Labeling Theory Of Deviance

866 Words2 Pages

By trying to explain what deviance is, you could say it is any type of behavior that violates what we call social norms (the accepted standard of behavior of social groups), but it is also something much broader and a lot more complex aspect within criminology itself, it is analyzed in order for people to try and understand the reasons behind why it actually happens. (Cliffsnotes.com, n.d.)

Theories of deviance

There are four main theories behind why deviance occurs:
Differential-association theory
Anomie theory
Control theory
Labelling theory

Although all four are important when looking at deviant behaviors, when trying to uncover why social reaction plays a part it is the labeling theory that highlights this.

Labeling theory
This …show more content…

This is supported by Howard Becker, an American sociologist, he believes the labeling theory can be applied across the whole criminal justice system when asking ‘how do criminals emerge?’ His answer to this is that society, including the police and the courts, particularly label those who are already deviant and that label then causes the individual to respond through becoming even more …show more content…

For example, when an individual is committed of a crime, when released, it would difficult to find a job.
A ‘deviant career’ can then develop. This is when an individual joins a social group who are all deviant. At this stage, an individual has confirmed and now accepts their deviant identity.
This is now the stage where the label of a deviant can become their ‘master status’ meaning their now deviant identity will overrule any other identity they may have, thus overriding all other relationships outside their social group. (Thompson, n.d.)

Labeling can also be considered a form of social control, this is expressed by Stan Cohen, a sociologist, who became interested in the ‘Mods Vs Rockers’ phenomenon hyped by the media. When looking at the media, it was said the violence between the ‘Mods and Rockers’ was considered a national problem that represented the decay of society. But Cohen (1972) came to a different conclusion in comparison to what the media had portrayed, which was that the violence reported by the media was actually minimal and almost all people down by the seaside that day did not participate in the ‘riots’ and neither were they part of the Mods or Rockers. (smccormac7,

Open Document