Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Treaty of Versailles during ww2
Treaty of Versailles during ww2
Impact of Treaty of Versailles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Treaty of Versailles during ww2
League of Nations
I have a few topics that I feel that I should bring to the attention of the people of the United States. There are a few matters that feel that the people of America should be able to speak their minds about. In particular to us I have recently come up with fourteen points. Only a few of the fourteen points were included in the treaty, the only important one being the League of Nations. All of the points that I have presented were good, but not being able to include any of these points did not catch me by surprise. On the hand, my point about The League of Nations being rejected was awfully offensive, as well as shameful to us as a nation. The United States being the best of nations, cannot agree on putting together an organization of many nations to keep domestic and foreign affairs under control. Most of us still have family back home in other countries and we must watch over them as well. It is the only logic and fair solution to rid most of the many problems that occur internationally. If we do not go on and modify our thoughts and rethink what we are letting slid by we will later regret it. If we don't get a move on it, the people after us will. We are bound to come up with an international organization to take care of worldly matters. So we ought to begin this League of Nations as soon as possible and take care of these matters at once.
As you may already know this opposition is being blown away mainly due to a few people, including Henry Cabot Lodge, Hiram Johnson, Robert LaFollette, and Senator Borah. They are all isolationism, therefore, they have who opposed any league of nations, and spoke out against the treaty, and the new league established in the treaty, and as well as against me. Must we continue being isolationists? Whenever we have isolated ourselves we have not found success. Our congress is totally dominated by republicans and me as a so-called democrat; I cannot get anything off the ground ("Woodrow"). I present my thoughts and the thoughts of the people to congress and they are just rejected. Shouldn't the people of The United States have a say in what should happen in our nation.
Hamilton approaches the people through this letter by pin pointing several key issues of worry and using his extensive knowledge and background to convince a new nation that they should see in favor of a new Constitution.
At the end of the 18th century, an undeclared war was going on between the United States and France because of the recent XYZ affair; triggering a positive reaction by Federalists like Fisher Ames to convince the authorities to make the war official. Not knowing what to do, President John Adams appointed former-President George Washington as commander of the army to hopefully resolve the issue with France through diplomacy (as was Washington's stance).
In the Midwest, farmers were losing their land to mortgage foreclosures. American tourist deaths were attributed to a terrorist attack. A president known for his effective use of the media governed the United States. The U.S. cooperated in a change of government in the Philippines. Parents and churches criticized motion pictures for eroding American morals. And Appalachian State, after setting a new enrollment record, received favorable publicity in a national magazine. Sound familiar? Think again; you're 55 years off. The year was 1934 in the U.S.A.
The first recommendation is the reform of the Senate. I agree with Sabato statement “The United States is still a federation of semi-independent entities,”(Sabato, 23) as others I am proud to be an Utahn. In 1787 with the writing of the United States Constitution there were thirteen states represent approximately 2.5 million people. Today, the United States population is over 320 million
The League of Nations did not prevent another World War due to numerous different reasons. First of all, the League of Nations whole identity was to maintain peace, discourage aggression from any nation, and to inspire other countries to cooperate especially in the field of trading different resources. One of the main ideas involved in the non-prevention of another war by the League of Nations was the Treaty of Versailles. The League of Nation was fully responsible for the process of the treaty going through the International Court of Justice. One the treaty was signed, Germany was reprimanded unethically. The Germans soon started cheating and developed military forces like submarines in the region of the Netherlands and placed tanks in Russia.
Following World War I, President Woodrow Wilson became the mastermind for the creation of an international organization (Dudley 72). Eventually he was successful in the creation of the League of Nations and fighting for it to become a part of the Treaty of Versailles (Dudley 72). Although the League became a point in the Treaty of Versailles, the United States still had to ratify the Treaty to become a part of the League themselves (Dudley 76). Americans became split about whether the United States should have a place in the League or not, and the U.S. Senate had a decision to make (Dudley 76). On one side of the argument was a Democratic senator of California, James D. Phelan (Dudley 74). Mr. Phelan believed that the United States should join the League of Nations because it is the duty of the U.S. to uphold our ideals and support Democracy (Dudley 76). However, on the opposing side of this argument was people like Lawrence Sherman, a Republican senator from Illinois (Dudley 76). Mr. Sherman felt that the United States should not join the League of Nations because that would go against the policies of isolationism he felt the U.S. should follow, and he believed that the League of Nations would bring America too much into the conflicts of Europe (Dudley 76).
...ome true and sincere attempt to put them into practice. But, as to myself, having been tired and disappointed for many years with offering vain, idle, visionary thoughts, and at length utterly despairing of success, I fortunately fell upon this proposal, which, as it is very new, so it has something solid and real, of no expense and little trouble, full in our own power, and whereby we can incur no danger in disobliging the U.S.
The dangers of faction can somewhat outweigh the good. The framers of the American Constitution feared the power that could possibly come about by organized interest groups. Madison wrote "The public good is disregarded in the conflict of rival factions citizens who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." However, the framers believed that interest groups thrived because of freedom, the same privilege that Americans utilize to express their views. Madison saw direct democracy as a danger to individual rights and advocated a representative democracy to protect individual liberty, and the general public from the effects of such inequality in society. Madison says "A pure democracy can admit no cure for the mischief's of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority Hence it is, that democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths."
Wilson and Roosevelt both greatly supported the creation of the League of Nations and lobbied for the United States to become a member. Created in 1919 at the Treaty of Versailles ending World War I, the League of Nations was the brainchild of President Wilson, who believed that such an institution would prevent war and protect democracy. The League, Wilson believed, ...
The pluralistic scholar David Truman notes that “the proliferation of political interest groups [is] a natural and largely benign consequence of economic development” (Kernell 2000, 429). That is, as American economic development increases, in the form of industry, trade, and technology, factions are produced in order to protect special interests. Factions have a large platform on which to find support from various political parties, committees, subcommittees, and the courts, as well as federal, state, and local governments (Kernell 2000, 429).
As the nation is in a bad economic crisis, a reform is needed to create a stronger and more successful united Country.
The anti-federalists has strong opinions when it came to the branches on the federal government. Congress should not have the power to meddle in the commerce of the states. The federal legislature is designed as an aristocratic institution, determined to steal the political prerogative of the people.
Many years later Isabella, the wife of King Edward II of England, plotted to kill
The League of Nations sounds like a superhero team and in a sense, the goal that The League was trying to achieve could have been something straight out of a comic book. Originally proposed by President Woodrow Wilson during World War I, The League was born after some alterations. The League of Nations’ main intention was to bring an end to the war and prevent another one of the same atrocious proportions from happening in the future. Forty zealous countries joined this fight, but the most powerful country of all was not among them: The United States of America. While many Americans agreed with the goal of The League, many did not and those that did not were ones in power. The portion of the “mission statement” for The League that caused
Fifty-one countries established the United Nations also known as the UN on October 24, 1945 with the intentions of preserving peace through international cooperation and collective security. Over the years the UN has grown in numbers to include 185 countries, thus making the organization and its family of agencies the largest in an effort to promote world stability. Since 1954 the UN and its organizations have received the Nobel Peace Prize on 5 separate occasions. The first in 1954 awarded to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, for its assistance to refugees, and finally in 1988 to the United Nations Peace-keeping Forces, for its peace-keeping operations. As you can see, the United Nations efforts have not gone without notice.