Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime prevention concepts and theory
Crime prevention theory
Elements of Criminal Liability
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime prevention concepts and theory
1.
Theft
Theft is the intentional taking of someone else’s property dishonestly without the owner’s consent. Theft requires the physical elements to be supported by fault, whereby the accused either intends to deprive the property’s owner permanently, or seriously impinge on the owner’s proprietary rights.
Deception
Deception is the intentional use of false representations by an individual through words or conduct; in order to dishonestly obtain an unfair advantage for self or another by inducing the victim to transfer a benefit or inflict a detriment upon the victim. The intention to deceive is the supportive fault element.
2.
Harm Principle
Mill stated the ‘classic liberal view of the relationship between law and morality’, introducing the Harm Principle: ‘the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others’.
Theft
According to Feinberg, the Harm Principle is liberty limiting - in order for behaviour to be caught by criminal law, that is, considered harm, wrongdoing must be a serious offence. ‘To be harm a person’s interests must be setback’.
Section 134(2) of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act (‘CLCA’) provides that a person will be guilty of an offence if they seriously encroach on the owner’s rights to their property. To seriously encroach would mean the offender dealt with the victims property with the intention of treating it as their own to dispose of at will. Or, the offender dealt with the property in a manner that created a substantial risk to the owner of recovery. The function of s 134(2) is to deter the possibility of that harm. To permanently deprive someone of their property rights by dealing with prope...
... middle of paper ...
...rt and Kugler, Matthew, ‘Community Perceptions of Theft Seriousness: A Challenge to Model Penal Code and English Theft Act Consolidation’ (2010) 7(3) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 511
Mcleod, Ian, Legal Theory (Palgrave Macmillan, 4th ed, 2007)
Herring, Jonathan, Great Debates: Criminal Law (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)
Mitchell, Barry, ‘Multiple Wrongdoing and Offence Structure: A Plea for Consistency and Fair Labelling’ (2001) 64(3) Modern Law Review 393, 395.
Steel, Alex, ‘The Harms and Wrongs of Stealing: the Harm Principle and Dishonesty in Theft’ (2008) 31(3) UNSW Law Journal 712
Stimpson, Claire, ‘Feminist Analysis of the Harm Principle: The Financial Element in Fraud’ (2013) 38(2) Alternative Law Journal 103
Williams, Glanville, ‘Convictions and Fair Labelling’ (1983) 42(1) The Cambridge Law Journal 85
Legislation
Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA)
Bibbings , Lois , and Donald Nicolson. 2000. “General principles of criminal law'? A feminist
R N Howie and P A Johnson, Annotated Criminal Legislation NSW, 2011-2102, (Lexis Nexis Butterworths 2012) 17769-1774
Tort, one of the crucial subjects of study when analyzing common law jurisdictions. Tort, is an action which causes another person or party to suffer harm or loss []. The person who has committed a tortious act is called the tortfeasor while the person who suffered harm or loss from such act is called the injured party or the victim. Although crimes may be torts, torts may not be crimes [] simply because a tort may not have broken a law. In fact, one must understand that the key idea of tort is not to punish the tortfeasor(s) but rather to compensate the victim(s).
9. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003). Legal Studies for Queensland, Volume 1, ForthEdition, Legal Eagle Publications: Queensland. 10. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003).
• Paton, John, et al., eds. Crimes and Punishment Vol. 2 New York: Marshall Cavendish Corporation, 1986.
According to Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, theft is, "The act of stealing; specifically, the felonious taking and removing of personal property, with an intent to deprive the rightful owner of the same" (Webster's 2). Before the advent of moveable type, no one had cause to apply this concept to information rather than physical property. If one were to steal a book, the act was easily recognized as of the same moral color as stealing a horse, a nugget of gold, or any other physical object. The thief?s possession of the stolen item constituted the rightful owner?s lack of it, a loss both real and measurable. Today, theft seems a hazier concept, due to the popularization and codification of Intellectual Property (IP) rights. IP rights differ from standard property rights in that they signify an individual's right of ownership over "intangible things" (Kinsella 3). Arguably, the most important such things are patents and copyrights. Patents protect inventions, and copyrights protect "original forms of expression" (Fisher 1). In both cases, the right to ownership amounts to ownership of an idea, not a physical object.
(7) H. L., Hart, The Concept of Law, ch. VIII, and D., Lyons, Ethics and the rule of law, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 78 ff,
... middle of paper ... ... A less intense example that fits into the discussion is the law of wearing a seatbelt. Not wearing a seatbelt while in a car is a good way of possibly causing harm to yourself.
Major problems were experienced in the early years after the Act over how the preserved common law conspiracy to defraud dovetailed with the new statutory conspiracy to commit a crime as frequently, an agreement to defraud will necessarily involve an agreement to commit a substantive offence entailing dishonesty such as theft or the new offence of fr...
Muncie, J., and Mclaughin, E. (1996) The Problem of Crime. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
In order to maintain social cohesion, the criminal justice system must be able to adapt, expand and create laws to catch conduct that may have not been an offence in previous generations. This is shown in the repeal of ‘larceny’ and its subsequent ad hoc statutory offences to the replacement of a collection of dishonesty offences, known as ‘theft and its satellites’. This meant the laws were now capable to extend to conduct that neither threatened nor violated property rights, included the dishonest acquisition or imposition of intangible benefits and detriments and encompassed the mere usurpation of rights beyond ‘taking and carrying away .’ This commonality further extended to the replacement of obtaining property by false pretences to deception and its subsequent offences, dishonest dealing with documents , dishonest manipulation of machines and exploitation . Such expansion, however, brings forth concerns of indeterminacy, broadness and vagueness rather than uniformity and commonality. Hence, this essay will explore whether deception and two of its subsequent offences are principled and justified in an increasingly over-criminalised society.
Lippman, M. (2012). Contemporary Criminal Law Concepts, Cases and Controversies (3rd ed.). [Vitalsouce Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com/books/9781452277660/5/3
Shoplifting is a major problem in today. The temptation of not paying for something, just hiding it away and saving your own money is a large factor for some people. The culprit just thinks he's getting a product for free and doesn't know what he's actually doing to himself and the community. Shoplifting effects everyone, yourself and the everyone in the local neighborhood.In this essay I'm going to explain some of the circumstances of stealing from local stores, or any store. After I've been caught stealing I found out how wrong it is and how it is a disadvantage to everyone.
One of the issues Mill addresses is the restriction of selling drugs or poison. Mill realizes that it may be possible to prevent the death and harm of others by restricting the sale of poison. The application of the harm principle would not allow for the poison to be prohibited because it violates the liberty of those who use poisons for innocent reasons (Mill 89). The issue is problematic because you must determine how far liberty may legitimately be invaded for the prevention of crime. It is possible that some sexual offenders watch or perform in pornography, but the majority of the people who use pornography never become criminals or sex offenders. In this case, Mill would not endorse
People are often blinded by the situation in which they are in, and by their personal motives which drive them to act. Humans, by nature, have faults and vices that are potentially harmful. It is the responsibility of society to anticipate harm, whether to oneself or to others. Once dangerous patterns and habits are recognized, it is imperative to anticipate and prevent injury from reoccurring. To allow any individual to be inflicted harm forces citizens to lose trust in the government, thus unraveling the fabric of society.... ...