The crucial importance of law changing behaviour, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of legislation has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on modifying the human behaviour. While it can be agreed that law might have the ability to alter individuals’ conduct, there are some parts it cannot touch. This essay will elaborate how by following the rules continuously it may become a habit and it may have the impact on behaviour and why people sometimes act against the laws thus will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
As the outset, there are numerous reasons why the law can change human behaviour, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact by keeping following the
From the monarchs of the ancient era to the democracy of today, order has been maintained by means of rules and regulations known as laws. Compliance with these laws is enforced through punishments ranging in severity according to the crimes committed to reduce violence and misconduct from individuals within a society. However, just as citizens consent to abide by the laws of the state in which they reside, one is compelled to preserve justice and condemn the unjust decisions of man when the social contract contradicts the laws sanctioned by God. Approaching this conflict between natural and manmade laws in a non-violent manner is called “civil disobedience”.
On this world, laws can be very important and can be the solution for keeping this nation and other countries together. Without laws, people would just do whatever they want to do and not think twice about it for the simple fact that they would know that there will not be any major consequences. Martin proves why these laws are so important to us and he also explains how they are important. There are many points which he proves that I totally agree with and there are also some things that I do not necessarily agree with
Laws are structured and implemented to benefit the masses. Unfortunately this objective is not always achieved. The constitution of the states is considered the best work of law yet it is unable to save the life of a child. Clearly the problem of violence is turning more into a socio-cultural and psychological problem than a legal one. However laws still need to be implemented justly in order to preserve the freedom and rights of me...
the laws of man and kept in check by society's own norms. The human struggle to
“When it comes to tax codes, or laws against littering or speeding or noise pollution, more and more ordinary citizens are becoming scofflaws [people who casually break the law]” (Trippett, A Red Light for Scofflaws). Frank Trippett in his excerpt, A Red Light for Scofflaws, argues that American citizens are casually breaking ‘minor’ laws in belief that these precepts are not that important, unlike the really violent crimes. The author supports his claim by first divulging what might the citizens think about the ‘minor’ laws. He then describe what he thought the people would do in regards to these laws (whether they would follow them or not). The author is trying to inform the commonality of the importance of this society’s laws, whether ‘minor’ or violent in order to make the people realize that every law are established and it is the people’s responsibility to obey them. In agreement with Trippett, today’s citizens are more prone to disobeying the ordinary, simple laws in thought that violent crimes are the main threats to the law and order of this society.
A controversial issue regarding the law has been whether it is ever right to disobey the law. Some people would argue that it is not always morally wrong to disobey the law. From this perspective, laws that are considered immoral or unfair hinder society through unnecessary restrictions. However, others argue that it is never right to disobey the law. Socrates, who maintains this view, discusses the issue of obeying laws in Crito by Plato, arguing that a citizen “[has] undertaken, in deed if not in word, to live [their] life as a citizen in obedience to us [the Laws]” (271). According to this view, obeying the law is a citizen’s duty, and a person who is not obedient to the law fails to fulfill his duty. In sum, the issue is whether disobedience of the law is moral or immoral.
The law regularly joins moral gauges to that most voters subscribe. In any case laws, in the same way as sentiments, will veer off from what 's good. Our precivil War subjection laws and hence the past social approach laws of contemporary African nation square measure immensely evident specimens of laws that go astray from what 's good.
of the country, many wanted to abide not only by the law but also by
Korsgaard argues that the will to want to obey the law is dependent upon the reasons that cause us to obey laws in the first place...
Parliament, the supreme law-making body, has an unrestricted legislative power, and the laws it passes cannot be set aside by the courts. The role of judges, in relation to laws enacted by Parliament, is to interpret and apply them, rather than to pass judgment on whether they are good or bad laws. However, evidence has shown that they have a tendency to deviate from their ‘real roles’ and instead formulate laws on their own terms. Thus the real role of a judge in any legal system continues to be a phenomenon questioned by many. We must consider whether they are “authoritarian law-makers, or if their profession makes them mere declarers of the law” . In this essay, I will argue the ways that judges do make law as well as discussing the contrary.
So far it is agreed that the destructive events and courses of action mentioned above have been an attribute of blind obedience, wherein one even goes against the accepted social and moral beliefs, which can be extremely unhealthy and result in an abnormal development of social framework. However, the rut of obeying the authority blindly can be defied by way of manipulation of situational factors, in order to stimulate people to act in a positive way. The menace of conformity or groupthink and blind obedience can be overcome by anyone by resisting such social pressures on an individual level. In addition to that, the development of a sense of personal responsibility, morality and pressure necessary for disobeying must be inculcated in order to avoid destructive courses of action ignited by blind obedience (Bocchiaro & Zamperini, n.d.).
Laws serve several purposes in the criminal justice system. The main purpose of criminal law is to protect, serve, and limit human actions and to help guide human conduct. Also, laws provide penalties and punishment against those who are guilty of committing crimes against property or persons. In the modern world, there are three choices in dealing with criminals’ namely criminal punishment, private action and executive control. Although both private action and executive control are advantageous in terms of costs and speed, they present big dangers that discourage their use unless in exceptional situations. The second purpose of criminal law is to punish the offender. Punishing the offender is the most important purpose of criminal law since by doing so; it discourages him from committing crime again while making him or her pay for their crimes. Retribution does not mean inflicting physical punishment by incarceration only, but it also may include things like rehabilitation and financial retribution among other things. The last purpose of criminal law is to protect the community from criminals. Criminal law acts as the means through which the society protects itself from those who are harmful or dangerous to it. This is achieved through sentences meant to act as a way of deterring the offender from repeating the same crime in the future.
...in the present. One minor incident can have an everlasting effect on the society and the path that the society then follows for its further development could be completely tangential. However, each of these elements are so deeply engraved in the functioning of the society that these societies begin to revolve around them and appear to be, if not essentially are, crucial for the existence and survival of the society. Russia is the best example of such societies because despite the society wanting to eliminate the existence of the mafiya, they still depend on it for the day-to-day functioning. Both these studies will continue to grow further interlinked and interconnected over the years as they have the same basis of study and the same subject matter. The relationship between law and society has developed over the past decades and is, evidently, going to further grow.
The criminal law takes immense part in society, including the following functions: to deter people from acts that harms others or society. Furthermore, people who do not follow the rules that are being set by the authority, they will be punished. The criminal law is there to guidance the general public on the manners of behaviour, which are seen acceptable by society. (Jonathan Herring; criminal law, page 4 eighth edition)
Both law and morality serve to regulate behaviour in society. Morality is defined as a set of key values, attitudes and beliefs giving a standard in which we ‘should’ behave. Law, however, is defined as regulating behaviour which is enforced among society for everyone to abide by. It is said that both, however, are normative which means they both indicate how we should behave and therefore can both be classed as a guideline in which society acts, meaning neither is more effective or important than the other. Law and morals have clear differences in how and why they are made. Law, for example, comes from Parliament and Judges and will be made in a formal, legal institution which result in formal consequences when broken. Whereas morals are formed under the influence of family, friends, media or religion and they become personal matters of individual consciences. They result in no formal consequence but may result in a social disapproval which is shown also to occur when breaking the law.