Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A write up on honor
A write up on honor
Who was Lazarillo de Tormes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
No Better Than Your Neighbor: Relationship Dynamics in “Lazarillo de Tormes” In the book “Lazarillo de Tormes” the main character Lazaro narrates his story of traversing masters and employers by request of a person, most likely a civil authority, referred to only as Your Honour and because of references to “Your Honour’s servant and friend” probably his current neighbor the Archpriest of Toledo as well (59). The Archpriest noticed how skilled Lazaro is at collecting and disseminating information throughout the city as the town crier, and encouraged him to marry one of his concubine servants and become his neighbor in an effort to ensure the scandal’s obscurity. Lazaro most likely knew of the Archpriest’s affair, yet also knew that because his …show more content…
lowly social position, he needed to demonstrate that he would be compliant and not instigate problems for the church through his occupation. Within the novel, Lazaro provides proverbs, short phrases that contain truth or knowledge often in an ironic way, to give context to his situation with the Archpriest. Through his proverb use he mocks the municipal and ecclesiastical powers in such subtle way, in order that he not incur harmful repercussions but still poignantly address the corruption of power in 16th century Spain all the while proving his trustworthiness to Your Honour and the Archpriest to maintain his livelihood in Toledo. Lazaro states in the Prologue that he believes that “important events” should “see the light of day”, referring indirectly to the affair between his wife and the Archpriest that is discovered later in the book, yet known to Your Honour from the beginning of the story (3).
The proverb that is used, “One man’s meat is another man’s poison” can be taken to mean both; his wife making the Archpriest content by being his concubine servant and how it causes Lazaro some distress from having to share his wife and protect his honour within the city (3). The same proverb can also mean that Lazaro’s wife by being the Archpriest’s concubine, grants Lazaro great privileges such as the house next to the Archpriest and various additional gifts from him. This causes stress on the Archpriest to ensure a high level happiness for Lazaro lest knowledge of the affair spread throughout the city. This proverb can apply to some of the other relationships that Lazaro goes through, as well as several others proverbs mentioned in the book also apply to the situation with the Archpriest and his …show more content…
wife. In his first experience with the outside world after being orphaned off by his mother, he travels with a blind man who shows Lazaro “how to make living” and survive (8). Whilst teaching him street smarts that indubitably helped Lazaro later on in the story, the blind man certainly takes advantage of him through starvation and frequent severe beatings. Lazaro’s poor treatment and living conditions are repeated in various forms with his subsequent masters, but he implements what he has learned in his experience with the cruel blind man in his other relationship. The most important lesson that the blind man imparts to Lazaro, which is applicable to some of his relationships that directly foreshadows his present situation with his wife, is: how being in a cuckolded relationship “will give you an ill-deserved day’s meals” (13). The proverb illustrating how he will willingly forfeit the sanctity of his marriage which endows him with trivial gifts and a slight economic and social advantage in his life. Later, Lazaro joins with a fake papal indulgence salesman who hustles whole cities if they annoy him.
This soon takes Lazaro to a town with many greedy citizens not wishing to buy indulgences, but when he offers them for free almost everyone in the area took one. The indulgences were in fact worthless and, since the act of selling the phoney papers was the entirety of the scam, the charity of the swindler initially seems out of place. However, after everyone in the city took one and their names were recorded, the indulgence salesman, agitated by the people’s sense of entitlement, tells the city clerk that “they’ll pay ransom for the release of at least ten Christian slaves in Algiers” (54). This experience with the dishonest indulgence salesman brutally asserts the proverbs ‘you can’t get something for nothing’ and that ‘there is always a catch’. Lazaro’s ironic use of these proverbs becomes clear when he reveals that he is receiving extra benefits from the Archpriest on special Christian holidays; he gets various gifts of clothing, food, and preferential treatment from the Archpriest, but at the cost of his wife’s faithfulness and potentially his honour within the city. Admittedly, Lazaro’s honour may not be all that important to him anyway as he is a lowly town crier, a profession of relatively low social standing, and finds that honour is not needed as long as you “keep with respectable people”
(59). Once Lazaro starts to live beside the Archpriest, the most prestigious clergyman portrayed in “Lazarillo de Tormes”, he clearly knows that the Archpriest is sleeping with his wife and is therefore willfully disobeying a commandment of God: “… thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife…” (Exodus 20:17 KJV). He also understands his position as a low-life within Toledo, since he is not noble born and has been a scavenger and a vagrant his whole life. Because of his knowledge of the Archpriest’s activities and his own self-awareness, he proverbially insults the Archpriest in the Prologue by saying that, “I am no better than my neighbor” (4). This proverb also could be seen as having a double entendre referring to how Jesus commanded to “love thy neighbour as thyself” as the Archpriest goes far beyond what is meant by the scripture (Mark 12:31 KJV). Your Honour in collaboration with the Archpriest would notice this affront and Lazaro would gain no favours by attacking them without the sufficient protection of being able to remind the intended audience that his position in the ménage à trois is the most preferable outcome. Lazaro explains that after he left a negative relationship with a priest that starved him inches from death, he encounters a fine dressed minor nobleman that decides to take Lazaro on as a servant. Lazaro believed at the time that it was a lucky break to finally have someone of wealth to work for, so he could end his starvation. However, it was discovered that the squire had no financially viable assets and was very poor, yet informs to young Lazaro a certainty when dealing with masters and superiors that “rich men… don’t want honest men in their houses” (43). Lazaro then applies this truth in his subsequent relationships by showing his willful compliance with the un-Christian behaviour of his masters. This, along with his steadfast denial of his wife’s infidelity to his fellow citizens, demonstrates to Your Honour and the Archpriest that he is trustworthy enough to keep in his position and he will not reveal the liaison with the Archpriest and his wife. Throughout “Lazarillo de Tormes”, Lazaro demonstrates his comprehension of the affair and the possible consequences for him or for the church and government and literarily attacks the injustices of his masters over a series of proverbs. He tells his superiors that they are of poor moral character and threatens them with the abysmal life that he has had and how he could make it happen to them. The book serves as a warning to Your Honour and the Archpriest that they would do well to maintain the status quo of Lazaro’s position to avoid public uproar.
Though the court case of the “Scandal at the Church” has no documented resolution, historical fact and conjecture leads to the belief that Mr. de Alfaro would not only lose the case, but family as well. From class and honour, to gender norms, race and maritally acceptable jealousy, there is nothing to support Mr. de Alfaro’s plea to convict this wife’s attackers. Knowing that Mr. Bravo had several other pending court cases and no prior convictions further suggests that the Bravo family was virtually untouchable, while Mr. de Alfaro’s family was simply expendable. Though 18th century Mexico was an extreme time, elements of such places have remained though the years as illustrated by prejudices and discrimination in the modern day world, leading to – similar to the court case – many injustices going unpunished due to vastly similar factors. With class and race are subtle factors in the modern day court system, the system does not seem to be on a path of change, though things have bettered over the years.
Can a girl living under a dictatorship with very little freedom, grow up? That girl's name is Anita de la Torre, the main character from the novel by Julia Alvarez. Anita lives in a big compound along with all of her relatives. They live together with all their cousins and have fun at the pond or the gate of the compound. In the story, her father and uncle are involved in a plot to overthrow the evil dictator, El Jefe. By the end of the novel, Anita grows up from being a young wide eyed kid to becoming a grown up adult because of all the hardships she endures. (Good thesis statement)
Little is known about Pedro de Cieza de Leon’s youth. Historians have discovered that Pedro de Cieza de Leon was a Spaniard, a conquistador, and a writer of Peru’s history. Pedro de Cieza de Leon was not well educated and had only the most basic education from his local school parish (Atlantis). Although he did not have a superior education, his four part book is reliable because he wrote about what he observed as a conquistador. This document is full of interesting information for the reader to discover the Inca’s way of living.
Mattie is a woman who owns the Jesus Is Lord Used Tire shop and houses illegal immigrants in her home. Esperanza is in the hospital because she tried to commit suicide and Estevan is at Taylor’s house explaining why things are like this for him and his wife. He talks about their life in Guatemala and explains, “‘In Guatemala you are careful. If you want to change something you can find yourself dead’” (143). This quote from Estevan gives both Taylor and the readers a glimpse of what life was like for them in Guatemala. Mattie taking in Estevan and Esperanza puts an end to their suffering and looming death that was always present in Guatemala, even if her decision was not “right” in the eyes of law. Kingsolver further proves that morality comes over legality by showing how much better their lives have become in Mattie’s care. When Taylor and Estevan are sitting together at their picnic, they start talking about life now. Estevan explains how Mattie has created an amazing life for him and Esperanza here and how he enjoys his job. This shows that through Mattie’s morality, Estevan and Esperanza were able to live better lives. If Mattie had never brought them in and instead followed the law, they would have most likely been captured and killed in Guatemala because of the political corruption
In the Ingenious Hidalgo Don Quixote de la Mancha Don Quixote takes on many exploits and is often broken and beaten along the way. Whether he is fighting with imaginary giants or the knight of the White Moon, Don Quixote ends up defeated. In City Lights Chaplin’s tramp endeavors to make money in order to help the blind girl. After being fired from his recent job as a street cleaner, the tramp enters into a boxing contest for 50% of the winnings. However, things do not go as planned and the tramp finds himself in a predicament. Still, and similar to Don Quixote’s boldness, the tramp believes there is an actual chance that he could win the match. Instead, he finds himself knocked out and no closer to his goal of helping the blind girl.
The movie La Jaula de Oro, is a life story of a journey of three kids from Guatemala to the United States. In the movie there are three kids Sara, Samuel, and Juan, they first embark on the journey through Mexico. When they first arrive to Chiapas, the kids put on a play to collect money for food, after the play Sara befriends this boy named Chauk. Who is an indigenous boy from Tzotzil, and also plans to get to America, and convinces them to come join the group. This group of kids is put through a lot during the film, it’s a very interesting journey for 4 kids to experience. This film shows the struggles and difficulties immigrants succumb and sheds some light into the harsh realities of what people don’t think about when they hear the word
A sense of ominous foreboding permeates the woeful passage from "Three Dirges." The conflict is immediately apparant: "Don Lazaro, you've got five boys in Comitan teaching the campesinos how to read. That's subversive. That's communist. So tonight, you have to kill them." Don Lazaro, the mayor of the war torn village, San Martin Comitan, seems to have no choice but to carry out this heartless command. His response is indicative of a desperate man searching for answers, yet already resigned to carrying out the task at hand. "What can I say? --you tell me!" cries an anguished Don Lazaro to the villagers. Is he pleading for their understanding, or asking for a miraculous solution that would alter the path that lay before him? It is this uncertainty that, when coupled with melancholy foreshadowing, leaves the reader at a suspenseful crossroad; suspecting that events are transpiring, but doubtful as to the outcome.
Awarded the French Prize for best foreign novel, The Tortilla Curtain by T.C. Boyle follows the lives of illegal immigrants after entering the United States and the struggles they face in their everyday lives. The Tortilla Curtain, although a fiction book, discusses politically charged issues such as illegal immigration, racism, and poverty. Racism and the Mexican culture are two main thematic topics in this piece of literature. As the debate over immigration continues to escalate across the nation, T.C. Boyle has many questions directed towards him from his readers. More specifically, what his views on immigration are. And Boyle has questions of his own. The such questions he states in an interview: “Do you have the right
The gain of Indulgence has no time or limit to its capaciousness. Tom Walker has a first hand experience with the price of voracity. A tight situation happens in order to warn readers not to let greed or hurdles blind them, for it can have a disastrous consequences. Washington Irving’s short story , “The Devil and Tom Walker” focuses on greed and its negative effects; this presents how self- indulgence is something that can lead to suffering in an individual’s life.
“The Wife’s Resentment” is a story with a plot that amazes the reader. It’s a plot that brings you directly into the 18th century society and introduces you to a young women’s suffering due to being betrayed by the only man she loved; which leads to the lost of her virtue and good reputation. It is apparent that this story is written in Amatory Fiction which was very famous during the 17th and 18th centuries. Amatory Fiction usually depicts an innocent trusting woman who is deceived by a lustful man as I mentioned above. This is the case for the main character in the story which is Violenta. Violenta is a poor orphan which is described by the author as a beautiful young lady with the capabilities of reading and writing and was known all throughout Valencia for her virtue and honest report until she met Roderigo. Seignior Roderigo, Knight of Valencia is described as a rich handsome person who pleased everyone. To him all women were indifferent and as stated by the author, “his business was mere gallantry, he knew not what it was to love; provided he could but triumph, he valued not the conquest” (144). Nonetheless,...
...rdon people from their sins. Then he tells a story about greed. Next the pardoner asks the audience for money for their sins. He is greedy because he wants their money. The pardoner in the is hypocritical because he tells a story about greed over money then tells people to give him money for their greed for money because he is greedy, and wants their money he could care less if they could afford it or not.
The aspect of greed shows itself as the heart of the many immoral acts committed by fictional characters and real people. From Adam and Eve’s betrayal to Macbeth’s collapse portrays what greed can produce as a result: destruction. Whether it destroys one’s health, it inherently portrays as a force to the path of corruption. The Pardoner, from The Canterbury Tales, defines greed’s purpose. This includes how greed pulls them to degeneration. No matter how subtle the fall, it still brings to distasteful events for the characters from The Importance of Being Earnest. Although the characters differ, their obsessions with their immoral acts decline their personalities. Thus, the authors portray the characters’ greed, as a pernicious force that drives
Juan Carlos Rulfo provides an interesting example of the more paradoxical nature of political engagement in documentary. Rulfo’s En el hoyo (2006) deservedly became one of the paradigmatic examples of the genre in Mexico. It documents the story of the construction workers involved in building the upper tier of Mexico City’s Periférico Avenue, a landmark public works project of then left-wing presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s administration as city mayor. MacLaird reads the film as a cultural product that “sustains reverence for the lower socioeconomic classes that López Obrador’s campaign had initiated, [but] with a more subdued tone than the political rallies and without the condescension and misery painted by the stylized
In this novel, the society is centered around dichotomies; “youth and dotage” (Balzac 67), “the young man who has possessions and the young man that has nothing” and “the young man who thinks and the young man who spends” (87). Any person who falls outside of either box is called a “[child] who learn[s]… too late” or can “never appear in polite society” (87), essentially meaning they are undesirable in a formal society because they cannot follow expectations. The titular character, Paquita, is an “oriental” foreigner, from Havana, domesticated in Paris when she was sold to a wealthy woman who desired her. She fits into no culture entirely, as she is “part Asian houri on her mother’s side, part European through education, and part tropical by birth” (122). She is bisexual, choosing neither men nor women over the other. She is controlling, dressing Henri in women’s clothing (119), but controlled as she is reduced to a possession. However, there are ways in which a person can still be desired even if they are not easily pigeonholed. With her golden eyes and sensuality, Paquita fulfills both of the main pursuits of this society, “gold and pleasure” (68). Consequently, unlike the Marquis and his irrelevance in society, Paquita is highly sought after, thus making her a valuable commodity. Her desirability is not because of who she is as a human, but instead what
... is not greedy at all because he doesn’t show off the fact that he is rich. He is loyal to his lord and a working-hard business man which is free from sloth, lust and gluttony. He is a perfect example of the human who lives their life best, not committing deadly sins unlike the pardoner. He disgusts of the miller in the book who is being very gluttony and lust. He warns the miller that he will be punished as in his tale says “He who does evil should not expect good.” He analyzes the miller in the book to the miller in the tale, Symkym; greed will bring disaster to him and will punish him by the fate. These completely different characters share the same theme for different reasons and purposes which tells the reader that the standard of morality is same to various people and they should not commit the sins which certainly will be punished in some way in the future.