Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis of poems
Literary analysis of poems
Introduction to poetry poem analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Poetry Analysis Legal Alien by Pat Mora and Forgiving My Father by Lucille Clifton are poems that reflect sentimental values that connect with our society. However, a correlation and contrast exists between the two poems. On the one hand, Legal Alien is a piece of literature that describes the life of a person of hispanic descent struggling for social acceptance on a daily basis due to society’s racial perspective. With this in mind, there is a tension due to the character’s racial background that creates feelings of social exclusion that evolve throughout the poem. Additionally, Legal Alien is a poem that displays a tone of frustration and depression due to character’s lifestyle. On the other hand, Forgiving My Father portrays the main character’s …show more content…
feelings towards the parents creating a sentimental tone. Equally important, the emotions created throughout the poem are due to the character’s socioeconomic status and hostile family environment leading to disputes and emotions. Taking the aforementioned facts into consideration, Legal Alien and Forgiving My Father are poems that describe two different views of life that reflect a depressive and sentimental tone that, along with the more detailed content, differentiates the two poems from other poems. To demonstrate, Legal Alien is a poem that notably reflects Pat’s Mora lifestyle, since “Family, Mexican-American culture, and the desert are all important themes in my children's books as well as in my poetry and nonfiction for adults” (Mora). Moreover, the author demonstrates throughout the poem the life and social interaction of a Mexican-American in the U.S. By the same token, the author also describes how bilingual individuals are able to switch languages with ease: Bi-lingual, Bi-cultural, able to slip from “How’s life?” To “Me’stan volviendo loca,” (1-3) ……………………………………… Sliding back and forth Between the fringes of both worlds (17-18) Additionally, the author describes the nature of the character’s job being able to work in a “paneled office” writing “smooth English”. Not to mention, the fact that the main character is portrayed as “inferior”, “exotic” by Americans, and even “as alien” by Mexicans – even though the character speaks both languages, which creates an emotional state of social exclusion and depression; however, the character responds to this atmosphere “by smiling”. Moreover, the poem is considered as a free verse poem due to the fact that the poem does not rhyme. In addition, the poem contains specific phrases that are characterized as metaphors, such as “ their eyes say” referring to the Mexican’s point of view towards the speaker. Another example, “ of both worlds” referring to the two languages and cultures English and Spanish. Comparatively, Legal Alien is a poem that reflects the speaker’s hidden feelings of exclusion from both cultures and her discomfort for not being accepted. On the other hand, Forgiving My Father is a poem that, by just reading the title, may provide the impression that the poem is about sadness.
In fact, the poem demonstrates how the daughter feels towards her father due to their socioeconomic status and the connection that exists within her family. Additionally, throughout the poem the daughter portrays a certain preference for her mother over the father – characterizing the father as irresponsible and “old liar” (10) for not providing enough income. Furthermore, the daughter continuously criticizes in a negative manner: “never be time enough daddy daddy old lecher / old liar. i wish you were rich so i could take it all” (9-10). On the first stanza, the daughter recognizes that “today is payday”, expecting anxiously the father to pay the bills due to the fact that, as described by the daughter, “all week you have stood in my dreams / like a ghost, asking for more time” (3-4); must be remembered that both parents are dead at that time, given that the speaker mentions “my mother’s hand opens in her early grave” (6) and “old dead man” (20). On the second stanza, the speaker portrays the resentfulness towards her father, seeing the mother as the victim “ i wish you were rich so i could take it all / and give the lady what she was due” (10-11). However, soon after, the speaker describes how the father comes from a low-income family as well and realizes that it was not completely his
fault: But you were the only son of a needy father, The father of a needy son; You gave her all you had (12-14) Finally, on the third stanza the speaker realizes that the problem is caused by both parents; not only the father as initially assumed – “ you were each other’s bad bargain, not mine ”. Ultimately, taking the overall criteria of the situation into consideration, the daughter decides to forgive both parent due to the fact that the provided socioeconomic status is difficult to resolve: what am i doing here collecting? You lie side by side in debtor’s boxes And no accounting will open them up. (21-23) By the same token, one remarkable fact of Forgiving My Father is the particular way the poem is written. Meaning, normally poems will include capital letters at the beginning of each sentence to emphasize and distinguish different thoughts throughout the poem. However, Forgiving My Father does not include any capital letters at any moment, which may represent that the author is solely expressing a single thought. Not to mention, the poem is also structured with a rhythm of ABCAB.
Fulfilling the roles of both mother and breadwinner creates an assortment of reactions for the narrator. In the poem’s opening lines, she commences her day in the harried role as a mother, and with “too much to do,” (2) expresses her struggle with balancing priorities. After saying goodbye to her children she rushes out the door, transitioning from both, one role to the next, as well as, one emotion to another. As the day continues, when reflecting on
At the beginning of the poem, the audience is able to witness an event of a young boy asking his father for story. While the father was deemed a “sad” man, it is later shown that his sadness can be contributed to his fear of his son leaving him. The structure then correlated to the point of going into the future. The future was able to depict what would happen to the loving duo. The father's dreams would become a reality and the son's love and admiration would cease to exist as he is seen screaming at his father. Wanting nothing to do with him. The young, pure child can be seen trying to back lash at his father for acting like a “god” that he can “never disappoint.” The point of this structure was not really a means of clarification from the beginning point of view, but more as an intro to the end. The real relationship can be seen in line 20, where it is mentioned that the relationship between the father and son is “an emotional rather than logical equation.” The love between this father and son, and all its complexity has no real solution. But rather a means of love; the feelings a parent has for wanting to protect their child and the child itself wanting to be set free from their parents grasp. The structure alone is quite complex. Seeing the present time frame of the father and son
The poem is written in the father’s point of view; this gives insight of the father’s character and
Perhaps no other event in modern history has left us so perplexed and dumbfounded than the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany, an entire population was simply robbed of their existence. In “Our Secret,” Susan Griffin tries to explain what could possibly lead an individual to execute such inhumane acts to a large group of people. She delves into Heinrich Himmler’s life and investigates all the events leading up to him joining the Nazi party. In“Panopticism,” Michel Foucault argues that modern society has been shaped by disciplinary mechanisms deriving from the plague as well as Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, a structure with a tower in the middle meant for surveillance. Susan Griffin tries to explain what happened in Germany through Himmler’s childhood while Foucault better explains these events by describing how society as a whole operates.
Now, in modern times, affairs seem to be a natural phenomenon of daily life. They are popularly seen in movies, novelas—soap operas and also expressed through literature. Although they are conventionally characterized as passionate and exciting, they can also catalyze a lot of thought and uncertainty for the individuals involved. “Migration” written by Rosa Alcala is a poem that takes a different approach in describing what an affair is. In her poem she rather focuses on describing the stressful cognitive affects that occur as a result of being involved in an affair. Through figures of speech, persona and images the author is able to establishes the feeling of the poem as cautious uncertainty.
In "Our Secret" by Susan Griffin, the essay uses fragments throughout the essay to symbolize all the topics and people that are involved. The fragments in the essay tie together insides and outsides, human nature, everything affected by past, secrets, cause and effect, and development with the content. These subjects and the fragments are also similar with her life stories and her interviewees that all go together. The author also uses her own memories mixed in with what she heard from the interviewees. Her recollection of her memory is not fully told, but with missing parts and added feelings. Her interviewee's words are told to her and brought to the paper with added information. She tells throughout the book about these recollections.
Susan Griffin's "Our Secret" is a study in psychology. It is a look into the human mind to see what makes people do the things they do and in particular what makes people commit acts of violence. She isolates the first half of the twentieth century and in particular the era of the Second World War as a basis for her study. The essay discusses a number of people but they all tie in to Heinrich Himmler. He is the extreme case, he who can be linked directly to every single death in the concentration camps. Griffin seeks to examine Himmler because if she can discern a monster like Himmler than everyone else simply falls into place. The essay also tries to deduce why something like the Holocaust, although never mentioned directly, can take place. How can so many people be involved and yet so few people try to end it.
The poem, The Sign in My Father’s Hands by Martin Espada, tells a story of a boy’s father standing up for social injustice and getting arrested by the police. The poem is composed of a theme of social injustice and racial discrimination. Throughout the poem, Espada told the story of his growing up experience in an immigrant home and his beliefs of fighting for Latino rights. Espada uses the free verse poetry style to tell the narrative of his childhood. The poem approaches the theme from the perspective of a child learning of racism and injustices.
The poem states not clearly, but profoundly that all this pair needs is each other, and that this trip or journey to give a little old lady some much needed food and money is more of a joyous occasion simply because of the company of each other. This memory, this recollection, though it includes the mother, is not about her, it is about the pair travelling together and using the time to enjoy the little things in life; a ride on a ferry, time spent laying together on a moonlit hillside, watching the sun rise after a long night of travelling. Whatever it is truly about, the one thing most important to the author is the memory itself.
While reading the poem the reader can imply that the father provides for his wife and son, but deals with the stress of having to work hard in a bad way. He may do what it takes to make sure his family is stable, but while doing so he is getting drunk and beating his son. For example, in lines 1 and 2, “The whisky on your breath Could make a small boy dizzy” symbolizes how much the father was drinking. He was drinking so much, the scent was too much to take. Lines 7 and 8, “My mother’s countenance, Could not unfrown itself.” This helps the reader understand the mother’s perspective on things. She is unhappy seeing what is going on which is why she is frowning. Although she never says anything it can be implied that because of the fact that the mother never speaks up just shows how scared she could be of her drunk husband. Lines 9 and 10, “The hand that held my wrist Was battered on one knuckle”, with this line the reader is able to see using imagery that the father is a hard worker because as said above his knuckle was battered. The reader can also take this in a different direction by saying that his hand was battered from beating his child as well. Lastly, lines 13 and 14, “You beat time on my head With a palm caked hard by dirt” As well as the quote above this quote shows that the father was beating his child with his dirty hand from all the work the father has
Perhaps among the most personal of subject matter, the relationship of the family unit has been explored at great lengths in confessional poetry. Reputable confessional poet Robert Lowell explored the idea of fatherhood while struggling with mental illness. Lowell wrote of a pain to which many readers could relate. Going through a separation and divorce, Lowell felt vulnerable and this was especially evident in his writings about his daughter. The vulnerability experienced by Lowell at this time appears to grow with each poem, and he seems to develop a fixation on the relationship he shares with his daughter and, in particular, the rift between them. While initially making comparisons between himself and his daughter in infancy in the first poem of For Lizzie and Harriet, (such as both of them being wearied by the passage of time), he appears to further unravel in The Hard Way, feeling more alone as his daughter reaches an age associated with self-sufficiency and rebellion. By this point in the collection of poems, it appears Lowell has become more concerned with the idea of mortality, both his own and his daughter’s. It seems as if he is at a loss as to how to close the gap between the two of them, and so, offers her the best advice he believes he can. “Don’t hate your parents, or your children will hire unknown men to bury you at your own cost.” (Lowell, 2003) This is almost a plea to his daughter. It highlights how deeply concerned he is about the distance between them. While it does seem that Lowell holds an austere view of adolescence, it also appears that his genuine attempt to impart some wisdom to his daughter is one made as a result of some emotional growth. The reader is presented with a powerful image of a man who i...
Indeed, the satirical tone of this poem suggests that the speaker is somewhat critical of his father. The whiskey smell, the roughness, the inconsiderate and reckless actions are under scrutiny. The mother's frowning countenance suggests she too is rather unhappy with the scene. However, the winning tone of the poem is the light and comical one.
Growing up in a very suburban town taught me many things about being a boy and even further into my life as a young man. I spent most of my childhood days running through the woods, fishing in our pond, or helping my father with some project that he had around the house. I used to always come back to him with everything for help. He would be doing something in the garage, and I would catch a fish that had swallowed the hook. I would run up to the house, break his concentration, and he would come help me. He always did that, and never seemed to mind it was like it was his job to love me and teach me how to be a good person. In the poem, I get a sense that there is no bond, like my father and I have which leads to confusion in the narrator's life. For instance, in line eight when he says "I would slowly rise and dress, feari...
In a typical family, there are parents that expected to hear things when their teenager is rebelling against them: slamming the door, shouting at each other, and protests on what they could do or what they should not do. Their little baby is growing up, testing their wings of adulthood; they are not the small child that wanted their mommy to read a book to them or to kiss their hurts away and most probably, they are thinking that anything that their parents told them are certainly could not be right. The poem talks about a conflict between the author and her son when he was in his adolescence. In the first stanza, a misunderstanding about a math problem turns into a family argument that shows the classic rift between the generation of the parent and the teenager. Despite the misunderstandings between the parent and child, there is a loving bond between them. The imagery, contrasting tones, connotative diction, and symbolism in the poem reflect these two sides of the relationship.
This contrast between a hands-on, physical man and an arrogant “show man,” is further emphasized in stanza three. Rather than working outside in the fields, the father is “sat all day in the tall grass sweet-talking weak jaws.” The father’s lack of activity is again contrasted with the mother trying to “make money like food and clothes and be the sum of every question.” These contrasts highlight the arrogance and pride of the father in the son’s eyes. The speaker shows how he despises his father for having these qualities and also expresses sympathy towards his mother.