Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
King lear and social status
The theme of power in king lear
Human suffering of the king lear
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: King lear and social status
The idea of justice and equality within a culture is one of extreme importance. Not only is criminal justice important to a society, but moral equality is essential to the welfare of a civilization as well. William Shakespeare’s play, King Lear, centers on the theme of justice, or rather injustice, in the world. The foolish King Lear must navigate through a society in which the only way there can ever be justice is when humans behave justly toward each other, which very rarely happens. King Lear takes place in a world where “justice is anything but constant, and fortitude, prudence, and temperance are called into question” (Graham n.pag.). Without the help of any divine force, the existentialist characters in William Shakespeare's King …show more content…
Lear must create their own fate while living in an unjust world. The theme of justice, or rather injustice, begins early in the book, when King Lear starts to divide up his land between his daughters, Goneril, Regan, and Cordelia. Regan and Goneril both flatter their father with empty praise that they don’t mean. When Lear asks Cordelia to confess her love for him, she replies “Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave/ My heart into my mouth. I love your majesty/ According to my bond; no more nor less” (Shakespeare 1.1.90-93). Though Cordelia speaks the truth and her sisters tell admiring lies, King Lear disowns Cordelia but gives Regan and Goneril his land and power. Similarly, Gloucester has trouble discerning which one of his children he can trust. He thinks that Edgar, his older, legitimate son, is out to kill him and take all of his power, and that Edmund, his younger, illegitimate son, is a benefactor who is trying to help him. It turns out that the opposite is true, as Edmund’s plot to kill his father starts to unfold: “Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land. Our father’s love is to the bastard Edmund As to the legitimate. Fine word—’legitimate’! Well, my legitimate, if this letter speed, And my invention thrive, Edmund the base Shall top the legitimate. I grow; I prosper. Now, gods, stand up for bastards” (Shakespeare 1.2.16-22). King Lear and Gloucester are put into nearly the same situation during the first act of the play. They both share the same character flaw of foolishness, and this indecisiveness as to which one of their children they can trust causes many problems throughout the remainder of the play. From the beginning of the story, it’s clear that the play takes place in a society where “the gods have not only forgotten man; the gods seem dead.
The stars alone—the destroying planets who hate the human race—rule the world” (Stopford n.pag.). According to Seàn Lawrence’s essay, “the characters in the play create gods in their own images, but which fail them” (Lawrence n.pag.). Alongside that idea, the characters’ views of God, or any divine force for that matter, change many times throughout the play. For instance, the characters believe in and pray to an omniscient God early on in the play. Soon, though, they begin to realize that any divine justice that may have been present is no longer available. For example, when King Lear’s loyal servant, Kent, hears about Regan and Goneril’s plan to overthrow their father, he says “Fortune, good night. Smile once more. Turn thy wheel” (Shakespeare 2.2.165). Another instance of a character praying to a divine force for help is when Regan and her sister deny Lear to stay at their house. After fighting with his daughters, Lear questions “You see me here, you gods, a poor old man/ As full of grief as age, wretched in both (Shakespeare 2.4.263-264). Because his daughters refuse to let any of his servants stay with them, Lear is forced to wander around the kingdom while a fierce storm starts to brew. King Lear witnesses first hand the lack of both moral and divine justice in Act II of the play.
Clearly, King Lear draws many conclusions
…show more content…
about the injustice in which the world he lives during the third act of the play. Stuck out in the wide open during a terrible storm, Lear gives the following soliloquy: “Rumble thy bellyful! Spit, fire! Spout, rain! Nor rain, wind, thunder, fire, are my daughters. I tax not you, you elements, with unkindness. I never gave you kingdom, called you children. You owe me no subscription. Then let fall Your horrible pleasure. Here I stand, your slave-- A poor, infirm, weak, and despised old man. But yet I call you servile ministers, That have with two pernicious daughters join Your high engendered battles 'gainst a head So old and white as this. O, ho, 'tis foul” (Shakespeare 3.2.14-24). Lear realizes that Regan and Goneril never really loved him, and that Cordelia is the only daughter he could ever have trusted.
Lear yells to the gods and asks for retribution, which eventually does come. In the third act, Lear also says “I am a man/ More sinned against than sinning,” making the point that more people have wronged him than he has done to others. (Shakespeare 3.2.57-58). While out in the raging storm, King Lear has an epiphany about the amount of injustice and homelessness that appears in his kingdom, which is seen in his following speech:
“Poor naked wretches, whereso'er you are,
That bide the pelting of this pitiless storm,
How shall your houseless heads and unfed sides,
Your looped and windowed raggedness, defend you
From seasons such as these? Oh, I have ta'en
Too little care of this! Take physic, pomp.
Expose thyself to feel what wretches feel,
That thou mayst shake the superflux to them
And show the heavens more just” (Shakespeare
3.4.28-36). Lear realizes that he didn’t do enough to stop the injustice that happened in his kingdom when he was king, and now that he wanders around as a homeless person during a terrible storm, he starts to feel pity for the people he ignored. Other acts of injustice are seen in Act III, like when Cornwall gouges out Gloucester’s eyes. After being blinded, Gloucester says “O my follies! Then Edgar was abused/ Kind gods, forgive me that, and prosper him!” (Shakespeare 3.7.91-92). In yet another decree to the gods, Gloucester realizes his own foolishness and folly for choosing the wrong son to trust, and his literal blindness equally compares to his metaphorical blindness of his inability to see the truth about his sons. Obviously, King Lear realizes many injustices in his former kingdom after being kicked out of his daughters’ homes. The idea of injustice within a society continues in Act IV of the play. After realizing the aftermath of his being blinded, Gloucester says “As flies to wanton boys, are we to th’ gods/ They kill us for their sport” (Shakespeare 4.1.39-40). In this simile, Gloucester compares the gods to immature and unjust children, and it’s one of the most recognized Shakespearean lines in history. At the beginning of the story, the characters pray to the gods in order to makes sense of the world around them. But, by this point in the play, they begin to realize that there either is no divine force that oversees the human race, or if the gods do exist, they don’t genuinely care about mankind. It is also important to note the characters that even attempt to pray to the gods. According to Frances Biscoglio, “the invocations to the gods say less about the gods than they do about the individual characters who utter them or do not utter them. Calling on the gods, in other words, acknowledging a transcendent power outside oneself, is a characteristic of all ‘good’ characters, and must therefore be seen as a spontaneous response of moral human beings” (Biscoglio n.pag.). That being said, King Lear, Gloucester, Kent, and Cordelia would be considered moral beings throughout the play because of their invocations to the gods, whereas Cornwall, Regan, and Goneril would be thought of as immoral not only because they never pray to any divine figure, but also their hurtful actions. Not all of the characters in the play give up hope on divine justice, though. For example, Kent says “It is the stars/ The stars above us, govern our conditions/ Else one self mate and mate could not beget/ such different issues,” meaning that fate makes us who we are. He says this in reference to Cordelia, because her nice and honest demeanor drastically varies from her sisters’ malicious behaviors. When Lear meets up with Cordelia at the end of the fourth act, he begs for her forgiveness, and expects her to still have a burning hatred for him, which is seen when he says: “Be your tears wet? Yes, faith. I pray, weep not. If you have poison for me, I will drink it. I know you do not love me, for your sisters Have, as I do remember, done me wrong. You have some cause; they have not” (Shakespeare 4.7.69-73). To his surprise, Cordelia replies “no cause, no cause,” thus forgiving him for all of his wrongdoings (Shakespeare 4.7.74). Although some moral justice is seen in Act IV, the amount of injustice continues to grow, which contributes to the idea that King Lear takes place in an unfair world.
Through Lear, Shakespeare expertly portrays the inevitability of human suffering. The “little nothings,” seemingly insignificant choices that Lear makes over the course of the play, inevitably evolve into unstoppable forces that change Lear’s life for the worse. He falls for Goneril’s and Regan’s flattery and his pride turns him away from Cordelia’s unembellished affection. He is constantly advised by Kent and the Fool to avoid such choices, but his stubborn hubris prevents him from seeing the wisdom hidden in the Fool’s words: “Prithee, tell him, so much the rent of his land comes to: he will not believe a fool” (Shakespeare 21). This leads to Lear’s eventual “unburdening,” as foreshadowed in Act I. This unburdening is exacerbated by his failure to recognize and learn from his initial mistakes until it is too late. Lear’s lack of recognition is, in part, explained by his belief in a predestined life controlled completely by the gods: “It is the stars, the stars above us govern our conditions” (Shakespeare 101). The elder characters in King Lear pin their various sufferings on the will of...
The similar theme of justice throughout Inferno and King Lear both depict the eventual consequence of ones actions throughout their existence. Often causing more harm than good, the actions in which they preform tends to damage them more than the action itself. In William Shakespeare King Lear, King Lear decides to disown Cordelia, the youngest of three daughters from owning any part of his kingdom due to the fact that Lear wanted to see which daughter loved him more in which Cordelia replied, “Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave, My heart into my mouth: I love your majesty, According to my bond; nor more nor less.” (Shakespeare 9) Although C...
The play of "King Lear" is about a search for personal identity. In the historical period in which this play is set, the social structure was set in order of things closest to Heaven. Therefore, on Earth, the king was at the top, followed by his noblemen and going all the way down to the basest of objects such as rocks and dirt. This structure was set up by the people, and by going by the premise that anything that is man made is imperfect, this system cannot exist for long without conflict.
Shakespeare's King Lear is a play which shows the consequences of one man's decisions. The audience follows the main character, Lear, as he makes decisions that disrupt order in his Kingdom. When Lear surrenders all his power and land to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him, the breakdown on order in evident. Lear's first mistake is to divide his Kingdom into three parts. A Kingdom is run best under one ruler as only one decision is made without contradiction. Another indication that order is disrupted is the separation of Lear's family. Lear's inability to control his anger causes him to banish his youngest daughter, Cordelia, and loyal servant, Kent. This foolish act causes Lear to become vulnerable to his other two daughters as they conspire against him. Lastly, the transfer of power from Lear to his eldest and middle daughter, Goneril and Regan, reveals disorder as a result of the division of the Kingdom. A Kingdom without order is a Kingdom in chaos. When order is disrupted in King Lear, the audience witnesses chaotic events that Lear endures, eventually learning who truly loves him.
In William Shakespeare's play, "King Lear", the main character, King Lear, claims to be "a man more sinned against than sinning"(3.2.60-61). Though a good king, King Lear's own actions cause his family and kingdom to fall apart. The sins committed against King Lear are a result of his personal faults of rashness, blindness, and foolishness.
...wo of them as “God’s spies” (Lear, V.3.17). This is the first time that Lear refers to God rather than a god or gods. In this metaphor, he and Cordelia are God’s employees and dependents rather than a necessary part of a natural order. He does not form his divine reference as an oath; he neither commands nor supplicates. It is a sweet vision and a sharp contrast to Lear’s earlier invocations of the gods. Were there some divine preceptor bent on teaching Lear an earthly lesson, he could safely say that it was learnt. But the play, of course, continues. What is important, finally, is not that Lear learns, but that we the audience learn. One of the most important aspects of this learning is anticipated by Kent, who first points out that any invocation of Jupiter can be countered by an opposite invocation of Juno to the same effect, which is to say none at all.
The element of Christianity enters here, because King is a God-appointed position, not to be given up. Lear, however, decides to disregard this fact, instead focusing on the immediate gratification he will receive from his daughters, and boosting his self-esteem while making him feel loved. Lear essentially offers his land and power for love, "Which of you shall we say doth love us most? That we our largest bounty may extend where nature doth with merit challenge," forgoing his God-given position and rights.
When Lear tells Gloucester “A man may see how this world /goes with no eyes” (4.6.146-47) he displays both of their misfortunes, but it is too late to prevent ultimate tragedy. Shakespeare proposes that their tragic saga is a mere game to the heavens. “As flies to wanton boys, are we to th’ gods,/They kill us for their sport” (4.1.37-38). This line generalizes the overall simplicity behind the tragedy of King Lear. Even though Gloucester and Lear made terrible, fatal errors the reader feels at the end as if it is intended to be their destiny.
The human condition can ultimately be defined as the positive and negative traits and characteristics that frame the complexity of human nature. This concept has been widely incorporated into many pieces of English literature throughout time, especially in William Shakespeare’s Jacobean tragedy, King Lear (hereafter Lear). More specifically, Shakespeare’s portrayal of the human condition in Lear depicts the suppression of one’s morality and/or rationality, triggering one’s downfall, as being due to unrestrained pride, gullibility and strong ambitions. Moreover, through studying the extract from the love scene/ Edmund’s soliloquy, I have gained a deepened understanding of Shakespeare’s representation of the human condition.
Human nature is a concept that has interested scholars throughout history. Many have debated over what human nature is – that is, the distinguishing characteristics that are unique to humans by nature – while others have mulled over the fact that the answer to the question “what is human nature?” may be unattainable or simply not worth pursuing. Shakespeare explores the issue of human nature in his tragedy King Lear. In his play, he attempts to portray that human nature is either entirely good or entirely evil. He seems to suggest, however, that it is not impossible for one to move from one end of the spectrum of human nature to the other, as multiple characters go through somewhat of a metamorphosis where their nature is changed. In this paper I analyze and present Shakespeare’s account of human nature in King Lear in comparison with other authors that we have read throughout our year in the Aquinas program.
King Lear Essay Shakespeare has written dozens of plays and in each one he has included some of the most complex characters ever put on stage. Hamlet, Othello, and Macbeth are just a few examples of these great characters that will always remain in our memories. However, standing beside the complex main characters in plays such as King Lear and Hamlet, there are secondary characters of equal, if not greater complexity. In King Lear, secondary characters such as Edmund, Edgar, and Cordelia are directly responsible many of the extreme changes that occur during the play and it is their complexity as human characters that allows them to do this.
The plays Hamlet and King Lear are quite different; but yet, quite similar. Both plays revolve around a central power struggle and its outcomes. However, King Lear doesn’t focus on one main character as Hamlet does, but instead follows a variety of characters through the troubles they find themselves in. One thing is certain though and that is the fact that betrayal leads to karmic justice. These plays illustrate this through acts of betrayal, the disruption of order caused by betrayal, and the vengeance that is sought after each betrayal.
One Work Cited King Lear meets all the requirements of a tragedy as defined by Andrew Cecil Bradley. Bradley states that a Shakespearean tragedy has to be the story of the hero who endures exceptional suffering and calamity. The story must also contrast the current dilemma to happier times. The play also depicts the troubled parts in the hero's life and eventually he dies instantaneously because of the suffering and calamity. There is the feeling of fear in the play as well, that makes men see how blind they are not knowing when fortune or something else would be on them. The hero must be of a high status on the chain and the hero must also possess a tragic flaw that initiates the tragedy. The fall of the hero is not felt by him alone but creates a chain reaction that affects everything below him. There must also be the element of chance or accident that influences some point in the play. King Lear meets all of these requirements, which have been laid out by Bradley.
William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of King Lear offers a hopeful view of humanity in which justice prevails; the people who sinned, including Edmund and Lear, encounter the punishment of the gods, but the virtuous characters, Edgar and Cordelia, are rewarded for pursuing the good by avoiding the punishment of the gods. Edmund possesses a damaged and villainous soul, which is justified by his death. His reputation angers him.
Lear’s first turning point in the play is resulted from miserably leaving Gloucester’s kingdom and discovering himself and his alter ego (The Fool) outside in a ferocious storm. Through Lear’s continuous built up anger since the two separate displeasing visitations with his daughters Goneril and Regan, and the additional rage of the storm; Lear begins his process of self-reflection. At the beginning of the storm Lear is furious with the actions of his daughter’s Goneril and Regan and attempts to challenge the storm to be even fiercer. Lear shouts, “Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage! Blow!” Act III, sc. ii, ll. 1, amidst Lear’s almighty calls the Fool makes effort for Lear to retrieve shelter. Then Lear says, “My wits begin to turn. Come on, my boy. How dost, my b...