is bounded at any moment.” (page 277). The German Confederacy was a group created to try to unify states. After the French Revolution things in europe got hectic. By creating the German Confederacy they tried to make everything easier and bring things back to order, but it ended up causing more of a problem. By using this simile, Thoreau was saying that life is much more complicated than it has to be. He gives the feeling of being ludicrous. That people complicate their lives with little things that don’t really matter much to the bigger picture. Another example in the text is, “ Let us spend one day as deliberately as Nature, and not be thrown off the track by every nutshell and mosquito’s wing that falls on the rails.” (page 280). What Thoreau is saying is the we should spend one day just being, as in living life without complications. Spend one day not getting off track and making it complicated by little things that don’t matter. Thoreau uses similes to compare life of humans to simpler things to show that we too, do not have to be complicated. But yet we are so he uses similes to clarify his …show more content…
points. Imagery was another way Thoreau appealed to pathos in “ Where I Lived and What I Lived For”.
He uses imagery to show how complicated people make life; how much of life is unnecessary. In turn, it evokes emotional responses from the readers. An example is, “ Hardly a man takes a half-hour’s nap after dinner, but when he wakes he holds up his head and asks, “what’s the news?” as if the rest of man kind had stood his sentinels. Some give directions to be waked every half-hour, doubtless for no other purpose; and then, to pay for it, they tell what they have dreamed. After a night‘s sleep the news is as indispensable as the breakfast. “Pray tell me anything new that has happened to a man anywhere on this globe”-- and he reads it over his coffee and rolls, that a man has had his eyes gouged out this morning on the Wachito River; never dreaming the while that he lives in the dark unfathomed mammoth cave of this world, and has but the rudiment of an eye himself.” (page 278). In this part of the text Thoreau explains the life of a man. In the end however, it turns into a sorrowful ending. What Thoreau was trying to say in this part of the text is that people could go experience things themselves instead of listening to stories. Instead of staying home and asking what is happening with the world, you could experience it yourself and that it is unnecessary to hear the stories in the
newspaper. Thoreau most effectively appeals to pathos through the use of imagery, allusion, and similes in “Where I Lived and What I Lived For”. With allusion he mostly uses allusions to greek mythology. With allusions from The Odyssey it makes a person feel weak because of the choices they make in life. With similes, Thoreau uses examples like the German Confederacy to get across the point of being too complex. He makes a person feel ignorant for the way they are living because they did not choose simplicity. Last, but not least Thoreau uses imagery to show a person how simple life could be and how complicated we make our lives. Thoreau uses these devices to evoke an emotional response from his readers so they can better understand how complicated we make our lives when really it could be simple.
Comparing Metaphors in Norman Maclean's, A River Runs Through It and Henry David Thoreau's, Walden
As Henry is working for Waldo, he will take care of Edward who’s his son. After doing so one day, Henry is placed a very uncomfortable situation where Edward asks his mother Lydian if Henry could be his new father. Lydian then starts to want Henry gone but wants to do so by finding him a nice woman to settle down with. She tells him that and he says “you want to be a matchmaker, Lydian? Find me something innocent and uncomplicated. A shrub-oak. A cloud. A leaf lost in the snow” (Lawrence and Lee 78). By saying this Henry’s showing how he favors nature and its beauty. Adding to that, the teachings that Henrys share with others show the importance of nature. This is seen when Henry is trying to get Emily to see the fact that there’s more to Transcendentalism than being a tree-hugger and to look at nature to see its beauty. He explains this to her by telling her “what is a house if you haven’t got a tolerable planet to put it on? Did you know that trees cry out in pain when they’re cut? I’ve heard them” (Lawrence and Lee 34). With this being said, Henrys explaining that in order to have a nice place to live, nature has to be taken care of. Overall, The Night Thoreau Spent In Jail focuses on the importance of
Pathos is prevalent throughout Thoreau’s essay. He uses pathos in an attempt to persuade his readers into making a logical and ethical choice. The essay as a whole is an attempt to anger the reader into taking action against what Thoreau sees as an unjust government. When he refers to “the mass of men” who are in service to the country, the soldiers, as being the “same worth only as horse and dogs” and of serving “the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines...
The opening paragraph is an incredibly vivid account of nights spent by “the stony shore” of Walden Pond. His description of the animals around the pond, the cool temperature, and the gentle sounds of lapping waves and rustling leaves all serve to remove the idea that nature is a wild and unkempt world of its own, and instead makes it seem much more serene and graceful. Any who thought of Thoreau as an insane outdoorsmen may have even found themselves repulsed by the monotony and constant bustle of city life and longing for the serenity felt by Thoreau. This
Thoreau conveys many points in his writing and a large recurring one is the state of society. As stated before, he believed that people are too focused on physical gain and modernization which leads them into desperation. He adds on to this belief later in the book asking that above all else whether it be money or fame he be given honesty (Thoreau 246). To Thoreau, the truth is more important than anything measurable in status. Thoreau believes that a minimalist lifestyle is a good lifestyle, similar to Mccandless. He speaks of how it is good that he can put all of his belonging in one pile in his yard because it removes the clutter from his life (Thoreau 85). He also says that his best quality in life is to want very little, because it keeps himself true to himself and keeps him from distraction. Thoreau also believes that every man should be one in himself not oppressed by the government. He says that everyone should be able to be themselves whether is is in accord with the government or not (Thoreau 240). He is essentially saying that the government should not be a part of people's life decisions only to maintain the
Throughout the passage many devices appear so the reader can have a deeper understanding of Thoreau’s attitude towards life. “Let us spend one day as deliberately as Nature, and not be thrown off the track by every nutshell and mosquito’s wing that falls on the rails. Let us rise early and fast, or break fast, gently and without perturbation;
. ." (lines 5-7). In this, he tries to begin to explain that in order to truly live the fullest life possible, one must live simply; literally "driv[ing] life into a corner, and reduc[ing] it to its lowest terms" is the only way to achieve fullness. Later, he also states: "Let us spend one day as deliberately as Nature, and not be thrown off the track by every nutshell and mosquito’s wing that falls on the rails. Let us rise early and fast, or break fast, gently and without [disturbance]; let company come and let company go, let the bells ring and the children cry. . ." (lines 13-16). In this, he expresses that one should not let the daily disturbances of life affect oneself. Life should be lived with litle disturbance, and even such disturbances should not be taken as seriously. In choosing to give examples, he shows just how many things go on that one can be pestered with, and that one should choose to ignore them and let them pass by. He also states: "Let us settle ourselves, and work and wedge our feet downward through the mud
Thoreau uses figurative language to show how people stress about many problems in their lives and that it makes their lives difficult. For example, he states “Let us spend one day as deliberately as nature, and not be thrown off the track by every nutshell and mosquito’s wing that falls on the rails.” He compares nutshell and mosquito to irritating problems we have that we get thrown off by. He wants us to take all the junk that we don’t need out of us and focus more on living life without stress. In addition, he also mentions “In the midst of this chopping sea of civilized life, such are the clouds and storms and quicksands and thousand-and-one items to be allowed for that a man has to live.” In this text, Thoreau uses a huge metaphor to explain
He pulled his dripping trunks from the line where they had hung all through the shower, and wrung them out. Languidly, and with no thought of going in, I watched him, his hard little body, skinny and bare, saw him wince slightly as he pulled up around his vitals the small, soggy, icy garment. As he buckled the swollen belt suddenly my groin felt the chill of death.” White is finally beginning to see it is no longer himself in his son but his son is growing up and White is only getting older. On the other hand, Thoreau is giving the visual of the pond itself over time and as the seasons change the details and perspectives of the pond are all becoming something else. As the seasons pass the way the pond changes and the view and elements around it
We often focus on the unimportant and minor details of life. Rather than just going on about life peacefully, we tend to complicate things for ourselves by never being satisfied. Throughout the story, Thoreau uses rhetorical questions as a literary device. He questions the actions of those who surround him by asking, “Why should we knock under and go with the stream?” This is similar to asking, “Why make things harder for yourself when you can just go with the flow?” He asks, “Why should we live with such a hurry and waste of life?” This question is straightforward, simply meaning; we often tend to rush life without completely living it. Instead, we should rather pace ourselves and enjoy every present moment before it’s gone.
To conclude, Thoreau believed that people should be ruled by conscience and that people should fight against injustice through non-violence according to “Civil Disobedience.” Besides, he believed that we should simplify our lives and take some time to learn our essence in the nature. Moreover, he deemed that tradition and money were unimportant as he demonstrated in his book, Walden. I suggested that people should learn from Thoreau to live deliberately and spend more time to go to the nature instead of watching television, playing computer games, and among other things, such that we could discover who we were and be endeavored to build foundations on our dreams.
... which represents how fleeting time is. Thoreau is aware that the time he has been given is so very limited, especially compared to an eternity, but like the river, time will go on even if he isn’t alive to witness it. “I have always been regretting that I was not as wise as the day I was born.” Compared to where he was in his life when he wrote this, when he was born there was a lot less to be concerned about. Babies are able to live the simple life which Thoreau desires. When we’re young we don’t possess as much of the knowledge as we do when we get older, our intellect can be compared to time. As we grow older we gain more knowledge, the two go hand in hand, but when we are young we aren’t wise so nothing is troublesome, which is why Thoreau says he wishes he was as wise as he was when he was born, life is never as simple as it was the moment you were born.
His use of personification implies his enjoyment of deep, one-on-one conversation. Previously noted, Thoreau prefers that ideas are said carefully and smoothly to avoid an abruptness to presenting it to someone else, if the room were to be crowded. Or, if the distance between the two people isn’t far enough to be able to register each other’s thoughts. He states that “our sentences wanted room to unfold and form their columns in the interval (25-26),” meaning that in order to let thoughts and ideas be understood by the other individuals, both must be at a distance to allow to process it and be able to let that distance add more detail to the thought or idea. This is supported by the following sentence where Thoreau describes it as “a singular luxury to talk across the pond to a companion on the opposite side (28-29).” Thoreau signifies the importance of communication and delivering thoughts by making it as though the thoughts and words themselves are actual living creatures that also have needs and wants. This complements his earnestness because he basically hinted to the reader in the beginning that he’s more fond of the contents of the mind than the person
In Thoreau’s view, he felt that the government was insufficient. He didn’t need the laws to be just, he used his conscious and morality. He was compelled to do what morally was right, rather than it being based on government issued laws such as the complacent society there is today. People seem to care about justice, yet are immoral. This was the message Thoreau was trying to get across.
Thoreau wasn 't one to take advantage of what the world had to offer and just took life what it was, all while following his motto of doing what was right. Thoreau sees the miracles of the world similarly to the Whitman poem because there isn 't a limit to what can be appreciated. There are quite a few modern views that compare well to Thoreau as they take that step away from society defined by technology and progression and just take a look at the bigger picture, one of these approaches is the recent Occupy Wall Street movement.