Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on politics and government during 1877-1900
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on politics and government during 1877-1900
Conservative Dominance in British Politics Between 1885 and 1902 During this period in history, it is clear to say that the conservatives dominated British politics. However, is it due to conservative strengths or liberal weaknesses? Although the weakness and the divisions within the liberal party helped the conservative cause, the latter party were dominant due to their unrivalled strength in politics. There were many reasons for these strengths, but it is safe to say that this was the main factor for supremacy in politics in the later 1800's. As Prime Minister in this period, Salisbury won three elections in fourteen years, which is a Conservative record unmatched by Liverpool in the 1820's and Margaret Thatcher in the 1980's. This is a clear indication of how successful the Conservatives were in this period. This shows that one of the main Conservative strengths was the leadership skills of Salisbury. He handled both opponents and awkward political customers on his own side with considerable skill. Historian Peter Marsh believes that Salisbury was 'more of a diehard than any Conservative leader since his godfather the Duke of Wellington.' Salisbury had many skills. His choice of leadership within the Conservatives was crucial. For example, in 1887 he appointed W.H.Smith to be first Lord of the Treasury. This showed Salisbury's shrewd judgement of men from a social group different from his own. This was important as this man was from a working class background, and could have had a good effect on the vote from the working classes. Salisbury also used to appoint people from a business background, with 200 in the upper house by... ... middle of paper ... ...th both Italy and Austria. Salisbury always refused attempts in the late 1880s by German Chancellor Bismarck to draw him into the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria and Italy. He believed that Britain's lack of definite alliances and commitments was to the country's advantage. Although Liberal weaknesses and divisions, such as the no support for leader Gladstone in the 1890s, helped the Conservative cause, this was not the main reason for dominance. The Conservatives owed a lot to the skills of Salisbury. He adapted well to the changing political climate, and also made policies which appealed to all walks of life, and a wide range of social people. He made astute political decisions and appointed opposition officials in his ranks. The dominance of conservatism was due to him, and his political strengths as a leader.
It could be argued that Gladstone’s failure to unite his party, during a time when their ultimate support and confidence in his leadership was crucial, was a significant tactical error that contributed heavily towards the failure of the 1886 Home Rule Bill. The results of the 1885 general election were to have a significant impact on the political landscape of Britain; despite winning the most seats, the Liberals did not have an overall majority.As Parnell and the Irish Parliamentry Party (IPP) held the balance...
Later he was elected to the House of Commons and associated himself with the conservative sect. He supported things such as complying with the Treaty of Paris. During the Constitutional Convention he remained in the background, but did play a very important role. He cast a tie breaking vote for the Great Compromise and also implied the threat that the South would not support the constitution unless it supported the Three-Fifths compromise. Although he constantly stated his support for the Three-Fifths Compromise he also implied that he would be willing to compromise with the North as long as they respected the basis of the Compromise. Although he did not sign the Constitution, His threats of a Southern walkout from the Convention and his unrelenting dedication to getting proper representation were some of the reasons that the Three-Fifths Compromise was
who had been seen by many Tories as a future leader of the party lost
Tom Gatenby To what extent did the Conservatives lose the election rather than the Liberals win the election? “The election of 1906 was a significant watershed in the political history of Britain” Kenneth Owen Fox The election of 1906 was a landside victory for the Liberal Party. This is due to many factors, it could been influenced by the manifesto of the Liberal Party, or perhaps even more strongly the failure of the Conservative Party to unify on such reforms as the Tariff Reform. The lack of a strong unified Conservative government clearly had a large effect upon the outcome of the 1906 election, to what extent this is true will be explained in the essay.
Sectionalism can be described as loyalty specifically to one’s section or region. In terms of the United States, sectionalism refers to two major regions, the North and the South. It became a rising issue in the colonies in the 1800’s and undoubtedly aided in the start of the civil war. If one was to ask Northerners, they would blame the South and vice-versa. To be brutally honest, it was a combination of both regions and their extreme sectionalism that inevitably led to an American’s nightmare, a Civil War within the Union.
He used the media as a tool and he knew that what people read and what they see and hear directly affect what they think.
The election of 1896 was a race between William McKinley, the Republican, and William Jennings Bryan, the Democrat. McKinley was the governor of Ohio and Bryan was the an attorney from Lincoln, Nebraska. This election is seen as the start of a new era in American politics, also known as the “realignment” election. (“The Election of 1896”). This election was mostly the city against the country and their battle for dominance in American politics. In the 1800s, American presidential contests had been a vote on whether the country should be governed by agrarian or industrial interests. This election marked the end of trying to win the White House with agrarian votes and definitely shifted where the country was heading.
being out of office and at the worst a civil war. It was all part of
Democracy in the United States became prominent in the early to mid 19th century. Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States, was inaugurated in 1829 and was best known as the person who mainstreamed democracy in America. Because he came from a humble background, he was the “genuine common man.” (Foner, pg. 303) He claimed he recognized the needs of the people and spoke on behalf of the majority [farmers, laborers]. However, critics of Jackson and democracy called him “King Andrew I” because of his apparent abuse of presidential power [vetoing]. These critics believed he favored the majority so much that it violated the U.S. constitution, and they stated he was straying too far away from the plan originally set for the United States. Because of the extreme shift of power to the majority, the limiting of rights of the few [merchants, industrialists] and the abuse of power under Jackson’s democracy, the foundational documents set in the constitution was violated, and the work of the preceding presidents were all but lost.
By examining Churchill’s use of rhetoric we can see what exactly made him such a great leader. His speeches were able to do more damage to the Nazis than any bomb could have done because his language rallied the people together. His use of repetition proved his points and reminded the country of what mattered most. His descriptive words helped build up anger against the Nazi rule and persuade everyone to pull through the tough times. He used pronouns in such a way that it would personalize everything and help unify his country. Through his unique use of words Churchill was able to convince many that if they could just endure that they would at last be victorious (Bungay).
In the words of Thomas Jefferson, “A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circlue of our felicities.” (Jefferson, 1801) This idea echoed far beyond it’s time and into the minds and hearts of the Populist’s, and became the center and the driving force of the Progressive era. During the gilded age railroads were being built, Industrialization was rising, the population of United States was increasing dramatically; and corporate businesses were becoming extremely powerful. The gilded age was known for its corruption and business domination, it wasn’t until the Populist movement when people started to fight back and also not until the Progressive movement when people started changing the government system.
Pier’s parents were considered conservative and they strongly supported Margaret Thatcher, which could influence his strong avocation of guns.
Winston Churchill is a great figure in British and world history. After winning the seat of Oldham in the 1900 general elections, he became associated with a faction of the conservative party then led by Lord Hugh Cecil. Churchill opposed government expenditures on the army. His own constituency disliked him, although he was the Member of Parliament until the next general election. After the recess of Whitsun in 1904 he crossed sides to the liberal party where he supported free trade.
Early in her power Victoria developed a serious concern with goings on of state, guided by her first prime minister, William Lamb, 2nd Viscount Melbourne. Melbourne was leader of that wing of the Whig Party that later became known as the Liberal Party. He exercised a immovably progressive command on the political thinking of the sovereign.
Through the course of the early nineteenth century and mid nineteenth century, Britain saw a change in politics, economics, and social implications based on the rise of the new queen. In 1837, the young girl that was the granddaughter of the prior king, King George III. Queen Victoria was raised and started her reign in a time when Britain had great changes in governmental, monarchist, and social factors. Reformation was the first serious issue that Britain as a society saw happening. After the Reform Act was introduced, political institutions began to alter and accept new ideas and transformations. After the reformation, the industrial revolution started to effect the economy and social ideologies within Britain. Not only were there issues