Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
When was fingerprinting first used
Role of fingerprint in criminal investigation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: When was fingerprinting first used
The history of fingerprint identification dates back all the way to the 200s BC. Ancient Chinese history shows details of using handprints as evidence in investigations of burglaries all the way back to 221-206 BC. Fingerprinting has been a major component in identification for crime scene investigations and law enforcement for centuries.
History
In July of 1858, the English began using fingerprints when Chief Magistrate of the Hooghly district in Jungipoor, India, James Herschel came up with the idea of using whole handprints instead of signatures. He took the hand of businessman Rajyadhar Konai, and pressed his hand onto a contract. Herschel claimed the idea was a mere tactic to “frighten him out of all thoughts of repudiating his signature”, and later became a way of signing contracts- only this time just using the index and middle fingers. However, at this time, the prints were not used as a scientific means of identification. It would be a while before the fingerprint collection grew, and then Herschel realized they could be used to prove or disprove identities.
Several decades later, the first use of fingerprints occurred in the United States when Gilbert Thompson used a thumbprint in an attempt to prevent forgery on a document in 1882. Also in the 1880s were the observations of fingerprints as identification by British anthropologist Sir Francis Galton, and only a couple of years later, police official Juan Vucetich started the first fingerprint files based on Francis Galton’s observations.
A big step in the use of fingerprinting happened in 1892 when a woman by the name of Francis Rojas murdered her two children. In an attempt to put the blame on another person, she cut her own throat, leaving a bloody print on a door ...
... middle of paper ...
...d in fingerprinting today. Law enforcement and the criminal justice system rely on the use of fingerprint identification and the help of IAFIS daily; without the technological advances like the creation of IAFIS, the manual processing and identification of prints by the thousands, or even millions, would be virtually impossible.
Having the ability to identify types of prints and surfaces, and the corresponding techniques to develop the prints, has helped crime scene investigators identify criminals and victims of scenes, and aided in the prosecution of defendants in the criminal justice system. Although the history and techniques go far beyond what was discussed in these few pages, it is important as a law enforcement officer or investigator to understand the very basics of how fingerprint identification began, and the simple techniques used to develop them today.
“DNA samples of semen retrieved from the crime scene matched blood drawn from Andrews. At that time, no state had a DNA databank. However, after witnessing the power of DNA evidence, state courts and state legislatures would soon grapple with the issue of whether DNA evidence should be admitted at trial as identity evidence and whether establishing state DNA databanks would be feasible and of value to law enforcement. A review of current law reveals that almost every state has embraced and institutionalized the utilization of DNA fingerprinting for crime fighting purposes” (Hibbert,
James, Stuart H., and Jon J. Nordby. "Fingerprints." Forensic Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Investigative Techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2005. 341-60. Google Books. Web. 27 Feb. 2014.
From the early days, with little literary reference material, to the current day, with substantially more, but still insufficient formation, the science of fingerprint identification has managed to maintain its credibility and usefulness. Although, academic institutions have yet to recognize the field as an applied science and include it in the curricula, which would provide directed research and literary reference, in libraries. Without this academic recognition, progress in the field of fingerprint is destined to be sluggish. Description of fingerprint identification as a forensic science’ or an ~app1ied science’ in no way implies that is not a reliable science. Fingerprint identification, correctly understood and applied, is just as scientifically valid and reliable as any other science and, indeed, more accurate than many. The fingerprint expert applies knowledge gained through training and experience to reach a conclusion. The many uses of fingerprint identification range from criminal investigation to non-criminal matters such as deceased, missing persons and disaster victim identification. Fingerprint identification has been used in the court systems for many years. Yet there are those who that still try to challenge fingerprint science and the experts in the court of law by a Daubert Hearing. In this paper, Daubert Hearing is define and detail outing background of the cases, the Government preparation, the Testimony from both sides, the judge’s verdict and finally, Mitchell’s second trial on this case.
...using forensic science and in 1901 fingerprinting was introduced as a new way of appointing the criminal to the crime they committed. The different methods that the police used in the late nineteenth century. ranged from walking the beat, in which the policeman would have to. walk about the streets looking for the crimes to be committed to the newly introduced detective work such as line-ups and photos of the crime scenes because the forensics had not really developed that much, yet to be of any help. But a breakthrough happened in the last few years of the nineteenth century when a man was convicted of murder because of the torn paper. used for his pistol wabbing was the same paper that was recovered from the victims of the wound.
Another discrepancy between actual forensics and how it is portrayed in the media is the availability of information in databases. There is only a small percentage of the entire population’s fingerprints or DNA samples stored within databases such as the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS). This makes finding a match between a DNA sample or fingerprint difficult, as a match would only be found if the person’s information was already stored within the database. If there is no match previously stored in a database, the fingerprint or DNA sample could be potentially rendered useless within a trial. Typically, in order to perform an analysis, investigators must already have a suspect in mind and request a DNA or fingerprint sample from him or her. If the suspect does not want to provide one however, the sample collected as evidence may not count as valid. The CSI effect creates an idealized image that all crimes can be solved with a hair or drop of blood, but this is not always the case in real life.
The acceptance of fingerprint identification in the judicial system as scientific evidence has become like expert testimony. Advances in image processing have impacted how fingerprints can be lifted without being destroyed, which has led to fingerprint evidence becoming the silent testimony leading to more conventions. In the case of the United States v. Byron C. Mitchell Criminal Action No. 96-00407, fingerprints found in the car were the scientific evidence which identified Mitchell as a participant in an armored car robbery (Appellant Counsel for Appellee, 2003).
Contextual information also affects the human comparative part of fingerprint analysis, in ways that alter the matching of the same fingerprints, years apart; however, when contextual information is provided, it actually helps 20% of forensic technicians, but that still leaves 80% hindered by contextual information (Dror et al, 2006). Contextual information affects the psychological aspects of perception and problem-solving, in a way that can obscure information that does not support the context, and it can even affect how forensic technician’s view and handle forensic evidence (Bernstein et al, 2013). However, there are some advantages of contextual information, because it can give the forensic division a mental shortcut, saving time and money; however, these shortcuts lead to inaccurate and biased conclusions. This essay has shown that contextual information creates erroneous mistakes and prejudiced results in forensic investigations. A possible way to remove the negative effects of contextual information is to have the forensic technicians, not know the context of the crime so that they do not
“Any action of an individual, and obviously the violent action constituting a crime, cannot occur without leaving a trace.” (LOCARD, 1934), This means that no crime can be committed without leaving behind evidence which will help forensic scientists link the criminal to the crime. When a person touches a surface or thing they leave behind some sweat which will create a copy of their fingerprint on the surface, they are often found at crime scenes and most of which are not linked to the case at all, but the uniqueness and reliability of these prints means that when a set of prints are found at a location they should not be the mark is examined and compared to prints taken from suspects, indicating that the person who matches these prints was at the scene of crime at some point, linking them to the
The criminal justice system has changed a lot since the good old days of the Wild West when pretty much anything was legal. Criminals were dealt with in any fashion the law enforcement saw fit. The science of catching criminals has evolved since these days. We are better at catching criminals than ever and we owe this advancement to forensic science. The development of forensic science has given us the important techniques of fingerprinting and DNA analysis. We can use these techniques to catch criminals, prove people's innocence, and keep track of inmates after they have been paroled. There are many different ways of solving crimes using forensic evidence. One of these ways is using blood spatter analysis; this is where the distribution and pattern of bloodstains is studied to find the nature of the event that caused the blood spatter. Many things go into the determination of the cause including: the effects of various types of physical forces on blood, the interaction between blood and the surfaces on which it falls, the location of the person shedding the blood, the location and actions of the assailant, and the movement of them both during the incident. Another common type of forensic evidence is trace evidence. This is commonly recovered from any number of items at a crime scene. These items can include carpet fibers, clothing fibers, or hair found in or around the crime scene. Hairs recovered from crime scenes can be used as an important source of DNA. Examination of material recovered from a victim's or suspect's clothing can allow association to be made between the victim and other people, places, or things involved in the investigation. DNA analysis is the most important part of forensic science. DNA evidence can come in many forms at the crime scene. Some of these forms include hair; bodily fluids recovered at the crime scene or on the victim's body, skin under the victim's fingernails, blood, and many others. This DNA can be the basis of someone's guilt or innocence; it has decided many cases in the twentieth century. As the times continue to change and the criminals get smarter we will always need to find new ways to catch them. Forensic science is the most advanced method yet, but is only the beginning. As the field of science grows so will the abilities of the
Once a crime has been committed the most important item to recover is any type of evidence left at the scene. If the suspect left any Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) at the crime scene, he could then be linked to the crime and eventually charged. A suspect’s DNA can be recovered if the suspect leaves a sample of his or her DNA at the crime scene. However, this method was not always used to track down a suspect. Not too long ago, detectives used to use bite marks, blood stain detection, blood grouping as the primary tool to identify a suspect. DNA can be left or collected from the hair, saliva, blood, mucus, semen, urine, fecal matter, and even the bones. DNA analysis has been the most recent technique employed by the forensic science community to identify a suspect or victim since the use of fingerprinting. Moreover, since the introduction of this new technique it has been a la...
Evidence shows that investigations of crime scene went on as far back as prehistoric times (Taylor 1). From evidence it shows that early men would take their fingerprints by pressing their fingers into clay or into rock (Taylor 1). Ancient Babylonians used this way for business and to try to save them for a mean of identification. Also, the prints were used for other official needs.
There was a multitude of evidence collected by the detective in the movie: photographs, objects left behind like tools and bones, weapons, restraining devices, and newspaper clips and other things. In one scene the killer takes a man and ties him to a poll in an abandon area. He leaves wooden planks down the victim. He cuts him just enough to allow for the rats to pick up the scent of the blood. Sometime later the rats get to him, and tear him to parts. By the time Amelia gets to the victim he is gone. The only thing left for her is to retrieve the evidence left at the scene. One method that she used to capture this evidence is fingerprints; eventually taken by other investigators. There was a fingerprint left behind which they then checked the box for prints. She was trying to see if the killer finally made a fatal mistake in his crusade of murders, but sadly he had cut the finger off of another man. They found the person by what seems to be the IAFIS program, which was established and used by the FBI and used by many states. A fingerprint is an impression left by the friction ridges of a human finger. AFIS is a biometric identification methodology, and there are many of them. When you take one’s Fingerprints and upload them to a national database for the FBI, this is called IAFIS; the name is given to once specific AFIS, by the FBI. This is a national fingerprint and criminal history program. Fingerprinting is used in criminal investigation and other cases, like fraud prevention. A theory behind fingerprints is how our fingerprints begin to have our own characteristics. The theory of relativity in fingerprints, and it says that we inherit some characteristics of our parent’s fingerprints. We may get their fingerprint type, but our own unique characteristics, like ridge endings, bridges, etc. It could be used to help figure out
Computers have also allowed the use of fingerprinting to expand. Agencies can now take someone’s fingerprints and send them through the computer and find out if they are linked to any other cases going on at the time, or any other cases in the past.
You turn on the news to see that another crime had been solved that day. But how did they do it? It was the work of forensics and fingerprinting. Forensics and fingerprinting is used to solve crimes that would otherwise be impossible. Everyone's fingerprint is slightly different then the next guy, and every other guy and girl.
1. Fingerprint recognition: A fingerprint is made up of ridges and furrows. Uniqueness is determined by ridges, furrows, the minutiae points. Fingerprint is one of oldest and most popular recognition technique. Every individual possesses unique finger patterns, even twins has different patterns of rings and furrows.