Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Approaches to crime prevention
Approaches to crime prevention
Case management case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Approaches to crime prevention
Case Study: Bank Teller Gets Nabbed for Theft In this case, Laura Grove, a newly promoted head teller at Rocky Mountain Bank had been living beyond her and her husband’s means for some time. Laura thought to herself that “she wasn’t getting any richer,” and decided after a night deposit bag went missing and the bank quickly paid up, that it might be worth the risk to nab a couple night deposit bags for herself (Wells, 2014, p. 75). Once Laura followed through with her theft of the night deposit bags, what classified her crime as larceny rather than skimming? The answer lies within the definition of larceny which is a crime that involves “the intentional taking away of an employer’s cash without the consent, and against the will of the employer,” …show more content…
Ultimately, it was her husband that reported his wife’s activities, that eventually led to her quick arrest. Had this not have happened, there was plenty of evidence that pointed to Laura’s possible involvement. First, she was the only one that broke out into a rash during the interview process that day. This suggests a sign of stress (Wells, 2014, p. 76). Secondly, she was the first one in the bank that morning, well beyond the time the surveillance cameras came on. Furthermore, she had one half of the night depository vault combination (Wells, 2014, p. 76). In addition, the previous bank branch she came from had numerous unexplained shortages of which she was a prime suspect (Wells, 2014, p. 76). Finally, during the interview process, it was clear that the current bank employees did not trust her. Although all of this is circumstantial evidence, it would have led the investigation to suspect …show more content…
Had the bank done a thorough background check on Laura beforehand, they would have known she had filed bankruptcy earlier that year or at very least of her poor credit prior to her hiring date (Wells, 2014, p. 76). Her poor credit would have been a red flag, a possible indication that her financial pressures made her a high risk when it came to working with money.
Though the reading is a little ambiguous in regards to whether it was a bank branch attached to Rocky Mountain Bank or another bank altogether that Laura transferred in from, prior to her transfer, Laura should have had a background check in regards to her performance at her prior branch. This is especially important if the branch is attached to Rocky Mountain Bank and they suspected her in unexplained shortages at that branch (Wells, 2014, p. 76). A thorough investigation should have been performed before ever transferring her with a
McOskar Enterprises, Inc. owns and manages a health and fitness center identified as “Curves for Women”. Tammey J. Anderson, the complainant, joined Curves on April 2, 2003. As part of the joining process Anderson signed a release of liability agreement. This agreement released Curves from any liabilities related to injuries that might be sustained by contributing in any activities or through the use of equipment. The agreement also stated that participants agreed to all risks of death or injury that could occur, Anderson read and signed the agreement of terms with Curves. After completing the liability agreement, Anderson began working out under the observation of a Curves’ trainer using the machines within the facility. During the workout Anderson notified the trainer that she began to feel pain in her neck, shoulder and arm, but finished her workout. She continued to feel the pain when she got home and pursued medical attention. As part of her prescribed medical treatment she was sent for a course a physical therapy. In June 2003 Anderson underwent a cervical discectomy, a procedure used to treat nerve or spinal cord compression. After her procedure Anderson sued Curves, claiming negligent acts during her workout. Anderson v. McOskar Enterprises, Inc., 712 NW 2d 796 (Minn. 2006).
Tort, one of the crucial subjects of study when analyzing common law jurisdictions. Tort, is an action which causes another person or party to suffer harm or loss []. The person who has committed a tortious act is called the tortfeasor while the person who suffered harm or loss from such act is called the injured party or the victim. Although crimes may be torts, torts may not be crimes [] simply because a tort may not have broken a law. In fact, one must understand that the key idea of tort is not to punish the tortfeasor(s) but rather to compensate the victim(s).
In this case, Taylor who was the Vice President of Meritor Bank hired Vinson as a teller for Meritor Savings Bank. For Taylor, there was an instant attraction to Vinson and he pursued her sexually. Vinson started meeting Taylor outside of work and the relationship grew to be of the sexual nature. Taylor, being her boss, started showing possessive displays of affection within the work place in front of job candidates and current employees. Taylor then suggested that Vinson apply for a higher-ranking job he supervised. Vinson deliberated on it, decided to interview, and was then promoted. Taylor and Vinson had many sexual encounters, 40-50 times, during the course of her employment with the bank. Taylor started getting more aggressive with his impromptu barrage of sexual encounters in places like the women's bathroom. When Vinson notified Taylor that she had developed and was embarking on a relationship with another male, Tay...
Steel, Alex, ‘The Harms and Wrongs of Stealing: the Harm Principle and Dishonesty in Theft’ (2008) 31(3) UNSW Law Journal 712
Criminal attitude and learning of dealing skills begins long before people become full-fledged thieves. Most have shady pasts that has influenced their intuitions about criminality and hustling, and this background often informs them of the best ways to evaluate information and situation. In Sam’s case, his experiences in jail were where he learned the most. Being around people with a similar ingenuity is crucial for fostering criminality. Ingenuity refers to the ability to actively exploit one’s environment by creating and controlling opportunities. It’s a furthering of larceny sense and springs from the street smarts retained with interactions with the underworld. It takes initiative to manipulate persons and resources, and a certain combination of cleverness and
What is forfeiture? A basic definition of forfeiture can be found nearly anywhere on the internet, including this one from Merriam-Webster, “the loss of property or money because of a breach of a legal obligation.” According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s website, there are two types of forfeiture, that of criminal and of civil. Criminal forfeiture typically happens after a criminal has already been charged with something after going through a legal process. They will have to give notice to the criminal, and then upon conviction, the government has rights to seize the assets in question from the offender ("Forfeiture."). It is essentially used as a form of punishment for committing a crime ("Forfeiture.").
Civil asset forfeiture has been the subject of public debate among the news media and law-makers nationwide; mainly in opposition of the practice. Civil asset forfeiture, in large, is the seizure of money and/or property from those who commit drug crimes. For instance, if an officer stops a vehicle and legally finds that there is a felony amount of narcotics inside the vehicle, and the owner has intentions of selling those drugs, that vehicle is subject to seizure along with any money that is found to be the proceeds of drug sales. Many people who have seen investigative news reports believe that officers can just pull someone over and take their property for no reason what-so-ever; however, an officer must have probable cause that the property
Evidence from the text to prove Laura wasn't very confident in herself, is when she says, "Yes, it was so hard for me, getting upstairs. I had that brace on my leg - it clumped so loud!...I had to go clumping all the way up the aisle with everyone watching!"(pg.94)
She also had to have a profound understanding of the inner workings and hierarchical structure of the FBI for which she was appointed an FBI agent who took her through the nitty-gritty of the
I think in the example of a poor person stealing to feed their family versus a rich person shoplifting for a thrill are not the same sort of crime. The poor person obviously cannot provide for their family and is stealing to survive, and the rich person can provide and the rush they feel from stealing could be classified as a mental issue. Although, Muncie states that people act with free will and they should be made responsible for their actions, these are two separate crimes (11). They are two separate for the meanings they have behind them, as one is in order to live on and another is out of selfishness.
Homicide is defined as the deliberate and unlawful killing of one human being by another. There are two other terms for homicide; murder and manslaughter. To break it down, a person killing another person. The penal code for homicide/murder is PC187. Homicide can be considered as either a criminal or non-criminal act.
Criminal law is a part of law concerned with certain acts (labeled as criminal) that eventually lead to punishment. Although there is no clear-cut definition of what a criminal act is, we can say there are generally two elements to nearly all criminal acts. First, a criminal act is intended to do substantial harm. For example, murder, rape, robbery are considered to be criminal acts. Second, a criminal act involves either criminal intent or guilty mind (mens rea). There are levels in criminal intent (which are relevant to guilt and punishment), the intent to harm in general is a necessary part in a typical case involving personal injury. Unlike civil wrongs that are generally concerned with harm caused by negligent or reckless behavior, criminal wrongs are necessarily the product of intentional, eventually cruel, behavior.
Larceny sense is when someone has “larceny in [their] heart” and “the ability to perceive and capitalize on less than legitimate activity” (190). In other words, someone with larceny sense isn’t constrained by conventional norms and attitudes in society. They are not only willing to participate and benefit from illegal activity, but they are skilled at doing so. They excel at detecting solid opportunities and know how to recognize situations that are too good to be true or are otherwise risky enough to be avoided. According to Steffensmeier, larceny sense is a trait that is part nature and part nurture. It is an instinct that is refined and developed through experience and interaction with other criminals (191). This is an example of something that sets “good” thieves apart from lesser thieves because it is a discipline that helps one avoid risky and low value impulse jobs common amongst beginners (26-27). A professional thief must value quality over quantity concerning heists and be skilled at making plans. Planning is essential because it lowers the risk of getting caught while also increasing the value of the objects being stolen. For example, Sam’s knowledge of antiques aided in his ability to steal higher quality objects including good silver and jewelry because he knew what to look for and where to look for it. Additionally, planning reflects a level of experience and expertise in one’s trade
They can run from lower level offenses, for example, shoplifting or vandalism to abnormal state crimes including furnished theft and incendiarism. Some such criminal acts don 't require the guilty party to snatch stolen products or even to mischief a victimized person, for example, burglary, which just requires unlawful passage with the expectation to carry out a criminal act. Others require the real taking of cash or property. Some, like theft, oblige an exploited person present at the season of the wrongdoing. Most crimes against property incorporate a range of degrees relying upon variables including the sum stolen and utilization of power or arms in cases related to theft, and real or potential damage in property destruction offenses.
“Taking is the act of obtaining physical possession or control of another’s property (Gardner & Anderson, 2012, p. 349)”. Retail theft or shoplifting has always been an issue for merchants. Shoplifting is defined as the unlawful concealment and/or taking of property offered for sale and as an attempt to deprive the owner of said property, usually the retail merchant, and the possession of that property without paying for it (Thomson Reuters, 2014). Taking in shoplifting cases can also be described as willful intent to deceive by way of