Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Poverty and academic achievement
The effect of poverty on one's education
The effect of poverty on one's education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Poverty and academic achievement
Compare and Contrast Essay
Gerald Graff’s article, “Disliking Books” and Richard Rodriguez’s “Scholarship Boy” are similar and yet different in many ways. The two articles describe the journey of two boys from different backgrounds through various stages in their education.
A similarity in the two articles is seen in the desire of the parents to make their children acquire formal education. Rodriguez’s parents took him and his other siblings to parochial schools because the nuns, in their opinion, taught better than other teachers. Although they were uneducated and held low paying jobs, they struggled and paid tuition for their children (Rodriguez 16). Besides, they made their children learn English even though they were Mexican emigrants themselves and knew little English. Graff’s father was interested in his education too. He was very concerned by his son’s hatred of reading and tried his best to make him learn to read, including forcing Graff to read by confining him to his room (Graff 23).
In the articles, the ambitions and challenges of the two boys are well understandable. They both tell the story of their quest for formal education. Being the child of Mexican emigrants, Rodriguez could barely speak English when he started school (Rodriguez 16). His working-class parents could barely pay for his education and that of his other siblings. He had to work extra hard to obtain a scholarship to go to college. Graff had his challenges too. He grew up in a rough multi-ethnic neighborhood in Chicago where he risked being beaten by other boys if he was found reading (Graff 23). Besides, he did not like reading until much later in college. Both writers, however, overcame their challenges and achieved their ambitions in the end.
...
... middle of paper ...
...hat of a father. The high level of sophistication and education in his teachers (factors he considers missing in his parents) makes him respect them much. The scholarship boy wishes his parents were exactly like the teachers (Rodriguez 16). Graff, on the other hand, critiques teachers. In his opinion, many literature teachers have lost touch with the passion for literature and are obsessed with professionalism, their journy to advance their careers and their fascination with analysis and theory (Graff 26).
Works Cited
Graff, Gerald. "Disliking Books." From inquiry to Academic Writing: A Text and Reader. Eds. Stuart Greene and April Lidinsky. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2012. 22-26. Print
Rodriguez, Richard "Scholarship Boy." From inquiry to Academic Writing: A Text and Reader. Eds. Stuart Greene and April Lidinsky. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2012. 15-22. Print
Schilb, John , and John Clifford. "Orientation ." Making Literature Matter An Anthology for Reading and Writing. 5th ed. Boston, New York: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2012. . Print
Richard Rodriguez' narrative, “Aria: Memoir of a Bilingual Childhood” and Carmen Tafolla's poem, “In Memory of Richi” have similar themes. In Rodriguez' narrative, he talks about his experience attending an American school. Similarly, Tafolla recites a story about a boy in an American school setting. Each story implies that students of another culture are subject to lose their cultural ties in order to fit in with the American society.
Milgram, Stanley. “The Perils of Obedience.” Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. Eds. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. Boston: Longman, 2011. 692-704.
The journey begins at the heart of the matter, with a street smart kid failing in school. This is done to establish some common ground with his intended audience, educators. Since Graff is an educator himself, an English professor at the University of Illinois in Chicago, he understands the frustrations of having a student “who is so intelligent about so many things in life [and yet] seems unable to apply that intelligence to academic work” (380). Furthermore, Graff blames schools for not utilizing street smarts as a tool to help improve academics; mainly due to an assumption that some subjects are more inherently intellectual than others. Graff then logically points out a lack of connection “between any text or subject and the educational depth and weight of the discussion it can generate” (381). He exemplifies this point by suggesting that any real intellectual could provoke thoughtful questions from any subject, while a buffoon can render the most robust subjects bland. Thus, he is effectively using logic and emotion to imply that educators should be able to approach any subject critically, even non-traditional subjects, lest they risk being labeled a buffoon.
Graff also gives his childhood experience as an example of himself successfully becoming more intellectual due to his passion with sports. Thence, Graff suggests schools to encourage students to exercise their personal interests in an intellectual serious way, and by doing that, it will help students to apply their unique intelligence into academic effort.
In the essay "Disliking Books" the author Gerald Graff explains his disinterest in literature and what helped him overcome it. The author informs us that as a child no books interested him, regardless of genre, time period it was written or author. He states his main issue was an inability to connect with the books presented to him. Even in college the author was unable to find interest in literature, confessing he couldn't even finish reading books he was assigned. This issue persisted until he was told to read Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn. At first he was unable to read it in any capacity; until he learned of the controversy over the ending. Graff suddenly took interest upon receiving a topic to think about while reading other than the book
In his essay “Disliking Books,” he examines the standard that many teachers hold. The author believes that the view of other teachers is that “leaving me alone with literary texts themselves, uncontaminated by the interpretations and theories of professional critics would enable me to get on the closest possible terms with those texts” (Graff 26). Teachers, as Graff believes, leave their students with only their own interpretations and perspectives on a text. This does not encourage learning or critical thinking, but hinders students’ abilities to improve and develop ideas their own. Without guidance, students cannot delve deeper into the subjects in which they are learning. Alternatively, in his “Other Voices, Other Rooms,” Graff reveals isolation in perspective of teachers through his own experience with teachers holding opposing viewpoints and theorizes “teachers in modern periods need nonmodernists (and vice versa) in order to make their subjects intelligible to their students” Graff 340). Hence, without elaborating on a subject from all possible viewpoints, a student will have a limited understanding of what it is and how to apply it in their life. Each student will take a different standpoint on what is said, and if they disagree, it will slip through their
In the library she would alternate what types of books they would read. Whenever she would read to him she would read in a way that made you cling to every word the author wrote. In times like these, Rodriguez would become engaged in these books. “I sat there and sensed for the very first time some possibility of fellowship between reader and writer, a communication, never intimate like that I heard spoken words at home convey, but nonetheless personal.” (Rodriguez 228). During this part of Rodriguez’s life, his view towards books changed.
Most students tend to perceive teachers as boring and ordinary, and rarely look up to them because they are seen as social outcasts. Students like Graff tend to look up to sports stars, actors, and singers. They are generally easier to connect to than teachers are. People want to be cool, not to be thought of as a know-it-all. Graff talks about how he never connected with school because being smart wasn 't cool, and how he turned to things that appear to be anti-intellectual. He says, “I was already betraying an allegiance to the
Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel K. Durst. "They Say/I Say": The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing: With Readings. Vol. 2e. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2012. Print.
It was then that Graff shifted the focus of his essay to himself. It would have been easy to continue to speak about the injustice the educational system had created against those who...
In “Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff, the author speaks about how schools should use students’ interests to develop their rhetorical and analytical skills. He spends a majority of his essay on telling his own experience of being sport loving and relating it to his anti-intellectual youth. He explains that through his love for sports, he developed rhetoric and began to analyze like an intellectual. Once he finishes his own story, he calls the schools to action advising them to not only allow students to use their interest as writing topics, but instead to teach the students on how to implement those compelling interests and present them in a scholarly way. In perspective, Graff’s argument becomes weak with his poor use of ethos, in which he solely focuses on his own anecdote but, through the same means he is able to build his pathos and in the last few paragraphs, with his use of logic he prevents his argument from becoming dismissible.
Through this essay Richard Rodriguez writes about his experiences as a son, and as a student. Through his relationship with his parents the reader can see how Rodriguez was separating for his
Tan, Amy. "Two Kinds". Literature, Reading Reacting,Writing. 5th ed. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Heinle, 2004.
Abcarian, Richard, Marvin Klotz, and Samuel Cohen. Literature: the Human Experience. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins, 2010. Print.