Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of fingerprints in the criminal justice system
The role of fingerprints in the criminal justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Many Law enforcements depend on rapid identification systems. The reason for this is law enforcement can take every criminal DNA and store it in a system and be able to access it, if needed or to find a criminal if she or he commits a crime. Also, law enforcement is dependent on identification computers because law enforcement doesn’t want a system that will crash. For example, if computers were to crash, police wouldn’t be able to identify if the criminal is telling the truth about who he or she is. Therefore, the computers law enforcement uses should be solid and efficient. Also, FBI depended on systems to keep track of their criminal record databases, because many criminals like to hack Law Enforcement computers. Law enforcement spends billions …show more content…
The system they use to keep the data in one network is Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System or IAFIS, this was launched on July 28, 1999 (Next Generation Identification, 2015). This system records national fingerprinting and criminal history system. This system responds to law enforcement request twenty-four seven for each day of the year. This system just doesn’t help local law enforcement, but it helps state, federal partners, and investigators. Law Enforcement depends on this system because it helps prevent and solve the crime or helps law enforcement catch criminals and terrorists. But this system just doesn’t save criminals fingerprinting but it keep criminals mug shots, history of offences, scars the criminal might have, tattoos, height and weight of the criminals. Also, this system is depended by law enforcement because it is the largest system in the world. This system has over seventy million subjects recorded, 34 million civil prints according to FBI. Also, includes fingerprints from 73,000 known and suspected terrorists processed by the U.S. or by international law enforcement agencies who work with us (Next Generation Identification, 2015). Another reason law enforcement depends on this system is because of the response time it has. The response time is 27 minutes for electronic criminal fingerprinting and 12 minutes for civil submissions according to the
The New York City Police Department enacted a stop and frisk program was enacted to ensure the safety of pedestrians and the safety of the entire city. Stop and frisk is a practice which police officers stop and question hundreds of thousands of pedestrians annually, and frisk them for weapons and other contraband. Those who are found to be carrying any weapons or illegal substances are placed under arrest, taken to the station for booking, and if needed given a summons to appear in front of a judge at a later date. The NYPD’s rules for stop and frisk are based on the United States Supreme Courts decision in Terry v. Ohio. The ruling in Terry v. Ohio held that search and seizure, under the Fourth Amendment, is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest. If the police officer has a “reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime” and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous”, an arrest is justified (Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, at 30).
By definition Biometrics are automated methods of recognizing a person based on a physiological or behavioral characteristic (Campbell, 1995). More and more businesses are now using biometrics as a preferred measure over traditional methods involving passwords and PIN numbers for 2 reasons; The person being identified is required to be physically present at the point of identification; Identification based on biometrics techniques removes the need to remember a password or to carry other identification (Watrall, 10/14/03). The need for biometrics can be found in federal, state and local governments, in the military, and in commercial applications (Campbell, 1995). Enterprise-wide network security infrastructures, government IDs, secure electronic banking, investing and other financial transactions, retail sales, law enforcement, and health and social services are already benefiting from these technologies (Campbell, 1995).
...d in fingerprinting today. Law enforcement and the criminal justice system rely on the use of fingerprint identification and the help of IAFIS daily; without the technological advances like the creation of IAFIS, the manual processing and identification of prints by the thousands, or even millions, would be virtually impossible.
Computer hardware used by criminal analysts are similar to those that are used in other professions that depend on computers to help complete their work. Crime analysts use desktop computers to complete a majority of their work and use laptop computers for work in the field and also for presentations. In many cases police department’s crime analysis units have their own servers to house tabular data stream, geographic data, and software applications that are shared by users. An example of why computers are important to crime analysis, if the information about every location in which a crime has occurred is properly entered into a data...
Recent advancements in technology have had a huge impact on the current criminal justice system. These new developments have made it easier for those in the field to track down criminals and help provide better evidence to support their cases. Things such as fingerprint databases, DNA testing, GPS tracking, and many other things have made it easier for prosecutors or defendants to prove their cases in court. This is very beneficial because with this new wave of technology officials are now able to provide more reliable and credible evidence in court. This current upsurge of technology will help benefit a lot people in the field. People such as law enforcement, falsely accused criminals, prosecutors, defendants, judges, the list just goes on and on. Technology has been has had a major impact on the criminal justice system, it is now been made easier to track down and catch criminals and made it so that the evidence provided at court is more reliable and credible.
In order to wipe out computer crimes, an agency specialized in computer crimes should be at task to take care of such crimes and special devices provided to them in their lab. The devices they have available is what they will use in curbing the crimes hence the need to provide them with sophisticated devices.
...initely at risk if anything more than the barest of features are implemented with the technology. It’s evident that the technology is not a necessity today, and that widespread usage may be something that’s quite a bit ahead in the future, if at all. Unfortunately, this is one technology that may initially find a better home in countries seeking to better track their citizens.
To the so innovative method of identifying criminals there also came problems. Data, who was to know that each police clerk would give correct measurements of the person or even perform the measurements. Even though there was faultiness to the method “bertillionage” (Bertillon's Method) remained as the primary method of identification for over twenty years, where Bertillon then Fathered the Mug Shot by including a picture to each identification card. Soon after Fingerprints were being included to identification cards, where soon after DNA was beginning to be used and placed into Law Enforcement database. Even though throughout the years there have been many innovations towards personal identification we still had not come across a method of identifying a criminal in all areas until we came across Next Generation identification and in more detail Iris
It has been almost fifty years since the first case of computer crime was prosecuted. Since then computers have made themselves at home in the everyday lives of Americans. There have been numerous new laws created to fight against the criminals using computers to cause damage to individuals, businesses and the United States. These laws are in constant need of updates and changes because of how fast computers are evolving. In this era almost everyone carries a computer around with them, either a laptop, tablet or smartphone. Although existing laws are sufficient there will always be the need for new laws to keep up with the technological changes that occur every day. Every time a criminal commits a new crime this opens the door for a new law to be needed.
FBI. (n.d.). Privacy Impact Assessment Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System National Security Enhancements. Retrieved June 7, 2017, from FBI.gov website: https://www.fbi.gov/services/records-management/foipa/privacy-impact-assessments/iafis
Advances in technology have eased the process though which government agencies can access PII and use this information to deter terrorism. However, it also poses a challenge in ensuring the protection of individual citizen’s right to privacy. It is with the same ease that the crime world can breach, steal, trade and misuse digitized or electronic PII to finance terrorism or other criminal activities (U S Congress, 2010). When protecting PII from ending up in unintended hands, or for unintended purposes, the agencies should utilize such collected information limited to the stated
But where would they obtain such data? Well, from a number of places, but we will consider two of them which are, the FBI: National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) and the FBI Uniform Crime Report (UCR). Are they really that important? Yes, because they gather information of criminal activities, race and culture, but only if they are combined which as of now they are not, and separately they lack certain information, for example particular age groups or races. Gaps like this can create incorrect data where crime can look under control in one are, but increasing in another area which can affect the community because they can locate the same information on any type of computer device that has
In all other states and territories, identity theft is not recognised as an offence. Some possible technological solutions for overcoming this issue range from all forms of biometrics (fingerprints and iris recognition technology), encryption of transactions, authentication and public infrastructure, data profiling and firewall security. The only limitation to practicing these innovations is the issue of
Information technology (IT) is important to the application of crime analysis in law enforcement. Crime analysis is the review of data collected and/or stored in order to identify trends of criminal activities so that the police can effectively adjust to deter that crime and continue to protect the public’s safety. According to Foster (2013), “The use of IT in law enforcement is rapidly expanding. Indeed, in 1996 it is estimated that state and local governments spent an estimated $3.5 billion on information technology goods and services, and they were expected to spend as much as $4.5 billion in 2001.” The question remains though about how information technology is used in crime analysis. Today, I will identify and explain what types of technology are necessary for accurate crime analysis; Identify four methods of collecting, storing, and retrieving information needed for crime analysis; and analyze the benefits of crime analysis to the community and to law enforcement.
There are some, but not many I’d be willing to wager, that can imagine life without some form of digital input device. Computers, cell phones, tablets, cameras, the list goes on when we think about devices that bring the digital world to our fingertips. This gives us an awesome gift to have access to so much information and the conveniences such as shopping, communicating in different ways, and finding information that are enabled by the internet. With this gift though, comes an awesome responsibility that most do not consider. With so much information available and some or most of it unprotected, it is little wonder that criminals have turned their attention to using this information to their advantage. Law enforcement’s reactive nature has