Letter From Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis

781 Words2 Pages

During the early 1960s, segregation and racism was still a common and influential issue. The ensuing conflict between the whites and the blacks led to violence, hate, and anger within the community. It was very difficult for either side to understand each other’s opinions and views; as the whites seemed to provide irrational and hateful views, while the blacks responded with peace (most-part) and presented a more rational and empathetic view. Martin Luther King Jr. was a staple in the Civil Rights movement, where he organized many protests, boycotts, and masses, to help increase the morale of the African American community. In 1963, during his time spent in Birmingham Jail, he wrote a letter in response to criticizers. In order to help persuade …show more content…

specializes at creating powerful, and impactful statements and sentence patterns, where it almost seems as if he had a consistent rhythm in his words. This form of writing creates a very interesting tone, where he presented a valid defense for himself and his actions. He utilizes a lot of rhetorical questions such as in Paragraph 6, where he asks “are you able to accept the blows without retaliating? Are you able to endure the ordeals of jail?” This is very effective, since it makes the audience take a step back and question themselves -- “Do I truly believe that colored people should have lower rights and opportunities?” Through creating empathetic emotions, it is a method that can make people open their minds, and effectively garnering more supporters. Another useful tactic Dr. King Jr. employed in his letter, was the use of anaphora. In paragraph(s) 16, 17, and 19, he states respectively, “I have been gravely disappointed”,”At first I was rather disappointed”,”But again I have been disappointed.” This repetition is there to constantly remind the audience what his point is, when such information is consistently coming back into your mind, it can be really impact someone’s perspective. Generally, his diction is very formal; presentable diction can come a long way -- as it impresses the …show more content…

The creative form of sentence structure in his writing complements the personal stories of black citizens in the community, and bringing up the moral stance on laws that oppress blacks in society. Parallelism was a clever usage of syntax, where this is portrayed clearly to be in favor of King’s side, justifying his protests and expression of the oppression blacks faced in America. In paragraph 11, MLK discusses the responsibility of following laws, which coincides with the following point, “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws,” which is very effective in making the audience realize how protesting and expressing their free will isn’t really bad at all, and that it is morally right for them to fight for their freedom-- even if it means breaking laws in order to do so. As mentioned previously, this falls hand-in-hand with ethos, the moral justification of the whole situation. Dr. King utilizes parallelism in that statement to define the difference between “just and “unjust” laws, which shows how this is more of a battle of morality than government. “Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say wait. But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim;...” is

Open Document