Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of colonialism on Congo
King leopold ii imperialism in africa
King leopold's ghost: adam hochschild book review essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of colonialism on Congo
King Leopold II of Belgium played a pivotal role in Central Africa from roughly 1878 to 1908, but his actions resonate far beyond the Congo Free State’s end in 1908.
In King Leopold’s Ghost (1998), Adam Hochschild sets the scene leading to King Leopold’s African exploration; more importantly, he describes the events during and following Leopold’s involvement in Africa, as well as how the crimes came to an end. Primarily, the key issue following Leopold’s role in the Congo is the “Great Forgetting,” in which the memory of his wickedness is glossed over; subsequently, history overlooks the effects and the victims of Africa. Incidentally, Hochschild stresses Heart of Darkness (1899) by Joseph Conrad has a very real grounding in Leopold’s
…show more content…
Despite the “Great Forgetting,” a increasingly global society managed to unite to end King Leopold’s prolonged abuse of freedom in Central Africa. In 1865 after Leopold I’s death, Leopold II ascended the Belgian throne, which had only existed independently for thirty-five years. Leopold I was chosen as King of the Belgians due to his status as a German prince and uncle of Britain’s Queen Victoria, but he was never close with his son, and eventual heir. In his youth, Leopold II was interested in geography, military training, and little else. He never even learned Flemish, the language of the majority of Belgium's population. He was subtle, sly, and awkward, yet he remained largely unaware of the advantages of calculating his actions for much of his youth. In 1853, Leopold was married to Archduchess Marie-Henriette, whom would bear him a son and three daughters; still, the marriage was loveless, much like his parent’s. Even before claiming the throne, Leopold was disappointed in the minute area of his territory, so he quickly began his …show more content…
Failure to purchase land elsewhere shifted Leopold focus shifted to Africa because other countries had already claimed every other appealing location, and they did not wish to sell. Plus, Central Africa offered little military threat, the peoples were extremely disjointed, and the land rich with ivory, so it appeared to be a prime location to conquer. Furthermore, Leopold was rather vocal that colonies where for profit, later his intentions masquerade as philanthropy. By the mid 1870s, Leopold’s awareness began to show and his youthful awkwardness began to fade as he claimed Africa needed protection, as he researched the continent, and Leopold’s Geographic Conference of 1876 brought his “intentions” to the public, as he tricked experts into planning aspects of his domination. Guests of the conference voted to create the International African Association, backed by powerful Europeans before its quick demise (39-45). Finally in 1878, Henry Morton Stanley became available to be the prefect tool to achieve Leopold’s desires, due to his drive and previous
The book mainly chronicles the efforts of King Leopold II of Belgium which is to make the Congo into a colonial empire. During the period that the European powers were carving up Africa, King Leopold II of Belgium seized for himself the vast and mostly unexplored territory surrounding the Congo River.
Adam Hochschild's "King Leopold's Ghost" is a lost historical account starting in the late 19th century continuing into the 20th century of the enslavement of an entire country. The book tells the story of King Leopold and his selfish attempt to essentially make Belgium bigger starting with the Congo. This was all done under an elaborate "philanthropic" public relations curtain deceiving many countries along with the United States (the first to sign on in Leopold's claim of the Congo). There were many characters in the book ones that aided in the enslavement of the Congo and others that help bring light to the situation but the most important ones I thought were: King Leopold, a cold calculating, selfish leader, as a child he was crazy about geography and as an adult wasn't satisfied with his small kingdom of Belgium setting his sites on the Congo to expand. Hochschild compares Leopold to a director in a play he even says how brilliant he is in orchestrating the capture of the Congo. Another important character is King Leopold's, as Hochschild puts it, "Stagehand" Henry Morton Stanley. He was a surprisingly cruel person killing many natives of the Congo in his sophomore voyage through the interior of Africa (The first was to find Livingston). Leopold used Stanley to discuss treaties with African leaders granting Leopold control over the Congo. Some of the natives he talked to weren't even in the position to sign the treaties or they didn't know what they were signing.
Leopold paid a large monthly price to a journalist to ensure a stream of sympathetic articles about his activities in the Congo. The French did not feel threatened by Belgium or by Leopold’s claims. Their main fear was that when the king ran out of money, as they were sure he would, in his expensive plan to build a railway, he might sell the whole territory to their rival, Britain. When talking to the British, Leopold hinted that if he didn’t get all the land he wanted, he would leave Africa completely, which meant he would sell the Congo to France. The bluff worked, and Britain gave in. Staff in place and tools in hand, Leopold set out to build the infrastructure necessary to exploit his colony. Leopold’s will treated the Congo as if it were just a piece of uninhabited land to be disposed of by its owner. Leopold established the capital of his new Congo state at the port town of
...abor to get what he wanted, ivory and rubber. Leopold was able to colonize and pillage Congo for its resources during the Scramble for Africa through forced labor. The quote that sums up my essay and the book is best described at the end of chapter 15. Massacring huge numbers of natives will eventually frighten the survivors into gathering rubber. This shows the intentions of forced labor by the Force Publique and the reason for the population drop in Congo during Leopold’s rule.
The book, King Leopold’s Ghost, is a second-hand account of one of the biggest crimes against humanity in history. The author, Adam Hochschild, explains the story of Leopold’s Congo in colonial Africa in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century’s. The accounts of the slavery and the inhumanities are told in vivid detail, and give an image so cruel and gruesome that they are only comparable to those of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany. After reading the book, the only question that was in my mind was how is this the only time I have heard of this? According to the book, this atrocity must never be forgotten, but it was, and in my opinion it should be taught in schools.
In King Leopold`s Ghost, the author Adam Hochschild conveys many attempts to challenge the actions of King Leopold`s control in the Congo. This was to reach an international audience at the time of the 20th century. Protestors depended on a variety of writing techniques to make their case successful. For example the use of direct letters to officials, published “open letters”, articles in newspapers, and public speeches. These protesters were George Washington Williams, William Sheppard, Edmund Dene Morel, and Roger Casement. These protesters became aware of the situation in the Congo in different ways. They also had diversity in how they protested through their writing. Although Edmund Dene Morel and Roger Casement share a comparative approach.
Imperialism has been a constant oppressive force upon societies dating back hundreds of years. Heart of Darkness, by Joseph Conrad, illustrates this oppression by providing an instance of its occurrence in the Congo of Africa, while simultaneously setting the stage for The Poisonwood Bible, which is essentially the continuation of the story. The Poisonwood Bible, by Barbara Kingsolver, demonstrates how the Congo is still affected by modern circumstances and ideology. Conrad’s novella acts as a sort of precursor to the events later depicted in Kingsolver’s novel, and this very connection between the stories illustrates the perpetual oppression of imperialism. This oppression is shown through the characterization of the pivotal characters of each respective text.
The land Leopold had obtained was about eighty times larger than that of Belgium itself. Plus, Leopold was proclaimed the “sovereign” ruler of all the Congo Free Sta...
Expansion was a goal that all nations wanted to achieve. Prince Leopold, the heir of the Belgian Throne, in a conversation, explained that “since history teaches us that colonies are useful. let us strive to get on in our turn. to lead to progress in every sense.” Being a prince, Leopold must have had a pro imperialist point of view, because he wanted to keep Belgium strong and prosperous.
During the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century, King Leopold II of Belgium invaded the Congo and used it to procure more wealth for himself and his nation. In doing so, as many as ten million Congolese were decimated, and they faced unspeakable horrors. Hochschild argues in King Leopold’s Ghost that all actions taken by King Leopold II were done out of nothing more than sheer greed and selfishness, and he used any means necessary to get what he wanted, and manipulated others into following suit by exploiting their own greed and racism. The only way the brutality was combated, Hochschild further goes on to describe, was through the actions of the few with a higher moral character.
During the Brussels conference in 1876, Leopold found the International African Association. Its object was, “the exploration of the country and the founding of stations which should be rest-houses for travellers and centres of civilization” (Tusan 195). The founding of the Congo as a free state was also proposed at the Brussels conference. Afterward came the Berlin conference of 1885. The Berlin conference was the formalization of the scramble and regulated european colonization and trade. It also defined the borders of the Congo, ensured free trade, and the abolition of the slave trade. The Treaty of Berlin was made to regulate colonization in Africa. As it stated, “All the powers exercising sovereign rights or influence in the aforesaid territories bind themselves to watch over the preservation of the native tribes, and to care for the improvement of the conditions of their moral and material well-being, and to help in suppressing slavery, and especially the slave trade. They shall, without distinction of creed or nation, protect and favour all religious, scientific or charitable institutions and undertakings created and organized for the above ends, or which aim at instructing the natives and bringing home to them the blessings of civilization” (Tusan 200). King Leopold then went on to claim the Congo as his personal property. He stated, “Our refined society attaches to human life (and with reason) a value unknown
As a political figure, King Leopold of Belgium had minimal power, yet he acknowledged the political and financial advantages of colonization, and acquired the Congo as a private colony whereas Britain snatched up colonies globally, including the “crown jewel” of all colonies, India. Belgium and Britain demonstrated a stark contradiction of two opposing methods of colonization. These two countries methods’ of domination ultimately decide the fates of each party, conqueror and conquered, in the precarious gamble that is imperialism.... ... middle of paper ...
While Leopold II, the King of Belgium, desperately wanted an overseas colony, The Belgian people did not share his enthusiasm; which created the feelings of neglect and apathy Belgium had towards Congo. The Congo Free State, established “in the margins of the Berlin Conference” in 1885, allowed Leopold to “gain international recognition of his possession” which he had begun to take control of since the 1870s. However, while Leopold was securing control of the Congo, the Belgian people were not interested in controlling colonies, as they believed that colonies “would merely soak up resources that would be better used for social purposes at home.” Thus, the Belgian people decided to solve the problem of having an unwanted colony by separating the Belgian government from...
From a young age, King Leopold was fascinated in obtaining his own colony in which he could exploit territory and resources from. At that time, Africa’s abilities in providing territory and resources were unknown for only a few people had explored the country. Leopold knew that he could not obtain Africa alone, thus Henry Stanley Morton proves his usefulness in this situation. Morton and many of Leopold’s missionaries were sent to map out the continent and illegally obtain territory through treaties, the basis of establishing order and rule for Leopold in Africa. Morton and the missionaries instilled terror by exploring the continent with combat weapons, such as elephant guns, and forced Africans to whip other Africans.
Zins, Henryk S. "Joseph Conrad and the Early British Critics of Colonialism in the Congo." Lubelskie Materiały Neofilologiczne 22.(1998): 155-169. MLA International Bibliography. EBSCO. Sun. 08 May 2011.