Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How standardized testing damages education
Effects of standardized tests on curriculum
Overall effects of standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How standardized testing damages education
Article 1: “Leaving Tests Behind” by Haley Sweetland Edwards
This article discussed the never-ending debate on the emphasis on standardized testing in the United States. It also addressed the idea that some states are eliminating several of the required standardized tests in public schools. Instead the states expected teachers to assess students’ progress through “alternative assessments” including performance-based projects. The principal from Abingdon Elementary School expressed that these “alternative assessments” allowed for teachers to see “more authentic” way to view their students’ growth (Edwards, 28). According to the article, “the trend in federal, state, and local education-policy circle has been to require more and more standardized exams as a way to establish common benchmarks of achievement and to hold schools accountable for their students’ progress (Edwards, 28).” However, many states have removed the mandatory exams and/or consequences due to low test scores, reducing the emphasis on standardized testing and diminishing the stress on students in those states. According to the article, the issue of the effectiveness of standardized testing is still being heavily debated.
…show more content…
I also believe that there is too much emphasis on teaching to the test instead of an emphasis on the usefulness of material in real life. In my opinion, the death of standardized testing will allow for teachers to teach material in a less stressful time-frame and allow for teachers to assess their students in a more relaxed, informal way.
Article 2: “What’s Out in 2017: 5 Ed Tech Trends on the Way Out in 2017” by Dian
The United States of America has placed low on the educational ladder throughout the years. The cause of such a low ranking is due to such heavy emphasis on standardized testing and not individual student achievement. Although the United States uses standardized testing as a crutch, it is not an effective measure of a student’s ability, a teacher’s competency, or a school’s proficiency.
Since the implementation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), schools and society have taken a different perspective on how to assess the student‘s progress. Schools are forced to make decisions based on assessments and how to show adequate yearly progress (AYP). Alfie Kohn points out that, in some cases, our students have become victims of standardized testing. In his article, Standardized Testing and Its Victims (2000), he demonstrates how testing has become detrimental to our students instead of helping them. He outlines these detrimental issues with eight facts.
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
The United States of America is ranked 15th in the world for it’s quality of education. Improvement in our education system is necessary if we want to keep up with the best nations in the world. Over the past ten years, a new push has been made to improve education in America through programs like No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. States across the country are assessing teachers and schools by using standardized test scores. By using standardized test scores, states link high stakes to the results such as grant money, salary, and jobs as incentive to improve the scores for the following year. In Wisconsin and other states, 50% of these evaluations are based solely on how students score on these tests making the results have a critical impact, affecting not only the futures of the students, but also the futures of their teachers. Although it is important to give schools and teachers feedback so that they can better educate students, high-stakes testing should be used minimally for this purpose because of the lack of conclusive results they produce, and the detrimental effects that they can have on students, teachers, and even the whole schooling community.
Article 1: “Leaving Tests Behind” by Haley Sweetland Edwards This article discussed the never-ending debate on the emphasis on standardized testing in the United States. It also addressed the idea that some states are eliminating several of the required standardized tests in public schools. Instead the states expected teachers to assess students’ progress through “alternative assessments” including performance-based projects. The principal from Abingdon Elementary School expressed that these “alternative assessments” allowed for teachers to see “more authentic” way to view their students’ growth (Edwards, 28).
“If my future were determined just by my performance on a standardized test, I wouldn't be here. I guarantee you that.” This quote by Michelle Obama illustrates the idea that standardized testing should not have such a large influence on education in America. However, a majority of people are under the impression that standardized tests are an accurate method to measure a person's intellectual ability. I believe that standardized tests have developed into a very critical part of the American education system that is hindering the growth of students and teachers instead of providing a tool that can accurately measure knowledge.
As the testing season has come and gone, the topic of whether or not standardized testing as a productive aspect of the current curriculum is a very popular topic of discussions. With all of the varying opinions about whether or not standardized testing is necessary, it is difficult for citizens to understand the truth. Those that are in acceptance with the current curriculum and agree that standardized testing is a good thing state that the tests are a key component in schools for the well being of not only the students, but for the prosperity of education as well. The advantages to using standardized testing includes necessary information they give to parents about how their child is performing,
Standardized testing has been a controversial subject for many years, thanks to America’s steady decline in the PISA rankings despite an increase in standardized tests. And for good reason, it yields little other results but rankings and can be an unreliable and inaccurate way to evaluate our students and teachers. Contrary to sympathizers’ beliefs, the monetary and educational sacrifices we make to have standardized tests outweigh their advantages.
In this paper, I will discuss standardized tests after the No Child Left Behind Act and whether or not they are effective in achieving the goals for which they were implemented. Standardized tests have been around a long time, but their use greatly increased after the NCLB Act required annual testing across the country. I will research the initial goals of these tests as well as statistics that show whether or not these goals have been achieved. Many scholars believe that standardized tests do not offer a fair or accurate measure of students or teachers’ true abilities. They argue that these tests do more harm than good in relation to the extreme pressure they place on both the students and schools as a whole. Another argument against standardized
Standardized tests are designed to hold teachers and educators accountable, but teachers are not the ones sitting down with a number two pencil in hand sweating bullets in the test room. According to the results of a Gallup Poll in September of 2015, most Americans voted that evaluating teachers based on test scores is unfair (“Testing Doesn’t Measure Up For Americans” 12). Teachers have been mandated to make math and reading the priority and have neglected science, history, and geography. Educators who teach neglected subjects, like those previously stated, cannot be judged based on test scores that have nothing to reflect on their subjects. This is undoubtedly the cause of American students who have lost interest in school and have caused scores to continue to drop.
Standardized testing is a major part of the education in the public schools and in our society today. It is used to determine student achievement, growth, and progress. However, is a strong standardized testing program the best way to improve education? This question has been a controversial argument that existed among educators for decades. No Child Left Behind, some educators and politician believe that a strong standardized testing program is the best way to improve education because it serves as a guidance to help them in determining what and when to teach students. It keeps teachers and the schools accountable to give an accurate comparison between states and subgroups. However, other educators believe that standardized testing is not
Did you know that standardized testing can be doing more harm than good. Throughout time the United States have use standardized testing as a tool to measure a student's success. In recent studies, has found that relying on one test score does not fully measure a student's ability. Although many people believe that it is the only effective way to measure what a student has learned, how well a teacher has taught, and how prepared a student is to succeed in the real world. The recent studies show that the ACT does not measure real learning, there are disadvantages, and stress that is caused by one test.
Standardized testing is such a huge and essential part of public schooling. Most people think something so major is wanted by everyone, but most people involved in public schools, such as parents, students, and teachers oppose these tests. There is a lot of unfairness when it comes to standardized testing. The tests have a larger impact on students and teachers than they really should, with only one per year. The ratio of importance to standardized testing isn’t equal at all, which is why there is a lot of opposition and hatred towards these tests. Standardized tests, an extremely popular thing when it comes to public education, are a huge problem for parents, students, and teachers associated with these districts and are ruining education
The use of standardized testing in public schools was mandated in 2001 by George W. Bush's No Child Left Behind Act and is supported by the Obama administration. In recent years, it has triggered an expanding controversy against standardized tests and the use of students' scores to evaluate teachers, schools, districts, and states. Some individuals argue that standardized testing benefits students, teachers, and schools by ensuring that they are held accountable. The truth is standardized testing does not accurately reflect student’s abilities and is potentially hurting today’s students.
Standardized testing is used in countries as a means to assess students, teachers and schools. Controversies of standardized testing include test purpose, design, implementation and use of test results. Standardized testing in the United States deeply affects the students and the school education system. They are unreliable and there is minimal increase of student performance of these tests. It is more than just a test. It has become a direct impact on how someone's future will look. Tests like the SAT or ACT should be a low-stake test to only be looked at to see a student's academic progress. Standardized testing should be revised because of the negative impacts on schools, schools are already opting out of accepting and taking certain tests, and the money aspect has affected everyone at the schools.