Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Define murder essay
Is murder justified essay
The history of capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Define murder essay
Lamb to the Slaughter Response
Ever: at any time, no matter the circumstance. Putting the definition of this word into the simple question, “Is murder ever justified?”, gives it an entirely different perspective. I know of many people who have said and I have heard many times that no matter the case, violence is never the answer. While I agree on this statement for most of the time, I still think “never” is not the correct word. This leads me to my opinion that yes, murder is a justifiable act.
1939-1945. Six of the worst and most inhumane years the earth has ever seen. Also known as World War Two. This is a perfect example of when murder was justified in recent history. When Adolf Hitler and his forces conquered Poland, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Denmark, Yugoslavia, Greece, and Norway, were we just supposed to kindly ask him to stop over a cup of tea? Would that really work? Countries like the U.S, Great Britain, Soviet Union, and
…show more content…
many others (called the allies) didn’t think so and declared war. I hope this doesn’t come as a surprise to anyone but there is murder in war. Millions were killed by millions of others in a terrible war that some thought would never end. The only way to stop a psychotic, power hungry, barbarous man was through the mass murder of his army. For the allies, without a doubt, murder was justified. Imagine your back against the wall, nowhere to go, with an unknown masked man holding a knife centimeters away from your throat.
He has no idea of your own knife hidden in your right hand behind your back. All he wants is to kidnap your precious seven year old daughter, who you secretly hid in the cupboard under the sink. Are you just going to sweetly console him into leaving you and your house untouched? Maybe give him a batch of cookies on the way out? Probably not. Assuredly you will realize, “I have to kill this man if I want my daughter and I to survive another day.” In a situation of self defense, murder is the right option, and your only option.
“When killing them with kindness doesn’t work, try a baseball bat” - Anonymous. I agree with this statement wholeheartedly. You should always first try to use words before bloodshed. But in some cases there is no other way. I’m not saying murder is always the answer or that it is even the answer most of the time. But I do know that in some cases, murder is
justified.
World War II, known as the largest armed conflict in history, began in Europe in the 1930s and led to effect many people. The war resulted in not only the involvement of more countries than any other war but also introduced powerful, new, nuclear weapons that also contributed to the most deaths. As Hitler rose to power in 1933 the Holocaust began, his quest for the ‘perfect’ race resulted in the use of concentration camps, which would help to create the largest genocide of people in history.
However, I think it is the best way to settle some things in that way. I, myself, is not a huge advocate for violence but if it is the only way to take care of business and to end something that is or has been bothering me for so long I will go the “extra” mile to fix
“Non-violence is a powerful and just weapon without cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals.” - Martin Luther King Jr.
“Violence never really deals with the basic evil of the situation. Violence may murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder murder. Violence may murder the liar, but it doesn’t murder lie; it doesn’t establish truth. Violence may even murder the dishonest man, but it doesn’t murder dishonesty. Violence may go to the point of murdering the hater, but it doesn’t murder hate.
"The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century: The Nazi Holocaust 1938-45." The History
Throughout history mass murder has not been a problem to the same level and in the same sense as it is today. A related occurrence that is seen in history, which can be studied for its similar preparation and organization, is genocide. Genocide, an international crime, is a large-scale form of mass murder, in which many people are killed in a string of independent events because of prejudices or war (Reisman, 2008). Killing a large group of people takes a high level of organization. The logistics of how to do it, where to do it, where to dispose of the bodies, among other things must be examined before killing begins (Reisman, 2008). The only similarity to the 21st century version of mass murder is the predatory violence involving extensive planning and little to no emotion involved in the killing (Meloy et al., 2004). However aside from that it is difficult to compare the two events because genocide has many killers and can take place over extended periods of time. For example, during the Holocaust Nazi Germany systematically exterminated millions of Jew over a period of three years (Reisman, 2008). This trend is relevant due to the death of more than three p...
Edward I. Koch uses his essay “The Death Penalty: Can It Ever Be Justified?” to defend capital punishment. He believes that justice for murderous crimes is essential for the success of the nation. The possibility of error is of no concern to Koch and if would-be murderers can be deterred from committing these heinous crimes, he feels the value of human life will be boosted and murder rates will consequently plummet (475-479). Koch makes a valiant effort to express these views, yet research contradicts his claims and a real look at his idea of justice must be considered in order to create a fair nation for all.
‘“Was it hard? I hope she didn't die hard.’ Sethe shook her head. 'Soft as cream. Being alive was the hard part’” (Morrison 8). Paul D questions the absence of Baby Suggs as he and Sethe sit on the front porch of 124. In the early pages of Toni Morrison’s book, Beloved, the theme of mercy is immediately present and stressed. The characters of Beloved live with the traumatic effects of living through slavery, and the value of life terrorizes their subconscious. The epicenter of Morrison’s book is Sethe killing her daughter out of love and mercy. Mercy is a powerful motive that drives human instinct, especially that of a mother’s psyche. Exploring this concept, Sethe’s actions were extreme, but not unique. They were actually explainable and even defendable.
The Holocaust, genocide, the Final Solution, or World War II; it doesn't matter what you call it, nothing can make the horrific events that occurred any less terrible. From 1939 to 1945 a raging war between the Allies and Axis powers. The Allies, who were made up of the United States of America, led by President Franklin Delanor Roosevelt, the Soviet Union, led by Joseph Stalin, and Great Britain, led by Winston Churchill. The Allies were trying to defeat the Axis powers made up of Germany, led by the heinous dictator Adolf Hitler, Italy, led by Benito Mussolini, and Japan, led by Hideki Tojo. The war resulted in many casualties, many by civilians who had to part in the conflict. The events that occurred will be remembered forever in text, pictures, and in the mind of those who lived it.
Capital punishment is a difficult subject for a lot of people because many question whether or not it is ethical to kill a convicted criminal. In order to critically analyze whether or not it is ethical, I will look at the issue using a utilitarianism approach because in order to get a good grasp of this topic we need to look at how the decision will impact us in the future. The utilitarianism approach will help us to examine this issue and see what some of the consequences are with this topic of capital punishment. For years, capital punishment has been used against criminals and continues to be used today, but lately this type of punishment has come into question because of the ethical question.
In the final analysis we see that it is hard to prove either side. For both arguments can become faulty by debate. Murder no matter how it is done is wrong, how we go about prosecuting those who act against our fellow kind is in the hands of our legal system. However, I do not want them on the streets where the people I love are, nor do I believe that a murderer can change. A person who is capable of killing another human being without cause will never fit into society and thus should not be a part of it.
I believe that under certain circumstances that capital punishment should be allowed because if someone is going to commit mass murder they should pay with the ultimate human right which is of their life. This topic has been widely thought of in the world with a few philosophers really encompassing my views. Those are the views of Ernest Van Den Haag and Bruce Fein. Philosophers who oppose our views are such like Justice William Brennan and Hugo Adam Bedau. I will prove my point using the ideas of deterrence and morality of the issue of capital punishment. If the government would show that if you kill someone there will be a consequence for their actions and that the consequence would be equal to what they have done. The population will see that it isn’t worth taking another humans life. If we were to kill people that are committing these mass killings of innocent people there would not be as many criminals around. Therefore the streets would be a place people wouldn’t be afraid of anymore.
The Death Penalty and War.Full Text Available By: Duner, Bertil; Geurtsen, Hanna. International Journal of Human Rights, Winter2002, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p1-28, 28p
The standard 21 year old adults have exchanged 250 thousand emails, spent 5 thousand hours video gaming and 10 thousand hours using their mobile devices (Lei, 2009). When people hear the word technology, they think of microwaves, televisions, cars, NASA, different types and transportation and more. For all that, technology has occurred long ahead these discoveries. Technology is an arguable matter amongst people. .In the old days, people lived an extremely simple life without technology. They used candles to light their houses and lanterns at the dark to travel, they used fire to cook and used newspapers and mail to share news. On the other hand, technology has seized an important place in our society. People are living in a stage of progressive technology. They are using all natural reserves applicable for making their lives better and easier. The society cannot picture life without electricity since it allows them to live through their everyday life. This paper argues that technology positively impacts people’s lives.
...all of these different angles and taking the time to fully understand the complex intricacies of a capital punishment case, it is now more clear than ever that in the case of murder or other violent crimes, execution of the criminal is the only just and ethical choice.