George Orwell Politics And The English Language Analysis

In his 1946 essay, “Politics and the English Language”, George Orwell asserts that the words, common discussions, and collective literary works, in English encompass less coherency, innovation, and power than ever before; the English language is on a decline. Using strong evidence from quoted figures to justify his claim, Orwell’s argument begins in a strong way and continues at this pace until the end. He stumbles over a contradiction when it comes to the idea that foreign words should be eliminated, yet the argument is overall successful, clearly making a valid point by the end of the essay.

Orwell starts off his essay by isolating a principal issue concerning English’s advancement. Even though every scholar is conscious that English is undergoing belittlement by its native speakers, most argue that no act of prevention will result in triumph. Most deem the act of conserving and revitalizing English’s uprightness to be hopeless, as the inherent status of language is not as an instrument but a distinct entity outside ones control. The author goes on to say that English’s debasement cannot be held responsible by any single writer. Instead, he reasons that language occurs in a reaction circle with itself, whereby untouched or unimaginative writing gives way to lesser criterions with which English is endorsed. To illustrate ideas on English language belittlement, Orwell features five quotes in his essay. Although he claims that these quotes aren’t meant to be of the worst quality, Orwell elucidates that he has integrated these examples to prove that many English writers write uncaringly vaguely, or that they are indifferent to coherency. The English language is formulated to sound pleasing to the ear, but often does not properly cl...

... middle of paper ...

..., and new words turn into popular words, old words and phrases will be converted into archaic and lose their spot within the English language. Sooner or later, what Orwell names as being “pretentious diction” will come to be archaic and shall be substituted with other phrases, which may or may not have foreign influence.

In exhibiting this essay, Orwell informs the public of the misconceptions arising within the English language. George Orwell’s response to such setbacks provide support and schooling by which he thought English could grow and flourish, both in the body of political rhetoric and within the literary fields. Aside from one tiny contradiction, the essay is well written and the point is effectively presented to the public. The author starts off by stating the issues and then he explains them one by one. Such an essay ought to be recognized and admired.