Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of conflict resolution
Influence of culture on beliefs, values, and behaviors
The use of conflict in conflict resolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of conflict resolution
Krishna’s Persuasion
“The art of war is of vital importance to the State. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected” (Sun Tzu, 3). Warfare has existed since man first sinned and Cain killed Able. In the Bhagavad-Gita, Arjuna is faced with a dilemma. He either has to kill family, or be killed by them. In his moment of need, Arjuna prays to Krishna, a Hindu God, to seek counsel and advice. Krishna gives advice and explains that this battle is about the greater good and must be done in order for Arjuna to achieve Dharma (sacred duty). The advice Krishna gives encompasses the entire worldview of Hinduism and affects Arjuna’s decision on what to do with his life. Krishna persuades Arjuna to follow his counsel by using the teachings of Hinduism in order for Arjuna to pursue his dharma, fight for his kingdom, and achieve moksha, proving the effectiveness of this worldview.
Arjuna is faced with a
…show more content…
predicament that forces him to consider killing his family in order to protect the kingdom that is rightfully his. In his moment crisis, Arjuna prays to Krishna for help. Krishna, the human embodiment of Brahman, eagerly responds and becomes his charioteer and advises him on what to do. Arjuna, dejected and worn down responds to Krishna, “I see omens of chaos, Krishna; I see no good in killing my kinsmen in battle” (Miller, 27). The only profit Arjuna can see in this battle is death. He either sees the death of himself which he is less concerned about, or the death of his cousins and family. Arjuna is dejected because of the predicament that he faces. He questions himself and his god. He sees no profit from killing family and friends. This weighs heavily on Arjuna and affects his whole countenance. “My limbs sink, my mouth is parched, my body trembles, the hair bristles on the back of my neck” (Miller, 27). In the next several lines of dialogue, Arjuna shows his main problem with the present circumstance. He sees killing family as a nefarious deed that will send him to hell. Krishna, his charioteer, god, and advisor, has to respond to Arjuna’s dejection when he cries for help. In order to change Arjuna’s mind, he must first allow Arjuna to voice his problems with the present circumstances. Being Arjuna’s counselor, Krishna influences Arjuna to ready himself and fight his family and rid the land of the evil. Krishna begins influencing him by an insult. “Why this cowardice in time of crisis, Arjuna?” (Miller, 31). Arjuna was being a coward; he would not face his duty. Krishna continues from this point and begins indoctrinating Arjuna with the Hindu worldview in order to show Arjuna that he needs to complete in Dharma, which means “sacred duty”. After learning of his sacred duty, Arjuna continues to seek Krishna’s advice.
Samsara, the continual death and rebirth cycle, is the beginning of Krishna’s second point. “If you think of its birth and death as ever-recurring…you have no cause to grieve” (Miller, 35). There is no cause for Arjuna to worry because in killing the enemy, they will be reincarnated and he will maintain good karma. Arjuna needs to worry about his own duty and karma rather than worry about his enemy’s fate. In order to achieve this, Arjuna will have set aside his cares of the world and focus on what lies ahead. He must listen to Krishna if he will prevail in this life and ultimately in the goal of moksha. Focusing on Krishna’s point, Arjuna begins to realize that he must face his enemies and prepare himself. He has nothing to fear, the embodiment of Brahman is at his side, and nothing he does to the enemy will harm their souls. Therefore there can be no damage unless he does not fulfill his own
dharma. The Bhagavad-Gita is a powerful book because it combines history with the Hindu worldview. This makes the book a powerful tool. Gandhi, himself, thought this book was one of kind and held to its teaching. The reason why this book is so powerful is because it alters morality for the reader. “Even if he kills these people, he does not kill and is not bound” (Miller, 137). In this quote, Lord Krishna tells Arjuna that killing is not. This book gives them a new sense of the word “morals” because it takes an entirely different light on right and wrong. The goal of Hinduism is to achieve moksha and become one with Brahman. In order to do this, a Hindu must let go of his concern of the world and focus on himself and his own dharma, which is what Krishna is telling him to do. From an outside perspective this sounds very self-centered, but to a Hindu, this is the primary purpose in life. Hinduism is very persuasive. This is clearly seen throughout the dialogue with Arjuna and Krishna. Arjuna brings objections and sadness while Krishna counters them with the Hindu worldview. Krishna influences Arjuna to pursue his dharma with two main points: reincarnation and dharma. Reincarnation, or samsara, allows for Arjuna to kill his family without worrying about their eternity because they will be reborn. Over a billion people believe this worldwide. It is a convincing and powerful worldview and religion. Ultimately, Krishna proved Arjuna’s arguments incorrect and proved that Arjuna should attack.
From the beginning of humankind, people have constantly had to deal with inner battles. Many of these issues cease to exist as time goes on, while new ones arise to take their place. There is one issue, however, that has remained consistent throughout time – morality. For centuries, humans have fought against the outside world and themselves to keep their morals properly aligned. The issue of morality is so dominant that it is still plays a vital role in today’s society. This can be seen in wars, law systems, codes of conduct, and religious texts. An example of a religious text where this can be seen is in pages 185 - 188 of the Bhagavad Gita, where Krishna, also referred to as “The Blessed One”, guides Arjuna through his inner struggles between
Generally, war results from arguments between nations over things like land, power, money, or religion. War over religion contradicts religion itself. In the passage titled “On War”, James Boswell states, “That amiable religion which “proclaims peace on earth,” hath not as yet made war to cease.” If religion proclaims peace on earth, then war goes against those morals.
Hinduism focuses on liberation from the realm of samsara, the cycle of rebirth and death, while Confucianism focuses on the Dao, the correct way to act for society, and ren, or benevolence. Both religions have religious texts that reflect these ideals, the Bhagavad-Gita belonging to Hinduism, and the Analects belonging to Confucianism. While these two texts originate from two distinct religions, the two have some similarities and differences. Both the Bhagavad-Gita and the Analects address the proper way for one to act; however, they differ when it comes to heaven and the main concern of each text. The main concern of the Bhagavad-Gita is a personal journey, achieving moksa through devotion to Brahman, and the main concern of the Analects is a communal journey, maintaining social propriety through the five relationships.
The Bhagavad Gita is perhaps the most famous, and definitely the most widely-read, ethical text of ancient India. As an episode in India's great epic, the Mahabharata, The Bhagavad Gita now ranks as one of the three principal texts that define and capture the essence of Hinduism; the other two being the Upanishads and the Brahma Sutras. Though this work contains much theology, its kernel is ethical and its teaching is set in the context of an ethical problem. The teaching of The Bhagavad Gita is summed up in the maxim "your business is with the deed and not with the result." When Arjuna, the third son of king Pandu (dynasty name: Pandavas) is about to begin a war that became inevitable once his one hundred cousins belonging to the Kaurava dynasty refused to return even a few villages to the five Pandava brothers after their return from enforced exile, he looks at his cousins, uncles and friends standing on the other side of the battlefield and wonders whether he is morally prepared and justified in killing his blood relations even though it was he, along with his brother Bhima, who had courageously prepared for this war. Arjuna is certain that he would be victorious in this war since he has Lord Krishna (one of the ten incarnations of Vishnu) on his side. He is able to visualize the scene at the end of the battle; the dead bodies of his cousins lying on the battlefield, motionless and incapable of vengeance. It is then that he looses his nerve to fight.
Arjuna gives up now, he will be full of shame, and a man who has given up
Similarly, Arjuna, the protagonist from The Bhagavad-Gita also experiences inner-conflict. The source of this conflict is that Arjuna is torn between fighting in a battle even if it must mean the death of his kin. As Arjuna confronts this life-or-death moral dilemma, he reader can empathize with Arjuna, and his emotional predicament. At the brink of an epic battle, Arjuna converses with the god Krishna.
A large amount of ancient texts contain themes relating to violence, power, and war, while others, such as The Bhagavad Gita and Confucius’ Analects, focus on individual and collective development through a series of selfless acts. The two texts provide an in-depth system of duties and learning created to provide direction for the betterment of the self, as well as society as a whole. The Bhagavad Gita places a greater focus on the duties of individuals that must be fulfilled to achieve an enlightened state with the divine forces. Contradictory consequences are presented for those who choose to act in an egotistical manner and deny their duties. Confucius’ Analects, on the other hand, places its main focus on collective development and responsibility
The discussion and interpretation of warfare in theology is not a new controversy. A purely Old Testament inspired interpretation would suggest that violence can be, and often is a widely accepted practice in the eyes of God. “The Book of Joshua”, is a particularly good example of the war theology found throughout the Old Testament as it is an account of the Israelites conquests at the behest of God. The God described in ”The Book of Joshua” is ruthless, absolute in his perception of peoples being ether righteous or wicked, and champions the total destruction of the Cainites. However, the New Testament paints God in a much different light. Jesus Christ, the son of God, acts in a manner that starkly contrasts the absolutes and violence of
The Bhagavad Gita is concerned with the complex relationship between the concepts of duty and desire. Krishna’s counsel throughout the text speaks on the way that duty and desire cause conflict with each other in the minds of men. His views on their relationship are shown during the conversation with Arjuna before a great battle, when Krishna counsels,
...th intense compassion and love for the enemy and wait for the enemy to shoot him down. My contention is that war is impossible when every one follows the principle of “Love they neighbor…” and “service before self”. However, my ethical system does not propagate relinquishing one’s duty. It is possible to imagine a soldier fighting a war as a part of his duty, slaying his enemies even as he continues to love them. This was what Krishna preached in Bhagwadgita to his disciple Arjuna who was horrified at the sight of his kinsmen fighting on the enemy’s side.
War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by man. There are many reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion, to name a few. When differences cannot be resolved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party, war is the last remaining option. Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun wrote in fourteenth-century Spain, that “War is a universal and inevitable aspect of life, ordained by God to the same extent as the sky and the earth, the heat and the cold. The question of whether to fright is not a significant moral question because fighting is constant; the minor decision not to fight this war will be made only in the context of knowing that another war will present itself soon enough because it is simply always there.”
The Bhagavad-Gita teaches many things, and amongst these, morality and moral law are developed for the Hindu religion. What Krishna, the primary Hindu god, declares in this somewhat epic poem to be the "basis of good in this world" (stanza 3, pg. 620 of text) is for people to take action. Action, as he goes on to state, is within the very nature of our beings to do. Krishna even states that "without action you even fail to sustain your own body" (stanza 8, pg. 620 of text). Thus, Krishna feels that action is very important and key. To take this concept as a relation to ethics, Krishna tells Arjuna, the warrior he is talking to in this poem, that "Action imprisons the world unless it is done as sacrifice; freed from attachment, Arjuna, perform action as sacrifice!" (stanza 9, pg. 620 of text). Thus, Krishna is prescribing that, in order for an action to be considered good, the good that he already declared to be the basis of all good in the world, one must detach himself from the action being performed and perform the action sacrificially. The detachment aspect is incredibly important to Krishna, for he proclaims that in "performing action with detachment, one achieves supreme good" (stanza 19, pg 620 of text). By doing this, Krishna believes that the world is preserved, for other people will follow the warrior's actions and imitate them in their own lives. A leader, such as a warrior or king, "sets the standard for the world to follow" (stanza 21, pg. 621 of text), as Krishna says and thus must take whatever action is necessary for the world to not be destroyed, to set examples of goodness and right in his own actions. By separating himself from these actions, thus becoming detached, he can achieve this. Another main reason that Krishna feels detachment is necessary is this: "You have a right to perform your prescribed duty, but you are not entitled to the fruits of action. Never consider yourself the cause of the results of your activities, and never be attached to not doing your duty." (Bhagavad-Gita 2.47). Thus, so long as one does not profit from his own actions, the action itself is good. And, this is Krishna's prescription for leading a life of morality and duty is the moral law to follow in order to achieve this.
"Step forward now, you soldier, you’ve borne your burdens well. Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets, you’ve done your time in Hell." This quote by Sgt. Joshua Helterbran is wonderful example of the burden, but also the benefit of war. The soldier paid his time in misery, but now gets to spend eternity in peace, the ultimate payoff. War does not only have to be the declared violence between nations, but can include the war inside an individual's mind, turmoil between loved ones as well. All of these conflicts may be destructive, however they may bring new opulence, if the trial is fronted correctly.
War is something that nobody wishes for but unfortunately, the leaders of some superpowers believe that it is necessary when in fact all they are doing is killing the world. The effects of war has had on mankind have had a profound effect as to how the world acts today. Although man has changed drastically, hatred is something that has managed to stay constant no matter where one goes; one could come to the conclusion that hatred is everywhere and there is no escape from it. Unfortunately for the world, this hatred is passed down as the years pass by, thus confirming the Golding’s statement, “Man is inherently evil”. Saying this, humans are the masters of their own fates and history shows that clearly humanity is taking advantage of this fact. Throughout history, man has passed its evil ways from generation to generation and as a result, the world is slowly killing itself because of the hateful doings of mankind.
To start, it may be worth noting that the so-called heroes have not embraced war unequivocally. Many, as is supposedly built within the collective unconscious, express a wish for a world without warfare or, rather, a different arrangement preventing the need for the killing and deaths on the battlefield. Alas, however, there is no safe haven, and thus, must accept final death as inevitable, for warfare, as defined, has been established by a divine will;