Labour Party in Britain in the Years 1924-31

2060 Words5 Pages

Labour Party in Britain in the Years 1924-31

Historians have debated just how competent the two Labour

administrations were between 1924 and 1931. Governments are normally

only considered “competent” if they have managed the economy

efficiently, prevented widespread corruption and maintained law and

order. Labour came to power at the end of 1923, a time when the

Conservatives and other right-wing groups were spreading vicious

rumours about Socialism. MacDonald was determined to disprove these

fears, particularly Churchill’s jibe that a Labour Party would “not be

fit to govern”. Since the Prime Minister is an integral part of a

government, it will also be important to look at the competency of

MacDonald himself.

Labour came to power in 1923, even though they had not actually won

the 1923 election, and were therefore not the single largest party.

Therefore, Labour could not form a strong government, thus making it

more difficult to pass legislation and to implement their policies.

However, despite these difficulties, the first Labour Administration

did have numerous successes both in social reform and foreign policy.

For example, with regard to social reform achievements, Labour raised

old age pensions as well as unemployment benefits, and revived state

scholarships to universities. They also passed legislation, which

stated that there was to be no gap between the two periods of 16 weeks

in any year in which benefits could be claimed. These policies were

by no means a sign of radical socialist ideals, but the actions of a

competent and compassionate government. Also, the 1924 “Housing Act”,

which increased Chamberlain’s ...

... middle of paper ...

...t Crash, which was a

cruel twist of fate for MacDonald, as for the first time he was in

control of the single largest party in the Commons. The 1931 banking

crisis was also very unfortunate for the Labour Government. Most

historians argue however that, despite the immense difficulties that

the Labour Party was confronted with, it actually did a good job of

governing, and showed itself to have the ability of representing the

nation as a whole, rather than just being a narrow-sighted pressure

group for the TUC. MacDonald had fulfilled his aims of disproving the

Conservative’s jibes about both socialism and the Labour Party.

Labour’s successes in foreign policy as well as in economic policy

showed a great deal of competence, despite the fact that most of the

cabinet ministers had little or no governmental experience.

Open Document