Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
George Orwell Reflections on Politics and Language
George Orwell Reflections on Politics and Language
George Orwell Reflections on Politics and Language
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: George Orwell Reflections on Politics and Language
“Political languages --- and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists --- is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” (Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 167) George Orwell believed that the decline of a language must have political, economic and moral causes, and such deterioration will ultimately lead to the further corruption of thoughts. The spread and invasion of the abused languages, especially when prompted by political manipulation, can result in political conformity destructive to the people, the country and the truth. In Orwell’s essay Politics and the English Language, he pointed out how he found the political trends in his time made the usage of pretentious, obscure and insincere language popular and how such trends facilitated the concealment of truth. For example, as Orwell exemplified sarcastically in this essay, when “people are imprisoned for years without trial, or shot in the back of the neck or sent to die of scurvy in Arctic lumber camps,” …show more content…
He focus on a particular type of abused language, the “ready-made phrases” (Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 168), the phrases that will come into your mind and construct sentences devoid of meaning for you. When he received a political pamphlet from someone, hoping to see an elaboration of ideas and opinions, was struck by “the invasion of one’s mind” of empty and pretentious phrases. He worried that, when people begin to rely on asking the words to construct the thoughts for them, no one will no longer be capable of efficient self-expression and ultimately, thinking. Orwell created a world in 1984 to show his idea that the control of language leads to the deprivation of intellectual thoughts, and this makes a complete manipulation of people
In the essay “From Ancient Greece to Iraq, the Power of Words in Wartime” by Robin Tolmach Lakoff, Lakoff discusses the fact that words are a tool as well when it comes to wars. She talks about the differences between our natural want and ability to kill things, and the mental training soldiers receive to make it easier for them. Lakoff talks about the practice of dehumanizing the “enemy” through nicknames that make us feel superior then our foes, and the repercussions of using this type of language. In the essay by George Orwell, “Politics and the English Language”, Orwell talks about the decay of the English language, especially in political writings. He discusses the fact that when it comes to writing, political being the main focus, it’s
Diction: While George Orwell used fairly simple and uncomplicated diction to tell the story many of his words still have a very powerful diction. In the first chapter the protagonist Winston is attack by the smell of “boiled cabbage and old rag mats”. This is the first indication to the nature of the living conditions of our protagonist. However, Orwell also uses his diction to create the atmosphere of Oceania with lines like “the world looked cold. Down in the street little eddies of wind were whirling dust and torn paper into spirals, and though the sun was shining and the sky a harsh blue, there seemed to be no colour in anything”. These lines contain powerful words like cold, torn, and harsh and these worlds help paint the picture of what kind of story we are reading.
One of the most essential ways in which feelings are expressed by humans is through language. Without language people are merely robotic figures that can not express their thoughts because language is in fact thought. When this speech is taken away through complete governmental power, a portion of human nature is also taken away. In 1984, due to totalitarianism, language has begun to transform into a poor representation of humanity and natural human expression. Orwell states, “But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” In the novel, a new language, Newspeak, has emerged. Newspeak has drastically limited the vocabulary of the English language
Orwell, George. “Politics and the English Language.” George Orwell: Critical Essays. London: Harvill Secker: 2009. 270-286. Print.
The time frame of this article is in 1946, a year after World War 2 has ended. Orwell takes the current situation into consideration when he appeals to his audience. Therefore, he addresses areas of politics in combination with recent events to try to persuade his audience while inducing a connection between the reader and his article. Orwell writes, “Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face…”. The reader makes a connection with the article because they can remember the previous experience of the topics in their time frame. However, Orwell uses pathos to finally convince the audience of his argument when he writes “Defenseless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, and the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets”. This technique is highly effective because readers automatically feel a sense of pity and sadness which in turn persuades the audience of the argument and convinces them to agree with Orwell’s
An Analysis of George Orwell’s “Politics and the English Language” (1946). Orwell’s article on the English language is on point because it defines how people have become lazy in how they communicate with each other. This type of “slovenliness” is part of the problem in terms of why the English language is often misused by the speaker: “The slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts” (Orwell para.2). Due to the speaker’s laziness, the language becomes confused, and the person begins having “foolish thoughts” that do not have very good accuracy. This mental process is one way that Orwell defines the importance of language as a tool for clarity of thought, which is important when conveying a message to another person or group of people.
Howe, Tom. "George Orwell." British Writers Volume VII. Ed. Ian Scott-Kilvert. New York: Scribner, 1984. 273-287.
Orwell argues that society is completely oblivious to the constraint that is involved in every day life. There is no individual in society and that everyone remains the same. “Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?” (46) Not only does a limiting of words show society that by controlling methods of co...
Despite the warnings of Orwell through both his essay and dystopian novel, bad English is still used today, and could be argued to affect more English than it did during Orwell’s life. The consequences are also just as he predicted, those who control the language are able to wield control over the thoughts of others. The usage of poor quality English by media has he effect of making the recipients of news more detached from events and as a consequence, more self-focused. The clumsiness and foolishness imposed by bad English ultimately degrading thought, politics, culture, and society is what Orwell had foretold. This is the English tragedy that is disregarded, modern thoughts of “English” are not of language but of the English Queen.
In the essay, George Orwell –the author –makes a well-thought out argument about the deterioration of the English language and the careless manner in which it is used in politics. Among the many mistakes and offenses made within English language Orwell lists, the writer argues against the use of pretentious diction, which is the use of excessive or unnecessary (and incorrect) words used in place of more simple words. Orwell contends that pretentious diction is especially harmful to English politics (and the English language, in general), because the political terminology and jargon that is used makes writing difficult to interpret, vague, and slovenly. Orwell also explains how different words may mean different things to different people and how important it is to use simple, concrete words so as to communicate the correct message to other
Many believe that Orwell came up with the political ideas surrounding his book Nineteen Eighty-Four. It was written in a time were politics were influenced by World War One and the decade after. In The Road to Wigan Pier, Orwell wrote, “The horrors of the Russian Revolution were still fresh in everyone’s minds.” I don’t think Orwell was necessarily giving us a detailed picture of how the future will look, or how political communication will be conducted. In D. J. Taylor’s 2004 biography of George Orwell he observed that, “the appeal – and the resonance – of Nineteen Eighty-Four to many of its original readers stemmed from the fact that it depicted a world that, by and large, they already knew.” This quote reinforces my idea that Orwell did not prophesize the future but forces us to think about how our past actions control our future. O’Briens statement "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." Is Orwell stating about what he and many others experienced as a teenager living through the horrors of the First World War. In my mind this only reinforces the notion that Nineteen Eighty-Four was written around the structure of the Russian Revolution feeding the predictions Orwell...
George Orwell’s 1984 is a grim vision of the future where the high class has figured out a way to maintain complete control over the middle and lower classes by eliminating free thought. This is done by maintaining a constant state of war with other nations, thereby maintaining undiminishing devotion for Big Brother and his ability to protect Oceania. This is all built on a series of continuous lies about the war, history, and a constantly increasing standard of living which the people blindly believe due to being conditioned to do so for decades. The Party uses language as a way of altering history and psychologically manipulating people’s minds to gain absolute power.
Orwell uses the information he had learned and experienced in the world to create the totalitarian nation of Oceania. The use of propaganda was seen all around Orwell and that influenced him to use aspects of propaganda in his novel. Orwell was influenced by use of propaganda in Yugoslavia, as stated by Philip Steele, “In Yugoslavia many innocent people were killed just because they belonged to the wrong ethnic group. Leaders justified this by calling it ‘ethnic cleansing’” (Steele 37). Yugoslavia justified their unethical actions by calling it “ethnic cleansing” similar to the way the party in justified their unethical actions why calling them “Thought Crimes”. The party vaporized an person that goes against the government, and justifies this action by calling it a “Thought Crime” this use of propaganda is identical to the actions in Yugoslavia. Nations of the world are treating their people in a cruel way, but by the use of propaganda they advertise is as something that needs to be done to benefit the country. This way people accept it (Steele 36). The nation in 1984, and those around the world both strive for total control and power. They will not stop until they have complete control and power over not only their people, but the nations around
Orwell makes his point on the state of the English language by using five quotes. He stated in the article that the quotes are not the worst, but an example of the worst quality. He chose the quotes to be examples of two main concerns. The quotes showed that too many writers are indifferent to coherency. The writing is written to sound good but usually is so vague it misses the point. He felt the weakening of the English language is not just the fault of writers, but uninspiring writing causes the standards to drop. In other words, poor writing causes poor speaking.
One way that Orwell accomplishes his goal of portraying manipulation and rebellion within the society of 1984 is by using