Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Colonizers and American Indians
Native american people during european exploration and colonization
The effect of Spanish colonialism on native american culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Colonizers and American Indians
The second part of this document is Bartolome trying to refute Sepulveda’s argument of using violence to subjacent the Indians. Las Casas takes a very different approach by not seeking to match theology with Sepulveda, in denying that it is God’s will, rather he appeals to the King directly. His opening statement is really one big flattery. He mentions how the king has a, “generous spirit and with the wisdom implanted in you by Christ” his actions will be fair. He further states that he is writing to the king in Spanish where Sepulveda wrote in Latin. This latter claim is implying how much Las Cases knows it is really the King of Spain who dictates what happens in the New World and with the wisdom given to the King by God, he’ll make the …show more content…
Las Cases argues that if those outside of the faith see Spain engaging in this war, they will be seen as, “Christian men, forgetting Christian virtue” instead of the nation showing mercy. While Las Cases wants Spain to treat the natives with compassion, he knows this is not how he’ll win the dispute. He must frame his appeal in ways that flatter the King or positions that oppose Las Cases, will hurt the image of Spain and undermined the king’s rule. To prove this point, Las Cases says that while Sepulveda claims to be upholding the King’s rule, he actually, “tears to pieces and reduces your rights by presenting arguments that are partly foolish, partly false, and partly of the kind that have the least force.” His next move is to criticize the soldiers who have the evil intention of looting the native’s possessions and are not bound to pay restitutions. Furthermore, he says the soldiers hold no distinction between man, woman, and children and kill all without a thought as no punishment is given, “What will they not do if they hear that there is a man teaching that they are consecrating their hands to God when they crush the Indians with massacres…” They kill and take and justify their actions because some theologian says it is okay since the natives are heathens and God wills
The second passage that I have read is a secondary source, and what has brought be to the conclusion is that the passage is being narrated by someone because in the passage the narrator says stuff like, “he said” and “Thus he replies” in the text. The main idea of the first passage is about how Indians in Hispaniola were deprived of their freedom and treated horribly. The main idea of the second passage is that the Indians who would go against the Law of God would have everything that they have away from them and they also would be
I was surprised by the author’s interpretation of the biblical text. I had never thought about what had happened to the Canaanites when the Israelites took their land. This story is very similar to the Europeans, mainly the English, coming to America. Both of these have oppressed people who leave their country to find a land that they believe is promised to them and in turn; they oppress a group of people and drive them from their land. Warrior believes that, like the Canaanites, the Native Americans are a group of forgotten people in the eyes of God. When I went to a Presbyterian church, I had learned the God loved everyone and I never thought that God would annihilate a group of people for living on a piece of land that God had promised to another group of people. During this time, the stories of the Canaanites
In Matthew Restall’s book The Seven Myths of the Spanish Conquest, he argues that many of the widely accepted modern beliefs about the Spanish Conquest are misguided or skewed. These myths more importantly show how dependent history is on the perspective of the one who is writing it, and how the writer perceives the events happening around them. One example, is the myth of white Spaniards going to a foreign land on the decree of a king and finding barbarous natives who are inferior to these so-called great men. Using documentation written from both sides, and taking into account the context of the time period, Restall explores the myths of the Spanish Conquest in order to frame a less romanticized, well-rounded view of what actually happened
Bartolome de las casas had hoped to prevent further harm to Indians, and clarify that they were not barbarians. Of the text named Bartolome de las casas: In Defense of the Indians(c.1550) it covers what is to be the Spanish Conquistadores, and talks of the natives to which at the time seen by many are barbaric, ignorant, incapable of learning, just another group of people to be conquered. But to the Catholic missionaries, they see the Natives as new people to influence and enlighten. But if at any time the person drops the belief in Christianity, they would use deadly force against the person or family. Adding to that, Hernán comments that their cities are “ worth of admiration because of their buildings, which are like those of Venice”(Poole 4).
The fear the Spanish unleashed to the Natives was immense. The armor the Spaniard’s whore terrified everyone who saw them. The loud clamor they made as they marched also installed fear into the Natives heads.
Bolivar illustrates the relationship between the Spanish American colonies and Spain. The relationship could be described as bitter, at least in the eyes of the Spanish colonies. Inferiority led the Spanish colonies to the ideas of revolution. Although their rights come from the Europeans, they do not acknowledge themselves as Europeans or Indians. The people of the Spanish colonies claim to be, according to Bolivar, “[…] a species midway between the legitimate proprietors of [America] and the Spanish usurper” (411). “Usurpers” meaning a position that is held by forces which entails an unwanted or uninvited relationship. It is because of the Europeans, as stated by Bolivar, that “we have to assert [European] rights against the rights of the natives, and at the same time we must defend ourselves against invaders [which] places us in a most extraordinary and involved situation” (411). This is also evidence of a bitter rela...
Bowden’s idea of why this happened focused mainly on the old misunderstood traditions of the tribes living in Mexico. He shows how the friars, churches and icons took the blunt of the revolts force. Bowden points out the religious differences and similarities be...
The character of Demetrio Macias proves to be quite ironic. One facet of his character reveals his determination to find Pancho Villa’s army, while the other side of his character parallels the extraordinary qualities Pancho Villa had as a hero. People viewed Pancho Villa as a revered hero who pushed out foreign "proprietors" and fought for the common man. On one hand, there is the compassionate man who helped those in need and rescued orphans providing them with food, education, and a home. On the other hand, there was the ferocious general who destroyed villages and killed innocent victims. Villa was generous and helpful to his followers, of which he insisted on loyalty and trust, but to those who violated his trust and authority, he was merciless and cruel. We can clearly see the similarities of these two leaders when we analyze their noble actions. Demetrio’s reluctance to stop ...
The discovery and conquest of American Indians inspired efforts to develop an ideology that could justify why they needed to enslave the Indians. The Spanish monarch wanted an ideal empire. "A universal empire, of which all their subjects were but servants. Charles V remained for them the dominus mundi, the legitimate and God-ordained lord of the world." (Weckmann, The Transit of Civilization, 23) Gold and religious conversion was the two most important inspirations for conquistadors in conquering America. Father Bartolome De Las Casas was a Dominican priest who came to the New World to convert the Indians to become Christians. He spent forty years on Hispanolia and nearby islands, and saw how the Spaniards brutally treated the Indians and sympathized with them. The Devastation of the Indies was an actual eyewitness account of the genocide by Las Casas, and his group of Dominican friars in which he demonizes the Spanish colonists and praises the Indians. Father Las Casas returned to Seville, where he published his book that caused an on going debate on whether the suppression of the Indians corrupted the Spaniards' values. What Las Casas was trying to achieve was the notion of human rights, that human beings are free and cogent by nature without the interference of others.
Finally, when it came down to the types of ceremonies and views both civilizations had, they were on two different pages. The Natives believed happiness was the key to good fortune. So, in order to get that fortune, they’d do sacrifices, and rituals to please the “mighty ones”. Then, as stated in the book “A History of Latin America”, it says, “Jews publicly converted to Christianity to avoid the torture…”, In which, this showed how religion and the spiritual views were forced upon people in the Spanish civilization.
...tence it at least allowed him to educate the natives about Christianity and that their experiences before now with the Europeans were not of a Christian nature. Throughout the letter, Las Casas seems careful to be very consistent and never veers from ensuring that his audience knows of the atrocities of the people of their own land to the natives fellow humans. God has a plan for everyone and this is not it.
The American version of history blames the Native people for their ‘savage ' nature, for their failure to adhere to the ‘civilized norms ' of property ownership and individual rights that Christian people hold, and for their ‘brutality ' in defending themselves against the onslaught of non-Indian settlers. The message to Native people is simple: "If only you had been more like us, things might have been different for you.”
Preston, Paul. The Spanish Civil War: Reaction, Revolution and Revenge. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2007. Print.
In Part 1, this representation is volatile because it only depends on his direct contact with them to a limited extent; rather, his perception is influenced by external factors. The first of these factors is his own prior life experience at the time of consideration, which is reflected primarily in the structure of Part 1. When the reader is first introduced to the Indian via Fierro’s military life, the picture painted is thoroughly hellish; one of the first things the reader learns is that he ‘mata cuanto encuentra | y quema las poblaciones’ (I:479-80). The reader is also made aware of a third party that communicates the actions of the Indians to Fierro and the soldiers through the use of “they” as an indefinite pronoun, ‘nos contaban que aveces,’ (I:511) the Indians would cut the feet off Christian women. Similarly, it becomes apparent that the Indian the Fierro fought in Part 1 was the son of a chieftain, ‘sigún yo lo averigüe,’ (I:602).