Langer Article Critique

1140 Words3 Pages

Critique of an article by Langer, Reflecting on Practice in High and Continuing Education
Introduction
The intent of this evaluation of Langer’s (2002) article is to find the schemes he employed to acquire knowledge on how adult’s student respond to demand in particular computer class, reflect critically, in summation, the contrast between non-traditional and traditional students about the use of deviations journals in the field. The focal point of the research study casts light on the major forces and themes of weaknesses portrayed in his report on the essence of journaling among traditional and non-conventual students (2002). The construction of this subject will produce five major elements starting with the research questions and purpose. …show more content…

The reader can relate to the product of the qualitative research obtained using interview method. Langer (2002) makes a readable summary of the responses collected from students regarding the interview questions. Give a context for interpreting the solutions, the article presents a clear table showing the demographic variables of ten pupils who took part in the survey. As stated earlier, an evaluation of a critique of learning journals is another research methodology that employed by the researchers. For instance, Langer (2002) cited John (1994) when structuring journal uses. “carries an imposed form of constraint regarding the way in allowing teachers to compare student responses and reflections and obtain feedback on specific discussion and lectures” (as cited by Langer, 2002, pp. 340-341). Still, this is a quality that Langer pointed out “non-traditional student has a hard time in applying critical thinking, might indicate that an instructor did not offer adequate guidance or facilitation how to produce journals that qualitatively reflective and collaborative (p. 347). Lukinsky (1990, as cited in Langer, 2002, p. 341), “it is key for instructors to guide the enhancement and use of various cases of learning journals and debate the values of each type for the individual use of increasing philosophical capacity in student writing.” The second flaw, the interviewing process of these scholars. Consequently, rather than interviewing all students who took part in the first section of the study, Langer and his assistants asked for volunteers of interviewed on their diaries. Furthermore, self-selected samples often used in research, have potential biases in this study, randomly choosing those with high positive or negative interest will

Open Document