Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on bravery and courage
The importance of courage
An essay on bravery and courage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In war, much reward is given, possibly to a fault. In The Matterhorn by Karl Marlantes, the reader follows Lieutenant Mellas, an Ivy League graduate, who in joining the military hopes to earn praise as a soldier. He will use this praise and reward as a soldier to propel his personal agenda. Once thrown into the thick, ghastly swamp that is the Vietnamese jungle, Mellas witnesses the true terror and horror of war. He quickly realizes what it means to be a true warrior, a man of character. This character that he comes to learn and understand throughout the novel comes to define him as a man and human being. As the story progresses, he becomes more angry with the U.S. Military. He begins to recognize how often the true heroes of war go unnoticed. …show more content…
At the beginning of the text Mellas often is only thinking of the medal or reward behind his actions, he nonetheless always carries out the correct decision that ultimately best benefits his soldiers and comrades in Bravo Company, showing that he does in fact know how to behave well.
This in turn leads himself and the reader to question the difference between behaving well and being a good person. Although at the start of his military career Mellas only consists of a personality, a stigma of “fake it till’ you make it,” he quickly begins to realize what it means to be a good person, soldier, and brother to his fellow piers, showing that in order to be good, one must develop character, and fully understand the reasoning and ethics behind their actions. At the beginning of the novel, Lieutenant Mellas merely consists of a personality. He is an Ivy League graduate who joined the Military in order to pad his resume, not to fight for his country or his brothers in war. The stigma that Mellas carries into the Military is one that is selfish; Mellas is there only to benefit himself. Early on, Mellas states that he …show more content…
“would wish anything, and maybe even do anything, if it meant getting ahead or saving his own skin” (7). Mellas consists only of the shell of a soldier. From the outside, Mellas appears to be a good soldier, he follows orders, is respectful of others, and does his job well, but this is all a façade. On the inside, Lieutenant Mellas lacks the character that many of his fellow soldiers already have. He only knows how to behave well. Like a dog, he is able to follow simple commands, do his job well and behave correctly, but he does not understand what it actually means to contain character. He lacks the understanding of reason behind the actions he performs, revealing his true personality, and the difference between a man of character and a man of personality. A man of character understands the reasons and ethics behind his actions and is able to inform his own decisions based on those reasons. Mellas’s first real realization of this is when Lieutenant Hawke, his superior calls him out for being fake. Hawke, a leader and man of character on the battlefield, tells Mellas that he has seen hundreds of soldiers just like him, men only seeking glory and medals, lacking true character and integrity. Mellas is at first angry with the fact that someone would accuse him of this, but he then begins to think hard about what Hawke has said. From this point forward, Mellas’s attitude toward the war begins to change, he learns what it means to be a man of character, and begins to follow in the footsteps of Hawke. Hawke, being a veteran soldier and man of character, sets an example for Mellas to follow throughout the book, allowing Mellas to ultimately change himself from a man of personality to a man of character.
At first, Mellas acts like and tries to curry favor with Hawke only to impress his superiors and someday move up in the ranks. Hawke, being a man of experience and character, quickly notices Mellas’s character flaw and calls it out. He tells Mellas that he should not be here if he is not willing to be a true warrior. Mellas, given command over a whole Platoon of soldiers, soon learns the brutality and cruelness of war. “Mellas went slowly through the photographs, his hands trembling…One picture was of a body with no head…There was a picture with three dead American kids all squeezed into one fighting hole” (397). At this point in time, Mellas just begins to realize what he as been thrown into. This brutality causes him to bond with his fellow soldier; something he notices about Hawke is his bond with all soldiers. He soon comes to feel this bond himself. This brotherhood that Mellas starts to feel for his fellow warrior is the beginning of his transformation into a man of character. It also drives him to question his reasoning for being on the battlefield. Mellas now understands all of what Hawke has said about not serving for the medal, but rather for your brothers standing next to you. More importantly, Mellas now understands what it means to be a man of character on the
battlefield and in life. Live for service to others. After this realization, Mellas is able to differ the between behaving well and being good, a man of personality and a man of character. By the end of the text, Mellas understands what it means to be a good person, soldier, and brother. This realization transforms Mellas from a man of personality to a man of character, the difference being that he now informs his own ethical decisions. Through the bonding that takes place in war, Mellas realizes the true reasons behind his actions, he is no longer a dog following orders, but rather an informed human being making decisions based on his ethics. These ethics that Mellas has acquired are based on the brotherhood that he feels with his fellow warriors. “He felt a new camaraderie with these kids. He knew it was sentimental, even mawkish, and he tried not to succumb to the loss he felt at moving a step up in the hierarchy” (270). Mellas now is able to put reason into his actions, and is able to make self-sacrifice for his fellow soldier. “He felt that this was possibly his last moment of life, here behind this log with these comrades, and knew it was indescribably sweet…[he] said good-bye, silently, not wanting to leave the safety of the log and their warm bodies. Then he stood up and ran” (476). A man of true character is one that lives to serve others, and bases his decisions and actions accordingly. Mellas, having finally realized what it means to be good, uses reason and ethics to inform his decisions, transforming himself into a man of true character and integrity. Mellas’s realizations show that in order to be good, one must also become a man of character rather than a man of personality, fully understanding the reasons and ethics behind their actions. At the beginning of the novel, Mellas is only a façade. He lacks the ethical reasoning and substance of a true warrior. He is merely a soldier following orders. Under the leadership of Hawke, Mellas begins to realize and value the truth of what it means to be good. Through the horrors and tragedies of war, Mellas becomes close to his company, allowing him to finally understand what it means to have true character. In order to have true character, and not just a personality, one must make informed decisions based upon the ethical reasoning behind their actions.
Where Men Win Glory is an ironic euphemism for war. The title is ironic because there is nothing glorious about war or the way it ended Pat Tillman’s beautiful life. Jon Krakauer orchestrates this masterpiece with his diligently, articulated descriptions and with a timeline sewn together from the threads of two worlds. The author’s style can best be characterized by his challenging, precise diction and his ability to fluently intervene pertinent quotes and facts that further persuade the reader toward his cause. Throughout the book, the author’s tone harnesses resentment towards the militant hierarchy; for through its ingenuousness, deceit, and manipulation, the military uses Pat’s death as propaganda to bolster the war’s support. Furthermore, the military covers up the fact that Tillman was a victim of fratricide, and it deceives the nation into believing Tillman’s end was a valiant fight against insurgents. When the truth is exposed and pursued by Dannie - Pat’s mother - the army destroys evidence and pleads guilty to ignorance as a rebuttal. This book is molded by three prodigious aspects that help to illustrate Pat’s life story. The carelessness of war, importance of family, and enhancement through change were all important ingredients that created a virtuous life. Each theme, in addition, challenges me personally to reassess the facts I have been fed and the reality that I have been presented. By doing so, I can achieve a sound base of knowledge and an intellectual prowess capable of challenging all facts presented.
There is a major change in the men in this novel. At first, they are excited to join the army in order to help their country. After they see the truth about war, they learn very important assets of life such as death, destruction, and suffering. These emotions are learned in places like training camp, battles, and hospitals. All the men, dead or alive, obtained knowledge on how to deal with death, which is very important to one’s life.
War can destroy a young man mentally and physically. One might say that nothing good comes out of war, but in Remarque's All Quiet on the Western Front, there is one positive characteristic: comradeship. Paul and his friends give Himmelstoss a beating in which he deserves due to his training tactics. This starts the brotherhood of this tiny group. As explosions and gunfire sound off a young recruit in his first battle is gun-shy and seeks reassurance in Paul's chest and arms, and Paul gently tells him that he will get used to it. The relationship between Paul and Kat is only found during war, in which nothing can break them apart. The comradeship between soldiers at war is what keeps them alive, that being the only good quality to come out of war.
...writes. He makes sure that he knows that he is a nobleman but as time goes on, you see change in Antipas and that he becomes more humble and aware of others. He genuinely wants to know more about Luke and what his values are.
As the reader can distinguish throughout the book, both men went in completely different paths after starting in the same position. The difference between both of their stories is the author’s positive role model and the other effects of the military academy. It does not have to specifically be the military academy to shape someone to be successful, but discipline and a father-like figure can make the difference. My father is fortunately in my life, and has shaped me into the person I am today. He has taught me numerous lessons that have gotten me to this point in my life. I am privileged enough to also have close successful cousins who often give me advice on how to become as successful as they are. With the help of a positive role model and a positive environment, the ability to become a good person, as well as successful can be obtained.
As Beals' journey begins, so do the warrior references, even before Melba herself is capable of realizing it. As Melba fights for her survival in only her first week of life, she is already being sung "On the Battlefield for My Lord" by her grandmother (Beals, 5). This foreshadows the impending war she will go on to fight as well as instilling her personal, family and religious values in the reader's mind. Beals, born on a day of war the day Pearl Harbor was attacked, grows up in a world where she is taught to be strong, yet allows herself to be pushed down by whites. "As a toddler, growing up in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1945, I felt safe only in my sepia-toned world, a cocoon of familiar people and places.
In The Red Badge of Courage, Henry Fleming was drawn to enlist by his boyhood dreams. His highly romanticized notion of war was eclectic, borrowing from various classical and medieval sources. Nevertheless, his exalted, almost deified, conception of the life of a soldier at rest and in combat began to deflate before the even the ink had dried on his enlistment signature. Soon the army ceased to possess any personal characteristics Henry had once envisioned, becoming an unthinking, dispas...
War slowly begins to strip away the ideals these boy-men once cherished. Their respect for authority is torn away by their disillusionment with their schoolteacher, Kantorek who pushed them to join. This is followed by their brief encounter with Corporal Himmelstoss at boot camp. The contemptible tactics that their superior officer Himmelstoss perpetrates in the name of discipline finally shatters their respect for authority. As the boys, fresh from boot camp, march toward the front for the first time, each one looks over his shoulder at the departing transport truck. They realize that they have now cast aside their lives as schoolboys and they feel the numbing reality of their uncertain futures.
...ust deal with similar pains. Through the authors of these stories, we gain a better sense of what soldiers go through and the connection war has on the psyche of these men. While it is true, and known, that the Vietnam War was bloody and many soldiers died in vain, it is often forgotten what occurred to those who returned home. We overlook what became of those men and of the pain they, and their families, were left coping with. Some were left with physical scars, a constant reminder of a horrible time in their lives, while some were left with emotional, and mental, scarring. The universal fact found in all soldiers is the dramatic transformation they all undergo. No longer do any of these men have a chance to create their own identity, or continue with the aspirations they once held as young men. They become, and will forever be, soldiers of the Vietnam War.
Paul and Hardy’s speaker were inclined to enlist in the war and both joined not realizing the hardships of the war. Paul had heard many motivational speeches from his schoolteacher, Kantorek, about patriotism, which influenced him to enroll in the war. Paul explains how hard Kantorek was pushing the boys into enlisting, "During drill-time Kantorek gave us long lectures until the whole of our class went under his shepherding, to the district commandant and volunteered," (Remarque 11). With the speeches that Kantorek gave, Paul and his friends felt a sense of patriotism and duty to enlist; he also realizes how vile the war is because of all the hardships faced. Hardy’s speaker abruptly decided to join the war because he didn’t have anything else better to do out of work, he says "He thought he'd 'list, perhaps, Off-hand like-just as I- Was out of work- had sold his traps - No other reason why,” (Hardy 13-16). Although Paul felt a sense of patriotism at the beginning, what he felt wasn’t national pride it was just Kantorek drilling into their minds that war is a noble thing to do, but Kantorek never expla...
The two classic war novels ‘All Quiet on the Western Front’ by Erich Maria Remarque and ‘Catch 22’ by Joseph Heller both provide a graphic insight into the life of soldiers serving their country in the historic world wars. One distinct theme of interest found in both books, is the way in which war has physically and mentally re-shaped the characters. Remarque creates the character Paul Baümer, a young soldier who exposes anxiety and PTSD (commonly known as Shellshock) through his accounts of WW1’s German army. ‘Catch 22’ however, is written in the third person and omnisciently explores insanity and bureaucracy in an American Bombardier Squadron through its utter lack of logic. The two novels use their structure, characters, symbolism and setting to make a spectacle of the way war re-shapes the soldiers.
From sunrise to sunset, day after day, war demolishes men, cities, and hope. War has an effect on soldiers like nothing else, and sticks with them for life. The damage to a generation of men on both sides of the war was inestimable. Both the novel All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque, and the poem “I Have a Rendezvous with Death,” by Alan Seeger, demonstrate the theme of a lost generation of men, mentally and physically, in war through diction, repetition, and personification.
Review of "War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning" War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning, written by the talented author Chris Hedges, gives us provoking thoughts that are somewhat painful to read, but at the same time are quite personal confessions. Chris Hedges, a talented journalist to say the least, brings nearly 15 years of being a foreign correspondent to this book and concludes how all of his world experiences tie together. Throughout his book, he unifies themes present in all the wars he experienced first hand. The most important themes I was able to draw from this book were, war skews reality, dominates culture, seduces society with its heroic attributes, distorts memory, and supports a cause, and allures us by a constant battle between death and love.
The reaction of one soldier to another is the basis of war, as camaraderie is the methodology by which wars are won. Henry gave witness to the horrors of war, the atrocities of battle, the deaths of his friends, and later a life of victory. The ultimate transformation in Henry's character leading to a mature temperament was found by finding himself in the confusion of war and companionship.
Many individuals look at soldiers for hope and therefore, add load to them. Those that cannot rationally overcome these difficulties may create Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Tragically, some resort to suicide to get away from their insecurities. Troops, notwithstanding, are not by any means the only ones influenced by wars; relatives likewise encounter mental hardships when their friends and family are sent to war. Timothy Findley precisely depicts the critical impact wars have on people in his novel by showing how after-war characters are not what they were at the beginning.