Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis of king lear
Character analysis of king lear
Character analysis of king lear
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis of king lear
William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of King Lear offers a hopeful view of humanity in which justice prevails; the people who sinned, including Edmund and Lear, encounter the punishment of the gods, but the virtuous characters, Edgar and Cordelia, are rewarded for pursuing the good by avoiding the punishment of the gods. Edmund possesses a damaged and villainous soul, which is justified by his death. His reputation angers him. In Act One, Edmund repeats “Base?”(1.2.10) when referring to himself. He questions whether he is truly the base or inferior to others. Edmund’s questions cause a break in iambic pentameter that is otherwise constant throughout the play. This change in structure indicates Edmund’s urgency and plea for help as he attempts …show more content…
Edgar reveals himself as the wholesome brother through his reference to the Ten Commandments and expressing his concern for others. When he speaks, most of his words are of positive connotation in attempts to benefit others. He believes that “the gods are just” (5.3.172) and “Ripeness is all”(5.2.11). His apparent trust and peace that the gods will decide when a person is ready for death provides encouragement to the audience. Unlike Edmund, Edgar does not reflect on his legitimacy or concerns to his benefit. Instead, he ‘ripens’ and becomes more mature by expressing concern, care, and love for others. He becomes self-actualized with this realization that the divine have a plan. Overall, Edgar’s humility and care for his father as well as the belief that the gods will reward the righteous offer a hope for …show more content…
Lear’s faults lead to disorder and chaos. He searches for flattery, eventually realizing that he has lost his power and status in society. The pinnacles of both Lear and Edmund’s suffering result in a shift in the play’s structure., Lear yells “Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks. Rage, blow!”(3.2.1) during the storm. The structure of this line is altered to trochaic pentameter to emphasize the cataclysmic flood and that he is no longer treated as the king. Lear is left at the mercy of others. He must realize that he does not possess any power. This altered structure imitates the altered state of Lear and of nature. Everyone turns on Lear because of his limited conception of man. Similar to Edmund, Lear now ranks lower in importance in society. Lear receives punished through suffering, yet when Lear realizes the good of Cordelia, she is taken away from him. Lear’s suffering allows him to empathize with and value those who suffer. Although Lear learns his moral lesson and repents, he receives the eternal punishment of the death of his beloved, humble
Through Lear, Shakespeare expertly portrays the inevitability of human suffering. The “little nothings,” seemingly insignificant choices that Lear makes over the course of the play, inevitably evolve into unstoppable forces that change Lear’s life for the worse. He falls for Goneril’s and Regan’s flattery and his pride turns him away from Cordelia’s unembellished affection. He is constantly advised by Kent and the Fool to avoid such choices, but his stubborn hubris prevents him from seeing the wisdom hidden in the Fool’s words: “Prithee, tell him, so much the rent of his land comes to: he will not believe a fool” (Shakespeare 21). This leads to Lear’s eventual “unburdening,” as foreshadowed in Act I. This unburdening is exacerbated by his failure to recognize and learn from his initial mistakes until it is too late. Lear’s lack of recognition is, in part, explained by his belief in a predestined life controlled completely by the gods: “It is the stars, the stars above us govern our conditions” (Shakespeare 101). The elder characters in King Lear pin their various sufferings on the will of...
Despite its undeniable greatness, throughout the last four centuries King Lear has left audiences, readers and critics alike emotionally exhausted and mentally unsatisfied by its conclusion. Shakespeare seems to have created a world too cruel and unmerciful to be true to life and too filled with horror and unrelieved suffering to be true to the art of tragedy. These divergent impressions arise from the fact that of all Shakespeare's works, King Lear expresses human existence in its most universal aspect and in its profoundest depths. A psychological analysis of the characters such as Bradley undertook cannot by itself resolve or place in proper perspective all the elements which contribute to these impressions because there is much here beyond the normal scope of psychology and the conscious or unconscious motivations in men.
King Lear as a Tragedy Caused by Arrogance, Rash Decisions and Poor Judgement of Character
“Poor turlygod! Poor Tom! That’s something yet! Edgar I nothing am” (2.3.20-22). Similar to Lear, Edgar realizes that he can no longer hold the power or influence that he once had. But rather than going mad and losing even more than he already has, Edgar decides to channel his loss into something greater. He risks his life and his identity to look out for his father, which effectively gives meaning to the nothingness. Edgar’s embrace of his reduction to destitution shows how such a state of nothingness, ironically tends to make people more whole and
Following this Lear begins to banish those around him that genuinely care for him as at this stage he cannot see beyond the mask that the evil wear. He banishes Kent, a loyal servant to Lear, and his youngest and previously most loved daughter Cordelia. This results in Lear surrounding himself with people who only wish to use him which leaves him very vulnerable attack.
Edmund lusted for all of his father’s power, lying to his gullible brother and father aided him in his plan for total authority along with destroying their lives. As bastard son of Gloucester, Edmund wanted to receive all of the power destined for his brother, Edgar, who was Gloucester’s legitimate son. Edmund stated his disapproval of his brother, “Wherefore should I/ Stand in the plague of custom, and permit/ The curiosity of nations to deprive me/ For that I am some twelve or fourteen moonshines/ Lag of a brother? Why bastard?”(1.2.2-6). Edmund wanted the respect and love that Edgar received even though he was Gloucester’s bastard son. He claimed that he was not much younger or “moonshines lag of a brother” therefore he should be considered just as smart and able-minded as any legitimate son. He built up hatred toward Edgar and in order to get rid of him he convinced his father that Edgar had betrayed him through a letter. The letter that Edmund made read, “If our father would sleep till I waked him, you/ should enjoy half his revenue for ever, and live/ the beloved of your brother, Edgar”(1.2.55-57). Edmund portrayed Edgar as the son that would kill Gloucester only to inherit his money and share his inheritance with Edmund. Gloucester believed Edmund, sending out guards to kill Edgar for his betrayal...
The most consolation that any character receives is wisdom and truth, highlighting the theme that truth and wisdom can be gained only through suffering. For example, when Lear is kicked out into the harsh storm, it allows him to realize that Cordelia actually loves him and that Goneril and Regan do not. Lear is able to realize that all people suffer and that he should have done more for the poor as he now has insight into their lives. Similarly, Gloucester 's blindness allows him to see that Edgar is good and that Edmund has been lying to him. Though these characters gain wisdom it does not stop them from future suffering. All the suffering that occurs in the play revolves around love or a lack of. By the end of the play everyone pretty much dies except Edgar, Albany and Kent. The ending is somewhat unclear, the kingdom needs a ruler but no one wants to step up. No one is spared in the end from the tragic events creating a lack of hope. Especially when Cordelia dies, the main honesty and goodness in the play dies with her. "Howl, howl, howl! O, you are men of stones! / Had I your tongues and eyes, I 'd use them so / That heaven 's vault should crack. She 's gone forever. (Shakespeare 5.3.308-310)” All of this possibly leads into the idea that in this play human life and suffering are meaningless. Everyone dies and there is little
The first stage of Lear’s transformation is resentment. At the start of the play it is made quite clear that Lear is a proud, impulsive, hot-tempered old man. He is so self-centered that he simply cannot fathom being criticized. The strength of Lear’s ego becomes evident in the brutal images with which he expresses his anger towards Cordelia: “The barbarous Scythian,/Or he that makes his generation messes/To gorge his appetite, shall to my bosom/Be as well neighboured, pitied, and relieved,/As thou may sometime daughter.” (1.1.118-122). The powerful language that Lear uses to describe his intense hatred towards Cordelia is so incommensurable to the cause, that there can be only one explanation: Lear is so passionately wrapped up in his own particular self-image, that he simply cannot comprehend any viewpoint (regarding himself) that differs from his own (no matter how politely framed). It is this anger and resentment that sets Lear’s suffering and ultimate purification in motion.
Critical commentary varies and appears exhaustive. Bradley speaks of evil, but thinks Lear dies in a moment of supreme joy; Knight argues that however vicious and cruel the Lear world is, the death of Cordelia represents the future triumph of love. Frye writes of Lear’s madness as our sanity if it were not sedated as if the universe is fundamentally absurd. Andrews writes that the meaning depends on the F vs. Q variations, and that the audience must be left uncertain. Snyder says that Lear dramatizes the phases of dying that we all endure, and that Lear dies because he is warn out by the exhaustion of life. Rackin comments that the play moves through a dialectical process of reconciliation of opposites that culminate in Lear’s triumph of faith. Hennedy notes the existential approach saying that Lear dies secure in knowledge that Cordelia lives after death, having experienced transcendence. The paradox of (in a Christian sense) that hopes comes from the cross. Donner writes that the cathartic experience the end of the play affords us is the belief that justice had not been done; how could it, and we can not forget the tremendous potential man has for evil that no one but God could forgive. Harris argues that the promised ...
ii. 48-50). Death, violence, and loss are woven all throughout the language, and in doing so, the physicality of such matters dominate the metaphorical world of the play. Perhaps the most tragic event in the play, the death of Cordelia allows the fullest expression of the tragedy’s address to personal morality. Like the other two daughters, Cordelia is an extension of Lear. Thus her death is an aspect of his own, allowing Lear to experience death and speak to the wrongness of it all. “No, no, no life! Why should a dog, a horse, a rat, have life, and thou no breath at all? (Shakespeare V. ii. 306-308).” Both unnatural and inevitable, the unjust death of Cordelia embodies our sense that death is wrong and outrageous. Most of us are not kings, but it may be true that in each of us is a King Lear who is unwilling to give our kingdom, our sense of privilege, our rights we think we have earned. We expect to cling on to our existence, and pretend death does not exist. As we continue to explore the psychology behind death, we find, as we so often do, that Shakespeare has been there before
King Lear is a tragic playwritten by William Shakespeare. It is a play about the suffering of two families that are caught in a struggle of greed, lust, and cruelty which eventually results in extreme amounts of pain and destruction for all the characters. In King Lear, there is a circular relationship between the characters' behavior and nature. That is, the destruction of the two families results from human behavior breaking accepted laws of nature, and the disturbances in nature result from the disturbances in human behavior. Shakespeare portrays this theme by demonstrating the damage Lear and Edmund create when they break the laws of nature, and of course, nature itself in the form of the storm in King Lear.
...world has been turned upside-down, his master has now slipped into absolute madness and is beyond the fool’s help. He no longer serves a purpose to the king, and predicts both his, and - as he has shared his fate to this point - Lear’s death with his final line in the play:
All these sacrifices made by Edgar shows the reader what kind of person he is. Although some sacrifices were for himself, he also considered other people when deciding on what actions to take. Edgar’s sacrifices show he is a brave, considerate, and caring person.
The first flaw in King Lear is his arrogance, which results in the loss of Cordelia and Kent. It is his arrogance in the first scene of the play that causes him to make bad decisions. He expects his favorite, youngest daughter to be the most worthy of his love. His pride makes him expect that Cordelia’s speech to be the one filled with the most love. Unfortunately for King Lear’s pride, Cordelia replies to his inquisition by saying, “I love your majesty/According to my bond and nothing less';(1.1.100-101). Out of pride and anger, Lear banishes Cordelia and splits the kingdom in half to the two evil sisters, Goneril and Regan. This tragic flaw prevents King Lear from seeing the truth because his arrogance overrides his judgement. Lear’s arrogance also causes him to lose his most faithful servan...
A tragic character must pass from happiness to misery whereby he must be seen at the beginning of t... ... middle of paper ... ... born a bastard which continuously haunts him, does what he does as an act against the whole society. Therefore, Edmund’s driving force is to revolt against those in power, against traditional values and against the very make-up of society. He regards this revolution as a worthy cause, and his scheming is aimed at putting himself in power, gaining the throne.